More stories

  • in

    2022 Acura MDX Type S Aims for Higher Echelons

    The new Type S version of the Acura MDX appears to be a high-performance model in the same vein as the myriad luxury SUVs wearing Mercedes-AMG, BMW M, and Audi S and RS badges. But now that we’ve experienced this turbocharged, 355-hp version of Acura’s three-row SUV for ourselves, we think the company’s real play here is simpler than that. Acura wants to move the MDX away from the pseudo-luxury space where slightly upscale family crossovers such as the Infiniti QX60 and Cadillac XT6 reside and toward the upper echelons of the luxury-SUV segment where more prestigious models such as the Audi Q7, BMW X5, and Genesis GV80 compete.The company is quick to point out that the MDX’s traditional positioning has worked well so far, as it has sold over 1 million units over four generations. So, the current MDX’s standard powertrain—a naturally aspirated 3.5-liter V-6—will continue to comprise the bulk of sales thanks to its attractive base price of $49,045. But the introduction of the Type S model allows Acura to play in the higher price realm where the fatter profit margins and more discerning customers are. The MDX Type S thus comes armed with a more powerful engine, a sophisticated suspension setup, lots of fancy optional features, and—naturally—a significantly higher starting price.

    For $67,745, you get the same turbocharged 3.0-liter V-6 as the TLX Type S sports sedan, which makes 355 horsepower and 354 pound-feet of torque. That’s more grunt than the Q7 55 and the X5 40i—both have 335 horsepower—but a bit behind the 375-hp GV80 3.5T. Acura’s familiar torque-vectoring SH-AWD system is standard. Acura also saw fit to add adaptive dampers and an air suspension that can raise and lower the MDX: In Sport and Sport+ modes it drops down 0.6 inch, while selecting Lift mode hikes the body a full 2.1 inches above its nominal height. The loaded MDX Type S with the Advance package is the first Acura (other than the NSX) to crest the $70,000 barrier, starting at $73,095. It’s mechanically identical to the base Type S but comes with goodies such as massaging front seats, nicer upholstery, and a bumpin’ 25-speaker ELS audio system. This is the kind of stuff that Audi and BMW customers expect to find in a luxury SUV. Open-pore wood, quilted leather, and an available blue color scheme help cultivate a convincingly upscale cabin vibe. The only sore spot inside is Acura’s touchpad-controlled infotainment system, which we still haven’t warmed up to.
    On the other hand, enthusiasts like us might have expected a bit more of a performance focus from something with a Type S badge. The turbo V-6 is strong enough to move the MDX confidently but is neither as characterful nor as responsive as we’d like. Acura expects it to be around a second quicker to 60 mph than the standard model, which did the deed in 6.4 seconds in our testing. The MDX has long been one of the nimblest three-row SUVs on the market, and the Type S’s adaptive dampers further tighten body control—especially in Sport mode. But the all-season tires limit grip, and the steering feels overboosted and artificial for something that claims to share DNA with cars we remember as fondly as the RSX Type S.Maybe we’re placing too much importance on the name. Because the MDX is one of the few Acura models that has remained sporty relative to its competition over the years, it has less ground to make up than the TLX Type S does within the sports-sedan segment. The MDX Type S has an appropriate mix of refinement and driving verve when measured against the BMW, Audi, and Genesis SUVs it’s aiming for. And if luxury-SUV customers can be persuaded to shell out more than $70,000 for an Acura, they’ll find that the MDX Type S has the features, the power, and the luxury quotient to live up to that price.

    Specifications

    Specifications
    2022 Acura MDX Type SVehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 4-door SUV
    PRICE
    Base: $67,745; w/Advance package, $73,095
    ENGINE
    turbocharged DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injectionDisplacement: 183 in3, 2997 cm3Power: 355 hp @ 5500 rpmTorque: 354 lb-ft @ 1400-5000 rpm
    TRANSMISSION
    10-speed automatic
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 113.8 inLength: 198.4 inWidth: 78.7 inHeight: 67.1 inPassenger Volume: 139 ft3Cargo Volume: 16.3 ft3Curb Weight (C/D est): 4770 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
    60 mph: 5.4 sec1/4-Mile: 14.4 secTop Speed: 112 mph
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY
    Combined/City/Highway: 19/17/21 mpg

    A car-lover’s community for ultimate access & unrivaled experiences. JOIN NOW

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2022 Lotus Emira Looks to Be One of the Brand's Best

    Lotus was born from innovation but has spent most of its recent history in stagnation. Founder Colin Chapman transformed Formula 1 and other top-flight motorsport series and sold clever, lightweight road cars. With the launch of the Esprit in 1976—the second most famous automotive wedge after the Lamborghini Countach—the British company also became an early pioneer of the mid-engine sports car. But after Chapman’s death in 1982, Lotus’s fortunes declined. The company passed between frequently cash-strapped owners, development funds were in short supply, and its history over the last quarter-century can be dispatched in a couple of sentences. The novel bonded-aluminum-frame Elise was launched in 1996, the larger and supposedly more practical Evora came out in 2010, and grandiose plans to subsequently launch five new models collapsed with the acrimonious departure of CEO Dany Bahar in 2012, leaving the existing model range to soldier on. The Evora continued to sell in ever-smaller numbers until it retired last year.

