More stories

  • in

    Our 2023 Honda Accord Touring Hybrid Embraces Change

    IntroductionHow bullish is Honda on hybridization? Not only has a hybrid powertrain replaced the last-generation Accord’s wonderful turbo 2.0-liter at the top of the 2023 Honda Accord hierarchy, but it also powers four of the six available trim levels. When it was time to choose one for a yearlong, 40,000-mile test, we had little choice but to embrace it.Say hello to our 2023 Honda Accord Touring Hybrid. This top-of-the-lineup trim costs $38,985 and offers no options beyond exterior color and a few dealer-installed accessories. Our car’s Canyon River Blue paint is one of the no-cost colors.The Touring is the only Accord in the lineup that comes standard with all of these goodies: front and rear parking sensors, a head-up display, wireless charging, rain-sensing wipers, and Low-Speed Braking Control, which alerts the driver and assists in reducing the effects of low-speed collisions via sensors on the front and rear bumpers. We’ll appreciate the heated front and rear outboard seats come February, and ditto for the ventilated front seats during summer. But alas, there’s no heated steering wheel. Like ketchup-flavored Lays, that’s only for the Canadian market. Memo to Honda: We’ll trade the heated rear seats for a heated steering wheel quicker than our northern friends can say, “Sorry.” Getting to Know You The introductory phase required avoiding sudden or full-throttle acceleration for 600 miles and limiting hard braking for the first 200 miles. Dialing back on driving dynamics gave us time, let’s say, to appreciate the interior’s refreshingly simple layout. It feels strange to compliment Honda on ordinary stuff like buttons for the climate controls, a dial for the volume, and a traditional shift lever, but we have a mass of touch-sensitive switches across the industry to thank for moving the goal post. While digging through the menus to dial in keyless-entry behavior, gauge-cluster mode, and audio settings, we found an option to disable permissions from built-in third-party applications. We appreciate this ability as digital privacy becomes harder to obtain, even if taking advantage of it disables onboard Google features. Android Auto and Apple CarPlay remain accessible, and your privacy with them.So far, the driving experience mirrors the simplicity of the interior layout. Yes, the hybrid powertrain alternates between its 146-hp engine, a 181-hp electric motor, or a combination of the two (rated at a combined peak of 204 horsepower) to power the front wheels. It also recuperates energy from braking into a 1.1-kWh battery that allows all-electric driving until around 20 mph. And there really isn’t a transmission in the traditional sense, as the Accord hybrid is directly driven by its electric motor more often than not. But the only way you can tell if any of this is happening is by switching to a display that shows it. You can also just ignore it. The brake pedal reveals nothing about regenerative braking, and the engine revs to generate electricity under acceleration so it feels, believably, like there’s an automatic transmission somewhere in there smoothly changing nonexistent gears. At freeway speeds, you can’t even hear the engine switch off and on. At that point, our Accord Touring is simply a large, comfortable sedan with an EPA highway rating of 41 mpg and a theoretical highway road-trip range of 520 miles on account of its smaller 12.8-gallon fuel tank. In true hybrid fashion, the Accord is thirstiest on the open road, but its EPA city mileage is 46 mpg. The all-important combined rating we’ll compare to our observed fuel economy over the course of 40,000 miles is a stellar 44 mpg.The only real tells that more is going on than meets the eye are the exterior pedestrian alert sound that kicks on in EV mode at low speeds and the shift paddles that adjust the level of regenerative braking through a probably-too-high number of settings (six!). You have to hold the paddle for a few seconds for the setting to stick, and you have to do so every time you start the car or shift out of drive. Still, we appreciate being able to dial up the regen to just before the brake lights activate, doing our small part to alleviate traffic. Test Results and What’s Next After break-in, we took this 3525-pound Accord to the test track for its arrival physical. There, it reached 60 mph in 6.5 seconds and the quarter-mile in 15.2 seconds at 91 mph. Both measures lag over a second behind the last turbo 2.0-liter Accord we tested, but it’s not all bad: Consider that these acceleration results essentially match those of an Acura Integra Type R we tested in 1997. What’s more, our new Accord’s 0.90-g skidpad orbit bests the old Type R’s 0.88-g effort.It’s safe to say that our Accord Touring is settling in nicely for its year-long test. That shouldn’t be too surprising after we put it on our 10Best list—the 37th time we’ve done so, by the way. But winning 10Best as many times as the Accord has doesn’t guarantee anything. In fact, it demands more scrutiny. How seamless will it remain after 40,000 miles? How much jealousy will we have for Canadian-market Accords and their heated steering wheels? Time will tell. Months in Fleet: 1 month Current Mileage: 2649 milesAverage Fuel Economy: 38 mpg Fuel Tank Size: 12.8 gal Observed Fuel Range: 480 milesService: $0 Normal Wear: $0 Repair: $0 Damage and Destruction: $0SpecificationsSpecifications
    2023 Honda Accord Touring HybridVehicle Type: front-engine, front-motor, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
    PRICE
    Base/As Tested: $38,985/$38,985Options: None
    POWERTRAIN
    DOHC 16-valve 2.0-liter Atkinson-cycle inline-4, 146 hp, 134 lb-ft + AC motor, 181 hp, 247 lb-ft (combined output: 204 hp, 247 lb-ft; 1.1-kWh lithium-ion battery pack)Transmission: direct-drive
    CHASSIS
    Suspension, F/R: struts/multilinkBrakes, F/R: 12.3-in vented disc/11.1-in discTires: Michelin Primacy MXM4235/40R-19 96V Extra Load M+S DT1
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 111.4 inLength: 195.7 inWidth: 73.3 inHeight: 57.1 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 53/50 ft3Trunk Volume: 17 ft3Curb Weight: 3525 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS: NEW
    60 mph: 6.5 sec1/4-Mile: 15.2 sec @ 91 mph100 mph: 19.2 sec120 mph: 41.1 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 7.4 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.4 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.9 secTop Speed (gov ltd): 125 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 173 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.90 g
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY
    Observed: 38 mpg75-mph Highway Driving: 39 mpg75-mph Highway Range: 490 miUnscheduled Oil Additions: 0 qt
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY
    Combined/City/Highway: 44/46/41 mpg
    WARRANTY
    3 years/36,000 miles bumper to bumper5 years/60,000 miles powertrain8 years/100,000 miles hybrid/electric components5 years/unlimited miles corrosion protection3 years/36,000 miles roadside assistance2 years/24,000 miles scheduled maintenance
    C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDDeputy Editor, VideoFrom selling them to testing them, Carlos Lago has spent his entire adult life consumed by cars. He currently drives the creative behind Car and Driver video. More

