News

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.The IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) just released a bleak report on the rear-seat safety of mid-size crew-cab pickup trucks. Among the Chevy Colorado, Ford Ranger, Jeep Gladiator, Nissan Frontier, and Toyota Tacoma, none received the top “Good” rating.The updated test adds a dummy in the rear seat behind the driver in an effort to encourage automakers to improve rear-seat protection.The IIHS released updated crash-test results that show mid-size trucks struggle to protect rear-seat passengers in front-end collisions. In fact, of the five pickups tested, which include the Chevy Colorado, Ford Ranger, Jeep Gladiator, Nissan Frontier, and Toyota Tacoma, none received the top “Good” rating from the test. An IIHS report last month showed similar results for compact passenger cars. IIHS safety ratings are broken down into four categories. The Good rating is the best available, followed by Acceptable, Marginal, and Poor. Of the five pickups, the Frontier did the best, earning an Acceptable rating. The Ranger followed with a Marginal rating, and the Colorado, Gladiator, and Tacoma all earned Poor ratings. The less-than-stellar ratings for the mid-size-truck segment stem from a lack of protection offered to rear occupants, as opposed to front-seat occupants. “A common problem was that the rear passenger dummy’s head came dangerously close to the front seatback, and in many cases, dummy measurements indicated a risk of neck or chest injuries,” said IIHS President David Harkey. “All these things tell us that the rear seat belts need improvement.”IIHSThe ratings also come on the heels of a more thorough test developed by the IIHS, which adds a dummy behind the driver’s seat. While the driver dummy is the size of an average adult man, the rear dummy is the size of a small woman or 12-year-old child. According to the IIHS report, researchers also developed new metrics that focus on the injuries most frequently seen in back-seat passengers.In the updated test, the Colorado, Frontier, Ranger, and Tacoma allowed the rear dummy’s head to come too close to the front seatback. The rear dummy in the Ranger did what the IIHS refers to as “submarining,” which causes the seatbelt to ride up from the pelvis to the abdomen, increasing the risk of internal injuries.According to the report, information taken from the rear dummy indicated a moderate or likely risk of both neck and chest injuries in the poor-rated Colorado, Gladiator, and Tacoma and a moderate risk of chest injuries in the marginal-rated Ranger. Associate News EditorJack Fitzgerald’s love for cars stems from his as yet unshakable addiction to Formula 1. After a brief stint as a detailer for a local dealership group in college, he knew he needed a more permanent way to drive all the new cars he couldn’t afford and decided to pursue a career in auto writing. By hounding his college professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he was able to travel Wisconsin seeking out stories in the auto world before landing his dream job at Car and Driver. His new goal is to delay the inevitable demise of his 2010 Volkswagen Golf. More

The Ford Mustang GT4 debuted at the 24 Hours of Spa in Belgium, with the entry-level race car slotting below the GT3 that will compete at Le Mans next year.The GT4 is a dialed back versus the GT3, but it is still an extreme track car with a ginormous rear wing, a stripped-down interior, and a lightweight body.Co-developed with Multimatic, the GT4 packs a V-8 based on the Coyote 5.0-liter available in the factory Ford Mustang.The seventh-generation Ford Mustang has motorsports in its blood. When Ford first revealed the 2024 Mustang, it also teased a series of race cars based on the V-8-powered muscle car—from the Dark Horse R track toy to an NHRA drag racer. Now, Ford has fully taken the wraps off the Mustang GT4 at the 24 Hours of Spa, which will serve as the entry-level vehicle for drivers looking to hone their craft in wheel-to-wheel competition.FordThe reveal of the GT4 comes shortly after the unveiling of the Mustang GT3 earlier this month. The GT4 sports a similarly vivid orange, red, and purple livery plastered with the new, simplified Ford Performance logo, a look also echoed on the SuperVan 4.2 that recently competed at the Pikes Peak Hill Climb. Based on the road-going Dark Horse, the GT4 slots between the Dark Horse R (which will be fully revealed soon) and the GT3 in the Ford motorsports lineup. GT4 cars produce less power and less downforce than the GT3 category.FordThe car qualifies for the SRO-sanctioned GT4 category, which includes GT4-specific series in Europe and America as well as eligibility for mixed GT3 and GT4 fields in leagues like the British GT Championship. The GT3, meanwhile, can run in more prestigious series like the World Endurance Championship, where Ford will enter the GT3 into the 24 Hours of Le Mans next year. While the GT3 will be run by a factory-backed team in IMSA’s GTD Pro class, the GT4 car is exclusively for customer teams. Ford first entered GT4 racing with the Mustang in 2017.Ford closely worked with Canadian engineering experts Multimatic—responsible for assembling the most recent Ford GT and developing many special-edition Aston Martins like the Valkyrie—on the GT4. Under the hood lies a Coyote-based V-8 that has been tuned for motorsport and was developed in-house by Ford Performance. It will also be built by Ford in Dearborn, Michigan, but Ford didn’t provide any other engine specifics. FordThe GT4 packs Multimatic spool-valve dampers and sheds weight thanks to bodywork made from natural fibers. Shifting is handled by a Holinger dog-ring gearbox with paddle shifters with pneumatic actuation, while the aerodynamics are specially designed for the GT4 category. The GT4 still features a large rear wing sprouting from the trunk lid, but the diffuser is far more tame than on the GT3, and there are fewer vents carved into the narrower fenders. The cabin is very similar to the GT3, stripped down to the bare essentials with Recaro racing seats to keep the driver nice and snug. More Awesome Ford Track CarsAssociate News EditorCaleb Miller began blogging about cars at 13 years old, and he realized his dream of writing for a car magazine after graduating from Carnegie Mellon University and joining the Car and Driver team. He loves quirky and obscure autos, aiming to one day own something bizarre like a Nissan S-Cargo, and is an avid motorsports fan. More