    Now there is an all-new Lotus sports car, the last model the company will launch before it switches to all-electric powertrains. The Emira has been developed using a substantial cash injection from Chinese automaker Geely, which took control of Lotus in 2017. It will be going on sale later this year with buyers able to choose between a Toyota-sourced supercharged 3.5-liter V-6 and—shortly afterward—a turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four from AMG. Before then, we got the chance to drive a V-6-powered prototype on the track at Lotus’s Hethel factory in Norfolk, England.Though the car we drove looked far tidier than the sort of scruffy, disguise-clad test mules used in early development, it was still in pre-production spec. According to Gavan Kershaw, Lotus’s director of attributes, it was a VP2-level prototype that had been borrowed from the pool of cars being used to test driver-assistance systems ahead of the Emira’s official launch. The supercharged V-6, familiar from the Evora, makes 400 horsepower and 310 pound-feet of torque (Emiras equipped with the six-speed automatic are treated to 317 pound-feet); our car had the standard six-speed manual gearbox and mechanical limited-slip differential. It was also riding on what will be the softer Tour suspension and Goodyear Eagle F1 tires rather than the track-biased Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2s that will be offered as an option.
    The Emira looks great in the flesh, its sleek styling and the sizable air intake apertures behind its doors making it appear more like a junior supercar than a sports car. Beyond the stickers proclaiming it a prototype, there were few clues the car we drove was short of production spec. Some of the interior plastics didn’t have an embossed-grain finish, there were a couple of well-hidden emergency shutdown buttons, and the Track Dynamic mode didn’t work. But the sense of quality was still impressive, especially compared to the crudely finished cabin of the Evora. The Emira is built using an adhesive-bonded aluminum structure—the same technique Lotus has used since the Elise—but ingress and egress have been greatly improved thanks to narrower sills and deeper door apertures. Despite its pre-build plastics, the Emira’s interior also impressed, with soft facings on the doors and dashboard and good ergonomics. Many parts have come from elsewhere in the group—the turn-signal and wiper stalks are obviously Volvo sourced—but the digital dashboard and central touchscreen are crisply rendered with bespoke graphics. The driving position is good, with plentiful adjustment and decent headroom, and looking out through the windshield, the tops of the fenders are visible to help position the car. Whereas the Evora was designed to be a 2+2, the Emira is strictly a two-seater, although there is room to squeeze soft-sided luggage between the seatbacks and the rear firewall.
    Our drive at Hethel took place in the appropriately English medium of gale-force winds and driving rain, but the Emira was happy to show its talents on the wet surface of the 2.2-mile test track. The supercharged V-6 is quieter at low revs than it was in the Evora, as a switchable exhaust valve keeps it muted in the default Tour driving mode, but either selecting Sport mode or taking the engine past 4000 rpm switches to the louder setting and helps the car find its voice. As before, the V-6 isn’t a particularly high-revver with its redline set at just 6800 rpm, but it feels muscular throughout the range and delivers lag-free responses. We live in a crazy world where the combination of 400 horsepower and a claimed 3152-pound curb weight makes for a power-to-weight ratio well short of the most muscular supercars (the new Ferrari 296GTB has one nearly twice as potent). But the greasy circuit quickly proves the Emira has more than enough power to make for a compelling driving experience, especially given the car’s near-total lack of adaptive or active systems.
    Lotus’s commitment to dynamic purity has it using hydraulically assisted power steering for the Emira. The V-6 uses an engine-driven power-steering pump, but the inability of the AMG engine to accommodate such an anachronism means it will use electrohydraulic assistance with an electric pump. It only takes a few corners to vindicate Lotus’s decision to stick with the analog technology. The Emira’s steering features the same combination of precision and feedback we remember being one of the Evora’s highlights, with slower off-center responses than are normal in this generally darty segment but with seemingly perfect proportionality behind it. The Lotus’s all-passive suspension is similarly gentle, with discernible roll under harder cornering loads but well-damped compliance over the Hethel track’s curbing and through aggressive directional changes. Grip levels are impressive too—the prototype’s dashboard display reporting peak lateral-acceleration figures of over 1.0 g in wet conditions.Despite the lack of active systems, the Dynamic mode did noticeably alter the character of the car. In Tour mode, throttle response is mellower, and the prototype’s stability-control system could be felt working to quell both understeer and oversteer. Sport is more liberal, allowing a modest dose of rear-end slip under power. But, in the absence of the nonfunctional Track mode, turning the ESC fully off delivered the revelation that the Emira feels far friendlier when pushed beyond its natural limits than many performance cars do behind a battery of driver-flattering active modes. It proved to be easily driftable in the wet conditions too.
    But you don’t need to be on the ragged edge for the Emira to feel special. On first acquaintance, it has all the virtues of a mid-engine layout but seemingly none of the vices. It’s keen to change direction, and with the mass of the V-6 giving an impressive throttle adjustability, it does so without any sense of snappiness upon sudden throttle lift and with a high tolerance for combined braking and turning inputs.Don’t worry, it wasn’t perfect. The Emira’s gearshift had a better weight and feel than the loose shifter of the Evora, but the linkage often seemed to snag on changes across the planes of the box, especially the shift from second to third. It also doesn’t have any kind of automated rev matching in any of its modes, an omission that indicates how seriously Lotus wants owners to take the business of driving it. That, or opt for the automatic version.
    The Emira is very much a Lotus, but a different one. The driving experience remains exemplary, something common to pretty much all its predecessors. But it also looks set to deliver the usability that the company’s earlier cars rarely gave much concern to. Given that Lotus is hoping to build up to 4500 a year—more than twice the combined annual totals of Evora, Exige, and Elise during the last decade—a broader appeal is both necessary and understandable. We need to wait to see how the Emira copes with the real world, but our first impression is overwhelmingly positive.Lotus has confirmed pricing for the fully loaded First Edition Emira V-6: $96,100, with U.S. deliveries beginning later this year. It has also said the base AMG-powered car will be available in 2023 at a $77,100 starting price.

