Reviews

From the April 2023 issue of Car and Driver.Beneath the purple skin specific to this commemorative Edition 50 Jahre that celebrates a half-century of BMW’s M Division, and shared by all M3 Competition models, is a stonking 503-hp twin-turbo 3.0-liter inline-six. With launch control engaged and the boost holding above 15.0 psi, the quickest-ever 3-series leaps to 30 mph in 1.0 second. The scoot to 60 mph takes 2.8 seconds, and the quarter-mile passes in 11.0 seconds at 124 mph. All-wheel drive comes standard on the Edition 50 Jahre and can be had on any other M3 Comp for $4000. It adds roughly 150 pounds to the curb weight, but the additional traction helps the 50 Jahre clobber its rear-drive counterpart by 0.7 and 0.6 second in the 60-mph and quarter-mile drags, respectively. The beauty of the Competition’s xDrive mode is that it offers the best of both worlds: all-wheel drive for supercar-grade acceleration and decoupling of the front axle to enable a rear-drive mode for power-oversteer shenanigans.Nothing in the segment comes close to the M3 Competition xDrive’s acceleration, which plays in a world with Porsche 911s and Chevy Corvettes and isn’t far from the 627-hp BMW M5 CS. Seriously quick. Furthering its supersedan status is a 1.03-g skidpad whirl and stops—aided by the $8500 carbon-ceramic brake package—from 70 mph in 153 feet and 100 mph in 297 feet. Some time behind the wheel of the BMW M4 CSL has us wondering what the Competition xDrive might be capable of if it were equipped with the CSL’s sticky Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Track Connect rubber. They are, after all, a direct-fitment tire and available from TireRack for $1836.Moving away from the World of Dynamic Insanity, when the drive modes are left in their softest Comfort settings, the M3 Competition xDrive is a livable place for daily consumption. The sharpest impacts reverberate up forged 19-inch front and 20-inch rear wheels and through the $4500 carbon-fiber buckets. The super-supportive seats are somewhat tricky to enter and exit yet provide a surprising amount of comfort. Marc Urbano|Car and DriverAs with all 2023 3-series, the M3’s interior is treated to BMW’s Curved Display that incorporates a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster and a 14.9-inch touchscreen infotainment system. The iDrive 8 operating system replaces most of the physical buttons for the HVAC and radio controls with a not-so-intuitive infotainment menu structure. Fortunately, iDrive 8.5 rolls out this summer, and BMW promises to solve these teething issues by improving the layout. Perhaps the fact that this five-seat sleeper returned 27 mpg on our 75-mph fuel-economy test is enough to forgive iDrive’s shortcomings. More on the BMW M3Starting at $83,595, the M3 Competition xDrive delivers astounding performance for the money. The Edition 50 Jahre comes standard with a carbon-fiber splitter and decklid spoiler, titanium tailpipes trimmed with carbon fiber, M Sport seats, a 50 Jahre-specific carry-on suitcase, the Executive and Parking Assist packages, adaptive LED headlights with Laserlight, wireless device charging, and M Shadowline trim, swelling the window sticker to $96,695. The only extra-cost options are the aforementioned carbon-fiber seats and carbon-ceramic brakes. But its time at the top of the 3-series hierarchy will be limited. The lighter 2024 M3 CS with an extra 40 horses and Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires arrives in the second half of this year. Whether the CS’s $36,100 upcharge is an economically sound decision remains unknown, but it’ll certainly contest the throne.Arrow pointing downArrow pointing downSpecificationsSpecifications
2023 BMW M3 Competition xDriveVehicle Type: front-engine, rear/all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $83,595/$109,695Options: 50 Jahre Edition (carbon-fiber splitter and decklid spoiler, carbon-fiber and titanium tailpipe trim, M Sport seats, carry-on suitcase, Executive and Parking Assist packages, adaptive LED headlights with Laserlight, wireless device charging, and M Shadowline trim), $13,100; carbon-ceramic brakes, $8500; carbon-fiber bucket seats, $4500
ENGINE
twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injectionDisplacement: 183 in3, 2993 cm3Power: 503 hp @ 6250 rpmTorque: 479 lb-ft @ 2750 rpm
TRANSMISSION
8-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: struts/multilinkBrakes, F/R: 15.7-in vented, cross-drilled carbon-ceramic disc/15.0-in vented cross-drilled, carbon-ceramic discTires: Pirelli P Zero PZ4F: 275/35ZR-19 (100Y) ★ R: 285/30ZR-20 (99Y) ★
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 112.5 inLength: 189.1 inWidth: 74.3 inHeight: 56.5 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 55/43 ft3Trunk Volume: 13 ft3Curb Weight: 3929 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 2.8 sec100 mph: 7.0 sec1/4-Mile: 11.0 sec @ 124 mph130 mph: 12.3 sec150 mph: 18.2 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 4.2 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.4 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 2.7 secTop Speed (gov ltd): 156 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 153 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 297 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 1.03 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 15 mpg75-mph Highway Driving: 27 mpg75-mph Highway Range: 420 mi
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 18/16/22 mpg
C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDSenior Testing EditorDavid Beard studies and reviews automotive related things and pushes fossil-fuel and electric-powered stuff to their limits. His passion for the Ford Pinto began at his conception, which took place in a Pinto. More

From the October 1979 issue of Car and Driver.Today’s question is: What do Jimmy Stewart and Colin Chapman have in common? The answer, of course, is Hethel, an airfield scratched into the flowering mustard fields of northeast­ern England near Norwich. Stewart was the commanding officer there when Liberator bombers were flying off against the Nazis during World War II. Chapman is the com­manding officer there now, and on the runways where Liberators came and went, the Lotus Elite, Eclat, and Esprit now test.The three cars that make up the Lotus fleet for 1980 are manufactured in a cluster of long, low buildings that look as if they might actually be the hangars Colonel Jimmy stored his planes in 36 years ago. They aren’t, of course. Out past the runways/test track to the west, you can see one of the old hangars, its paint long since lost to the English win­ters, its huge front door gaping open, its windows punched out. There’s a lot of history floating all around, and it’s hard not to feel it when you’re standing on the old runway in the fading summer light. In fact, with just a little effort you can almost hear the rumble of four 1200-horsepower Wright radial engines warming up at the far end of the run­way, almost see in the heat shimmer a Liberator straining against its brakes. The interlude with the past is short­-lived. The Liberator becomes a white Esprit, and the four radial engines are reduced to four screaming cylinders as Sherman races past, the fifth wheel straining against the suction cup that holds it lamprey-like to the Lotus’s slim, Italianate flank. No, we don’t usually go to the factory of origin to do road tests. This visit grew out of a routine call to Lotus of North America to arrange for an Esprit to test. Lotus, we found, was in the mid­dle of a giant reorganization in the U.S., and simply had no cars to hand off to road testers. But Steve