The 2023 Mercedes-AMG G63 Grand Edition will be limited to 1000 copies globally.The Grand Edition features matte black paint and unique gold exterior accentsMercedes hasn’t said how much the G63 Grand Edition costs, and it’s not yet saying if it’ll be offered in the U.S. market.While the Mercedes-Benz G-class is known to be seriously capable off-road, it’s also known as a machine that celebrities and rich folks alike roll out to flaunt their status. The 577-hp AMG G63 variant is especially bougie, and the newly introduced Grand Edition takes that to the next level.As the kids say, the 2023 Mercedes-AMG G63 Grand Edition has some serious drip. For those who don’t know what that means, Google’s search function is a useful resource. Simply put, the SUV’s matte black paint (MANUFAKTUR Night Black Magno) and exclusive gold exterior accents give it a fashionable appearance.Mercedes-AMGThere’s nothing subtle about the G-wagen’s unmistakable shape and styling that can be traced back to the 1979 original. Only a couple years earlier, the 1977 movie Smokey and the Bandit hit theaters, featuring Burt Reynolds behind the wheel of a black-and-gold Pontiac Trans Am. The G63 Grand Edition puts off those same vibes, with its gold-colored decals and multispoke wheels. The latter are forged 22-inchers painted Tech Gold, which match the color of the side graphics. Mercedes also says an Affalterbach emblem in Kalahari Gold Magno is “emblazoned” on the hood in what sounds like a German version of Pontiac’s screaming chicken.Mercedes’s three-pointed star emblems, the AMG badges, and details on both bumpers as well as the ring around the rear-mounted spare tire carrier are coated in Kalahari Gold Magno too. Inside, the Grand Edition has black nappa leather with gold contrast stitching. The same color combo applies to the floor mats, and above the glovebox there’s a plaque on the grab handle that says “Grand Edition” with the “G” in bold. For G-wagen, get it?Mercedes-AMGSome might say the G63 Grand Edition is glitzy, but others might call it gaudy. Either way, Mercedes says it only plans to sell 1000 copies around the globe. The company hasn’t said how much the limited-production model costs, nor is it releasing any information about a potential U.S. version, which will be announced later.More G-Wagen ReadingThis content is imported from poll. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.Senior EditorEric Stafford’s automobile addiction began before he could walk, and it has fueled his passion to write news, reviews, and more for Car and Driver since 2016. His aspiration growing up was to become a millionaire with a Jay Leno–like car collection. Apparently, getting rich is harder than social-media influencers make it seem, so he avoided financial success entirely to become an automotive journalist and drive new cars for a living. After earning a journalism degree at Central Michigan University and working at a daily newspaper, the years of basically burning money on failed project cars and lemon-flavored jalopies finally paid off when Car and Driver hired him. His garage currently includes a 2010 Acura RDX, a manual ’97 Chevy Camaro Z/28, and a ’90 Honda CRX Si. More

John Roe|Car and DriverCar and DriverFrom the July/August 2023 issue of Car and Driver.C/D Test Results at a Glance60 mph: 4.3 sec1/4-Mile: 13.1 sec @ 104 mphBraking 70–0 mph: 182 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.86 gHighway Range: 270 miHere we are again. After gathering the year’s new EV offerings for a week of intense back-to-back scrutiny, rigorous driving, and long hours of charging, a Hyundai has come out on top. Following last year’s win by the Ioniq 5, that model’s new sedan sibling, the Ioniq 6, motors away with the top prize this year. Add strong showings by the Genesis Electrified GV70 and the Kia EV6 GT, and a picture starts to form: When it comes to EVs playing in the broad main swath of the market, the Hyundai-Kia-Genesis group is clearly out in front.That the Ioniq 6 shares much with the Ioniq 5 is to its benefit, but the new entry does more than just put a three-box hat on the same platform and up the model name by one. “Just look at it,” we said of the Ioniq 5 when it won, and we could do the same for the Ioniq 6. While the two siblings’ designs are dissimilar, the banana-shaped sedan is every bit as striking as the angular hatchback. We see a bit of the first-gen Mercedes CLS in the sloping profile. Hyundai claims the 1930s Stout Scarab as inspiration—and though that obscure machine and the Ioniq 6 are nearly a century apart, once you see pictures of the two, you know the notion isn’t just something the designers made up. The Rest of the FieldRegardless of whether the shape came to Hyundai designers by way of a turn-of-the-millennium four-door “coupe,” a Streamline Moderne–era proto-minivan, or some kind of fever dream, its aerodynamics give the Ioniq 6 a slip-through-the-air drag coefficient as low as 0.22. We also like it because it’s good to see an automaker introduce a dedicated EV that’s a sedan (the Polestar 2 and Tesla Model 3 are two others) rather than another mid-size crossover. View PhotosIt’s not just well executed—it’s a car we want to drive.John Roe|Car and DriverUnderneath, Hyundai’s E-GMP platform continues to shine. This car comes with a single rear-mounted motor making 149 or 225 horsepower (depending on battery size) and 258 pound-feet of torque or can be had with dual motors that combine for 320 horses