    A car-lover’s community for ultimate access & unrivaled experiences. JOIN NOW

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2022 Ferrari 296GTB Embraces Electric Assist to Devastating Effect

    By now it’s pretty obvious the machines have won, so bow down before our new robot masters. Technology, however, has been seen as a diluter and polluter of the involvement and interaction that exemplifies sports cars, a notion that dates as far back as the advent of power steering. In recent years the list of high-tech aids has turned into a heap: stability control, yaw control, torque-biasing differentials, electric power steering, brake-by-wire, active aerodynamics, and hybrid assistance. The Ferrari 296GTB has them all and more and yet still delivers a driving experience that feels as pure and uncorrupted as its most analog predecessor. And its hidden cleverness makes piloting this 819-hp part-electric supercar and accessing a high percentage of its towering talents feel almost ridiculously easy. The biggest news is the arrival of Ferrari’s first road-going V-6 since the 246 GT Dino retired in 1974. And as the Dino never officially got to wear the Cavallino Rampante shield (at least not officially), that makes this the first V-6-powered Ferrari street car. The new engine displaces 3.0 liters and uses two turbochargers set within the V of its widely spaced cylinder banks, which are 120 degrees apart. Each turbo boosts three cylinders, their potency evinced by the engine’s 654-hp output, which Ferrari claims is the highest per-liter figure of any production car currently on sale.

    Electric assistance comes from an advanced 164-hp axial-flux motor that sits between the V-6 and the eight-speed dual-clutch transmission. A third clutch can separate the combustion engine from the driveline, allowing the 296GTB to operate solely under electric power, though it can only do this for relatively brief periods at speeds of up to 84 mph. The 6.0-kWh battery pack behind the seats provides an estimated 10 miles of range. Unless locked into its electric drive mode via the steering-wheel-mounted selection switch, officially known as the eManettino, the GTB will fire the V-6 to life if anything more than the top inch or so of the accelerator travel is used.Ferrari’s engineers dubbed the new engine the piccolo V-12 while developing it, and it does a convincing aural impression of a 12-cylinder under the sort of hard use we couldn’t resist giving it, revving to an 8500-rpm limiter with unbridled enthusiasm. At lower engine speeds, there’s no mistaking the turbocharging, with an induction sound like a rushing stream, until the exhaust note and mechanical symphony grow loud enough to mask it. But the instant response of the electric motor means there is no discernible turbo lag—the electric motor actually dials back its contribution slightly as boost pressures build to keep the power delivery as linear as possible.
    With the powertrain giving its all, the 296GTB feels every bit as fast as 819 horsepower suggests. The new car is less quick than the more powerful, all-wheel-drive SF90 Stradale that sits above it in the company’s hybrid hierarchy, but only slightly. Acceleration is wicked, and we estimate launch control will deliver a 2.9-second 60-mph time and a quarter-mile in the nines. And the 296GTB’s 1:21 lap time at Ferrari’s Fiorano Circuit is only two seconds slower than the Stradale (and 1.5 seconds quicker than the V-8-powered F8 Tributo.)Despite its outlandish output and rear-wheel drive, this Ferrari, shod with street-friendly Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires, exhibited colossal grip on Spanish mountain roads—the traction control using varying regen from the electric motor to prevent slip without the need to wind back the engine. On the tight, dusty Monteblanco circuit near Seville, another GTB equipped with the track-oriented Assetto Fiorano package and riding on Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R tires had even better adhesion but stayed benign as its elevated limits were deliberately breached. Raffaele de Simone, Ferrari’s chief development driver, was insistent we experience the 296GTB with its traction control switched off, and the resulting yaw angles were expertly managed by the Side Slip Control system. This car is no harder to drift on a track than a Mazda Miata.
    Even among the many other technical highlights, the GTB’s steering and brakes stood out. The rack uses electric power assistance, yet it manages to deliver feedback that feels entirely natural and unfiltered, reporting accurately on everything from surface texture changes to slip angles under the hardest track use. The electrically boosted brakes have removed the direct hydraulic link between the pedal and the calipers that grip carbon-ceramic discs, but the weighting and responses seem just as true. An active feature adds both the ability to pre-charge the system ahead of hard stops and to subtly clamp individual brakes to help shepherd the front end into corners. The presence of so much technology should probably make the 296GTB feel lacking in emotional engagement, but the reality is anything but. The assistance is invisible—helping the car to slow, turn, and deploy its enormous power, without diminishing the visceral excitement that comes from unleashing so much sound and fury. It isn’t as raw as the V-8-powered F8 Tributo that will sit closest to it in the Ferrari hierarchy, but the 296GTB honestly doesn’t feel like any less of an experience.
    The more obvious comparison is with Ferrari’s other plug-in hybrid. The 296GTB’s V-6 and rear-wheel-drive position it below the 986-hp, all-wheel-drive SF90 Stradale; the new car is also a claimed 220 pounds lighter, smaller, and—to our eyes—more elegantly proportioned, especially when viewed from the side. The lack of all-wheel drive also means the GTB never suffers from the slight steering corruption the Stradale sometimes gets from its powered front axle. The 296GTB’s $322,986 price also makes it nearly $200,000 cheaper. It’s definitely not $200,000 worse.The 296GTB’s cabin feels plenty spacious for a two-seater Ferrari, and there is even a respectable amount of luggage space in the front trunk. At the back, the glass engine cover shows off both the V-6 and, in a very 2022 twist, the orange high-voltage cables that take current to the electrical motor. Complaints are limited to small annoyances: a clumsy infotainment system and Ferrari’s continued enthusiasm for putting all switches onto the steering wheel. The result is ergonomic confusion, especially with audio controls, the headlight flasher, and the windshield washer fighting for space on the back of the wheel. Usability would be improved by a couple of old-fashioned column stalks. The 296GTB stands as proof that hybridization and increasing technology in ultra-performance machinery doesn’t need to be feared. At least, not when Ferrari does it. It has taken huge effort to make something so complex appear so simple, a digital supercar that manages to feel almost entirely analog. It is both a technical masterpiece and as thrilling as any Ferrari should be.