Ramsden, presi­dent of Lotus North America (the new company name), said why don’t you go to Hethel and test there. So we did.It’s important to understand that Lotus today is not the Lotus of memory. Memories of spidery, quick little throw­backs (the 7), of slick, agile roadsters (the Elan), of raw-boned, thinly dis­guised race cars (the Europa), may be an important part of the Lotus legend, but now nothing more. Today, Lotus is the purveyor of expensive, sophisticated, sleek, luxurious exoticars—machines for those with the money with which to indulge themselves, and also the desire to flout the Italian tradition. Certainly, the Esprit—the Lotus we chose to concentrate on—is at least a match in looks to anything currently available from the Italians. But this should come as no surprise since it was designed by the ubiquitous Giugiaro. The quality of materials and their fit and finish is easily up to world exoti­car standards. And, as our hours on the test track (runways) at Hethel and on the surrounding motorways, highways, and narrow lanes proved, the Esprit’s steering, handling, brakes, and comfort give away nothing to the competition. And by doing nothing more than being there all this time, the four-cylinder en­gine is suddenly reaching parity with its bigger-displacement brothers. When it was introduced in the Elite in 1974, the little 2.0-liter—despite its four valves per cylinder and its efficient performance—didn’t seem quite right in a $16,000 exoticar. But time and the investors have worked in its favor. The combination of economy and performance now makes more sense than thirsty V-6s and V-8s. The engine—originally designed for the ill-fated Jensen-Healey sports car but always intended for a Lo­tus something or other—is the highest-­output 2.0-liter available in a passenger car. With two Zenith CD1 75SE carbs fit­ted for U.S. emissions specs, the engine produces 140 horsepower at 5800 rpm (160 hp at 6200 rpm in Europe with twin Dellorto carbs). It isn’t a neck­snapper, but it will move a 2500-pound Esprit with, well, elan. And get 16 mpg in the EPA city cycle in the process. There may still be those elitists out there who simply don’t want a four-cylinder anything in their exotics, but they’re a dying breed. In any case, Lotus has the horsepower doctor at work even now, and some interesting things are in the offing. Although an automatic transmission is available on the front-engine, four­-passenger Elite and on the 2+2 Eclat (they’re the same car with slightly different physiognomies, which result in dif­ferent seating arrangements), it’s a five­-speed only for the two-seat, mid-engine Esprit. The gates on the Lotus-built transmission are closely spaced, and once you learn the correct pressures and angles to apply, the stick slides from one to the other quite nicely. Except for reverse. On our test car reverse would frequently disappear into the me­chanical fifth dimension and refuse to reappear until it was good and ready. Much fuming, cursing, working the stick with both hands, clutching and de­clutching, and all the other tricks wouldn’t help. When it was ready it was findable, but not until. Clutch effort, by the way, is very high. Spending much time in stop-and-go traffic could be a painful experience. The non-assisted rack-and-pinion steering is a delight: quick, precise, and with the right amount of road feel trans­mitted to your hands. Even major course corrections seem to require little more than thinking them to make them happen. The Esprit responds. It also handles. It’s a well-known fact that locating the engine between the axles does good things for weight distri­bution and esoterica such as the polar moment of inertia. So the Esprit starts out with that mid-engine advantage. The front suspension is simple but effective: unequal-length control arms, coil springs, shocks, and an anti-sway bar. At the rear, there is a trailing arm, a coil-shock combination, and a lateral link for each side. The result is a basi­cally neutral-handling car that will go into mild understeer when pushed. But add a little more wheel to get the weight shifting, and the tail will move out to put you into induced oversteer that’s easily controlled with the throttle. Inside, the Esprit is an ergonomic delight. Once you wedge your body through the narrow door opening, ne­gotiate the slim space between the seat and the non-adjustable steering wheel, and settle your backside into the race­car-like bucket seats (no backrest adjust­ment!), you’ll find everything where it can be easily seen and reached: The in­struments are housed in a wraparound binnacle that sits on top of the dash. There’s a closeness, a comfortable intimacy you feel when you’re snuggled into the wraparound buckets with all the controls at your fingertips. Some of that intimate feeling also comes from the lack of visibility at the rear quarters. But that seems a small price to pay for what is easily one of Giugiaro’s best design packages. The Esprit must also get the nod as the best Lotus Mr. Chapman and Com­pany have cranked out. The Elite has al­ways been a rather strange-looking cre­ation, although its occasional seating for four is something of a redeeming virtue. The Eclat is simply a less useful Elite, although it does look a little better. The Esprit, on the other hand, is a purpose­-designed car that gets the job done. It is mechanically advanced, its performance is entertaining if not awesome, and it is flat beautiful to look at. Mike Knepper|Car and DriverLotus will hint at things coming in the near term: things like turbocharging, V-8s, and even a four-door luxury car. And that’s all well and good. But for now, the Esprit will do just fine.Arrow pointing downArrow pointing downSpecificationsSpecifications
1980 Lotus Esprit S2Vehicle Type: mid-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 2-door coupe
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $30,955/$31,965Options: leather trim, $620; metallic paint, $390.
ENGINEDOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and headDisplacement: 120 in3, 1973 cm3Power: 140 hp @ 5800 rpmTorque: 130 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm 
TRANSMISSION
5-speed manual
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: control arms/trailing armsBrakes, F/R: 9.8-in disc/10.8-in discTires: Dunlop SP Sport Super Radial Formula 60F: 205/60VR-14R: 205/70VR-14
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 96.0 inLength: 167.7 inWidth: 73.2 inHeight: 43.7 inCurb Weight: 2444 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 8.4 sec1/4-Mile: 16.7 sec @ 85 mph100 mph: 26.8 secBraking, 70–0 mph: 194 ft 
EPA FUEL ECONOMYCity: 16 mpg 
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED More