  • in

    1998 Isuzu Trooper Lives Large

    From the April 1998 issue of Car and Driver.What’s most interesting about the new Trooper is not what’s changed, but what remains the same—namely, the suspension’s geometry and dimensions. After Consumer Reports described a near tip-over during a violent short-course lane-change maneuver in July 1996, we would not have been surprised to see the company increase the next Trooper’s track width or toss in some increased roll stiffness. HIGHS: Ride quality, build quality, powerful new engine, cavernous interior.In our lane-change tests of the Trooper and its twin, the Acura SLX, we have never noticed any rollover tendencies. Sure enough, Isuzu went on to prove that the Trooper was not defective. Last July, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced that tests it had conducted failed to reproduce the results claimed by Consumer Reports. The investigation was closed, and CR’s petition for a recall of the Trooper was denied. So the Trooper was vindicated, but sales have nonetheless suffered in the wake of the Consumer Reports hatchet job.To reinvigorate sales, Isuzu wisely chose to make useful product changes that address criticisms raised by Car and Driver, not Consumer Reports. The Trooper and the Acura SLX both finished fifth in comparison tests conducted in March 1994 and April 1996. In both tests, we dissed the Trooper/SLX’s primitive shift-from-a-stop part-time four-wheel-drive system, its lethargic acceleration, and to a lesser extent, its dull cubist styling. We also praised it loudly for its huge interior, its rigid chassis, its com­fortable and well-isolated ride, and its vaultlike build quality—virtues that did not fade in a 35,000-mile test. An automatic four-wheel-drive system has been installed in this new Trooper. It engages at the push of a button. The optional Borg-Warner Torque-on-Demand (TOD) system is computer-controlled. When the “4WD AUTO” button is pressed (below 60 mph, please), the front hubs are automatically locked and a light marked “Auto” appears on the dash. Wheel speeds, vehicle speed, accelerator inputs, and other factors are monitored by the system’s brain. When all-wheel traction is required, a multi-plate clutch like that in an automatic transmission apportions up to 50 percent of the available torque to the front axle. A series of LED lamps on a dash schematic illuminate to indicate the amount of torque being sent to the front axle. There is no center differential, but the clutch pack in the transfer case never engages fully when the vehicle is turning on dry pavement, so the axles don’t bind. When the road is smooth and dry, turning off TOD saves fuel by disengaging the front axle. For serious off-roading, a floor-mounted lever can be shifted (from a stop) to engage a planetary gearset for low range and also to fix the torque split at 50/50. TOD comes bundled with a lim­ited-slip rear differential, power folding mirrors, and a host of convenience features—all for $2180. LOWS: Lots of body roll, crummy radio, boxy styling.On slippery, snow-covered roads, imprudent stabs of the accelerator provoke the rear wheels to spin slightly before the front-axle torque comes online, but when driven normally, especially with the transmission in its winter-­driving mode, the system performs admirably. Ultimate off-road perfor­mance is limited by the Bridgestone Dueler tires, but the Trooper seems about as capable as a Mercedes ML320. More good news resides under the hood, where the previous 3165cc engine has been stroked to 3494cc and endowed with two more camshafts. The dual overhead cams, acting directly on the valves, are said to reduce complexity, noise, and cost and improve reliability compared with the old SOHC setup. To reduce intake-air temperatures, air is inhaled from inside the left fender, and the intake manifold, which now fea­tures variable-length runners, is better insulated from the cylinder heads.These refinements, plus reduced internal friction and a slightly higher compres­sion ratio, boost output to 215 horsepower at 5400 rpm and 230 pound-feet at 3000 rpm (up from 190 and 188, respectively). City fuel economy remains the same at 15 mpg, but highway fuel economy improves by 1 mpg to 19. A bonus: Less scheduled maintenance is required for the new engine, and that lowers the operating costs, which we found to be rather high in our long-term test report on the 1994 Trooper. The new engine feels much more ath­letic in all driving conditions. There’s better passing power and a more brisk step-off, and top speed increases from 105 to 108 mph. Our 4380-pound test car crossed the quarter-mile line in 17.3 sec­onds at 78 mph, well down from the 18.1-second, 75-mph time turned by our last 4485-pound Trooper. That level of per­formance would have put the Trooper mid­pack in our last comparison of sub­-$40,000 utes. Perhaps in response to our carps on the boxy styling, Isuzu has revised the Trooper’s snout slightly, which improves its looks about as much as a nose job would improve the visage of Jesse Helms. What really makes the Trooper more attractive is its price, which has dropped substantially. The base price of $27,285 is down $1010, and a fully loaded model tops out at $35,370—about four grand less than the previous Limited model, despite a superior drivetrain and similar equipment levels. Our test car’s $30,975 price tag places it squarely in the neighborhood of midrange Explorers and Grand Cherokees, neither of which provides the interior space or build quality the Trooper boasts. The Dodge Durango approaches the Trooper’s interior size and adds a third seat, which is not offered by Isuzu, but it trails the Trooper in either performance or fuel economy, depending on which engine is chosen. All the qualities we raved about in pre­vious Trooper tests remain praiseworthy. The build quality is excellent, with tight panel gaps and zero rattles or squeaks. The ride remains quite comfortable and well isolated. The Trooper still leans consider­ably in turns, but stiffening the anti-roll bars would likely result in head toss over one-wheel dips and bumps. Head toss can lead to cookie toss when you ride this high above the pavement. More on the Trooper From the ArchiveThere is still some room for improve­ment. The radio’s sound quality, ergo­nomics, and reception are subpar. We still don’t like the 70/30 split swing-out rear­-door arrangement because it is impractical for carrying long objects. A roll-down window in the wider door would help. We also dislike external spare tires that block rear visibility and make parallel parking difficult (will my bumper or my spare tire touch the car in back?). VERDICT: Isuzu muscles toward the front of the lux-ute pack.The new transfer case and the improved engine should earn the Trooper a podium finish in its next C/D comparo. And over the long haul, concentrating on improving the product will serve drivers better than reacting to alarmist rantings from the safety nannies. SpecificationsSpecifications
    1998 Isuzu TrooperVehicle Type: front-engine, rear/4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 5-door wagon
    PRICE
    Base/As Tested: $28,245/$30,975Options: Performance package (Torque-on-Demand 4-wheel-drive system, limited-slip rear differential, power folding outside mirrors, privacy glass, and manual 4-way-adjustable front seats), $2180; CD player, $550
    ENGINEDOHC/ 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injectionDisplacement: 213 in3, 3494 cm3Power: 215 hp @ 5400 rpmTorque: 230 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm 
    TRANSMISSION4-speed automatic
    CHASSIS
    Suspension, F/R: control arms/rigid axleBrakes, F/R: 11.0-in vented disc/12.3-in vented discTires: Bridgestone Dueler 684P245/70R-16
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 108.7 inLength: 185.8 inWidth: 69.5 inHeight: 72.2 inPassenger Volume, F/M/R: 54/52 ft3Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 46/90 ft3Curb Weight: 4380 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS
    60 mph: 9.6 sec1/4-Mile: 17.3 sec @ 78 mph100 mph: 40.1 secRolling Start, 5–60 mph: 9.8 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 5.0 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 6.7 secTop Speed (drag ltd): 108 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 216 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.71 g 
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY
    Observed: 15 mpg
    EPA FUEL ECONOMYCity/Highway: 15/19 mpg  
    C/D TESTING EXPLAINED More