and 446 pound-feet. Most versions get a 77.4-kWh battery pack. Our EV of the Year test car, a dual-motor Limited, managed 220 miles in our highway test and is EPA rated at 270 miles of range. Range projections get even better from there. The single-motor Limited nabs a 305-mile EPA estimate, the dual-motor SE with 18-inch wheels rather than the fancier trims’ 20s is good for 316 miles, and the single-motor SE caused jaws to drop earlier this year when Hyundai revealed its 361-mile EPA range estimate (though we observed only 260 miles in our highway test). That version also nets a 140-MPGe combined figure, topping the rear-drive Tesla Model 3’s 132 MPGe. (An entry-level model with a smaller 53.0-kWh battery pack delivers commensurately less range: 240 miles on the EPA cycle.) When the electrons run low, the Ioniq 6’s 800-volt architecture allows for recharging at up to 235 kilowatts, making for some of the quickest charge times we’ve seen from any mainstream EV.On the subject of speed, the dual-motor version gets to 60 mph in a brisk 4.3 seconds, although the accelerator mapping makes it feel less sporty than some other dual-motor EVs (the EV6 GT, for one). The same run in the 225-hp single-motor version takes 6.2 seconds. The Ioniq 6’s solid structure is imperturbable, lending the car genuine composure over lumpy pavement on the most challenging sections of our test loop. The ride is taut and well damped, and the car stays flat and secure during cornering. Hyundai has also mastered the “whoa,” with good brake-pedal feel and easy customization of lift-off regen via steering-wheel paddles, including the option of none at all.View PhotosDual screens set a tone of modernity.John Roe|Car and DriverWe can’t say that Hyundai has mastered the EV soundtrack—although to be fair, no one has. Granted, this area is one of personal preference, and you certainly have your choice of spacey accompaniment, but we were happy to silence the noisemaker. Doing so allows the Ioniq 6 to show off its sound isolation.Don’t expect upscale cabin materials at this price, although the design is inventive, particularly the sleek door panels. And the sloping roofline cuts into rear headroom even with the low-set seat cushion. Happily, Hyundai didn’t reinvent its infotainment system for electrified duty, and the switchgear isn’t different for different’s sake. Generous console storage further enhances livability. The trunk, though, is just as small as you’d guess. And the frunk isn’t much compensation—that space will hold little more than a few notebooks.The Ioniq 6 is both a well-executed electric and a car we want to drive. This polished EV makes few missteps as it puts Hyundai’s E-GMP platform in the winner’s circle. Again.Deputy Editor, Reviews and FeaturesJoe Lorio has been obsessed with cars since his Matchbox days, and he got his first subscription to Car and Driver at age 11. Joe started his career at Automobile Magazine under David E. Davis Jr., and his work has also appeared on websites including Amazon Autos, Autoblog, AutoTrader, Hagerty, Hemmings, KBB, and TrueCar. More

From the July/August 2023 issue of Car and Driver.Car and DriverThis is only our third EV of the Year contest, and we’re already getting a bit jaded. Oh, your car offers 300 miles of range? Okay, but that’s no longer a big deal. Ditto with sub-five-second 60-mph times and crazy-fast DC charging speeds. While internal-combustion engines continue to evolve gradually after more than a century of incremental improvement, EVs make technological leaps annually—in battery chemistry, motor design, and charging capabilities. The tech is changing so fast that what’s groundbreaking one year is normal the next and outdated two years later.The WinnerThere are more players in the game, but lest you think the relatively simple EV powertrain—one moving part in the motor, no transmission—is the cheap avenue to develop a car, it isn’t. Billions are spent on ground-up projects, and every year, we’ve included at least one entry from a new brand, a list that includes Polestar, Rivian, and Lucid. This time we’re looking at Vietnam’s VinFast, with its VF8, here to face off against an electrified Hummer SUV, an imperious BMW 7-series, and an array of compelling cars from Kia, Hyundai, and Genesis. Nissan is back, parlaying its decade-plus of electric expertise into the all-wheel-drive Ariya. The Cadillac Lyriq returns with a second motor and significantly more power. The entries from Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Lexus aim to make converts of internal-combustion stalwarts with familiar-feeling luxury, and even Toyota is in the mix after years of insisting that hybrids are the only rational way forward. You might notice that this is our first year without a Tesla on the ballot, and that’s because this is the first year Tesla had nothing new to offer. One thing we’ve learned in the short history of this contest: The EV space changes fast. A company that’s out front one year might be midpack the next. Or it might stay on a hot streak, continuing to reimagine mainstream transportation for an EV future. Audi Q4 e-tron • BMW i7 • Cadillac Lyriq AWD • Genesis Electrified GV70 • GMC Hummer EV • Kia EV6 GT • Kia Niro EV • Lexus RZ450e • Lucid Air Pure AWD • Mercedes-Benz EQE350 4Matic+ • Nissan Ariya • Toyota bZ4x • VinFast VF8Andi Hedrick|Car and DriverAudi Q4 e-tronFor brand loyalists who might find change scary, the Audi Q4 e-tron reassures.There are EVs that strive to reimagine the tenets of automotive design, and then there’s the Audi Q4 e-tron. It’s so conventional it may as well have a turbo 2.0-liter four under the hood, because electrification doesn’t bring any novelty or delight. You know those smiley-face feedback terminals in airport bathrooms? If the Q4 had one, nobody would push the green smiley button. Most everything is fine, but nothing is great.With dual motors and 295 total horsepower, the Q4 hits 60 mph in 5.6 seconds, which is perfectly acceptable. The ride is