Kia K900 and Cadenza Are Dead for 2021
We’re not surprised to see these slow-selling sedans go away given the existence of Hyundai’s Genesis luxury brand and the market’s insatiable demand for SUVs. More
Subterms
100 Shares99 Views
in Motor NewsWe’re not surprised to see these slow-selling sedans go away given the existence of Hyundai’s Genesis luxury brand and the market’s insatiable demand for SUVs. More
113 Shares99 Views
in Motor NewsHyundai Motor Group has created a four-foot-tall AI-powered robot named DAL-e, which will be a pilot project in one of its dealerships in South Korea.
The robot, equipped with facial recognition tech, is intended to help customers in showrooms by providing information about products and services.
DAL-e will go through improvements while it’s being piloted, but if all goes well, other Hyundai and Kia dealers could get their own DAL-e.
One Hyundai dealership in South Korea is gaining a new employee: DAL-e, a four-foot-tall artificial-intelligence-powered robot. If all goes well in the pilot program, the Hyundai Motor Group—which includes Kia—could send another DAL-e, which stands for “Drive you, Assist you, Link with you-experience,” to the Hyundai or Kia dealership nearest you.
Kian, the AI-Powered Bot, Wants to Talk Kias
VW Previews Adorable EV-Charging Autonomous Robot
Ford Uses Robotic Dogs to 3D Map Factory
Currently there is no timeline for when more DAL-e robots could appear, and before they do, Hyundai says, it will be updated and improved through the pilot program. The purpose of DAL-e is to provide information on products and services. So for now, at least, it doesn’t look like DAL-e will try to sell you a car, but perhaps that’ll change once it learns about commissions.
Hyundai Motor Group
AI technology gives DAL-e the ability to recognize faces and communicate. If a customer comes into a showroom without a mask on, DAL-e will recognize that and will be able to remind the person to put on a mask. DAL-e, with its four omnidirectional wheels, will also be able to move freely throughout a showroom, escorting customers to wherever they need to go.
This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More
88 Shares159 Views
in Motor NewsThe 2022 Mitsubishi Outlander will debut February 16.
The redesigned crossover will likely share components with the Nissan Rogue.
Expect it to go on sale later this year.
Mitsubishi’s first new product in a long time, the redesigned 2022 Outlander, will officially arrive February 16. Of course, we’ve already seen much of the new model thanks to leaked photos of its new exterior styling, but we’ll learn more about its mechanical details and see its interior in a few weeks.
2022 Mitsubishi Outlander Arrives Early Next Year
Tested: Mitsubishi Outlander Plug-In Hybrid
This content is imported from YouTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
The new Outlander will look more modern than the current generation, which has been around since 2014. It’s expected to share components with the recently redesigned 2021 Nissan Rogue, including possibly its underpinnings and its 2.5-liter inline-four engine. The plug-in-hybrid version of the Outlander will also return for this generation.
Mitsubishi released a video showing a prototype of the Outlander driving off-road and says that it will offer a new version of the company’s Super All-Wheel Control all-wheel-drive system. The company also says that the new Outlander will be larger than before, which means its optional third-row seat is likely to remain.
The car will debut via live stream on February 16 at 6 p.m. EST, and the 2022 Outlander will go on sale in the U.S. sometime later in 2021.
This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More
125 Shares119 Views
in Motor NewsAccording to a new online survey from Cox Automotive, there’s a lot of good news for electric-vehicle fans.
Cox found that 40 percent of people planning to buy a pickup in the next two years would consider an EV pickup.
Not surprisingly, the survey showed that buyers who would put an electric truck on their shopping list tend to care more about technology, while those sticking with internal combustion are more likely to prioritize horsepower.
It’s no surprise that some of the hottest new electric vehicles are the upcoming barrage of pickup trucks. Certified fresh options from traditional automakers including Ford and GMC (through its revived Hummer brand) as well as startups like Tesla and Rivian will all be arriving in the next few years, and people have noticed.