    Specifications

    Specifications
    2022 Ferrari 296GTBVehicle Type: mid-engine, mid-motor, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 2-door coupe
    PRICE
    Base: $322,986
    POWERTRAIN
    twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve 3.0-liter V-6, 654 hp, 546 lb-ft + AC motor, 164 hp, 232 lb-ft (combined output: 819 hp, 546 lb-ft; 6.0-kWh lithium-ion battery pack)
    TRANSMISSION
    8-speed dual-clutch automatic
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 102.4 inLength: 179.7 inWidth: 77.1 inHeight: 46.7 inCargo Volume: 7 ft3Curb Weight: 3700 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
    60 mph: 2.9 sec100 mph: 5.7 sec1/4-Mile: 9.7 secTop Speed: 205 mph
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST)
    Combined/City/Highway: 20/18/22 mpgCombined Gas + Electric: 60 MPGeEV Range: 10 mi

    A car-lover’s community for ultimate access & unrivaled experiences. JOIN NOW

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Watch Our 2022 Honda Civic Si Video Review

    The 2022 Honda Civic Si is heavier, less powerful, and slower than the car it replaces. It’s also more expensive and missing features that used to come standard. And yet, as explained in this video, we think it’s remarkable that this sub-$30,000, turbocharged, stick-shift sedan still exists at all. With the number of vehicles that offer a manual transmission dwindling, you must appreciate that the Si comes only with a stick shift. And what becomes immediately clear after a few miles is that someone on the development team cared about its weighting and shift action. It’s a great gearbox.

    As we reported in our instrumented road test, the Civic Si remains an inexpensive sedan that’s easy to live with and pleasurable to drive. The interior is attractive and decently sized, which producer/editor Alexander Malburg demonstrates in this video from the back seat. Even the fuel economy is strong, at 31 mpg combined. What about the slower performance? As our test data shows, the differences are minor. For example, the 2022 Civic Si’s rolling start, 5–60 mph acceleration test result matched that from the last generation, so you don’t notice a change in real-world driving. On the other hand, you will notice the absence of heated seats come winter. Our only real complaint is one that also was true of the previous-generation Si: During a high-rpm, wide-open-throttle upshift, the engine speed flares and hangs while you’re changing gears. You either have to wait for the engine speed to fall to shift smoothly or accept a clunky gear change when you reengage the clutch. This trait becomes especially apparent in contrast with how nice the shifter feels. Overall, the Civic Si makes for an excellent and affordable family commuter. It’s why we named it a 2022 Editors’ Choice in the sport compact car category. And we remain eager to see what Honda has in store for the next-generation Type R.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2022 Lincoln Navigator Enters the Tech Era

    The buzz around enormous body-on-frame luxury SUVs has reached a fever pitch. As lavish and accommodating as ever, these massive driving implements continue to advance in high-tech usefulness, with new and updated entries from Jeep and Lexus bolstering the segment’s ranks. Someone at General Motors even had the idea to give the V treatment to the Cadillac Escalade, supercharged V-8 and all. To that lot we’ll add the 2022 Lincoln Navigator, which has been polished with thoughtful touches and new hands-free driving capability as part of a mid-cycle refresh. The ability to transport people and stuff with glitzy curb appeal makes full-size luxury utes outsize status symbols unto themselves. Jeep doesn’t even badge its Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer as Jeeps, lest they be tainted by the mud-plugging reputation of its lesser models. Not so with the latest Navigator, which has LINCOLN plastered across its stern and the brand’s crosshair emblem set as a nearly foot-tall protrusion within its gently redrawn grille. Flanking that grille are thinner LED headlights, while the rear dons a slimmer full-width LED taillight bar that now emits horizontal animation sequences when you approach and exit the vehicle. Michael Knight’s K.I.T.T. would approve.