  • in

    Honda Motocompacto First Ride: Rad Rebooted

    Today, as in the 1980s, city traffic sucks. No one likes commuting in gridlock, but it’s often unavoidable even in places with robust public-transportation networks. After all, to get on a bus or a subway, you first have to get to the station. And because many do so via car . . . you get the gist. Various agencies and companies have tried addressing this “first mile/last mile” problem over the years with mixed results. Now, though, Honda is giving it a try—rather, giving it another try.More than 40 years ago, Honda tried addressing Tokyo’s traffic jams with the folding Motocompo scooter. The idea was you’d park in a lot several miles from where you worked, unfold the compact two-wheeler, and ride the rest of the way. Sounds brilliant, especially in Japan’s crowded urban areas. Honda even designed it to fit in a special trunk compartment in its contemporary City hatchback. But it sold the little Motocompo only in Japan and then pulled the plug in 1983 after a two-year run.However, like many JDM Radwood-era rides, the Motocompo is more popular now than it was in its own time. And with urban mobility still an issue, Honda’s design team decided it was time to revisit the concept.Enter the Honda Motocompacto. Like the OG, it’s a scooter with a seat. Also like the Motocompo, once folded, it can fit into the back of a conventional hatchback. But while project leader (and designer) Nick Ziraldo and his team looked to the original for inspiration, four decades’ worth of technological advancement means the Motocompacto is no mere design retread.First, the Motocompacto is, well, more compact-o than its ’80s inspiration. Its wheelbase is 3.5 inches shorter, it’s almost four inches narrower, and it’s a whopping 8.5 inches shorter overall. And that’s in folded-out, ready-to-ride mode. The new scooter also folds down far more neatly—and in a smaller volume—than the Motocompo. At 29.2 inches long, 21.1 inches tall, and 3.7 inches wide when folded up, the Motocompacto takes up roughly 18 percent less space than one of the carry-on-suitcase-sized boxes we use to measure cargo capacity. And at a claimed 41.3 pounds, it weighs less than half as much as its 92-pound ICE ancestor. That, combined with the carrying handle, makes it fairly easy to move around with one hand.The weight and size savings are linked to the other drastic change. Instead of the Motocompo’s smoky, 49-cc two-stroke carbureted single-cylinder engine, the Motocompacto has a DC electric motor. And it drives the front wheel, not the rear one. Thus, instead of a fuel tank, the new scooter’s body contains an integrated lithium-ion battery pack. And because there’s no need to accommodate an internal-combustion drivetrain, the Motocompacto actually has onboard storage, unlike the Motocompo. It’s not much, at 18.1 by 3.1 by 9.5 inches, but Honda says it’s big enough to hold a small laptop.Admittedly, with its 0.7-hp output, the Motocompacto isn’t as powerful as the 2.5-hp Motocompo. It also has a lower top speed—15 mph instead of 25 mph. But Honda spokespeople say that this was deliberate, ensuring that the Motocompacto isn’t legally a motor vehicle like a motorcycle or even a Vespa-sized scooter. That’s likely why, in contrast to the Motocompo, the Motocompacto doesn’t have a horn or turn signals, though it does have an LED headlight and taillight as well as a bell. Because of its modest speed and size, Honda says Motocompacto riders can freely scoot in bicycle lanes (where local ordinances allow).Sadly, there aren’t any bike lanes at Detroit’s M1 Concourse. But Honda did set up a neat little circular course for us to get a taste of what Motocompacto riders will experience. And if those riders are anything like us—or, allegedly, several Formula 1 drivers—they’ll be dismounting with smiles on their faces.Once you unfold and secure the foot pegs, handlebar, seat, and rear wheel, starting up the Honda Motocompacto is as easy as pressing the power button. Don’t worry; it won’t accidentally run away from you mid-unfold, thanks to safety sensors in the handlebar and rear-wheel assemblies. All the unfolding parts also have redundancies to ensure they won’t refold unexpectedly. The power button also changes the riding modes, which are shown on the LED display along with battery percentage, speed, and headlight status. Mode 1 limits you to 10 mph, while Mode 2 gives you the full 15 mph. With your preferred max pace set, just grab the synthetic leather handgrips and press the throttle with your thumb, and away you go.Ziraldo and Jane Nakagawa, American Honda’s R&D business vice president, said the Motocompacto team was obsessed with making the folding scooter fun to ride. Mission accomplished, team. Thanks to its skinny tires, tidy dimensions, and low weight, the Motocompacto is a cinch to lean into turns. While there’s not much road feedback coming through the handlebar, the steering itself is incredibly light. Honda claims a 0-to-15-mph time of 7.0 seconds for the Motocompacto. That doesn’t sound like much, until you’re atop a rolling briefcase. But the Motocompacto never feels unsteady or fragile at its top speed (fair warning, though, it does have a 265-pound weight limit). Combine all of this with the well-calibrated thumb throttle, and we were tearing up corners at top speed within seconds, grinning all the while. If you had a Razor scooter as a kid, riding the Motocompacto will be second-nature child’s play. Like a Razor scooter, the Motocompacto doesn’t have any suspension. However, Ziraldo says the tire compounds as well as the rubber dampers in the seat assembly were tuned to reduce vibrations and impacts. We’ll have to take the scooter on rougher surfaces to see how that works, but the sensations coming through the synthetic-leather seat at the M1 Concourse weren’t uncomfortable.Fortunately, unlike that Razor, the Motocompacto has an actual brake. Note the singular. But because the scooter’s so light, and because your weight is mostly on the rear, the cable-operated drum brake in the back is more than enough to bring you to a swift halt. And it’s easy to modulate with the lever mounted on the left.Don’t expect any stopping assistance courtesy of regenerative braking, though. Honda didn’t give the Motocompacto any, over concerns that the battery might overcharge and become damaged on long downhill sections. Range is modest for an e-bike but pretty good for a suitcase with handlebars. Honda claims the Motocompacto can do 12 miles on a charge, with a full recharge taking 3.5 hours using the provided charger and a 120-volt household outlet. In addition to the onboard LED display, you’ll be able to monitor charging status via a forthcoming dedicated app (which will also include features like GPS tracking and changing settings via Bluetooth).While 12 miles might seem underwhelming compared with something like the BMW CE 02’s roughly 56-mile range, remember that this is a first mile/last mile solution. It’s meant to supplement your car, not replace it. It’s a way to get to a train station or for college students to get around campus. And on that last front, a Motocompacto is easier to secure in a stairwell or your dorm room than a Ruckus.It’s also noticeably cheaper than a Ruckus. At $995 to start, the Motocompacto is also less expensive than the CE 02 and many e-bikes, particularly the folding ones. Everything feels solid and tightly screwed together. Unlike a Razor, this isn’t a toy. You’ll want to save up a bit more for a proper cycling helmet, though. Oh, and the optional decals, stickers, and skins that Honda also plans to offer. Yes, that means you can rep the football team while racing to Orgo 101. Honda hinted that other accessories are also in discussion.It’s too early to tell whether the Honda Motocompacto will have a bigger impact than its predecessor. But considering how popular Honda’s mini motorcycles, especially the Grom, have become, we can’t imagine the electric scooter will disappear after two years. Several C/D staffers have already said they want one. And starting this month, you’ll be able to buy it either at your local Honda/Acura dealer or online. At which point, city gridlock might become your playground.SpecificationsSpecifications
    Honda MotocompactoVehicle Type: mid-motor, front-wheel-drive, 1-passenger, 0-door scooter
    PRICE
    Base: $995
    POWERTRAIN
    Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous DCPower: 0.7 hp Torque: 12 lb-ftBattery Pack: air-cooled lithium-ion, 0.24 kWhCharger: 84 WTransmission: direct-drive
    DIMENSIONS (folded/unfolded)
    Wheelbase: 29.2 inLength: 29.2/38.1 inWidth: 3.7/17.2 inHeight: 21.1/35.0 inCargo Volume: 0.3 ft3Curb Weight (C/D est): 42 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
    15 mph: 7.0 sec1/4-Mile: 63.5 secTop Speed: 15 mphResearch EditorAfter discovering car magazines and Fast and Furious movies in high school, Matthew Skwarczek wanted to create cleaner fuels to keep automobiles around. But after a brief engineering career, the Chicagoland native realized he preferred researching and writing about the cars themselves. That’s how he found himself first at MotorBiscuit and then at C/D. Today, when he’s not reading, he’s daydreaming on Bring a Trailer, backpacking, or riding his motorcycle or bicycle. More