decent, but the 0.84 g of skidpad grip is middling. Inside, the Q4 presents angular Audi shapes and design cues without incorporating Audi-level materials, and in doing so exposes its Volkswagen ID.4 roots. One driver noted, “VW Group did the bare minimum turning the ID.4 into the Q4 to squeeze more profit out of the MEB platform.” The Q4 e-tron offers no surprises—unless you find a mere 190 miles of range at 75 mph surprising for a car with a $66,190 as-tested price. The Q4 does make a better case for itself at something closer to its $50,995 single-motor base price (the dual-motor starts at $56,395). But it would still come across as a token offering for a very particular customer, someone looking for continuity in brand experience while making the transition to EV ownership. In other words, if the lease is up on your Q5 and you’re ready for your first EV, the Q4 e-tron is the obvious nonthreatening choice: premium-cross-over comfort food for Audiphiles. For everyone else, there are more interesting ways to spend $60,000. —Ezra DyerSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $56,395/$66,190Combined Power: 295 hp Combined Torque: 339 lb-ft Battery: 77.0 kWh Onboard Charger: 11.5 kW Transmissions: direct-drive Curb Weight: 4974 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 5.6 sec1/4-Mile: 14.3 sec @ 98 mph Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 113 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 167 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.84 g EPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 93 MPGe• Range: 236 miMichael Simari|Car and DriverBMW i7Sublime, substantial, and sybaritic, the new 7-series is also extremely well suited to battery power.The word “luxury” gets thrown around like a backyard football in automotive reviews, but if any car earns that descriptor, it’s the BMW i7 xDrive60. There are faceted-diamond details in the headlights, self-opening and -closing doors, rainbows in the cabin, and a cashmere interior so soft and plush that sinking into it feels like a hug from a Mongolian textile artist. The logbook for the i7 reads like a librarian’s admonishment: “Quiet, quiet, quiet.” It’s so hushed that one staffer complained it made his thoughts too loud. Flooring the accelerator won’t drown out those thoughts, as the i7’s two motors deliver their combined 536 horsepower without even a whine, and the big body rides smoothly at speeds well past legality. Drivers might find the touchscreen-heavy controls and deep menus overwhelming, and accountants may have quibbles with the $151,995 as-tested price of our i7, but back-seat passengers won’t notice a ripple in their lattes. Curves and rises slide beneath the i7 with nary a bobble. There’s drama aplenty in the i7’s appearance, but its on-road demeanor is stoically unflappable. The i7 also charges quickly, needing 47 minutes to get from 10 to 90 percent, and with 310 miles of range at 75 mph, one won’t have to stop too often. This is almost a disappointment, as a long wait at the station would give more time in the optional reclining Executive Lounge seats, enjoying a massage and the 31.3-inch Theatre Screen.—Elana ScherrSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $120,295/$151,995Combined Power: 536 hp Combined Torque: 549 lb-ft Battery: 101.7 kWhOnboard Charger: 11.0 kW Transmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 6084 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 4.4 sec1/4-Mile: 12.7 sec @ 114 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 150 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 162 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 331 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.92 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 87 MPGe• Range: 308 miMarc Urbano|Car and DriverCadillac Lyriq AWDThe dual motors’ big horsepower helps this new-age Caddy better live up to the brand’s traditional virtues.The two-motor Cadillac Lyriq is the double cheeseburger to the single-motor version’s cheeseburger. Like adding a patty, that second motor transforms things from good to yum. Horsepower jumps from 340 to 500. Sprints to 60 mph fall from 5.7 seconds to a droolworthy 4.6. Best of all, this double cheeseburger of a Cadillac remains on the value menu: The upgrade is a mere $2000.The second motor adds all-wheel drive to the Lyriq’s lengthy list of standard equipment. For $65,615, our test car came loaded with toppings—a 19-speaker stereo, huge screens, a head-up display, leather—although GM’s excellent hands-free driver-assist system Super Cruise requires a subscription. We mention money because the Lyriq looks and acts more expensive and refined than expected at this price point. A supple ride pampers, interior materials dazzle, and a quiet cabin means you’ll only hear your stomach grumbling.A look at the 102.0-kWh battery’s range gives the impression that the extra power comes without a penalty. The EPA says the two-motor Lyriq will go 307 miles, only five less than the rear-drive version. But in our 75-mph highway range test, the two-motor setup reduced range from the single-motor’s 270 miles to a disappointing 220. DC fast-charging speeds can’t quite match some competitors, but the 11.5-kW Level 2 hookup is competitive, although the 2023 single-motor Lyriq has standard 19.2-kW charging capability.While the additional motor does add some excitement to the driving experience, the overall feel is competence, not fun; isolation, not involvement. More DeVille than devil, the Lyriq’s fun-to-drive quotient held it back in scoring. But if you’re looking to be coddled by a luxurious and practical SUV with all-wheel drive and sub-13.0-second quarter-mile time, order up the two-motor Lyriq.