    It takes a careful eye to spot the new Gator on the road, but glance inside and its 13.2-inch center touchscreen is an easy giveaway. Compared to the 10.1-inch display that it replaces, the updated setup is a better fit in this seven- or eight-passenger Lincoln’s cavernous interior, which remains one of the more fetching environments in automobiledom. As a gateway to the new Sync 4 infotainment system’s bounty of features—including an optional 28-speaker Revel audio system that does its best to shake the windows out of the truck—the touchscreen also is crisply rendered and smartly laid out. Additional animations, such as swaths of faint twinkling stars that follow the needles around the digital speedometer and tachometer, grace a more data-focused 12.0-inch instrument cluster display. The Navigator’s plethora of pixels extends to its rear quarters, with second-row passengers gaining both an optional 5.8-inch infotainment touchscreen and a pair of 10.1-inch, Amazon Fire TV–equipped monitors affixed to the front seatbacks. While a three-across second-row bench remains available, stick with the standard captain’s chairs and you’ll unlock the newly added massage function for those heated and ventilated middle seats. Put a butt in every seat of the 131.6-inch-wheelbase L model, and there’s still plenty of luggage space for all occupants—34 cubic feet behind the third row versus 19 cubes in the regular 122.5-inch-wheelbase version.
    From the optional 30-way power-adjustable front seats to the lovely open-pore wood trim laser-etched with a map of the pathways in New York’s Central Park—the latter included in one of two new design packages for Black Label models—the Navigator is a warm and inviting place to be. Classic luxury vibes aside, this Lincoln’s greatest draw probably will be the new ActiveGlide driver assistant, which debuts as standard equipment on the upper Reserve and Black Label trims as the brand’s version of Ford’s BlueCruise. Much like GM’s Super Cruise, ActiveGlide employs lane centering, adaptive cruise control, and driver monitoring to provide hands-free motoring on roughly 130,000 miles of divided highways. Virtual steering-wheel icons and overviews of the vehicle on the road combine in the gauge cluster to indicate when the system is active. An available head-up display (standard on the Black Label), plus a phalanx of standard active-safety gear, provides additional convenience and security.
    Though our exposure was brief, ActiveGlide works as advertised, and the steering column-mounted camera and infrared light emitters saw through our attempts to trick their vision by wearing a mask, sunglasses, and hat. If it does detect your attention has strayed from the road, the system beeps with increasing intensity, the steering wheel vibrates, and the vehicle will eventually tap the brakes before the system shuts off. It will not stop the vehicle if you fail to heed its warnings, as some other systems do. Ford is upfront that this initial version of BlueCruise/ActiveGlide has been programmed rather conservatively and that improved capability, among other features, will come via over-the-air updates. This is a good thing, as ActiveGlide currently is not as capable as it probably can be and, from our experience, not as stoic in operation as GM’s Super Cruise. We observed some wandering between lane lines, the system is quick to disengage around tighter bends, and occasionally it refused to recognize that we were paying attention, even after we wiggled the steering wheel. But as a tool for reducing some of the strain from gridlock and boring highway treks, it is a welcome addition. Fortunately, the Navigator is now better to drive when a human is in full control, thanks in part to a retuned suspension that includes a stiffer rear anti-roll bar and a new camera-based system that scans the road ahead and primes the adaptive dampers for upcoming bumps. This is still a large and heavy vehicle imbued with minimal athleticism—despite what its Excite drive mode suggests—but its slow, numb steering is well suited to its preferred casual pace, and body motions feel calmer and more collected than we remember. The newly added electronic brake booster is tuned to provide a reassuringly firm and progressive brake pedal, making smooth stops a cinch. And all versions can now be had with new 22-inch wheel designs (20s remain standard on base models), which returned good ride quality on the smooth pavement around Phoenix. But we’ll hold off on a final verdict until we drive one on our familiar Midwestern goat paths, as the big rollers did clomp uncomfortably over the few sharper impacts we encountered.
    Little has changed under the Navigator’s hood since this generation debuted for 2018. The twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 still develops 510 pound-feet of torque and is backed by an unhurried 10-speed automatic transmission. Also familiar are an 8700-pound maximum towing capacity and standard rear-wheel drive; all-wheel drive is a $2695 to $3000 option, except on the Black Label, where it’s included. However, minor tuning changes have dropped the engine’s horsepower count from 450 to 440, which apparently the EPA notices more than we did. The Navigator’s combined fuel-economy estimate has increased by 1 mpg to 18 or 19 mpg, depending on the model. But we don’t expect much deviation from the 5.2-second run to 60 mph that we recorded in our test of a 2021 model. That’s satisfyingly quick for a big SUV that costs $78,405 to start and can top $120K in loaded L form. Just as noteworthy is the V-6’s revised exhaust note, which thrums more deeply than before and lends this big Lincoln an appropriately throaty voice that could (almost) be mistaken for a burbling V-8’s. A comparison test ultimately will determine how the new Navigator fares against its also-fresh peers, including its archrival, the Escalade. We could argue that Lincoln fumbled the finishing touch by not commandeering the blown V-8 from the GT500 Mustang as a riposte to the Escalade V. But as a mainstay of the segment that it pioneered back in 1998, the Gator’s latest revisions help keep it in step with the times.

    Specifications

    Specifications
    2022 Lincoln NavigatorVehicle Type: front-engine, rear- or 4-wheel-drive, 7- or 8-passenger, 4-door SUV
    PRICE
    Base Navigator, $78,405; Navigator L, $91,770
    ENGINE
    twin-turbocharged DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injectionDisplacement: 213 in3, 3489 cm3Power: 440 hp @ 5850 rpmTorque: 510 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm
    TRANSMISSION
    10-speed automatic
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 122.5-131.6 inLength: 210.0-221.9 inWidth: 79.9 inHeight: 76.4-76.1 inPassenger Volume: 172 ft3Cargo Volume: 19-34 ft3Curb Weight (C/D est): 5700-6100 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
    60 mph: 5.2 sec100 mph: 13.8 sec1/4-Mile: 13.8 secTop Speed: 100 mph
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY
    Combined/City/Highway: 18-19/16-17/22-23 mpg

    A car-lover’s community for ultimate access & unrivaled experiences. JOIN NOW

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    INEOS Grenadier Seeks to Deliver the Classic SUV Experience

    Many of us feel deep regard for our favorite cars, but few can match the commitment Jim Ratcliffe has shown to one of his. The CEO of the INEOS chemical company and one of the U.K.’s richest men, Ratcliffe mourned the passing of the previous-generation Land Rover Defenderso much that he ordered the creation of a new car very obviously inspired by it. And, being British, he named it after the pub where the idea was hatched: The Grenadier.Getting the automotive Grenadier to near-launch status has involved a legal battle with Jaguar Land Rover over the right to build something with such an obvious visual relationship to the classic Defender, plus the sort of heavy-duty check writing that will fatigue even a billionaire’s wrist. Magna Steyr engineered the Grenadier in Austria. It will use a BMW inline-six engine and is set to be built in what was, until recently, a Daimler factory—the Hambach plant in France that was originally created to build the Smart Fortwo.