Every Electric Pickup Truck Coming Soon
2023 Ford F-150 Electric
How We’d Spec 2021 Rivian Electric R1T and R1S
Those are the results from a new survey of pickup shoppers conducted by Cox Automotive, which found that 40 percent of consumers who plan to buy a truck in the next two years are considering an electric option, and a solid half of those in the market for an EV pickup truck find the current selection of electric vehicles appealing.
“Our research shows new EV pickup trucks are leading more consumers to consider an EV product,” said Vanessa Ton, senior manager at Cox Automotive, in a statement. “EV pickups are a catalyst for EV growth.”
To be sure, Cox did not conduct a massive, anonymous survey to discover these results. Instead, Cox worked with MarketVision to administer an online survey in November and December that ended up getting opinions from 155 consumers who are in the market for a pickup truck, including 60 who were specifically shopping for an electric pickup truck.
Not all truck shoppers are interested in the same things. Price and driving performance were the top two considerations, but after that, things diverge slightly, Cox found. One big difference is where horsepower or new technology rank on the list of important features. “ICE buyers prioritize horsepower; shoppers interested in EVs care more about technology,” Ton said.
Cox Automotive
Specifically, horsepower matters for 77 percent of of fossil-fuel truck shoppers but only 58 percent of EV truck shoppers. For a truck that’s “technologically advanced,” the difference is about the same but in the other direction. Seventy-seven percent of EV truck shoppers think an advanced truck is something to consider while only 56 percent of ICE truck shoppers thought so. And, for the traditional OEMs who think Tesla or Rivian have a steep conquest hill to climb, “brand name” came in near the bottom of the list for buyers interested in EVs (45 percent) and ICE (55 percent) truck shoppers.
GMC
Rivian
That doesn’t mean Ford will undoubtedly lose tons of customers because of the Cybertruck or the Rivian R1T. When Cox showed people pictures of trucks from the four companies surveyed—Ford, GMC, Rivian, and Tesla—but without any brand and model indications, 59 percent said they liked the Ford F-150 electric pickup truck, while only 19 percent said the same about the Tesla. Once the names were attached to the pictures, interest in the Cybertruck jumped to 32 percent, while Ford dropped to 45 percent. That still made the F-150 the truck people were most interested in—”perhaps indicating familiarity is attractive,” Cox said—but it also shows the strength of the Tesla brand.
This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More
138 Shares149 Views
in Motor NewsEarlier this month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued a final ruling for Low Volume Vehicle Manufacturers.
It’s not official yet, but when it is, companies such as DeLorean and Superformance will be able to sell finished, turnkey replica cars in the U.S.
Replica makers must apply for approval from the NHTSA, EPA, and CARB, and U.S. sales will be capped at 325 units per year.
On January 15, in the waning days of the Trump administration and roughly four years after it was expected, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) finalized a 102-page ruling that will permit the production of turnkey replica cars from companies including the new DeLorean Motor Company (DMC).
The ruling will allow Low Volume Vehicle Manufacturers (LVVM) to build and sell up to 325 units of replica cars per year in the United States. That means DMC—same name, new company—can get back to work on its version of the updated DMC-12. Superformance—which provided the Cobras in Ford vs. Ferrari—will be able to sell complete Cobras and Daytona coupes. And Morgan can bring its vintage wares to our shores already built and ready to drive.
Where’s the New DeLorean We Were Promised?
Replica Ford GT40 from Ford v Ferrari to Be Sold
Replicating Hollywood’s Famous Rides
That is, as soon as the rule is published in the Federal Register, the last step toward making a regulation official. There was hope that could happen within a week, but Wednesday evening, in the first hours of the Biden administration, a regulatory freeze went into effect giving new agency heads a chance to review work in progress.
“The people I am talking to are not sure if we are talking days or weeks but not likely months,” Stuart Gosswein, the senior director of federal government affairs for the SEMA aftermarket trade group, told us.
Congress originally instructed NHTSA to finalize the rules by the end of 2016, but it wasn’t until January 2020 that the agency finally issued a 118-page proposed ruling. NHTSA went silent after that. In November, when we spoke to DMC and SEMA about the delay, both shrugged. They never knew what had happened or when something might be done.