—Tony QuirogaSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $64,990/$65,615Combined Power: 500 hp Combined Torque: 450 lb-ftBattery: 102.0 kWhOnboard Charger: 11.5 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 5838 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 4.6 sec1/4-Mile: 12.9 sec @ 113 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 132 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 182 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 396 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.82 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 89 MPGe• Range: 307 miMichael Simari|Car and DriverGenesis Electrified GV70A battery-electric powertrain proves well suited to this impressive luxury SUV.If you don’t know to look for the closed-off grille, the Electrified GV70 could pass for one of the gas-burning models. They share the same design—a great one that helped earn the regular GV70 a 10Best spot this year—so the Electrified GV70 gets off to a good start. With the EV version of the GV70, you don’t give up anything except a little cash. Both variants share the same tight body control, coddling interior, and smooth ride. But the EV offers shenanigans in the form of Boost mode. Click the oddly placed button—about the only odd thing in the car—on the 6 o’clock steering-wheel spoke, and you’ll experience a 483-hp shot for up to 10 seconds (429 horses otherwise), provided the battery is charged up enough. Deactivate stability control, and you can leave a trail of rubber. Or roll into the accelerator judiciously, and 60 mph is 3.8 seconds away. The GV70’s biggest downside is range. This vehicle uses much of the same hardware as the GV60, but the GV70 carries extra mass. We measured 190 miles at 75 mph—10 fewer than the smaller and lighter GV60. At least it charges quickly: 24 minutes from 10 to 90 percent on a 350-kW DC charging unit. Still, less than 200 miles on a charge isn’t going to win EV awards, especially since this made-in-America model no longer qualifies for some of Uncle Sam’s incentives.—K.C. ColwellSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $67,550/$75,275Combined Power: 483 hp Combined Torque: 516 lb-ftBattery: 77.4 kWhOnboard Charger: 10.9 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 5060 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 3.8 sec1/4-Mile: 12.3 sec @ 111 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (C/D est): 150 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 183 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 363 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.85 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 91 MPGe• Range: 236 miMichael Simari|Car and DriverGMC Hummer EV SUVThe GMC Hummer EV SUV brings less wretched excess.To say we like the GMC Hummer EV SUV more than the pickup because there’s less of it sounds flippant, but it’s true. At “just” 4.3 tons, the SUV weighs 980 pounds less than the SUT, considerably improving its lot. Its three-motor propulsion system makes 830 horsepower instead of the pickup’s cool 1000 due to the less massive battery (170.0 kilowatt-hours instead of 205.0) imposed by its 8.9-inch-stubbier wheelbase. It’s just as quick, though, achieving 100 mph in a frightening 8.8 seconds. Less tonnage also means it (eventually) stops shorter and cuts a slightly less pitiful arc around the skidpad. But the squishy suspension exhibits more dive and squat than the Summer Olympics. The consumption meter regularly pegs at an alarmingly high figure, and there’s a drift meter. Dear God, no.We also prefer the SUV because the rear-mounted spare doesn’t impinge on cargo space like the tires within the truck’s bed. The 11.1-inch-shorter rear overhang does wonders for the EV’s departure angle, while the abbreviated wheelbase improves the break-over angle, wheel articulation, and turning diameter: an astonishing 35.4 feet with four-wheel steering.But this Hummer still comes across as a giant middle finger directed at a class of vehicles meant to be efficient. Its curb weight is so excessive it’s exempt from EPA labeling, like a heavy-duty pickup. Perhaps that’s what it takes to convince a certain crowd that EVs can be cool, but it’s not of-the-year material.—Dan EdmundsSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $105,595/$106,220Combined Power: 830 hp Combined Torque: 1200 lb-ftBattery: 170.0 kWhOnboard Charger: 19.2 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 8660 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 3.4 sec1/4-Mile: 11.9 sec @ 112 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 112 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 199 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 459 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.76 gMichael Simari|Car and DriverKia EV6 GTThis modern muscle car was the quickest of all this year’s contenders.Of this year’s contestants, Kia’s 10Best-winning EV6 GT is easily the most entertaining. Sure, the GMC Hummer SUV has a CrabWalk mode, and the BMW i7 has a Theatre Screen to rival your local cineplex, but those are mere parlor tricks. Gimmicks get the likes on TikTok, but to reach the top pedestal in this competition, a vehicle must sidestep viral temptations and deliver an emotional driving experience. Kia’s hot-rotor GT has just that. It starts with dual motors and their ability to blur the surrounding landscape. With a nearly instantaneous arrival of 545 pound-feet of torque at the bottom end and 576 horsepower at the top, the GT blitzes to 60 mph in just 3.1 seconds and demolishes the quarter-mile in 11.4 seconds at 120 mph. Stick with it and 161 mph is possible, says Kia. For $62,925, that’s major-league performance. Need proof? That’s just 0.1 and 0.2 second, respectively, behind the 657-hp Lamborghini Urus Performante, making the EV6 GT the swiftest EV in this year’s field. When it’s not sucking you back into the amply bolstered seats, making you look like Colonel Stapp on a rocket sled, the GT boasts the ability to eat up apexes. It’s also the only vehicle in this year’s bunch with an electronically controlled limited-slip rear differential. Activate Drift mode, and you’ll be burning up more Goodyears than an NHRA Funny Car. When it comes to more civilized driving, the EV6 GT’s 190 miles of range at 75 mph isn’t noteworthy. But just like it accelerates, the GT charges at warp speed, needing only 26 minutes on a DC fast-charger to replenish from 10 to 90 percent. While the EV6 GT meets and exceeds its performance target, its focus is too narrow to take home the gold in this competition. Yet Kia’s thrill ride is good enough to earn a silver medal. Had the GT launched with the rest of the EV6 lineup last year, its presence would have likely pushed the EV6 past the Hyundai Ioniq 5 for our 2022 EV of the Year award.