    Having spent what was reportedly a nine-figure sum refitting Hambach to produce the Mercedes-Benz EQA and EQB, Daimler chose to switch production of the compact EVs to Hungary. Thus, INEOS was able to acquire what was effectively a brand-new facility equipped with line robots still in their delivery packaging. INEOS will continue to produce the tiny Fortwo EV for several years as part of the deal. (The sight of Fortwo EVs and pilot-build Grenadiers passing through the final inspection area together is an incongruous one.)The Grenadier is deliberately old-fashioned. While the new Defender has moved to an independent suspension and is targeted at affluent lifestyle-focused buyers, the Grenadier is aimed at those who expect fewer concessions from their SUVs—i.e., more utility than sport. As such it features body-on-frame construction, live axles at both ends, and a two-speed transfer case as standard, together with a locking center differential. Electronically locking front and rear diffs will be optional, but the Grenadier doesn’t get adjustable drive modes like Land Rover’s Terrain Response system, nor height-adjustable air springs or adaptive dampers. This is intended to be a tough, simple vehicle capable of life in the true wilderness; the closest current U.S.-market alternative is the Jeep Wrangler.
    Touring the gleaming Hambach plant confirms that the Grenadier will be a very different car from the one that inspired it. The old Defender was built in a dark, dingy part of Land Rover’s Solihull factory to tolerances which could be politely described as highly variable. The Grenadier line feels more like an operating room, with body shells scanned to confirm accuracy at better than 1 millimeter. Despite the external similarities, the new car is substantially different beneath the surface. A peek inside the front fenders reveals an intricate structure that provides the deformation necessary to allow their distinctive flat tops to satisfy pedestrian impact standards. The Grenadier’s engine compartment also looks very well filled by the BMW-sourced engine. INEOS will be offering both gasoline and diesel turbo sixes displacing 3.0 liters, although only the gas version is planned for States. It makes 281 horsepower and 332 pound-feet of torque and is paired with an eight-speed ZF automatic. A manual transmission option would have been more in keeping with the spirit of the Grenadier but was deemed too expensive to develop.
    Our drive was limited to a well-worn pre-production prototype on a course made up entirely of gelatinous mud—the spoil heap of a former French coal mine. The entire experience was conducted in low range, with the highest speed attained a modest 16 mph. The prototype also lacked the electronically locking front and rear differentials or the traction control that the finished car will have.The Grenadier’s cabin feels more spacious than the cramped accommodations of the old Defender, and although most of the prototype’s switchgear wasn’t working, the dashboard has a pleasingly utilitarian design—the button layout on the central and roof consoles bears a strong resemblance to the CRM114 Discriminator panel from the classic movie Dr. Strangelove. A single central display screen relays all driving information; what looks like a secondary digital instrument pack in front of the steering wheel just houses warning lights. The powertrain’s origin is made obvious by the familiar bulbous design of the BMW gear selector, although the transfer case is managed by a separate mechanical lever next to it.
    The off-road courses created for media events are usually carefully designed to show off a car’s talents without running the risk of getting stuck. Not here. The Grenadier bogged down several times during our drive, although never so badly that it couldn’t extract itself and then conquer the obstacle given more speed or improved technique. The prototype felt like a hard-used test mule, its transmission clunking and bigger accelerator inputs sometimes causing the engine to hesitate. But the basics are certainly promising, with the gas pedal weighted to give gentle initial responses well suited to off-road driving and the engine having plenty of midrange brawn to keep moving through the sapping mud.
    While the lack of electronic adjustments is intended to be part of the Grenadier’s core appeal—there is less to go wrong in tough environments—it will require some adjustment for those who’ve grown accustomed to the various modes prevalent in modern high-end SUVs. And there is no option to raise the ride height of the suspension (ground clearance is 10.4 inches). The Grenadier doesn’t even have hill-descent control, which has become nearly standard among today’s off-roaders.For many potential customers that back-to-basics approach will be a key part of the Grenadier’s appeal, and it does give an unarguable connection to the vehicle that inspired it. We suspect that the finished version is going to feel much more like the classic Defender than the new Land Rover Defender does. The other unanswered question is where it will be positioned in the market when it hopes to go on sale in the U.S. next year. We suspect the old-fashioned driving experience won’t be matched by an equally old-fashioned price, with reports hinting at the range starting around $75,000.

    A car-lover’s community for ultimate access & unrivaled experiences. JOIN NOW

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Tork Kratos R Electric Motorcycle – First Ride Review