  • in

    Tested: 2024 Kia EV9 Boldly Leapfrogs the Telluride

    From the December 2023 issue of Car and Driver.CORRECTION 11/1/23: This story has been updated to state that the EV9 isn’t the fastest-charging EV we’ve ever tested; the Genesis Electrified GV70 has charged quicker. We’d imagine that most car designers don’t get too excited when they’re assigned to a new three-row SUV. There’s only so much you can do with a two-box shape, and the segment is so competitive that it pays to play it safe rather than do something entirely novel. But a few years ago, Kia proved all of that wrong with the Telluride, and now the Korean automaker is doing it again with the new electric EV9.Whether you view it from 100 yards away or up close, the EV9 makes a big impression. You can tell that the people who worked on this vehicle—designers and engineers alike—were up to the challenge of executing a battery-powered take on the family crossovers that have become so popular in driveways across the nation.HIGHS: Strong performance, quick charging, compelling design inside and out.Built on Hyundai Motor Group’s top-notch Electric Global Modular Platform (E-GMP), the EV9 has proportions that are radically different from the Telluride’s, even though it gives off a somewhat similar boxy vibe. The wheelbase is 122.0 inches long, nearly eight inches longer than the Telluride’s, and the wheels are pushed to the corners, giving the EV9 a far more dramatic stance. The headlights, which combine a row of dot-style LEDs with swooshes of LED accent lights, are almost cyborgian, and the vertically oriented, intricately detailed taillights look like they belong on some sort of science-fiction spacecraft.The attention to detail inside is even more impressive. Although the EV9 is not a luxury utility vehicle, no one seems to have told the people who selected the materials in our fully loaded GT-Line test car. The faux leather is soft, the dashboard incorporates a variety of attractive finishes, and there are innovative touches, such as trampoline-style mesh front-seat headrests that are far more plush than you’d expect from looking at them. Yes, there are screens galore, including a 12.3-inch infotainment screen and digital instrument cluster. They are easy to navigate, and there are enough physical buttons and knobs to make the interface accessible. Our only real UX annoyance was the placement of the climate-control screen, which the steering wheel obscures.More on the EV9This being a family-oriented vehicle, the environs aft of the driver and passenger are especially important, and they don’t disappoint. The second-row captain’s chairs are not only heated and ventilated but also available with power adjustability and extendable footrests. The rear doors are wide, easing entry, and Kia even sweated the little stuff such as the roof-mounted air vents, which are surrounded by attractive bezels. While the third row of seats isn’t quite as generously sized as some of the largest gasoline-powered three-row models, the bottom cushion is placed at an appropriate height and angle for adults to sit comfortably, making this a reasonable place to sit for short periods.This level of design and packaging aptitude isn’t surprising, given the success of the Telluride, and neither is the EV9’s strong performance, considering that the 10Best-winning Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Kia EV6 share the EV9’s E-GMP platform. There’s a relatively wide range of powertrain configurations available, starting with a single-motor, rear-wheel-drive setup and a 76.1-kWh battery pack. We tested the top-of-the-line dual-motor, all-wheel-drive model, in which front and rear motors combine for 379 horsepower and 516 pound-feet of torque. The juice comes from a 99.8-kWh battery pack, a greater capacity than what we’ve seen in any of the other E-GMP vehicles thus far.LOWS: Ambitious pricing, some head toss, awkwardly placed HVAC controls.This big lithium-ion pack weighs a claimed 1249 pounds, and the EV9 tips the scales at a prodigious 5839 pounds—1349 more than the last Telluride we tested. But the electric motors have more power and torque than the Telluride’s 291-hp 3.8-liter V-6, and in terms of acceleration, they more than make up for the extra weight. The dual-motor EV9 lunges to 60 mph in just 4.5 seconds and passes through the quarter-mile in 13.3 seconds at 101 mph. Those are quick numbers regardless of segment, and the EV9’s instantaneous responses to jabs of the accelerator make the Telluride—which gets to 60 mph more than two seconds slower—feel positively sluggish in comparison.Kia has also done a good job of ensuring that the extra weight doesn’t dull the EV9’s dynamic qualities. It’s fitted with 285-mm-wide Hankook Ion Evo AS SUV all-season tires, which are considerably wider than the Telluride’s 245s, and larger brake rotors. The results speak for themselves: The EV9 gripped around our skidpad to the tune of 0.87 g and stopped from 70 mph in 184 feet, numbers that would have been more than competitive in our recent comparison test of gasoline three-row SUVs. Even better, the EV9 is satisfying to steer, with good weighting from the helm and nicely controlled body motions. We did notice a bit of head toss on the roughest roads, but overall the ride quality is good, and responses to changes in direction are linear if not especially eager.At 70 mph, the EV9 registers a hushed 67 decibels. It’s a pleasant highway cruiser, although cruising range is just about the only objective metric where the EV9 doesn’t beat the Telluride. In our 75-mph highway range test, the EV9 posted a reasonable 240-mile result, a bit short of the EPA’s estimate of 270 miles. Realistically, the EV9 will deliver less than that on road trips if it’s loaded with family members and stuff—we could fit five carry-on bags behind the third row and 17 with the third row folded, by the way—which means you’ll be stopping to recharge every few hours.Fortunately, the EV9’s electrical architecture is set up to replenish the battery quickly. At a 350-kW DC fast-charger, we watched it gain 100 miles of range on the display in just 13 minutes and measured an average charging speed of 139 kilowatts between a 10 and 90 percent state of charge—among the highest average of any EV we’ve ever tested. And if you desire more outright range, there is a single-motor configuration that has the big battery and a 304-mile EPA range. However, its paltry 201 horsepower will likely result in slow acceleration times.More Hyundai-Kia EVsAs the EV9 is in the first wave of three-row electric SUVs to enter the mainstream market, its price will be a crucial factor for convincing families to switch to running electrons. The EV9 starts off right about where the Telluride tops out, at $56,395 for the rear-drive, small-battery model. Unsurprisingly, our significantly more powerful and significantly better-equipped GT-Line is a whole lot more than that, with an opening price of $75,395. That’s a lot to ask when so many compelling gas-powered alternatives exist for less coin, but the EV9 looks great inside and out and offers enough of a performance advantage to feel worth that. Those who do take the leap won’t be disappointed.VERDICT: Kia shows that three-row SUVs, too, can benefit greatly from the switch to electricity.CounterpointsTalk about playing to your strengths. Kia takes the two things it does best—three-row SUVs and electric vehicles—and joins them together in the EV9. Quiet and quick power delivery make sense for a family vehicle, and the EV9 has both. Its third row is grown-up friendly, its hatch is cargo friendly, and its front rows are full of features that make driving and charging more comfortable. Like Kia did with the Telluride, the brand’s three-row EV will have everyone else playing catch-up. —Elana ScherrIs it time to update my go-to Kia Telluride recommendation for three-row-SUV buyers? Passenger space in the EV9 is virtually identical; the biggest differences are third-row headroom (the EV9 has more) and hip room (the EV9 has less). Sure, the EV9 has a plush interior and luxe features, such as optional power second-row seats with leg rests, but it can also drive ponderously with an occasional wallow induced by its more than 1300 extra pounds. But it’s the EV9’s higher price and today’s imperfect charging network that keep me recommending Tellurides. —Dave VanderWerpSpecificationsSpecifications
    2024 Kia EV9Vehicle Type: front- and rear-motor, all-wheel-drive, 6-passenger, 4-door wagon
    PRICE
    Base/As Tested (C/D est.): $75,395/$77,500 
    POWERTRAINFront Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous AC, 189 hp, 258 lb-ft Rear Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous AC, 189 hp, 258 lb-ft Combined Power: 379 hpCombined Torque: 516 lb-ftBattery Pack: liquid-cooled lithium-ion, 99.8 kWhOnboard Charger: 10.9 kWPeak DC Fast-Charge Rate: 215 kWTransmissions: direct-drive
    CHASSIS
    Suspension, F/R: struts/multilinkBrakes, F/R: 14.2-in vented disc/13.6-in vented discTires: Hankook Ion Evo AS SUV285/45R-21 113V M+S K
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 122.0 inLength: 197.4 inWidth: 77.9 inHeight: 70.1 inPassenger Volume, F/M/R: 58/58/35 ft3Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 82/44/20 ft3Curb Weight: 5839 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS
    60 mph: 4.5 sec100 mph: 13.0 sec1/4-Mile: 13.3 sec @ 101 mph120 mph: 21.3 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 4.7 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 1.9 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 2.9 secTop Speed (gov ltd): 126 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 184 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 365 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.87 g  
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY AND CHARGING
    Observed: 79 MPGe75-mph Highway Driving: 76 MPGe75-mph Highway Range: 240 miAverage DC Fast-Charge Rate, 10–90%: 139 kWDC Fast-Charge Time, 10–90%: 37 min 
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY
    Combined: 80 MPGeRange: 270 mi
    C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDSenior EditorDespite being raised on a steady diet of base-model Hondas and Toyotas—or perhaps because of it—Joey Capparella nonetheless cultivated an obsession for the automotive industry throughout his childhood in Nashville, Tennessee. He found a way to write about cars for the school newspaper during his college years at Rice University, which eventually led him to move to Ann Arbor, Michigan, for his first professional auto-writing gig at Automobile Magazine. He has been part of the Car and Driver team since 2016 and now lives in New York City.   More