—David BeardSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $62,925/$63,100Combined Power: 576 hp Combined Torque: 545 lb-ftBattery: 77.4 kWhOnboard Charger: 10.9 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 4817 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 3.1 sec1/4-Mile: 11.4 sec @ 120 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (mfr’s claim): 161 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 164 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 331 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.88 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 79 MPGe• Range: 206 miMichael Simari|Car and DriverKia Niro EVRational in size and spec, the Kia Niro EV just needs a rational price.There should be more EVs like the Kia Niro. It’s small outside with a surprising amount of room inside, both for passengers and their stuff. We’re easily pleased by hidden dash shelves and underhood storage—even if the Niro’s front trunk is more suitable for a tool kit or a granola bar than any major cargo—so the Kia gets cred for compartments. With so many EVs crushing the scale and stuffing garages, the Niro stands out as the perfect size for a city car or college runabout, just the sort of low-mileage commuting that suits an electric vehicle. The Niro won’t be competing in the electric-car drags. It makes a sensible but not over-the-top 201 horsepower via a lone electric motor feeding the front wheels. It’s not winning the recharge races, either. Once you burn through most of the estimated 253-mile range, refilling the 64.8-kWh battery pack from 10 to 90 percent takes 63 minutes at a DC fast-charger. The Niro earns praise for its soft but well-controlled ride, reliable brake feel, and easily adjustable regeneration settings. The cockpit is a mix of touchscreen and hard controls, contemporary without forcing a buttonless experience onto drivers just yet. Phone connectivity is uncomplicated, and wireless charging is an option. Optional heated rear seats and a heat pump for the climate control are nice features for those in cold climates. There were some minor quibbles in our logbook about dull steering feel, but the biggest hang-up with this Niro was its price. We’d love to encourage more city-size electric runabouts, but for $40,875, you could buy a lot of gas for a hybrid Honda CR-V.—Elana ScherrSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $40,875/$47,940Power: 201 hp Torque: 188 lb-ftBattery: 64.8 kWhOnboard Charger: 11.0 kWTransmission: direct-driveCurb Weight: 3837 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 6.6 sec1/4-Mile: 15.2 sec @ 94 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 106 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 175 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.87 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 113 MPGe• Range: 253 miMichael Simari|Car and DriverLexus RZ450eA pleasantly smooth SUV, but its limited range cuts the party short.A driving range of 120 miles in our 75-mph highway test (196 miles according to the EPA) doesn’t bode well for a $60K SUV with a name as mellifluous as a two-step verification code. It’s almost cruel for Lexus to make the pleasantly smooth RZ450e so enjoyable but only good for a short distance. The RZ is slightly smaller than the familiar RX and roughly the size of a Tesla Model Y. It shares its platform with the Subaru Solterra and the Toyota bZ4X, both of which are more than $13,000 less than the Lexus. Here’s why: The RZ’s interior is like upgrading to first class. There’s plenty of room, and the cabin materials are beautiful. The dash has a 14.0-inch touchscreen with text big enough for rear passengers to read. We expect therapists may start recommending the RZ as a cure for stress. While its sharp steering and dynamic handling make it fun for an SUV, it lacks a lot of what we’ve come to expect from EVs. There’s no frunk. Its 63.4-kWh battery is smaller than most, and the claimed 150-kW maximum DC fast-charging speed isn’t bad, but its competitors can charge more quickly. Charging at home on a 32-amp 240-volt connection, the RZ will need a claimed 9.5 hours to take the battery from empty to full. The RZ450e is a lovely SUV that seems to be only impersonating an electric vehicle.—Austin IrwinSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $59,650/$63,415Combined Power: 308 hp Combined Torque: 320 lb-ftBattery: 63.4 kWhOnboard Charger: 6.6 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 4617 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 4.6 sec1/4-Mile: 13.5 sec @ 99 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 103 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 171 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.83 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 95 MPGe• Range: 196 miMarc Urbano|Car and DriverLucid Air Pure AWDThe latest Lucid variant is still technically impressive but only slightly less rarefied.Lucid Motors continues to broaden its lineup at both ends, introducing more affordable, less powerful versions of the Air sedan that come in under six figures while also rolling out the wild, performance-oriented Sapphire, which tops $250K.After testing the Air Grand Touring for last year’s EV of the Year evaluation, we included the “base” Air Pure model this year. It starts under $90,000 in its 430-hp single-motor, rear-wheel-drive configuration, which