It’s equally mystifying why NHTSA finally moved the process forward, but no one is complaining. In a release, SEMA president and CEO Christopher J. Kersting said: “The roadblocks have been eliminated. Companies will be able to hire workers, start making necessary parts and components, and produce and sell cars.”
The final draft addresses all of the points in the earlier proposal that SEMA and replica-car makers took issue with, such as agreeing to let courts handle intellectual property disputes. NHTSA also agreed to a 10 percent variance in vehicle dimensions, and replicas don’t need to be exact clones of the original down to moldings and trim pieces. Only engines with current EPA approval can be used, but lighting, window glazing, and certain seat belt provisions will be covered under the federal motor vehicle standards in effect at the time the original vehicle was produced.
Superformance’s Shelby GR-1 Concept Gets Closer
Gosswein said LVVMs will need to register with NHTSA, the EPA, and, if they wish to sell cars in California, the California Air Resources Board (CARB). After submitting information and a picture of the original and replica vehicles to NHTSA, the agency has 90 days to review the application. If there are no complaints, the manufacturer can start the production lines at the end of those 90 days. Before Wednesday’s regulatory hold, that could have meant some new replicas on the streets as soon as May.
Not so with a new DMC-12, however. Company vice president James Espey told Car and Driver that DMC doesn’t plan on submitting its paperwork to the two federal agencies and California until it has finalized the powertrain and financing for the new stainless-steel coupe. The engine the company planned for four years ago runs out of emissions compliance in 2024. He’s not sure it makes sense to use a motor so close to the end of its life. DMC could also go electric. “We have to consider all the things available now that weren’t on the table five years ago,” Espey said.
Espey said the company needs to go over the new ruling with its engineering team in the U.K., find a way forward with its planned engine supplier and sort out approvals, and line up between $5 million and $10 million to complete development and begin production. So a new DeLorean is optimistically still at least 18 months away.
SEMA to Focus on Powertrains
SEMA’s Gosswein said that since NHTSA has done its job, SEMA will turn its efforts to powertrains. “We need to get engine companies to produce engine packages or work with big manufacturers so that [LVVMs] can collaborate.”
SEMA doesn’t want to see replica makers forced into producing their own EPA-compliant engines because OEMs and engine suppliers decline to invest the time and money necessary to provide suitable units. SEMA wants to create a replica-engine ecosystem ensuring a variety of makes and sizes are available.
For instance, “GM had an LS3 engine package from 2012 that was for specially constructed vehicles in California,” Gosswein said. The approval for the LS3 package lapsed, but “that’s something GM can update for the current model year and get CARB to recertify.”
In the meantime, DMC has big plans for this year. January 21 marked the 40th anniversary of the final assembly of the original DMC-12. Considering the DMC-12’s continued brand recognition, Espey is confident we’ll get the gullwinged wonder we’ve been hoping for. He said he continues to get a few messages a week from potential buyers asking if they can send deposits.
“I still think the brand has a lot of power,” he said. “We’re open to talking to suppliers, investors, and others because there’s a lot of demand, and I don’t think having to wait a year or a year and a half is going to put a lot of people off.”
This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More
125 Shares149 Views
in Motor Newsのちすたチャンネル on YouTube
The Honda S2000 is a serious machine. With a sky-high redline and one of the most potent naturally aspirated four-cylinders ever made, the light roadster demands a serious driver to get the most out of it. And few drivers are as serious as the one in this video, uploaded in may by Nochisuta Channel on YouTube.
This content is imported from YouTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
The video features an S2000 attacking what one Reddit commenter identifies as Gunsai Touge, which you might know from Initial D or Best Motoring. It’s one of the more famous touges—or winding/mountain roads—in Japanese car culture, in part because of its tight turns and high-speed sections. It demands full attention, with zero runoffs and no room for error. So it’s all the more surprising to see an S2000 going so fast it catches air.