Different parts of the world have different automotive tastes. So when Genesis launched in Europe, it commissioned what it clearly thought was an appropriate new model for this new territory—the G70 Shooting Brake, a station-wagon version of the G70 sedan.The longroof’s creation may have been ordered on the basis of outdated evidence, however. Europeans still appreciate wagons but, like the rest of the world, are increasingly turning to SUVs instead. Nevertheless, the Korean brand’s efforts have resulted in a handsome, useful addition to the lineup—one that bears a vague resemblance to the Lexus IS300 SportCross from the early 2000s. Sadly, Genesis has no plans to sell the Shooting Brake outside Europe. We drove one in the U.K. to discover what we’re missing.GenesisLike that long-ago Lexus SportCross, the G70 Shooting Brake is a lifestyle wagon rather than one designed to carry sizable loads, its design-led mission obvious in the rakish angle of its liftgate. The twin-turbo 3.3-liter V-6 that sits atop the G70 range in the U.S. hasn’t made it to Europe, leaving buyers exclusively with turbocharged four-cylinder engines. The 2.0-liter gasoline version is offered in 194- or 241-hp strength (each making 260 pound-feet of torque), while a 2.2-liter diesel makes 197 horsepower and a stout 324 pound-feet of torque. An eight-speed automatic transmission and rear-wheel drive are standard, with Europeans denied all-wheel drive. We drove the 241-hp version in plush Luxury Line trim.Related StoriesThe G70 Shooting Brake feels impressively well engineered, especially considering it’s aimed at a limited market (the brand sold just 650 non-SUVs in all of Europe last year). The power-operated liftgate features an integrated spoiler that stylishly splits the glass area and can be opened using a button integrated into the rear wiper housing. The cargo hold itself is compact, with the aperture narrowed by the rear lights and a load-space cover barely larger than the sort fitted to most hatchbacks. Even with this removed, no dog could ride back there without feeling claustrophobic. Genesis reports 16 cubic feet of luggage space with the 40/20/40-folding rear seatbacks in place, just five cubic feet more than in the sedan, and 54 cubic feet with the seatbacks folded. While the liftgate looks good and works well, the powered struts are inelegantly bolted to the rear pillars with no attempt to hide their mechanism. As with the G70 sedan, we’re not fans of the fake plastic mesh embossed into the sides of the rear bumper, and the extra-large oval exhaust finishers that come with the more powerful gasoline engine look a little silly with no tailpipes visible inside them. Forward of the rear doors, the Shooting Brake is, unsurprisingly, identical to the sedan. Beyond some areas of bright trim, the basic interior is dark and functional, but our sample car was augmented with the pricey option of beautiful quilted nappa-leather trim as well as the 3-D digital instrument cluster, which gives an impression of depth to the rendered dials. Front-seat space is generous with a good range of adjustment, but as in the sedan, full-size passengers in the rear seat lack legroom.The Shooting Brake’s turbo 2.0-liter engine gives plentiful performance. Refinement isn’t perfect—there is a gravelly tone at idle, and the engine turns vocal when worked hard. But the four-pot has both a potent midrange and a willingness to run to its 6300-rpm redline. Genesis says the Shooting Brake is nearly 100 pounds heavier than the sedan. Our wagon’s claimed 6.4-second 0-to-62-mph time is 6.4 seconds, 0.3 second slower than its sedan counterpart. Powertrain responses in the gentler dynamic modes are a little slow—the transmission pauses before delivering kick-down gearchanges—but the gearbox then can be too eager in the Sport and Sport+ settings, with the latter seeming determined to stay in the lowest possible gear. Manual gear selection is possible through weighty metal paddles, but although the changes are brisk, navigating the eight ratios is made harder because the digital readout insists on displaying the gear it thinks the Sport Brake should be in for maximum fuel economy rather than the one it actually is in. Genesis has created a bespoke chassis tune for the G70 Shooting Brake, and it’s firmer the sedan’s. That was evident on the sections of rough pavement we drove in the U.K. Despite standard adaptive dampers and smaller 18-inch wheels, the Luxury Line’s suspension often jarred over imperfections, even in the soft Comfort mode. On the flip side, we saw disciplined body control as chassis loads increased, accurate cornering, and impressive traction in slippery conditions.Our sample Shooting Brake lacked a limited-slip differential—that’s reserved for the Sport Line—and when pushed hard, the vehicle feels clearly rear-wheel driven. It’s hard to imagine many owners regularly choosing the frenetic Sport+ mode, which eases the stability control to allow tail-out antics. More relevant is the excellent cruising refinement, as the Shooting Brake’s cabin stays hushed at rapid freeway speeds. Fuel economy was less impressive, as we saw the equivalent of just 23 mpg, giving 360 miles of range from the 15.8-gallon tank.GenesisCompared with the station-wagon versions of the Audi A4, BMW 3-series, and Mercedes C-class that Europeans can also choose, the G70 Shooting Brake feels like a fresh alternative. It is well equipped and well priced against them, and it offers a greater level of exclusivity thanks to the novelty of the brand. During our time with the G70 wagon, one enthusiastic onlooker asked us if it was an Aston Martin. After reading the badge, another asked if Phil Collins had established his own auto company. Arrow pointing downArrow pointing downSpecificationsSpecifications
2023 Genesis G70 Shooting BrakeVehicle Type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door wagon
PRICE (EST)Base 2.0T, $43,100; diesel, $45,950; high-output 2.0T, $49,750
ENGINES
turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve 2.0-liter inline-4, 194 hp, 260 lb-ft; turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve 2.2-liter diesel inline-4, 197 hp, 324 lb-ft; turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve 2.0-liter inline-4, 241 hp, 260 lb-ft
TRANSMISSION
8-speed automatic
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 111.6 inLength: 184.4 inWidth: 72.8 inHeight: 55.1 inPassenger Volume, F: 55 ft3Cargo Volume, behind F/R: 54/16 ft3Curb Weight (C/D est): 3800–4000 lb
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
60 mph: 6.5–9.0 sec1/4-Mile: 15.3–16.6 secTop Speed: 135–146 mph
FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST)
Combined/City/Highway: 24–29/20–23/30–36 mpgCar and driverCar and driver Lettermark logoEuropean EditorMike Duff has been writing about the auto industry for two decades and calls the UK home, although he normally lives life on the road. He loves old cars and adventure in unlikely places, with career highlights including driving to Chernobyl in a Lada. More

BMW showrooms are bursting with big, expensive SUVs. It used to be that the X7—with six-cylinder and V-8 variants—was the undisputed king of the hill, but now there’s also the all-electric iX M60 and the M division’s own XM. With huge horsepower and torque numbers, the latter two threaten to overshadow the X7, particularly the six-cylinder base version. But while the X7 xDrive40i comes up short on bragging rights in this corner of the showroom, it still stands tall in the wider world.The X7’s inline-six is a good one, and for 2023, the twin-turbocharged 3.0-liter tacks on another 40 horsepower, bringing the total to 375. Torque is boosted by 52 lb-ft to 383. A 48-volt hybrid-assist system chips in as well, pushing net torque to 398 lb-ft, with the system’s battery replenished via brake-energy recuperation. The 3.0-liter six is newly mated to BMW’s Steptronic Sport automatic transmission. It has the same eight forward speeds as before but adds launch control and a Sprint function. The latter is accessed by pulling the left shift paddle, which makes the gearbox downshift to the lowest possible gear, activates the hybrid system’s electric boost, and switches the powertrain and chassis into their most aggressive drive modes.More big BMW SUVsIn typical driving, this engine is quiet and well mannered. But rev it past 4000 rpm or so, and it emits a sporty growl reminding you that, oh yeah, BMW was once known for sporty coupes and sedans. HIGHS: Plenty quick, turns and stops with surprising athleticism, ears-stuffed-with-cotton quiet.Actually, this X7’s acceleration also calls to mind BMW’s