puts it on even footing with the lowest-priced Tesla Model S. But that configuration isn’t quite ready yet, and our test car came equipped with the upgraded 480-hp dual-motor setup that tacks an extra $5500 onto the bottom line. Along with several options, including $10,000 for “future-ready” semi-autonomous hardware of unknown capability and a $4000 sound system, our Air’s as-tested price sat at a decidedly higher $111,550.This is hardly an entry-level car, and its execution continues to wow us in terms of build quality, interior materials, and refinement—and not just for a startup automaker. However, even if its performance and range figures are good for the money—3.5 seconds to 60 mph and real-world highway range of 310 miles—the Air was still too costly in our estimation to move the needle in terms of market relevance. Plus, newer luxury EVs, including the BMW i7, are beginning to show how far a bit of extra attention paid to design flair and extravagance can go. The Lucid could use some of this if it’s going to play in these spaces with established luxury brands.As a newer automaker, Lucid is already doing a lot of things right, but it still has room to grow as it continues to branch out into new territory.—Joey CapparellaSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $94,550/$111,550Combined Power: 480 hp Combined Torque: 686 lb-ftBattery: 92.0 kWhOnboard Charger: 19.2 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 4951 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 3.5 sec1/4-Mile: 11.7 sec @ 122 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 140 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 168 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 324 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.90 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 121 MPGe• Range: 384 miMarc Urbano|Car and DriverMercedes-Benz EQE350 4Matic+A slippery sedan with impressive range, the Mercedes-Benz EQE350 4Matic+ otherwise seems less than an E-class.Without the Mercedes-Benz emblems on its front and rump, the EQE350 sedan could be a Jelly Belly Candy Company product. While its lozenge-like design defines anonymous, it delivers an incredibly low drag coefficient of 0.20. That and a conservative range estimate are reasons the EQE350 4Matic+ is among the few EVs to exceed its EPA figure in our 75-mph highway range test, traveling 10 miles past its 260-mile estimate. Hooked up to a DC fast-charger, the dual-motor EQE350’s 90.6-kWh battery goes from 10 to 90 percent in 42 minutes. Beyond that, the 288-hp electric sedan has little to brag about. For the handful of positive comments about its silky ride and snazzy interior, there are numerous complaints about its awkward brake pedal, compromised forward visibility, and frustrating MBUX infotainment interface. Our example featured the 12.8-inch “floating” center touchscreen, as the 56.0-inch Hyperscreen from the EQS is not yet available in the EQE.While the EQE350 isn’t intended to provide the verve of the AMG version, its loose body control and numb steering make it uninvolving to drive, although its available rear-axle steering greatly enhances maneuverability. With 564 pound-feet of instant torque, the 5488-pound sedan hit 60 mph in 5.2 seconds. The 402-hp EQE500 4Matic+ has more punch—or Mercedes offers a subscription-based Acceleration Increase, which ups the EQE350’s output to 348 horses via an over-the-air update. Charging extra to unlock built-in power feels like a money grab, as does the EQE350 4Matic+’s lofty $79,050 starting price. As tested, ours ballooned to $94,640, making this pill-shaped EV tough to swallow.—Eric StaffordSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $79,050/$94,640Combined Power: 288 hp Combined Torque: 564 lb-ftBattery: 90.6 kWhOnboard Charger: 9.6 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 5488 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 5.2 sec1/4-Mile: 13.9 sec @ 97 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 130 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 178 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 358 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.86 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 86 MPGe• Range: 260 miMarc Urbano|Car and DriverNissan AriyaDual motors add undeniable urge, but Nissan’s Ariya still plays on the yacht-rock station.As a follow-up to the Leaf, the Nissan Ariya seemed primed for success, given Nissan’s years of experience building and marketing an affordable EV. Unfortunately, the Ariya has proved to be a somewhat middling choice in the electric-SUV segment, particularly when driven back to back with similarly priced EVs such as the Cadillac Lyriq. Granted, the recently introduced 389-hp dual-motor all-wheel-drive powertrain adds a noticeable punch to the Ariya’s performance, zipping the car to 60 mph in 5.0 seconds versus 7.5 seconds for the 238-hp single-motor front-wheel-drive model. The Ariya also rides smoothly and offers a cabin that’s luxury-car quiet during cruising. But its handling is forgettable, and the brake-pedal modulation is poor—an unfortunate failing given that the Ariya’s e-Pedal mode falls short of true one-pedal driving.The top-spec model we tested, a $62,770 e-4orce Platinum+, was quite posh, with blue faux-suede and leather upholstery, copper-colored accents, and a wood-trim panel with backlit haptic buttons for the climate controls. The upscale nature of the Ariya’s cabin leaves us wondering what more an Infiniti-branded version could possibly offer.We also might have expected Nissan’s extensive experience with modern EVs to result in class-leading range and faster charging capability for the Ariya, but that’s not the case. We managed 210 miles between charges on our 75-mph, real-world highway range test, and the Ariya’s maximum 130-kW charging rate means it takes longer to juice up its 87.0-kWh battery pack than either the Hyundai Ioniq 6 or the Kia EV6. Instead, the Ariya’s primary selling points are its hushed interior and easygoing demeanor, which may well be enough for casual drivers but aren’t enough to take the EV of the Year crown.