  • in

    Tested: 2023 Mercedes-Benz S580e PHEV Upstages the EQS

    From the November 2023 issue of Car and Driver.Mercedes’s EQS sedan seeks to be the S-class of electric vehicles, but it feels alien and lifeless compared with the brand’s beloved flagship. The new-for-2023 plug-in-hybrid Mercedes-Benz S580e, however, steps confidently into the future while preserving the Sonderklasse’s past and does so with few compromises.HIGHS: Palpable prestige, generous electric range, quick recharging. The PHEV S-class pairs a turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six with an electric motor. Exceeding its 46-mile EPA range estimate, it traveled 58 miles on electricity alone in our 75-mph range test—that’s greater than any other PHEV we’ve tested (unless you count the BMW i3 with a range extender; you shouldn’t).Of course, the electric EQS goes farther, but range anxiety remains an issue on long trips. The S580e avoids those worries by offering gas fill-ups along with DC fast-charging capability, a rarity among plug-in hybrids. Mercedes claims the optional 60-kW charging hardware ($500) takes the 22.7-kWh battery from 10 to 80 percent in 20 minutes.The faster charging capability and numerous add-ons meant our S580e cost nearly $140,000 as tested. Still, its $123,700 base price undercuts the V-8-powered S580 by $1450 and the EQS580 by $3400. LOWS: Uneven brake-pedal response, irksome touch buttons, $16K upcharge for rear-seat climate controls.The S580e’s cabin is properly palatial, with headrest pillows that rival Ambien. The $3800 Warmth & Comfort package heats and ventilates the rear seats yet weirdly leaves riders back there without climate controls. Rear-seat rheostats require the $16,100 Executive Line package. We also scoffed at the second row’s two cupholders, which we struggled to release from the center armrest. The touch controls on the steering wheel are finicky, but mercifully, the EQS’s giant Hyperscreen isn’t here; its absence leaves space for upscale dash trim commensurate with the sedan’s price. The hybrid’s interior registered a hushed 64 decibels during 70-mph cruising, matching the EQS580.The S580e’s plug-in powertrain doesn’t make a peep as the car wafts down the interstate in Electric mode. Its e-motor provides an instantaneous 354 pound-feet of thrust, so it helps the Benz easily keep pace with traffic without waking the straight-six. The hybrid system’s combined 510 horsepower and 553 pound-feet push this 5606-pound all-wheel-drive limo to 60 mph in a tidy 4.2 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 12.6 ticks at 112 mph.Related StoryA cushy ride and fluid body motions make the luxury mission clear, and thanks to available rear-axle steering, the S580e is surprisingly nimble. Its lone dynamic flaw is a nonlinear brake pedal that is a plague in stop-and-go traffic, an issue in the EQS as well. Given that the plug-in S-class is considerably more prestigious and stylish, with enough real-world electric range to handle daily commutes, it essentially renders Mercedes’s equivalent EV irrelevant.VERDICT: The perfect blend of electromobility and S-class nobility.SpecificationsSpecifications
    2023 Mercedes-Benz S580e PHEVVehicle Type: front-engine, front-motor, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
    PRICE
    Base/As Tested: $123,700/$139,900
    POWERTRAIN
    Turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve 3.0-liter inline-6, 362 hp, 369 lb-ft + AC motor, 148 hp, 354 lb-ft (combined output: 510 hp, 553 lb-ft; 22.7-kWh lithium-ion battery pack)Transmission: 9-speed automatic
    CHASSIS
    Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilinkBrakes, F/R: 14.5-in vented disc/14.1-in vented discTires: Hankook Ventus S1 Noble 2 HRSF: 255/40R-20 101H M+S Extra Load MOE-S RunflatR: 285/35R-20 104H M+S Extra Load MOE-S Runflat
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 126.6 inLength: 208.2 inWidth: 76.9 inHeight: 59.2 inTrunk Volume: 13 ft3Curb Weight: 5606 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS
    60 mph: 4.2 sec100 mph: 10.1 sec1/4-Mile: 12.6 sec @ 112 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 4.8 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.9 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 3.2 secTop Speed (gov ltd): 129 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 174 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 366 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.85 g
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY
    Observed: 35 MPGe75-mph Highway Driving, EV/Hybrid mode: 75 MPGe/36 mpg75-mph Highway Range, EV/Hybrid mode: 58/630 mi
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY
    Combined/City/Highway: 23/20/29 mpgCombined Gasoline + Electricity: 51 MPGeEV Range: 46 mi
    C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDSenior EditorEric Stafford’s automobile addiction began before he could walk, and it has fueled his passion to write news, reviews, and more for Car and Driver since 2016. His aspiration growing up was to become a millionaire with a Jay Leno–like car collection. Apparently, getting rich is harder than social-media influencers make it seem, so he avoided financial success entirely to become an automotive journalist and drive new cars for a living. After earning a journalism degree at Central Michigan University and working at a daily newspaper, the years of basically burning money on failed project cars and lemon-flavored jalopies finally paid off when Car and Driver hired him. His garage currently includes a 2010 Acura RDX, a manual ’97 Chevy Camaro Z/28, and a ’90 Honda CRX Si. More

  • in

    The 1992 BMW 325i Lives Up to the 3-Series Legend

    From the September 1991 issue of Car and Driver.The world is watching this car. Let’s face it, when Magic Johnson steps out onto the hardwood, the fans expect to see a performance that no fresh­-faced rookie could hope to deliver. When Tom Clancy publishes a new thriller, folks plan on staying up late with the reading lamp on. When Mick Jagger grabs hold of the mike, you know in your heart that it’s going to be party time. And when the star in the limelight is an all-new BMW 3-series, the weight of expectations hangs heavily indeed. After all, this car has history behind it. We’re talk­ing about the descendant of the fabled 2002, the giant-killer sedan that inspired a cult of followers and put BMW on the map in the U.S. twenty years ago.HIGHS: The performance of a wing-footed god, an engine that can sing Mozart, German good looks.And don’t forget about how the upward­ly-mobiles made the previous 3-series a must-have trinket in the boom-boom 1980s. The world is watching and waiting for another reason too. Today, showrooms everywhere are bursting with wannabes—­terrific sports sedans eager for a bite of BMW’s glory. The newcomers are mostly Japanese—the Infiniti G20, the Lexus ES250, the Nissan Maxima, the Acura Vigor, to name four—and there are a few American upstarts too, like the Ford Taurus SHO and the Chevy Lumina Z34. And they’re all awfully good. The old 325i, despite constant improvements, was about to become somebody else’s lunch meat. Now for the good news: In an attempt to put some distance between itself and the wannabes, the Neiman-Marcus of sports sedans has gotten serious. No half measures this time around; BMW redesigned the 325i from bumper to bumper, in the process making it both more exciting and more practical. The all-new 325i, which went on sale here in June, has a new chassis with new rear suspension, a new and more pow­erful engine, and a sleek new four-door body (a two-door will arrive early next year) with more interior room and improved aerodynamics. About the only thing not changed is that it’s still rear-drive. Let’s start with the obvious, the parts you can see. The 325i looks good in photos, but not half as stylish as it does in person. Gone forever is the old model’s boxy shape (thank goodness), replaced by slicked-back sheetmetal that says “made in Germany” and delivers a Cd of 0.33. And we can tell you this: People look at this car—a lot.This 325i is still compact, ten inches shorter than a Honda Accord, but it is now reasonably roomy. Its wheelbase is up five inches, and the front wheels have been pushed to the far corners of the chassis, all of which opens up interior room consider­ably. The EPA’s interior-volume figures indicate about six percent more cabin space, but the improvement feels like three times that. The 325i finally qualifies as a passable four-passenger sedan; six-footers can ride in back for long distances. No 3-series has ever been as handsome inside, either. The dash and door panels are tastefully sculptured (the old model’s door trim looked like spruced-up economy-car upholstery). Still, the 325i’s cabin is typi­cally German in its approach to luxury, which is to say restrained. The plastic used on the interior panels and dash is expensive-­looking but unyielding, the seats are park-­bench firm, and there’s no carpeting on the bottom of the door panels. A Lexus ES250’s interior, hardly an example of wretched excess, looks like a New Orleans cathouse by comparison. Nor is there an abundance of labor-­saving devices at your fingertips. Power seats aren’t standard, and neither is a tilt steering wheel—though they will be avail­able later in the model run as part of a spe­cial luxury package. The driver’s window switch lacks the one-touch all-the-way-­down feature you can get in inexpensive cars like the Honda Civic. Any shortage in convenience gear will be quickly forgotten once you take the wheel. There is joy here. The first thing you notice is that the businesslike interior layout works. You can see the clearly marked gauges easily. The driving position is near perfect, and the reach to the steering wheel is just right. All of the stalks, controls, knobs, and buttons are within easy reach and are easy to see (except the electric win­dow switches, which are spread too far apart on the center console). Everything you touch in the cabin sends a single message back to your brain: “quali­ty.” Well, make that almost everything you touch. The lone exception to the cabin’s feelgood message is the glove box—which, unlike the huge storage compartments in previous Bimmers, is now a small crevice with a flimsy, ill-fitting plastic door. LOWS: The eye daggers aimed your way by those who still associate BMWs with yuppie excess.The 325i drives so well, any sort of glove-box remorse vanishes before you’ve gone a block. Once again, the overriding impression is quality—the savory hum of the machinery, the smooth-as-silk feel of the major controls, the sensory reward of sure-footed handling.The 325i is motivated by the same twin-cam 24-valve 2.5-liter in-line six as the larg­er 525i sedan—and we do mean motivated. The engine makes an impressive 189 hp at 5900 rpm. It’s a peaky motor, the kind you associate more often with sports cars, with maximum torque occurring at 4700 rpm—higher in the rev range than many engines’ horsepower peaks. Which is to say, when you want to go, you have to have about 4000 rpm on the clock or the engine feels drowsy. Keep the revs up and the 325i is a rocket: It takes only 6.9 seconds to get to 60 mph and 15.3 sec­onds to cover the quarter-mile, at which point you are hauling buns to the tune of 91 mph. Not long ago we raved about muscle cars that could go that fast. You get the proper soundtrack as stan­dard equipment, too. The 325i’s engine is a symphony of expensive-sounding whirring and humming, all muted to a whisper for your listening enjoyment. The whirring turns cat-angry when you twist the engine to the 6500-rpm redline, but it never strains. You direct the symphony with a Getrag-­built five-speed manual gearbox and a pro­gressive clutch that make seamless gear-changing as easy as switching TV channels with your remote. A four-speed automatic is available, but if you want the full measure of joy that the engine has to offer, take the five-speed. Speaking of joy, the 325i’s chassis offers plenty in that regard. It cruises com­fortably, soaking up the big swells and thumping over the tar strips. Its steering is crisp and accurate, its standard ABS brakes powerful. The 325i enjoys hustling along twisty, tree-lined roads and feels as sure­footed as a Sherpa—even when you’re cor­nering so hard the passengers are wide-eyed and rigid in their seats. It sets no new stan­dards in handling, but the standards it holds to are plenty high. More 3-series reviews from the archiveThere are, however, a couple of things the 325i should do better. It wanders too much on long, straight stretches of high­way. And it tops out at only 128 mph. The identical car sold in Europe goes 143 mph, but BMW programs the computers of cars bound for America to limit top speed. BMW says only that it’s “worried that U.S. buyers might fit replacement tires with an insufficient speed rating.” Sounds flimsy to us. We think BMW of North America is feeling the cold wind of liability litigation blowing. Understandable, perhaps, in today’s litigious climate. Whatever BMW’s reason for lopping 15 mph off the 325i’s top speed, it has done the rest of the job right. The new small Bimmer feels like fine machinery whether you’re cruising through downtown or whipping along the open road at a full gallop. It’s roomy enough for family-car use and quick enough on its feet to plaster a grin on your face when you go up-tempo on two-lanes. Its twin-cam six emits a lusty cry. And the 325i looks almost as pricey as it is. In short, it has soul. VERDICT: A sports sedan with its priorities straight. BMW has moved the target again.We also think it’s got the legs on the wannabes again. Not by all that much, maybe not for long. But for now, at least, you pay more and you get more. Come to think of it, that’s another thing we’ve learned to expect of BMWs.Expectations confirmed.SpecificationsSpecifications
    1992 BMW 325iVehicle Type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
    PRICE
    Base/As Tested: $28,365/$29,900Options: leather upholstery, $1100; metallic paint, $435
    ENGINEDOHC 24-valve inline-6, iron block and aluminum head, port fuel injectionDisplacement: 152 in3, 2494 cm3Power: 189 hp @ 5900 rpmTorque: 181 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
    TRANSMISSION
    5-speed manual
    CHASSIS
    Suspension, F/R: control arms/multilinkBrakes, F/R: 11.3-in vented disc/11.0-in discTires: Pirelli P600205/60HR-15
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 106.3 inLength: 174.5 inWidth: 66.9 inHeight: 54.8 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 47/38 ft3Trunk Volume: 15 ft3Curb Weight: 3038 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS
    60 mph: 6.9 sec1/4-Mile: 15.3 sec @ 91 mph100 mph: 19.3 sec120 mph: 33.5 secRolling Start, 5–60 mph: 8.1 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 10.1 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 10.4 secTop Speed: 128 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 178 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.80 g 
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY
    Observed: 22 mpg
    EPA FUEL ECONOMYCity/Highway: 18/26 mpg 
    C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDDirector, Buyer’s GuideRich Ceppos has evaluated automobiles and automotive technology during a career that has encompassed 10 years at General Motors, two stints at Car and Driver totaling 19 years, and thousands of miles logged in racing cars. He was in music school when he realized what he really wanted to do in life and, somehow, it’s worked out. In between his two C/D postings he served as executive editor of Automobile Magazine; was an executive vice president at Campbell Marketing & Communications; worked in GM’s product-development area; and became publisher of Autoweek. He has raced continuously since college, held SCCA and IMSA pro racing licenses, and has competed in the 24 Hours of Daytona. He currently ministers to a 1999 Miata and a 1965 Corvette convertible and appreciates that none of his younger colleagues have yet uttered “Okay, Boomer” when he tells one of his stories about the crazy old days at C/D. More