sporty coupes and sedans. The 4.6-second 60-mph time betters that of the 430i xDrive coupe (5.2 seconds) and the last 540i we tested (4.7 seconds). The SUV’s 13.4-second quarter-mile sprint at 102 mph puts it within spitting distance of that same 540i. Against rival SUVs, the X7 40i is quicker than the six-cylinder Mercedes GLS450 and the Audi Q7 with the turbo 3.0-liter V-6. Even so, the xDrive40i still trails a respectful distance behind its V-8 sibling the X7 M60i, which blazes to 60 mph in 3.8 seconds and rips through the quarter-mile in 12.3 seconds at 111 mph.Giving up that last measure of quickness pays dividends for the xDrive40i at the pump. The six-cylinder X7 ratcheted up its EPA numbers by a couple of notches this year, and its 21-mpg city and 25-mpg highway estimates beat the M60i’s numbers by 5 and 4 mpg, respectively. Over 770 miles of driving, we averaged 21 mpg, which compares fairly well to the 40i’s 22-mpg EPA combined rating.If the X7 displays athleticism when you give it the stick, then it does so even more when you bend it into a corner. Our 40i had the optional Dynamic Handling package, and while we weren’t enamored with its Integral Active Steering, the active anti-roll bars combine with the standard adaptive air springs to help keep this tall and heavy SUV composed through curves, much more so than one might expect given its size. Abetted by the optional four-wheel steering, the X7 xDrive 40i also exhibits excellent lateral stability around the skidpad, where it hangs on with 0.92 g of grip—that absolutely stomps the Range Rover Sport (0.81 g), not to mention the racier X7 M60i (0.85 g). Defying its 5545-pound curb weight, this SUV also stops from 70 mph in just 149 feet, outbraking both the M60i (155 feet) and the Audi RS Q8 (158 feet); it also stops shorter than the Lamborghini Urus Performante (152 feet). But maybe you want to sit back and just cruise. Out on the highway, we were impressed with the cruise control’s highly capable assisted-driving mode, which smoothly maintains lane position. More startlingly, it executes automated lane changes (at the driver’s direction) that are confident and brisk rather than tentative and drawn out, as in most other systems with that capability.Marc Urbano|Car and DriverRide quality is not great, though, particularly if one strays from Comfort mode. Despite the suspension’s road-preview capability, there’s significant impact harshness over bumps, and we noticed some side-to-side jitter on rough pavement surfaces. That’s perhaps to be expected given the massive 23-inch wheels our test car was wearing; they’re a new option this year, but the 21s or 22s would be a better choice. The X7 sure is quiet, though. We measured a library-esque 62 decibels at 70 mph, which makes even battery-electric SUVs such as the Rivian R1S (68 decibels) and BMW’s own iX M60 (65 decibels) seem raucous by comparison.Your seat for this aural bliss is a comfy perch with softer padding than the BMW norm. The X7 doesn’t go full glam like the iX, though our example did have the glitzy crystal switches (part of the $3950 Executive package). The X7’s ambient lighting is fancier than before, as there’s now an illuminated badge and surrounding chevron designs on the right side of the dash, which seems a bit much. A vegan leather-like upholstery, Sensafin, is standard on the 40i, but ours was slathered in the optional extended merino leather ($1950), including on the dashboard ($900). Marc Urbano|Car and DriverBMW’s curved dual-screen display is another new addition to the X7 this year. The central screen measures 14.9 inches, and although it functions as a touchscreen (a swiping motion moves through the function tiles), it also retains a large rotary controller, which makes moving among the screens a snap and is a particular boon for scrolling through satellite radio stations. In a less welcome development, the climate controls have migrated to the touchscreen, which isn’t the most convenient spot—one must open the climate-control menu to adjust the fan speed, for instance.Rear-seat space is generous in the second row and tolerable in the third. Our X7 had full power adjustment of the second-row seat, which meant that moving the seat forward to access the back bench was also a powered operation, one that’s much slower than a manual release. Marc Urbano|Car and DriverAs in the X5, the cargo hold is accessed via an upper liftgate and drop-down lower tailgate, both power operated. Buttons at the rear opening can raise or lower both rows of rear seats, and another on the tailgate can lower the car slightly to ease cargo loading. Unfortunately, there’s precious little space for luggage when all seats are in use—just 13 cubic feet.LOWS: Winces at the sight of potholes, inconvenient climate controls, not much luggage space with all seats in use.The xDrive40i’s starting price of $77,845 is some $25,000 less than the X7 M60i’s, although our test vehicle, larded with extras, rang in at $96,745. Clearly, there are no bargains in this corner of the BMW showroom. But the X7 xDrive40i wants for nothing—even next to the ritzier and more powerful luxury SUVs wearing the roundel badge. Arrow pointing downArrow pointing downSpecificationsSpecifications
2023 BMX X7 xDrive40iVehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 4-door wagon
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $78,845/$96,745Options: Executive package (soft-close doors, heated and cooled cupholders, glass controls, massaging front seats, gesture control, premium sound, panoramic sunroof, power rear-seat window shades), $3950; Dynamic Handling package (active steering, active anti-roll bars), $3300; 23-inch bi-color alloy wheels, $2600; Ivory White merino-leather upholstery, $1950; Driving Assistance Professional package (adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping and evasion assist, traffic-jam assist, automated lane changing, front-cross-traffic alert), $1700; Climate Comfort package (5-zone automatic climate control, ventilated front seats, heated front and outboard rear seats), $1600; Alcantara headliner, $1000; Parking Assistance package (surround-view camera system, parking assistant, drive recorder), $900; leather dashboard, $900
ENGINE
turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and iron head, direct fuel injectionDisplacement: 183 in3, 2998 cm3Power: 375 hp @ 6250 rpmTorque: 398 lb-ft @ 1850 rpm
TRANSMISSION
8-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilinkBrakes, F/R: 15.6-in vented disc/15.7-in vented discTires: Pirelli P Zero PZ4F: HL275/35R-23 108Y Extra Load ★R: HL315/30R-23 111Y Extra Load ★
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 122.2 inLength: 203.6 inWidth: 78.7 inHeight: 72.2 inPassenger Volume, F/M/R: 58/50/34 ft3Cargo Volume, behind F/M/R: 90/49/13 ft3Curb Weight: 5545 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.6 sec100 mph: 12.7 sec1/4-Mile: 13.4 sec @ 102 mph120 mph: 19.6 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 6.1 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.3 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 3.7 secTop Speed (gov ltd): 128 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 149 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 300 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.92 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 21 mpg
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 22/21/25 mpg
C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDDeputy Editor, Reviews and FeaturesJoe Lorio has been obsessed with cars since his Matchbox days, and he got his first subscription to Car and Driver at age 11. Joe started his career at Automobile Magazine under David E. Davis Jr., and his work has also appeared on websites including Amazon Autos, Autoblog, AutoTrader, Hagerty, Hemmings, KBB, and TrueCar. More