    Tork Kratos R ReviewTork Kratos and Kratos R are meant for consumers looking for a premium offering in the electric mobility spaceAfter being in development for years, Tork Motors finally launched its much ambitious electric motorcycle named Kratos last month. The Pune-based EV manufacturer has introduced two variants of the battery-powered motorcycle- standard and a slightly more powerful R trim. We recently got an opportunity to test the latter and check how it performs in the real world.Will it be able to create a niche for itself amongst the plethora of other two-wheelers cropping up in the market in recent times even though most of the offerings in the current two-wheeler space are scooters? Will it be able to challenge conventional IC engine motorcycles which are still going strong? Let us answer these and a few more questions through our first ride impression.Tork Kratos Review – Design & QualityBased on the pre-production Tork T6X prototype, Kratos is claiming to be the first indigenously developed electric motorcycle in India. This essentially means that everything in the motorcycle, barring the battery cells, including the electric motor, battery pack and its casing, running gear, electronics, etc., have been designed, conceptualised and manufactured in India.Starting with its design, Kratos doesn’t stray too far from the T6X prototype although there are substantial differences to tell them apart. For starters, it gets a V-shaped headlamp cluster but the LED internals inside Kratos give the electric bike a Transformers-like appearance. The curves and edges along the body panels give the motorcycle a sharp look.Tork Kratos R ReviewFurther, a raised tail section along with split-style seats and split grab rails lend it a much-needed sportiness to its closet. While the muscular tank accentuates its aggressive nature, the bulkiness of the huge electric motor placed underneath takes some sheen off the otherwise beautiful-looking Kratos. Overall, Kratos is one handsome motorcycle that is bound to catch enough attention.However, that doesn’t necessarily translate to the bike’s fit and finish. Quality of switchgear, mirrors and even the instrument console were found to be substandard at best and could do well with some improvements. While quality of brake levers aren’t bad, metallic finish levers instead of plastic units would do justice to this premium offering. The bike also misses out on a proper metallic crash guard or a belly pan which could prevent scraping the battery pack.Tork Kratos Review – ErgonomicsFootpegs on Kratos are slightly rear-set which translates to a slightly committed yet comfortable riding stance thanks to a taller handlebar. The seat itself is very well cushioned with the right amount of padding. The pillion seat also looks decently spacious enough although we couldn’t test it with a pillion behind. An accessible saddle of 785mm would make this motorcycle comfortable for riders of most heights.Tork Kratos R ReviewTork Kratos Review – FeaturesBeing a premium offering, Tork has loaded Kratos, especially the top-spec Kratos R, with very impressive equipment. It gets a digital instrument console that displays a wide range of information but has some visibility issues under direct sunlight and needs a serious upgrade. Apart from the three ride modes, you get reverse mode to pull yourself out of a tricky parking space.The faux fuel tank gets some space to store one’s knick-knacks but isn’t big enough to store even a half-face helmet. It also gets a USB charger inside the storage. The biggest highlights from its feature list are the connectivity options that offer remote functionalities such as geo-fencing, find my vehicle, motor walk assist, track mode via Bluetooth, crash alert, etc.Tork Kratos ReviewUnfortunately, we weren’t able to test any of them since our test bike was a pre-production model with a Beta version of the software sans all the features mentioned above. Other notable features on offer include in-built navigation, all-LED illumination, regenerative braking, hazard lights, OTA updates, Active throttle control, smart charge analysis, guide me home headlights and more.Tork Kratos Review – Ride & HandlingTork has been clear since the initial phase of its development that this bike will offer a sporty riding experience. For some parts, this does hold true with its slightly stiff suspension setup which offers sure-footedness while on the go. However, as a side effect, you do feel firmness in the ride quality when you move across a pothole or a sharp bump.Tork Kratos ReviewWhile you do wish the ride was a tad bit more comfortable, it isn’t as harsh and unnerving as a sports bike and it’s something that one can get used to. The positioning of the battery does provide stability to the bike but it also makes it a little tricky while manoeuvring through congested traffic. This would also result in the rider putting an extra effort while leaning into a sharp corner, especially on a track.The bike rides on 17-inch front and rear wheels that are shod with MRF Zapper which provide decent enough grip. However, a thicker front tyre instead of 90/80 section would have inspired more confidence in the rider. While brakes felt adequate enough during moderate speeds, they missed out on a sharper bite required to bring a vehicle to a halt from a high speed.Tork Kratos ReviewSlamming the brake levers too hard might result in locking up the wheels which could be a recipe for disaster. Hence, at this price point, especially for the top-spec Kratos R, Tork must upgrade to an ABS setup for a safer ride experience.Performance & RangeKratos R comes with three ride modes namely- Eco, City and Sport with different levels of performance and range attached to each of them. The bike always starts on the Eco mode as default before the rider changes the mode through the switchgear. In Eco mode, performance is adequate but definitely doesn’t excite and the active throttle control (ATC) starts intruding once you reach 45 kmph.Tork Kratos ReviewWe spent most of our time in the Sport mode extracting most of the performance and in this mode, the ATC was the least intrusive. Unlike most EVs, performance in Kratos R is in line with a conventional petrol-powered two-wheeler which gradually develops power. There isn’t a mad rush of torque generally associated with EVs but the surge is felt linearly as one pulls the throttle.A top speed of 80kmph was reached on a busy highway stretch beyond which the bike felt a little wobbly. Pulling the throttle hard did take an effect on the indicated range on the console but while riding through traffic the range stayed stagnant for a long duration. This suggests that regenerative braking was working properly.Tork Kratos ReviewWe rode the top-spec Kratos which comes with a stronger 9kW motor and dishes out a peak torque of 38 Nm. Tork claims a real-world range of 120km in Eco mode which drops to around 70km in Sport mode. But since we got to ride the bike only for a short duration we aren’t able to confirm the exact range in a real-world scenario.Price & OfferingsThe two variants of the electric bike- Kratos and Kratos R are priced at Rs 1.08 lakh and Rs 1.23 lakh (both ex-showroom, Pune) that are inclusive of FAME II and state subsidies. Apart from the extra bit of performance, consumers opting for the top-spec Kratos R benefit from the free access to the charging network established (or will be established) by Tork across the various centres for two years.Tork Kratos ReviewAlso, the standard Kratos misses out on a fast-charging capability offered in the top-spec trim. While Kratos is available in a single white paint scheme, Kratos R gets three additional options in the form of blue, red and black. The Pune-based EC manufacturer is also offering a warranty for a period of 3 years or 40,000km as standard on both variants.The company will be opting for a dealership model starting with Pune and then spreading to Tier 1 metros like Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai and Ahmedabad. Tork is also promising doorstep services which we are yet to receive details about. It is planning to tie with local entities to set up a widespread charging network that will be further expanded to smaller centres.Tork Kratos ReviewVerdictKratos R is able to score high on most aspects but there isn’t escaping the fact that refinement is missing in this pre-production model. The motorcycle has small yet noticeable drawbacks which can hinder one’s ownership or riding experience. However, these drawbacks aren’t that glaring as seen in some other modern EVs that have come out in the recent past.Good thing, though, that Tork has taken all feedback into account and promised to make the final production-spec model an overall better package. If you could look past the small niggles mentioned above, there is plenty to like about the motorcycle. However, it will be too soon to recommend one before all the rough edges are ironed out. More