  • in

    Value City: 2024 Chevrolet Trax

    From the November 2023 issue of Car and Driver.Automakers are guilty of chasing numbers. You can blame us to a certain degree, for egging them on by testing as many cars as we do. But one number that fewer and fewer automakers aspire to is the lowest price. We’re avoiding the word “cheap” because it has a negative connotation as it defines both quantitative and qualitative attributes. This gives us reason to celebrate the newly recast and redesigned Chevrolet Trax, which is simultaneously affordable and exceptional. HIGHS: Quiet when cruising, composed in corners, spacious back seat and cargo area.By our count—we include the unavoidable destination charge—there are 19 automobiles on the market today that cost less than $25,000. A bare-bones Trax is $21,495, and the Activ, tested here, represents the top of the line at $24,995. That trim opens the door to some deluxe features, including an 11.0-inch touchscreen and keyless entry and starting. The Sunroof ($895) and Driver Confidence ($795) packages, found on our test car, net wireless charging, adaptive cruise control, rear parking sensors, blind-spot monitoring, and lane-departure warning. Wireless CarPlay and Android Auto come standard, even in the base model. The cabin does feature plastics that a durometer would scratch, but pleasing switchgear compensates. Chevy got the touchpoints right—the steering wheel has a most welcome supple leather wrap, and the shifter is a lever coming out of the console, not some dial or confusing array of buttons. Pull the lever into D, and the turbocharged 1.2-liter inline-three makes it obvious that it’s got but 137 horses. Holding your foot to the floor for 8.8 seconds will take you to 60 mph. Thanks to its torque peak of 162 pound-feet occurring at 2500 rpm, the wee size of the engine goes unnoticed in typical day-to-day driving—until you need to get ahead of a semi before a merge. The 50-to-70-mph passing time is 6.4 seconds, and a 70-to-90-mph jaunt is more like 10. The gravelly growl the three emits under duress is more offensive than the 72-decibel reading at full throttle indicates. But at 70 mph, the cabin hums a 69-decibel tune you’d swear was lower still. At that speed, the engine turns about 2250 rpm, and the Trax tracks arrow straight with great on-center steering feel. Like its predecessor, however, the new Trax fell short of its EPA highway estimate (32 mpg) in our 75-mph real-world test, returning just 30 mpg. LOWS: Torpid when passing, hard-plastic interior, no all-wheel drive or manual.What you can’t get in any Trax is all-wheel drive. You have to step up to the roughly $5000-pricier Trailblazer to get that in a Chevy SUV. But a decent set of winter tires will get a Trax anywhere you want it to go. Chevy’s press release calls this new model “reimagined,” a euphemistic way of acknowledging that the previous-generation Trax needed a thorough rethink. Michael Simari|Car and DriverThe Korea-built Trax checks a lot of the boxes SUV buyers want: excellent outward visibility, strong curb appeal, tons of room. The lack of all-wheel drive eliminates the need for a floorpan hump, giving two rear-seat occupants space to spread out and three plenty of room for their Reeboks. The rear compartment isn’t filled with luxuries, omitting basics such as a center armrest and cupholders (not even molded into the door panels). Back-seat riders do get a pair of USB ports and tons of legroom—3.0 inches more than in the old Trax. The newfound space isn’t the result of some packaging marvel. The vehicle is just bigger, by a whopping 5.7 inches between the axles and 11.0 inches in total length. This also creates a larger cargo hold, up seven cubic feet to 26, for all of that active-lifestyle gear automakers imagine their customers tote around. More on the Chevy TraxWith so few cars on the market, a top-level Trax may give Ford’s entry-level offering, the Maverick pickup, a run for its money. The Ford has the edge in cargo and towing capacity—Chevy does not recommend lashing a trailer to the Trax’s bumper—but the back seat is better in the Chevy, and your cargo won’t get wet if it rains. The similarly priced Honda Civic and Volkswagen Jetta are dynamically superior to the Trax, but it isn’t a runaway. The 0.84-g effort the Trax makes on the skidpad is in the ballpark of the sedans, as is its braking distance. VERDICT: A high-value vehicle in an otherwise cheap segment.Among vehicles under $25,000, whether they’re in an SUV wrapper or not, the Trax handles well. It’ll corner at its limit without protest or excessive body roll. It won’t set any Lightning Lap records, but it feels richer and looks more expensive than it is. So don’t call the Trax cheap—it’s way too jampacked with value for that descriptor. SpecificationsSpecifications
    2024 Chevrolet TraxVehicle Type: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door wagon
    PRICE
    Base/As Tested: $24,995/$26,685Options: sunroof package (power sliding glass, manual shade, wireless charging), $895; Driver Confidence package (rear cross-traffic alert, lane-change alert with blind-zone alert, adaptive cruise control), $795
    ENGINE
    Turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 12-valve inline-3, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injectionDisplacement: 73 in3, 1199 cm3Power: 137 hp @ 5000 rpmTorque: 162 lb-ft @ 2500 rpm
    TRANSMISSION
    6-speed automatic
    CHASSIS
    Suspension, F/R: struts/torsion beamBrakes, F/R: 11.8-in vented disc/10.6-in discTires: Goodyear Assurance Finesse225/55R-18 98H M+S TPC 3179MS
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 106.3 inLength: 178.6 inWidth: 71.8 inHeight: 61.4 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 54/44 ft3Cargo Volume, Behind F/R: 54/26 ft3Curb Weight: 3069 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS
    60 mph: 8.8 sec1/4-Mile: 16.8 sec @ 81 mph100 mph: 30.5 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.4 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 9.5 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 4.8 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 6.4 secTop Speed (C/D est): 115 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 180 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.84 g
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY
    Observed: 25 mpg75-mph Highway Driving: 30 mpg75-mph Highway Range: 390 mi
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY
    Combined/City/Highway: 30/28/32 mpg
    C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDExecutive EditorK.C. Colwell is Car and Driver’s executive editor, who covers new cars and technology with a keen eye for automotive nonsense and with what he considers to be great car sense, which is a humblebrag. On his first day at C/D in 2004, he was given the keys to a Porsche 911 by someone who didn’t even know if he had a driver’s license. He also is one of the drivers who set fast laps at C/D’s annual Lightning Lap track test. More