From the October 1984 issue of Car and Driver.Score one for those close-lipped Chrysler engineers and mechanics who keep better track of their beery conversations with us at the local watering hole than we thought. There we were, on 1985-model preview day at the Chrysler Proving Grounds, driv­ing a very real, production-ready turbo­charged Shelby Charger. We were about as unprepared for this blessed event as any self-respecting, well-informed, inquisitive automotive journalist could be.We’re not stupid. We know that Chrys­ler’s been running stuffed Shelbys around the test track and through the wind tunnel for over a year. We just didn’t know when, if ever, the real deal would come to pass. We could only imagine the outcome of a street fight between the lighter-by-200 pounds back-alley Shelby and the techno­logically “superior” Daytona. With equal turbo engines, the more expensive Dayto­na would obviously be lunch meat for the feisty Shelby. Would Chrysler really let that scenario play on Main Street, U.S.A.? Dick Kelley|Car and DriverApparently, some verrry persuasive product planners convinced the marketing types that the Daytona owners would be home getting a good night’s sleep when the Shelby bad boys headed out to play. The planned midnight-snack menu would, instead, include the likes of the Pontiac Sunbird Turbo, the Toyota Celica GT, the Renault Fuego Turbo, the Datsun 200SX Turbo, and Mitsubishi’s Cordia Turbo. So Chrysler decided that the world was big enough for both a Daytona Turbo and a Shelby Turbo. The 2.2-liter turbocharged four-cylinder is better than ever this year, with an elec­tronic waste-gate control capable of allow­ing 9 psi of boost for ten seconds, after which it settles back to 7 psi. The added pressure ups the turbo’s horsepower rating from 142 to 146 in full-boost mode. How well does the Shelby deliver all that power to the ground, you ask? After a couple of lightning laps around the proving grounds in a pre-production prototype, we’d say that the company’s 7.6-second 0-to-60-mph claim is entirely plausible. Compare that with the normally aspirated Shelby’s nine-second time, which we ran up the flag­pole and saluted in April 1983. Related StoriesDick Kelley|Car and DriverSlipping the compact 2.2 turbo into the Shelby’s smaller engine bay was accom­plished with relative ease. The front-box section of the Shelby’s frame and the en­gine mounts were strengthened to withstand the increased torque loads, and the hood was bulged to accommodate the air cleaner. In addition, several Daytona Tur­bo pieces were modified for combat duty in the Shelby: a larger-capacity radiator, larg­er rear brakes, upgraded internal transmis­sion parts, a more efficient firewall heat shield, and shortened versions of the chas­sis and engine wiring harnesses. The most important components car­ried over from the Daytona to the Shelby were equal-length driveshafts, an excellent answer to the torque-steer problem. No nasty undertow threatens to sweep the Shelby’s front wheel out from under con­trol when the gas pedal is goosed; Carroll’s car is as straight and true as its more so­phisticated mentor. Dick Kelley|Car and DriverThe Charger Turbo is the only Shelby for 1985, and its new image inspired the development engineers to tighten up the rest of the little street rocket’s act. Changes to the internal valving of the power-steer­ing unit improve its already exemplary feel. The spring rates are recalibrated, and gas­-pressurized shocks appear at all four cor­ners; the combination is a tremendous im­provement over last year’s harsh ride quality (assuming the prototype here is true to production). Unidirectional Good­year Eagle VR50 205/50VR-15 tires re­place 195/50s. Even the seats have re­ceived attention, in the form of more sup­portive backs and side bolsters and additional lumbar padding. About mid­year, the Shelby will also get the new Lanc­er’s dual-rail five-speed manual shifter to replace the current, slightly balky shifter. As a package, the Shelby Charger has hoed a long row from its 1982 fall debut as a crude but effective boy racer. Yet its marvel­ous sense of purpose—pure, unadulterated performance for under $10,000—is stron­ger than ever. Says the Shelby Turbo’s main champion, Ken Mack, chief product plan­ner in charge of subcompact and specialty cars, “It’s an extension of the original Shel­by philosophy: If you want to go fast and you don’t want to spend a lot of money, the Shelby Charger is for you. Simply stated, it offers more bang for your buck.”1985 Dodge Shelby Charger TurboVehicle type: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 3-door sedan Estimated base price: $9200 Engine type: turbocharged inline-four, iron block and aluminum head, Chrysler electronic fuel injectionDisplacement: 135 cu in, 2213 ccPower: 146 hp @ 5200 rpmTransmission: 5-speed manualWheelbase: 96.5 inLength: 174.8 inEPA Fuel Economy, city: 19 mpg More

It has now been several years since the Blazer returned to Chevrolet’s lineup, and we’re still scratching our heads, wondering exactly who this two-row mid-size SUV is for. It’s priced like a premium crossover but isn’t as luxurious as you’d expect for $50,000. It’s styled to look like the Camaro but doesn’t have the performance to back up that appearance. And it’s definitely not the body-on-frame off-roader that many hoped for when Chevy announced the Blazer was coming back.But the Blazer must be doing something right, because it’s been quietly racking up plenty of sales over the last few years, and an electric variant, the Blazer EV, is set to arrive soon. After testing the refreshed 2023 Blazer in loaded RS trim, we’re reminded that it does many things well even if its purpose is less than clear.The changes for 2023 are largely cosmetic and include revised headlights and taillights, new wheel designs, and a larger infotainment screen. While we think the exterior design is trying a bit too hard, the Blazer certainly looks aggressive and sporty—especially when finished in the two-tone color scheme of our RS test car, which had Radiant Red Tintcoat paint ($495) combined with a black roof ($550). The optional 21-inch wheels ($1000) also contribute to its athletic stance—for a mid-size crossover, at least.HIGHS: Handles well, throaty V-6 engine, aggressive looks.More on the BlazerThe interior looks lifted straight from a Camaro, with a similar gauge cluster binnacle, air-vent design, and row of HVAC buttons stretching across the dash. Some of these touches don’t work as well in a higher-riding SUV, though—the low-mounted vents blow air on your knees, for instance—and the mix of materials leaves something to be desired compared with similarly priced SUVs such as the Kia Telluride.Underneath, the Blazer doesn’t have anything to do with the Camaro anyway. As cool as a sporty crossover based on General Motors’ excellent longitudinal-engine Alpha platform would be, that remains a pipe dream for now. Instead, the Blazer’s transverse-engine platform is shared with the Cadillac XT5 and GMC Acadia, not exactly pedigreed siblings in terms of driving pleasure. Chevy, however, makes the most of these underpinnings with careful tuning, as the brake pedal is firm, the body control is good, and the steering is reasonably accurate. The Blazer drives well for what it is, and its performance figures from the track—0.90 g on the skidpad and a 70-mph stopping distance of 165 feet—are strong for this segment. But it’s not built to satisfy drivers the way the best performance-oriented SUVs