Watch Full-Electric F-150 Drift, Do Donuts in Snow
Automotive YouTubers to Watch While at Home
Watch Travis Pastrana Jump a Speedboat in Gymkhana
That jump, the climax of the video, is what got the video posted on the /r/cars subreddit this week. It shows the lowered S2000 grabbing air, slamming back down in a shower of sparks, and kicking sideways into a perfectly controlled drift. But the whole video is worth watching, if only for the bravery required to maintain this pace on such a treacherous road.
This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More
138 Shares169 Views
in Motor NewsThe National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued a final set of regulations affecting autonomous cars.
These rules were first promulgated last March and carry over from work started in the Obama administration.
Most interesting, perhaps, is that there are new terms for the “driver’s seat” and the “steering wheel” on self-driving vehicles.
Automakers know exactly how safe their self-driving cars should be now that the U.S. government has updated its decades-old regulations to include vehicles without steering wheels, pedals, or seats. In short, any light-duty vehicle designed to carry people and drive itself has to protect those people the same way that every other vehicle does.
NHTSA Mildly Redefines Autonomous-Car Safety Rules
A New Book Looks at Google, Uber, and Autonomy
What seems like an obvious conclusion after nearly a decade of government studies and guidance was instead confusion. Automakers, tech giants, and startups developing the technology have faced an uncertain path to commercial success. As more states allowed on-road testing of autonomous vehicles, federal law remained ambiguous on their certification and sale to the general public. With the rules in limbo, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) had been accepting dozen of petitions to temporarily exempt certain self-driving prototypes from federal law.
Specific terms in the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) define the features, performance, and test procedures that, with very few exceptions, every production vehicle must pass in the U.S. While its archaic language prevents us from enjoying trick headlights, this same language has protected us from crashes and injuries that still kill people in countries with weak or no national safety laws. But automakers, bursting at the seams to build cars that drive better than we do, have curbed these plans without official and clear changes to these regulations.
In March 2020, NHTSA issued a proposal to amend the “200 series” rules in the FMVSS that govern how a car’s seatbelts, airbags, seats, windshield, and other critical parts must be installed. The rules also define crash tests. While NHTSA has always updated these rules with tougher standards, the agency may have never thought a passenger would sit in a driver’s seat or that a steering wheel could fold out of sight.
Finally, this month, in the period between the U.S. Capitol attacks and the presidential inauguration, NHTSA finalized them. Here’s what the updated rules do—and don’t do—for cars with Level 3, 4, and 5 autonomous systems.
Everyone up Front Is a Passenger
The driver’s designated seating position must have smart airbags that can sense if a child, regardless of their posture, is in the seat. Currently, the law only applies for the front passenger seat. A second airbag readiness light will be required in addition to the one for the front passenger seat to show whether the airbag is activated or not.
The Driver May Not Be a Driver
All mentions of the “driver’s seat” or “front passenger seat” will now be called “front row” when being used as a reference point for measurements and other tests. The “driver’s seat” in other conditions will be called “driver’s designated seating position” to indicate where a driver can be if the vehicle manufacturer allows such control. But “driver,” unlike in previous NHTSA proposals, will not be redefined to mean an automated driving system. This is still a human.
“Manually Operated Driver Controls” Does Not Mean Remote Controls
This is a new term and is meant to combine the traditional array of pedals and steering wheel. NHTSA explicitly states it does not mean control by smartphone or tablet, any kind of remote control, or joystick.
Make the Wackiest Steering Wheels and Pedals You Want
Instead of “steering wheel,” the rules will now state “steering control.” However, since NHTSA states it never defined the wheel as being a perfect circle, manufacturers can go crazy with shapes so long as they satisfy current regulations that protect a driver from the steering wheel. NHTSA also says that automakers can design any stowable steering wheel and pedal controls so long as they work in two operating states: when stowed, they cannot be used; when deployed, they must be in full reach and control of the driver.
Inboard Seats Are Allowed
Any seat positioned more than 12 inches from either door is classified as an inboard seat. So far, this has only applied to front and rear middle passengers in a bench configuration. Now, NHTSA will allow single inboard bucket seats in the first row and many combinations thereof (such as two seats on the far right, or two in the middle and none on either side). In cases where there are two inboard seats in one row, only one has to have a smart airbag and a three-point seatbelt. The other, at the manufacturer’s choosing, does not have to be covered by an airbag and only requires a lap belt. This is in accordance with current regulations and recognizes, however oddly, that placing two frontal airbags in close proximity would cause further complications in a crash.