  • in

    The Dreyfus Maserati Keeps a Legacy Alive

    From the December 1995 issue of Car and Driver.René Dreyfus, who lived with unique grace for 88 years until August 17, 1993, was one of the last of the legendary Grand Prix drivers from what is often called the Golden Age of motorsport. Ironically, at the time of his death, the race car that brought him to his adopted homeland was in the final stages of restoration in a shop tucked in the hills of western Connecticut. This massive yet oddly sensuous Maserati 8CTF served as a centerpiece in an epic that transformed Dreyfus from world-class race driver to one of the most renowned restaurateurs in New York, and finally to a living icon among racing afi­cionados (all of which is recounted in My Two Lives, the autobiography Dreyfus wrote with historian Beverly Rae Kimes a decade before his death). The elegant single-seater Maserati, chassis-number 3031, was one of three surprisingly potent GP cars built by the Maserati brothers in 1938 to contest the Mercedes-Benz and Auto Union panzers under the new, downsized formula of 4.5 liters unblown, 3.0 liters supercharged. The car would go on to numerous appear­ances at the Indianapolis 500, to win the Pikes Peak hillclimb, and eventually, after meticulous restoration, to live in high pro­file as part of the vast collection of auto­motive historian Joel Finn of Roxbury, Connecticut. Now the 8CTF shrieks and wails again in vintage events across the country, as it did this past summer during a major reunion of prewar Indianapolis cars at the Milwaukee Mile in West Allis, Wisconsin. Running with a nimbleness surprising for its age, it serves as a vital relic of the pin­nacles of American and European racing in an unforgettable era. In 1930, René Dreyfus surged onto the international racing scene, winning the Monaco Grand Prix as an unknown ama­teur from nearby Nice, beating hometown favorite and France’s best driver, Louis Chiron. His performances throughout the 1930s aboard Bugattis, Alfa Romeos, and Maseratis were consistently good, but his alleged Jewish background (actually, he was Catholic) prevented enlistment by the dominant Nazi-backed Mercedes-Benz and Auto Union teams. In early 1938, Dreyfus scored his greatest victory on the narrow streets of Pau in the foothills of the Pyrenees. He was at the wheel of an ungainly Delahaye entered by Laury Schell and Lucy O’Reilly Schell, wealthy American expatriates living in Paris and Monaco. She was the brash daughter of an Irish immigrant who had made his fortune in the New World. The pair had moved to Europe in the 1920s and immersed them­selves in the world of rallying and ama­teur sports-car racing. In 1937, after Laury had finished third in the Mille Miglia, they formed Ecurie Bleue in concert with Delahaye, a small but respected Parisian sports­-car manufacturer that had created a 4.5-liter V-12-powered car for the new Grand Prix formula. For the first race of the Grand Prix season, Mercedes-Benz came to Pau with new W154 cars for the team leader Rudi Caracciola and Hermann Lang. Auto Union did not enter, leaving Dreyfus as the only serious opponent. He deftly exploited the Delahaye’s nimbleness and better fuel mileage to win by nearly two minutes. While fellow Frenchmen were cele­brating Dreyfus’s upset, in Italy the three remaining Maserati brothers—Bindo, Ettore, and Ernesto—and their 10-man staff were completing a trio of Grand Prix machines that on paper were the equal of anything in the world. Since the death in 1932 of brother Alfieri, the acknowledged family leader, the Maseratis had established a reputation for technical brilliance and financial blundering. Their output was minuscule compared with that of rivals Alfa Romeo and Bugatti: 16 cars in 1934, 17 in 1935, a mere nine in 1936. But 1937 brought an infusion of money from the Orsi family of Modena (who would move the operation to their home turf by 1939) and a fresh resolve to reenter Grand Prix competition. View PhotosPaul Pietsch runs third in the 1939 German Grand Prix.Bruce Craig and Indianapolis Motor SpeedwayErnesto, who was the best designer among the brothers, created the 8CTF. The name stood for eight-cylinder competition testa fissa, or “fixed head,” meaning that the valve seats and combustion chambers were integral with the cylinder block. It was a DOHC straight eight with twin Roots superchargers that produced 350 (gross) horsepower at 6300 rpm from just 3.0 liters. The chassis featured an inde­pendent front suspension (with longitu­dinal torsion bars) and quarter-elliptic leaf springs at the back. The first two cars, chassis 3030 and 3031, appeared for the Tripoli Grand Prix on the lightning-fast Mellaha circuit in May 1938. They immediately created a sensation in the hands of Count Felice Trossi and Achille Varzi. Masterpieces in cast and polished aluminum, the cars proved to be as quick as they were beau­tiful. Unfortunately, the minuscule size of the Maserati operation had forced economies in testing and development that were to haunt their entire campaign. Varzi broke his transmission on lap seven and Trossi retired with the same difficulties four laps later, after leading the Mercedes and Auto Unions and setting the fastest lap of the race. This was to establish a pattern for the cars—Trossi, on the pole at Livorno but didn’t finish; Pescara, the race lead and fastest lap before retiring.By September, a third chassis (3032) was completed for the Italian Grand Prix at Monza. Goffredo “Freddie” Zehender crashed, bending the car slightly, while Trossi got as high as third before being dis­qualified. View PhotosDreyfus (second from left) confers with LeBègue as Luigi Chinetti (third from right) ponders the Maserati’s lack of speed.Bruce Craig and Indianapolis Motor SpeedwayDespite their erratic performance, the 8CTFs were attractive to many Americans, who had seen four of the older V8RI single-seaters perform well in 1936–37 and believed that a modern European GP car could win at Indy. During the early spring of 1939, Cotton Henning, the chief mechanic for Chicago union boss “Umbrella Mike” Boyle, purchased chassis 3032 and a spare engine. This machine, with some modifications for the Indi­anapolis Motor Speedway, was to carry the great Wilbur Shaw to two consecutive vic­tories (1939 and ’40), with a third in 1941 prevented by a broken wire wheel.German driver Paul Pietsch reached a high-water mark with 3031 in the 1939 German GP at the Nürburgring. He led the race against the full might of the Mer­cedes-Benz and Auto Union teams, but finished third because of repeated failures of the Maserati-manufactured spark plugs. By this point, Lucy Schell, who was now running Ecurie Bleue following a highway crash that badly injured her hus­band, had tired of Delahaye’s uncompeti­tive cars. She purchased the two remaining 8CTFs: chassis 3031 and 3030. Both were entered for the Swiss Grand Prix in August, where Dreyfus soldiered home eighth in 3030 (the other car did not start). Less than a month later, on September 1, 1939, Hitler invaded Poland. View PhotosMauri Rose put the 3031 car on the Indy pole in 1941.Bruce Craig and Indianapolis Motor SpeedwayFrance and Great Britain declared war on Germany two days later. Dreyfus, like thousands of his countrymen, enlisted and was slated for officers’ training. But once Poland fell, the German panzer advances ceased and Europe lapsed into a seven-­month hiatus that is recalled as the “phony war.” It was during this lull that Lucy Schell, widowed after her husband had been killed in a second road accident, decided to send her two Maseratis to the 1940 Indianapolis 500. Her intent was to perform well in the race and then to sell the cars, which already had a solid reputation based on Shaw’s victory the previous year. In early 1940, political strings were being pulled to give Dreyfus a 45-day fur­lough from his military duties. He would be joined by René LeBègue, a French sports-car and rally driver, who would serve as number two on the team.The crew chief for the blue-painted Ecurie Bleue “Lucy O’Reilly Schell Specials” would be Luigi Chinetti, a transplanted Italian endurance-racing driver who had set up shop in Paris in the early 1930s. Chinetti, an ardent anti­fascist, had demurred in returning to Italy to join the Army, having served in the brutal