can.Michael Simari|Car and DriverThe Blazer’s top powertrain, a 308-hp version of GM’s familiar 3.6-liter V-6 engine, is effective too but looks dated next to the turbocharged competition. This 2023 Blazer, while a few ticks slower than the mechanically similar 2019 RS model we tested, gets to 60 mph in a quick-enough 6.6 seconds. But its 24-mpg result on our 75-mph highway fuel-economy test doesn’t look so good compared with the Hyundai Santa Fe. That similarly sized crossover, which has a 277-hp turbocharged 2.5-liter inline-four, achieved 27 mpg in the same test while also getting to 60 mph more than a half-second quicker. This Blazer’s naturally aspirated engine and nine-speed automatic transmission do deliver quick responses, however, as demonstrated by the 5-to-60-mph time of 6.6 seconds—usually, a rolling start exacts a time penalty, but not here.The Blazer offers a turbo four too, but it’s a somewhat weak 2.0-liter unit with 228 horsepower. It does provide a fuel-economy benefit, so that may be a worthy trade-off for some buyers; the related Cadillac XT5, with its 237-hp turbocharged 2.0-liter four, for example, achieved 29 mpg in our highway fuel-economy test but is considerably more sluggish to 60 mph, at 7.6 seconds.Michael Simari|Car and DriverThe Blazer RS we tested comes only with the six, and the engine’s character fits the sporty image of this trim level well. It has a surprisingly aggressive exhaust note, and the engine sounds good when pushed. The RS is also now the only model that, if equipped with all-wheel drive, comes with a more advanced twin-clutch setup on the rear axle that’s able to provide torque vectoring.LOWS: Downmarket interior, costs too much, subpar fuel economy.Our biggest reservation about this model, with an as-tested price of $51,660, is the cost. Slightly smaller but far more posh compact luxury SUVs, such as the Genesis GV70 and Volvo XC60, can be had for comparable money, and they put the Blazer’s interior to shame. And similarly sized two-row crossovers such as the Hyundai Santa Fe and Honda Passport can be had for thousands less with equivalent levels of equipment. For somewhere closer to $40,000, the Blazer might make more sense, but at this price, we’re just left thinking of all the other attractive alternatives.Arrow pointing downArrow pointing downSpecificationsSpecifications
2023 Chevrolet Blazer RS AWDVehicle Type: front-engine, front/all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door wagon
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $47,095/$51,660Options: Driver Confidence II package (adaptive cruise control, automated emergency braking, Safety Alert seat, rearview camera with surround-view monitor), $1375; 21-inch wheels, $1000; Enhanced Convenience package (power tilt and telescoping steering column, ventilated front seats, heated outboard rear seats, memory settings), $950; black two-tone roof, $550; Radiant Red Tintcoat paint, $495; Storage Optimization package (front console organizer, collapsible cargo-area organizer), $195
ENGINE
DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injectionDisplacement: 223 in3, 3649 cm3Power: 308 hp @ 6700 rpmTorque: 270 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
TRANSMISSION
9-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: struts/multilinkBrakes, F/R: 12.6-in vented disc/12.4-in vented discTires: Continental CrossContact LX Sport265/45R-21 104V M+S TPC Spec 3115MS
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 112.7 inLength: 191.8 inWidth: 76.7 inHeight: 67.0 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 56/52 ft3Cargo Volume, behind F/R: 64/31 ft3Curb Weight: 4310 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 6.6 sec1/4-Mile: 15.1 sec @ 92 mph100 mph: 18.4 sec120 mph: 34.0 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 6.6 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.0 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.6 secTop Speed (C/D est): 130 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 165 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.90 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 18 mpg75-mph Highway Driving: 24 mpg75-mph Highway Range: 520 mi
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 21/19/26 mpg
C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDSenior EditorDespite being raised on a steady diet of base-model Hondas and Toyotas—or perhaps because of it—Joey Capparella nonetheless cultivated an obsession for the automotive industry throughout his childhood in Nashville, Tennessee. He found a way to write about cars for the school newspaper during his college years at Rice University, which eventually led him to move to Ann Arbor, Michigan, for his first professional auto-writing gig at Automobile Magazine. He has been part of the Car and Driver team since 2016 and now lives in New York City.   More

From the May 1984 issue of Car and Driver.White. That was its official color: just white. Not Arctic Afternoon White or Win­ter Wonderland Memories White or Albi­on Regal Mist White. Just plain white.The spectrum of the automotive world pertaining to off-road vehicles shines in nu­merous bright, sometimes garish colors, but the Isuzu Trooper II beams out the simple white of well-rounded, do-it-all, natural, clean, healthy vitamin-D sunlight. This is what they call a “ute” in Africa: a utility vehicle. The Land Rover may be considered the prototype. Small ones are a growing phenomenon in America now, with GM, Ford, and Jeep making them and Mitsubishi and, shortly, Toyota importing them. It’s almost a movement, these little do-it-all utes. The big ones have been around for decades—especially Toyota’s Land Cruiser—but there’s suddenly a new wave of them, leaner and neater. More from IsuzuIt’s a fresh automotive breeze. You don’t buy one of these to make the scene in the valet line. They cannot provide the kind of performance that lures you out of bed and onto the Crest Highway before dawn on Sunday. Not one of them, in de­cades to come, is going to be restored for Pebble Beach. But if one of them strays your way, you’ll soon adopt it like a member of the family. And I reckon it will stay adopted; you and your compact utility unit are quite likely to grow gray together. Isuzu has a nice, friendly little utensil go­ing for it here. The firm’s publicists have dubbed this one Isuzu’s “first convertible,” convertible in the sense that it will perform a lot of different tasks, from recreational off-road four-wheeling to playing the sta­tion-wagon role around town to, as they say, touring. Not grand touring, mind you, just touring. Isuzu has chosen a specific marketing position on the utility-vehicle spectrum, and quite a conservative one at that. This is no monster. You have no hope of gnawing down Annapurna with your knobbies. You’re not going to yank stumps or herd caribou with this one. Your neighbor’s kid isn’t going to add six shocks and jack it up seven feet. You won’t see a funny-buggy version winning Baja. But you will jump into the Isuzu Trooper for the supermarket trek when snow has the power lines down. You will throw boots and bags and maybe a pack of Scouts into the thing, and if they’re all muddy, you’ll just chuckle. You’ll be happy to invite the dog into the back to go to the vet (he’d be one of those amiable, hair-in-the-eyes, shaggy, family-type dogs; the Trooper is that sort of vehicle). Lots and lots of fresh­-caught fish and retrieved ducks could ride home with you, causing no distress to the next person to drive it. And you’ll be abso­lutely content to take it to work every day, puffing away on your pipe like a geology professor. The Trooper II is essentially