Non-Forward-Facing Seats Are Not Allowed
These rules apply to forward-facing seats only and aren’t intended for use with sideways, open-concept, “campfire,” or similar types of seating arrangements.
Folding Driver’s Seats Are Allowed
Apparently Tesla, based on statements during the proposal’s comment period, wants to be able to stow the driver’s seat when its vehicles are in autonomous mode. NHTSA says, on page 76 of the Final Rule document: “Although such a system would be unnecessary (and likely illogical), a manufacturer could provide a system that stows the driver’s seat when the controls are stowed.”
Self-Driving Car Levels 0 to 5 Explained
Nothing changes for cars with semi-automated driving systems that are Level 2 and below. Currently, there are no cars with true Level 3 systems—those that will drive fully autonomously, with the driver on standby in case of emergency—but many automakers are testing the capability. For that, they’ll have to certify that their cars meet the autonomous rules above in addition to the normal rules.
But while these new rules offer much-needed clarity, they don’t govern how any autonomous driving system should function. NHTSA has been overtly hands-off in this area and still has no requirements for how such critical systems like emergency braking or adaptive cruise should work. But for now, the door is wide open for future autonomous cars—even if there isn’t a seat at that door.
This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More
125 Shares139 Views
in Motor NewsIf you don’t mind taking your car obsession to extremes, and are wealthy enough to afford it, a new listing for a property near Dallas could be just the “sprawling car haven” you’ve been looking for.
The pearl, for drivers, is a 10-stall garage and a well-appointed vehicle repair facility, with multiple car lifts and a paint application booth.
When you’re not driving or working on your rides, you can lounge in the pool or the automotive-themed entertainment space with a wall of TVs.
If you’ve ever visited a shabby-chic, old-school gas station-cum-repair garage and thought, “I could live here if it only had an outdoor pool,” we’re found the home for you. Say hello to your new $8 million home—complete with a 10-car garage—in Roanoke, Texas.
Garage Mahals: Over-the-Top Dream Garages
11 Solutions to Keep Your Cramped Garage in Order
Sitting on a 10-acre property 20 minutes outside Dallas/Fort Worth, the “sprawling car haven” (as Realtor.com describes it) is large enough that it actually requires two addresses. The house features five bedrooms, five full bathrooms, and two half-baths in 7419 square feet. If that’s not enough room for you, there’s also a guest house and an “outdoor living center,” an outdoor fireplace, and a built-in wine cooler.
via Realtor.com
The exterior parking area is, Zillow notes, “oversized,” and the property’s listing agent told the Dallas Morning News that’s because five of those acres are basically an empty space that has been used to park cars.
But it’s the garage that is likely to get Car and Driver readers most interested. Alongside room for 10 vehicles to shelter in place, the property includes: “car lifts, a paint application booth, a tire changer, and antique memorabilia galore to get your Fast and Furious fix followed by fun around the fire pit and in the oversized tiered pool,” according to Realtor.com.
via Realtor.com
Pictures on the property listing show that the current owner has a bit of an automotive obsession. There are enough old license plates hanging on the walls to keep you busy on eBay for a while if you were to sell them off. Classic automotive industry memorabilia is tacked to the ceilings and walls. Rusty old gas pumps sit outside, and at least one has been turned into a cooler in the entertainment area (which also has five TV screens). An old Chevrolet pickup converted into what looks like a bar sits in one of the building’s many nooks. We assume the Alfa Giulia Quadrifoglio and Cadillac XT5 will not be included.
via Realtor.com
via Realtor.com
The house and garage and everything else are currently listed on a number of real estate sites for $7,999,000. Not bad for a facility that was built in 2014 and could be yours for an estimated monthly payment of just $37,493. But hey, at least there are no homeowner association fees. It was put up for sale earlier this month and, if you’re interested in buying, the realtor is offering virtual tours this weekend.
This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More
This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.