Trentino campaign of World War I. He was more than happy to make what he considered a one-way trek to America. Joining the little team on the sea voyage aboard the Italian liner Comte di Savoia was Lucy Schell’s 19-year-old son Harry, an American citizen who had been raised a Frenchman and spoke little English. In fact, none of the team was fluent and relied on Bernard Musnik, the New York-based correspondent for L’Auto, to act as inter­preter. Lucy Schell, the instigator of the entire expedition, remained in France. Dreyfus’s beloved France would never be the same, whether he returned or not. While they were at sea, Hitler’s hordes poured across the lowlands and drove the British Expeditionary Force back to the English Channel. The Ecurie Bleue con­tingent arrived in New York on May 23, and then flew to Indianapolis for practice and qualifying. The brace of 8CTFs were completely unsorted regarding suspension setting and American fuel mixtures, and too-low gear ratios limited top speed. But the French­men were greeted warmly by the Speedway establishment—especially by Shaw, who had his winning chassis 3032 per­fectly tuned for the monster track. In 1940, the fastest cars—including Shaw’s—were lapping at 127 mph. Both LeBègue and Dreyfus struggled to get past 118 mph with their hastily prepared cars. When qualifying ended, only LeBègue had squeezed into the field, in the 31st spot at 118.98 mph. Dreyfus, at 118.83 mph, was bumped by Billy Devore and Floyd Davis and relegated to second alternate starter. How and why this happened remains something of a mystery. In his autobiog­raphy, Dreyfus claims he misunderstood the qualifying procedure. He thought, as in Europe, he had been guaranteed a starting position, and thus he did not exert full effort. This may be the case, although the notion that a driver as intelligent as Dreyfus would have remained that ignorant of the rules, regardless of the lan­guage barrier, appears doubtful. (Some believe he was disheartened by Shaw’s much faster lap times, as well as those of other American drivers he felt were inferior.) No matter—Dreyfus redeemed him­self in a roundabout manner. It was decided that he, as team leader, would share the driving with LeBègue, who would start the race and run the first 250 miles. Dreyfus would take over and pre­sumably charge to a high finish. This appeared to be possible when he began to turn practice laps in LeBègue’s car at about 125 mph—perhaps overrevving the engine in the process. Then a con­necting rod broke. Dreyfus’s autobiography appears to conflict with the facts here. He states that he was driving his own car (3031), but Speedway records indicate it was LeBègue’s car (3030), and that in a des­perate last-hour thrash Chinetti transferred Dreyfus’s good engine into LeBègue’s qualified machine. They ran according to plan, with Dreyfus taking over while the car was in 10th place. His planned assault (which he believed might have carried him as high as fifth place) was halted when the final 50 laps were run under the yellow flag in a light drizzle. Wilbur Shaw won again in his Maserati, and the LeBègue-Dreyfus car motored home 10th. While the Schell team was disap­pointed with their showing, the race results paled in comparison to the critical inter­national situation. On June 17, the French sued for peace. It appeared that going home was impossible. Being unsympa­thetic to the French Vichy puppet govern­ment, Dreyfus ended up buying a restaurant in Closter, New Jersey, which he ran until December 7, 1941. The day after Pearl Harbor, he joined the United States Army and served with distinction in the European theater. View PhotosJohn Rogers and the engine from the Maserati 8CTF, the restoration he worked on for 10 years.Bruce Craig and Indianapolis Motor SpeedwayFollowing the war, he and his brother Maurice opened a restaurant called Le Gourmet in Manhattan. In late 1952, they started the famed Le Chanteclair on East 49th Street. Until the early 1980s, it was a watering spot for motorsport enthusiasts. Chinetti spent the war in Manhattan as an imported-car mechanic and “enemy alien.” He ultimately became the U.S. importer for Ferrari. LeBègue did return to France and somehow managed to smuggle a Talbot GP back to the United States for the 1941 500. (It failed to qualify. He then went into the perfume business in New York.) Harry Schell entered prep school, then returned to Monaco to be with his mother. During the 1950s he became an accomplished, if second-level, Grand Prix driver before dying in a 1960 crash at Sil­verstone, England. Following the 1940 race, Lucy Schell sold both Maseratis to former racing driver and car owner Lou Moore. With a year to tune them for oval-track racing, Moore was able to at least demonstrate the 8CTF’s potential. With Elgin Piston Pin sponsorship, the talented Mauri Rose behind the wheel, and a taller ring-and­-pinion gear, chassis 3031 gained the pole position for the 1941 Indy 500 at 128.69 mph. After the car retired with ignition trouble at 60 laps, Rose took over for Floyd Davis, who was mired mid-pack in an Offenhauser-powered car also owned by Moore, and won the race. The second former Ecurie Bleue car, 3030, was driven by Duke Nalon, who started 30th and struggled to finish 15th. When racing resumed in 1946, the Dreyfus car was sold to one R.A. Cott of the Federal Engineering Company in Detroit for driver Russ Snowberger, who started 10th at Indy and finished 12th. Louis Unser won the Pikes Peak hillclimb in the car in 1946 and 1947. By 1949, the Maserati eight-cylinder had been replaced by an Offenhauser four­-cylinder which stayed in the car until 1951. View PhotosRené LeBègue at the Indianapolis 500 is 1940.Bruce Craig and Indianapolis Motor SpeedwayIts final outing at Indy came in 1953, with its original engine back in place. Now 15 years old, the veteran machine failed to qualify (as it had since 1950) and drifted into limbo. The car’s recovery began when English Maserati enthusiast and collector Cameron Millar purchased 3031 and began its restoration and active vintage racing career in the 1970s.In 1982, Millar sold the Maserati to Joel Finn, who ranks among the world’s top vintage-car collectors, historians, and racers. He and his chief restorer, John Rogers, began a laborious 10-year project to bring the old car back to its former glory. It required all of Rogers’s prodi­gious talent as a machinist and fabricator. The engine was in particularly rough shape. The complex blower drive on the lower Roots supercharger was bent and seized. New valve guides had to be machined and set in the fixed head by employing a special jig and working with a mirror inserted through the exhaust ports. New bearings, rods, pistons, tappets, and valves had to be installed. Massive restora­tion of the body, which had been modified over the years, was required. Rogers had just completed refurbishing Finn’s rare Mercedes-Benz 154/163 Grand Prix car when he set to work on the Maserati. He found amazing contrasts between the two contemporary machines. “The Mercedes was big, tough, almost crudely military,” he recalls. “But the Maserati was like a sculpture. The alu­minum was cast as if it was going to a car show rather than a race. The fabrication, considering the time that it was built and the size of the Maserati operation, was beyond belief.” While Finn and Rogers were toiling to restore chassis 3031, another top-rank col­lector, Bob Rubin, was completing the second Schell car, chassis 3030. The restoration was done by Chris Leydon of Lehaska, Pennsylvania. Each owner attempted to replicate the cars during dif­ferent periods; Finn painted 3031 in the red livery of the Maserati brothers as the car last ran for the factory at the 1939 German Grand Prix. Rubin and Leydon dressed 3030 in the Ecurie Bleue colors, as it appeared at Indianapolis one year later.The Shaw car (3032), is a centerpiece of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Hall of Fame Museum’s collection. The Finn and Rubin cars were brought to the Milwaukee Mile this past summer for a reunion of prewar Indi­anapolis cars. There they electrified the gath­ering with the unearthly screech of their super­charged straight eights. The memory of the great machines and their extraordinary journey to America has once again been revived. More