the familiar P’UP (a.k.a. Chevy LUV) pickup. You don’t realize this at first, as the body design is completely different, but almost every­thing under the squarish steel skin—­chassis, suspension, engine, driveline—is either identical or very similar to the short­-wheelbase Isuzu P’UP four-by-four. In­deed, it is being imported as a truck, not a car. That’s why the three-person rear bench seat is a $300 option. Isuzu has cho­sen to pay the 25-percent truck duty in­stead of lumping the approximately 15,000 Troopers they hope to sell this year into their (meager) share of Japan’s “voluntary” import quotas.This is not as new a vehicle as it may ap­pear to U.S. eyes. It’s been on sale since 1981 under various names in various places—Jackaroo in Australia and Chevy Trooper in Guatemala—though with a 1.8-liter engine instead of our emissions-con­trolled 2.0-liter. Why is it “II”? Well, as explained by Paul Geiger, product-development manager at American Isuzu Motors, the “two” desig­nates the truck version. “One” is the auto­mobile version, meaning it has a rear seat as standard as well as certain other fea­tures. America should be getting that as soon as the quotas are de-volunteered. Geiger also points out that our tester is only the first of a regular line his depart­ment is planning. By mid-summer we should be seeing a much more elaborately equipped model. It will have as standard equipment the power steering and air con­ditioning that are extra-cost items on the base version, plus a “decor package” that includes a tach and other gauges, a higher-­performance radio/cassette unit, a center console, and a rear wiper/defogger system. Further down the road, we may see a four-door body style, a five-speed trans­mission (Isuzu currently offers a five-speed only in its 2WD trucks), and a larger engine. Even without all the upcoming goodies, the base Trooper II is a very appealing ute. It may be a little short of power, but that’s about the only significant drawback it shows when you put it through all the paces Isuzu has planned for it in this country. Like the pickup, the Trooper II comes with a choice of gasoline and diesel engines. The gas burner, which we tested, is an Isuzu mainstay, the same 1950cc SOHC unit sold in the P’UP and the Impulse, though in the latter’s fuel-injected installa­tion it pumps out eight more horses.Power is the one mechanical point that may give potential purchasers pause. The gas Trooper’s 82 horsepower at 4600 rpm and 101 pound-feet of torque at 3000 rpm frankly place it toward the lower end of its class’s performance curve, as most of its competi­tors offer another 25 percent or so, at least as an option. The pushrod oil-burner is somewhat more competitive in its field, with its 2238cc, 62 horsepower, and 96 pound-feet of torque. Unhappily, you don’t get 25 percent bet­ter gas mileage to fill in the performance gap when you choose Isuzu. EPA numbers are a rather unimpressive 21 mpg city, 27 mpg highway. C/D observed mileage through several tankfuls (it has a smallish 13.2-gallon capacity, by the way) ranged from 17 to 22 mpg, with a 21-mpg average. That’s merely in the ballpark with other similar four-by-fours.While the engine reminds us of that old laxative slogan “It works without embar­rassing urgency,” the relative anemia is not a serious handicap. The rather tall, boxy vehicle will run down the freeway at about 60 mph in an adequately relaxed manner. It’s quiet enough, too, and only occasional­ly do you wish somebody had installed fifth gear at the bottom of that tall stick since the last time you absent-mindedly tried for it. Aaron Kiley|Car and DriverAt around-town speeds, there is ample acceleration. You’re not going to shut down any Rabbit GTIs, but you can often vanquish people who don’t realize they’re racing. If you’re brutal about your clutch work, you can even chirp a rear tire in first gear. (There is no limited-slip differential.) Off paved roads and even off roads of any kind, the Trooper will cruise along in fine style, even at 7000-foot altitudes. There isn’t enough excess torque to do much in the way of booting the tail out, but we found we were able to churn up any gradient that took our fancy. Power, in other words, was no delimiter of where we wanted to go. The only kind of driving that really starts you thumbing through the turbo-kit cata­logs is a long mountain ascent. This is an exercise that brings back the old VW Microbus days. Remember rowing between third and fourth to try to squeeze just l mph more out of the old girl? It seems to us that the basic Trooper II package would be almost as versatile and useful as the old bus, too. Isuzu has crammed a cavernous volume into a box that’s just slightly larger (in length and width) than that of the Chevrolet S-10 Blaz­er. The rear seat folds and folds again to the point of nearly vanishing, leaving you with a high ceiling and a low, entirely flat load floor. The spare tire lives out­doors. As for access, if the one rear door isn’t wide enough, there’s always the sec­ond, smaller one. The official payload rating is 1222 pounds, and Isuzu claims 70 cubic feet for the cargo volume. In real terms, this turns out to be enough for all of Aaron Kiley’s photo gear plus Larry Griffin’s weekend luggage. Stupendous! Driving the Trooper is a mild pleasure at all times. Like so many Japanese products, this one is laid out in a way that puts one at home immediately. What little instrumen­tation there is is right there ahead, though we must complain about one indicator that’s a little too visible. The blue high­-beam light glares out like a laser during night driving. Bring on the masking tape. Outward visibility is exceptional in all quadrants, which accounts in part for why jaunts around town are so effortless. The other part of that equation is the ease and honesty of all the controls. In finalizing the Chevy S-10 Blazer, it seems as though the engineers deliberately tried to create the ergonomic illusion of a larger, heavier, more powerful vehicle. The Isuzu, by con­trast, is light, almost delicate to operate in every respect. The Trooper’s real claim to fame, how­ever, is not only its functional interior but also its impressive ride. For a four-wheel-­drive vehicle, this is about as plush as it gets, yet there was no hint of the springs being too weak or the shock absorbers too limp. There was no flopping around in the hard­est cornering we attempted. Nor does the Trooper seem to hobbyhorse longitudinal­ly or wobble laterally while running straight on some surfaces, as the S-10 Blaz­er sometimes does. Altogether pleasant. Handling is entirely benign. At the limit, understeer calls a halt to higher cornering speeds on either pavement or dirt. On the latter, engaging the front driveline merely reduces the magnitude of the push without seeming to result in any more speed around the corner. The tires, beefy B.F. Goodrich All-Terrain rubber, worked beautifully on both dirt and pavement, dis­playing no nasty quirks and being next to silent at all times. The primary limitation on cornering, in fact, is the driver’s seat. If you’re spinning doughnuts to the left, all of a sudden you’re going to fall off, laughing like a hyena into the ravine between the seats. . . There’s a lot of value here. At an estimat­ed base price well below $9000, the Troop­er II is bound to become a member of a lot of American families. Arrow pointing downArrow pointing downSpecificationsSpecifications
1984 Isuzu Trooper IIVehicle Type: front-engine, rear/4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 3-door wagon
PRICEAs Tested: $13,199/$9850Options: air conditioning, AM/FM-stereo radio/cassette, power steering, rear seat.