—Drew DorianSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $61,525/$62,770Combined Power: 389 hp Combined Torque: 442 lb-ftBattery: 87.0 kWhOnboard Charger: 7.2 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 5087 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 5.0 sec1/4-Mile: 13.4 sec @ 108 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 128 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 176 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 342 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.86 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 87 MPGe• Range: 257 miAndi Hedrick|Car and DriverToyota bZ4XThis Toyota brings back the compliance EV.Toyota has not been shy about its begrudging migration to EVs, saying limited raw materials for batteries should be used in smaller chunks in hybrids or plug-in hybrids. It’s clear the company isn’t looking to sell many bZ4Xs, as it took the same approach it did with the low-volume GR86 sports coupe, sharing development costs with Subaru, whose Solterra is a twin to this mid-size SUV.The bZ4X is unremarkable in every way, as though Toyota is architecting a self-fulfilling prophecy, proving that hybrids are better by delivering a mediocre EV. So-so applies equally to the bZ4X’s range and acceleration. Adding the optional second motor, as in our Limited AWD test car, ups horsepower by only 13, and EPA range is a maximum of 252 miles in front-drivers. Our 222-mile all-wheel-drive test car went just 160 miles in our 75-mph highway range test.Although the back seat is roomy for adults, and the cloth treatment on the dash is a cut above, the ride quality isn’t great, the driver’s area is cramped, and the steering wheel must sit unusually low for the driver to see the gauge display. Optional radiant heat that warms front occupants’ legs is the rare distinctive feature. Presumably, this lessens climate-control use, slightly extending the limited range.Early EVs that mainstream automakers created seemingly just to meet zero-emissions requirements and with marginal customer appeal are dismissively referred to as “compliance cars.” This is also a descriptor that fits the bZ4X quite well.—Dave VanderWerpSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $50,115/$52,439Combined Power: 214 hp Combined Torque: 248 lb-ftBattery: 65.6 kWhOnboard Charger: 6.6 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 4436 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 6.0 sec1/4-Mile: 14.6 sec @ 94 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Top Speed (gov ltd): 105 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 184 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 342 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.80 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 102 MPGe• Range: 222 miMarc Urbano|Car and DriverVinfast VF8Ready or not, the Vietnamese EV upstart plunges into the U.S. market with its VF8 SUV.If you’re a powerful international conglomerate that wants to sell cars in the U.S., the easiest approach is to buy a company that already does that. Think Tata with Jaguar and Land Rover, Geely with Volvo, or whoever controls Lotus these days. It’s much more difficult, and smacks of a certain hubris, to forgo all incumbent brand awareness and institutional knowledge and just start building cars. But if any country loves blithe confidence, it’s America, so let’s give a warm welcome to the VinFast VF8, the latest answer to the question, “How hard can it be to build a car?”—Ezra Dyerread the full reviewSpecificationsBase/As Tested: $54,200/$55,190Combined Power: 402 hp Combined Torque: 457 lb-ftBattery: 82.0 kWhOnboard Charger: 11.0 kWTransmissions: direct-driveCurb Weight: 5771 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 5.0 sec1/4-Mile: 13.9 sec @ 98 mphResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.4 sec.Top Speed (mfr’s claim): 124 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 181 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.84 gEPA FUEL ECONOMY• Combined: 80 MPGe• Range: 191 miMore Stories Based on EV of the YearEditor-in-ChiefTony Quiroga is an 18-year-veteran Car and Driver editor, writer, and car reviewer and the 19th editor-in-chief for the magazine since its founding in 1955. He has subscribed to Car and Driver since age six. “Growing up, I read every issue of Car and Driver cover to cover, sometimes three or more times. It’s the place I wanted to work since I could read,” Quiroga says. He moved from Automobile Magazine to an associate editor position at Car and Driver in 2004. Over the years, he has held nearly every editorial position in print and digital, edited several special issues, and also helped produce C/D’s early YouTube efforts. He is also the longest-tenured test driver for Lightning Lap, having lapped Virginia International Raceway’s Grand Course more than 2000 times over 12 years.Director, Vehicle TestingDave VanderWerp has spent more than 20 years in the automotive industry, in varied roles from engineering to product consulting, and now leading Car and Driver’s vehicle-testing efforts. Dave got his very lucky start at C/D by happening to submit an unsolicited resume at just the right time to land a part-time road warrior job when he was a student at the University of Michigan, where he immediately became enthralled with the world of automotive journalism.Executive EditorK.C. Colwell is Car and Driver’s executive editor, who covers new cars and technology with a keen eye for automotive nonsense and with what he considers to be great car sense, which is a humblebrag. On his first day at C/D in 2004, he was given the keys to a Porsche 911 by someone who didn’t even know if he had a driver’s license. He also is one of the drivers who set fast laps at C/D’s annual Lightning Lap track test. More