  • in

    Tested: 2022 VW Jetta GLI Proves That VW Still Cares about Drivers

    UPDATE 2/25/22: This review has been updated with test results. Despite Volkswagen’s push toward electric vehicles, the company is providing assurances that it’s still dedicated to the sporty compact car. Want evidence? The new-generation Golf GTI and Golf R have clearly been developed with driving enthusiasts in mind. VW’s American arm pushed for six-speed manuals in both of those cars and convinced its corporate overlords in Germany that such a move would be rational and wise. Consider that a love letter to the American driver, because our counterparts in Europe won’t find that option available when they place their orders.The performance variant of the humble Jetta sedan—the Jetta GLI—also will not show up in a European showroom; it’s sold only in North America and Brazil. The GLI’s 228-hp turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four makes a whopping 70 horsepower more than the standard Jetta’s engine and comes with performance enhancements such as adaptive dampers and a limited-slip differential.[image id=’e2357688-5d28-42b1-b3e8-d5c962a9251d’ mediaId=’7f31fa46-bce0-4515-9018-773a600baa7c’ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’6×4′][/image][pullquote align=’center’]HIGHS: Playful driving demeanor, still available with a six-speed manual, Audi-like cabin environs.[/pullquote][editoriallinks id=’50e90e4b-39c5-4758-9ebf-4b9b8e92bb10′ align=’left’][/editoriallinks]Updated for 2022, the Jetta GLI wears a newly styled grille and front bumper with red detailing. The rear bumper has been revised as well and sports a honeycomb-patterned lower valance and larger-diameter exhaust outlets. The GLI’s cabin receives new red contrast stitching to accent the black leather upholstery and new touch-sensitive steering wheel controls.The GLI remains a lovely driving partner. During our test drive through the hill country near Asheville, North Carolina, the GLI’s eager steering and crisp-shifting six-speed manual made running through the area’s narrow mountain passes a joyful exercise. Although it isn’t as tied-down as the new Golf GTI, the GLI does its best impression of that performance icon. On the highway during normal cruising and commuting, the GLI settles into Jetta mode, meaning it’s refined, comfortable, and easygoing.[image id=’56772605-7d30-4ae1-88f9-74aa33bf7223′ mediaId=’4198a760-e097-4229-aafd-d2031ef0e0ce’ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’original’][/image] Despite the fact that VW has made no changes to the car’s powertrain, our test results indicate that the 2022 model is slightly slower than the last GLI we tested back in 2019. Nonetheless, it still turned in a solid performance at our test track, reaching 60 mph in 6.1 seconds and eclipsing the quarter-mile in 14.6 seconds at 100 mph. The GLI is quicker than the new-for-2022 Honda Civic Si, which needed 6.8 seconds to hit 60 and delivered a 15.1-second quarter-mile time. But the VW’s cornering grip fell short of the Honda’s, with a 0.86-g result for the GLI on our skidpad versus 0.96 g for the Civic. Some of the performance deficit is due to VW no longer offering summer tires (previously a no-cost option) on the 2022 GLI. That shouldn’t stop you from fitting a set. [pullquote align=’center’]LOWS: Cheaper base model has been removed from the lineup, exhaust drones noisily when cruising in Sport mode, fussy steering wheel audio controls.[/pullquote][image id=’01144799-a99d-42dc-ac32-b5e4cebae9c7′ mediaId=’437c20c9-d892-41fa-ac14-17aa9ec29363′ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’original’][/image]The GLI sports an updated exhaust system that sounds a bit louder for 2022, particularly when driving in Sport mode, which lets more of the car’s newly baritone voice to enter the cabin. This soundtrack may delight boy-racer types, but we found ourselves needing to activate the Normal driving mode to quiet the cabin when cruising. Ultimately, we’re not convinced this does much to enhance the GLI’s appeal.Same goes for the new touch-sensitive steering-wheel controls. Their glossy black finish gives an added pop of premium appearance, but on several occasions when driving the snaking roads west of Asheville, we managed to inadvertently change the radio station midcorner by accidentally bumping the tuning button. Moreover, the volume control slider is fussy and imprecise.[image id=’95824569-e24d-4e96-9a98-36110ddc91bc’ mediaId=’58cf53d3-8e93-415d-8ed7-e15545e9c720′ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’original’][/image]The nicely tailored interior gives off strong Audi vibes, which is good because for 2022 Volkswagen has eliminated the entry-level GLI trim, leaving only the loaded $31,990 Autobahn model. Opt for the dual-clutch automatic, and the price climbs to $32,790. The GLI’s nearest rival, the Honda Civic Si, is all new for 2022 and starts at just $28,315.But VW may find that the GLI’s biggest competition is inside its own showroom: The 2022 Golf GTI starts at $30,540—granted that’s for a base model with less equipment. But the Golf’s hatchback body style, its performance legacy, and its more modern styling may draw buyers away from its Jetta sibling. The 2022 model’s updates help keep it fresh, though, and the GLI’s fun-loving attitude is something every driver can appreciate.[vehicle type=’specpanel’ vehicle-body-style=” vehicle-make=” vehicle-model=” vehicle-model-category=” vehicle-submodel=” vehicle-year=”][/vehicle][image id=’bf222a99-967e-406f-a4d3-886f2d33b440′ mediaId=’7b3ccdb0-7fbe-49cf-9788-a06b93f199df’ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=’A car-lover’s community for ultimate access & unrivaled experiences. JOIN NOW’ expand=” crop=’original’][/image]

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More