ENGINESOHC inline-4, iron block and aluminum headDisplacement: 119 in3, 1950 cm3Power: 82 hp @ 4600 rpmTorque: 101 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm
TRANSMISSION4-speed manual
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: control arms/rigid axleBrakes, F/R: 9.8-in vented disc/10.0-in drumTires: B.F. Goodrich All-TerrainP225/75R-15
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 104.3 inLength: 174.2 inWidth: 65.0 inHeight: 70.1 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 50/44 ft3Cargo Volume: 45 ft3Curb Weight: 3220 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS30 mph: 4.4 sec60 mph: 17.4 sec1/4-Mile: 20.5 sec @ 64 mphTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 12.1 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 18.6 secTop Speed: 85 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 210 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.64 g 
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 21 mpg
EPA FUEL ECONOMYCombined/City/Highway: 23/21/27 mpg 
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED More

After laboring away under the hood of countless Camrys, Siennas, Highlanders, and many other models, Toyota’s 3.5-liter V-6 is slowly being ushered off stage. In a move common throughout the industry, a turbocharged four is supplanting the naturally aspirated V-6. With the 2023 model year, the Highlander joins the four-cylinder club, but it’s a change that Toyota is making as invisible as possible.With a drop in cylinder count comes a drop in horsepower, now 265 ponies versus 295 before. But the turbocharger delivers a compensating boost in torque, which rises to 310 pound-feet from 263. Still, with 4529 pounds to move, the turbo four strains at times, holding lower gears when a burlier V-6 might confidently upshift. That impression of a hard-working turbo four is born out in our testing of an all-wheel-drive Platinum. The smaller engine’s 7.2-second 60-mph time lags 0.5 behind the number for the all-wheel-drive V-6, and the same was true with a rolling start in our 5-to-60-mph test. Michael Simari|Car and DriverIn the Highlander, the step-up powertrain offering (at a cost of $1400 in most trim levels) is a four-cylinder hybrid. With a total of 243 horsepower, the gas-electric combo nearly matched the acceleration performance of the turbo four in the run to 60 mph. The Highlander hybrid (again with all-wheel drive) was just a tick behind the 2.4T to 60 mph at 7.3 seconds, but it fell further behind in the 50-to-70-mph passing test, taking 5.2 seconds to the turbo four’s 4.7.Make It GrandSo, the 2.4 turbo can’t quite match the V-6 in acceleration but stays (just barely) ahead of the hybrid. The new engine’s drivability, though, is above reproach. The turbo’s boost is smoothly integrated, and response is quite linear for a boosted four. At low speeds on rolling terrain when you’re just grazing the throttle, some turbocharged engines can surge unevenly, but not this one. It helps that Toyota pairs the boosted engine with a well-behaved eight-speed automatic rather than a CVT as in the Subaru Ascent. Additionally, Toyota claims the new engine is good for the same 5000-pound towing capacity as the V-6.HIGHS: Modern infotainment, composed ride, solid braking performance.We just wish the engine sounded happier in its work. Once the engine reaches 3000 rpm or so, the four-banger’s machinations are less than melodious. It quiets right down when cruising, though, and we recorded 68 decibels at a steady 70 mph, marginally better than the V-6.The benefit you’d expect from engine downsizing is improved fuel economy, and the 2023 Highlander’s gas mileage does improve, just not by a lot. With all-wheel drive, the Highlander 2.4T’s EPA estimates are 24 mpg combined, 21 city, and 28 highway, which amounts to just 1 mpg better than the previous V-6 across the board. (The front-wheel-drive version ekes out another 1 mpg in all three measures.) The Highlander hybrid is the real gas-mileage champ, with EPA combined estimates of 35 mpg for all-wheel drive and 36 mpg for front-wheel drive, numbers that lead the field.Aside from the engine swap, the Highlander’s driving experience is largely unchanged. The ride is composed, and the body structure feels solid even when you thwack into a pothole that reveals itself at the last minute. The steering, though, doesn’t feel connected to anything beyond the firewall (and switching to Sport mode doesn’t help, as that only affects the powertrain). We understand this isn’t the type of machine that’s likely to be chosen for Sunday-morning canyon carving, but a better-tuned helm would be welcome even in more mundane commuting, such as when you’re riding close to the concrete barriers in construction-narrowed lanes. Handling is neither particularly sporty nor clumsy—about what you’d expect from a family-size SUV—and skidpad grip at 0.84 g is in line with competitors. Hit the brakes, and the Highlander hauls itself down from 70 mph in 170 feet, a solid performance (although not quite as good as what we recorded with the 2023 Hyundai Palisade).Michael Simari|Car and DriverInside the well-finished cabin, the 2023 model year brings a few tech updates. The Limited and Platinum get a digital instrument cluster, and Toyota’s latest infotainment system makes its debut here. Standard on the Limited and Platinum and optional on the XSE and XLE, the broad, 12.3-inch touchscreen is perched high on the center dash and boasts a lag-free processor and sharp graphics. The volume knob is a far reach, and we miss having a tuning knob, but that’s a fast-disappearing amenity these days. The driver instead interacts with the audio system via the steering-wheel buttons. With so much screen real estate, we’d also like to have the ability to show multiple functions at once, but that’s only possible when using Android Auto or Apple CarPlay, both of which are wireless.Below the screen, the physical climate controls have a good separation of function, making the system easy to use. And below that is a shelf for your phone, which now offers wireless charging (previously the wireless charger was awkwardly located in the console storage box). As before, there’s another handy shelf on the passenger’s side of the dash.Michael Simari|Car and DriverAs in all mid-size SUVs, the Highlander’s second-row captain’s chairs are plenty roomy for adults, and buyers alternately can also choose a middle-row bench seat in four of the six trim levels. The picture is less rosy in the rearmost seat, where the low cushion forces a knees-up seating position, while legroom ranges from tolerable to almost nonexistent, depending on the position of the middle-row seats. And don’t expect to carry much luggage with the third row in use. If you regularly use the third row, there are roomier choices in this segment—the Chevrolet Traverse and the Volkswagen Atlas, to name just two. Toyota clearly is cognizant of this shortcoming, as it’s introducing the longer and roomier Grand Highlander for those who regularly carry a crowd.LOWS: Minuscule fuel-economy gains, a bit less spring in its step, cramped third row. This year’s engine swap hasn’t altered our opinion of the Highlander by a whole lot. The V-6 was a stronger performer, but the turbo four is adequate. The 2.4T gets better mileage, but not much better. We continue to think that the Highlander hybrid, with its stellar gas mileage, is the way to go. And of the Highlander’s plethora of trim levels, all but two of them give you that choice.Arrow pointing downArrow pointing downSpecificationsSpecifications
2023 Toyota Highlander Platinum AWDVehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 4-door wagon
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $52,560/$54,372Options: Running boards, $599; dashcam, $375; carpeted floor and cargo mats, $358; roof-rack cross bars, $350; door edge guards, $130
ENGINE
Turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, port and direct fuel injectionDisplacement: 146 in3, 2393 cm3Power: 265 hp @ 6000 rpmTorque: 310 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm
TRANSMISSION
8-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: struts/multilinkBrakes, F/R: 13.3-in vented disc/13.3-in discTires: Goodyear Eagle Touring235/55R-20 102V M+S
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 112.2 inLength: 194.9 inWidth: 76.0 inHeight: 68.1 inPassenger Volume, F/M/R: 55/49/31 ft3Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 84/48/16 ft3Curb Weight: 4529 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 7.2 sec1/4-Mile: 15.5 sec @ 92 mph100 mph: 18.5 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 7.7 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.5 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.7 secTop Speed (gov ltd): 113 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 170 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.84 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 21 mpg
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 24/21/28 mpg
C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDDeputy Editor, Reviews and FeaturesJoe Lorio has been obsessed with cars since his Matchbox days, and he got his first subscription to Car and Driver at age 11. Joe started his career at Automobile Magazine under David E. Davis Jr., and his work has also appeared on websites including Amazon Autos, Autoblog, AutoTrader, Hagerty, Hemmings, KBB, and TrueCar. More