More stories

  • in

    2025 Nissan Kicks Adds All-Wheel Drive, Starts at $23,220

    Nissan released pricing information for the 2025 Kicks subcompact crossover. The Kicks earned a major overhaul for 2025 that includes a larger footprint, a more powerful engine, and a totally new design. Pricing for the redesigned Kicks starts at $23,220 for the base model ($24,720 for the base model with AWD) and ranges to more than $29,070 for the all-wheel-drive-equipped SR model. We’ve seen this Kicks before; Nissan first showed off the new generation of the subcompact crossover in March. The redesign has brought a larger footprint, a new design, a more powerful engine, and available all-wheel drive. Now, five months later, Nissan has just announced pricing for the 2025 Kicks. NissanDespite the major overhaul, pricing for the Kicks doesn’t change all that much. In front-drive guise, the subcompact SUV kicks things off (sorry) with a starting price of $23,220 for the entry S trim. The mid-trim SV carries a starting price of $25,070 and swaps the standard 7.0-inch display for a larger 12.3-inch center screen while adding support for wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.The front-drive version of the top SR trim comes in at $27,570 and gains a 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster, improved driver assistance technology, and unique styling cues. All-wheel drive can be added to all three trims for an additional $1500 on the S and SR or $1650 on the SV. Nissan announced last spring that the Kicks would begin arriving in dealerships late this summer but hasn’t provided a specific date. All trim levels will be powered by the recently added 2.0-liter four that it shares with the Nissan Sentra sedan. The new mill churns out 141 horsepower and uses a continuously variable automatic transmission to send power to the wheels. More on the Nissan KicksJack Fitzgerald’s love for cars stems from his as yet unshakable addiction to Formula 1. After a brief stint as a detailer for a local dealership group in college, he knew he needed a more permanent way to drive all the new cars he couldn’t afford and decided to pursue a career in auto writing. By hounding his college professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he was able to travel Wisconsin seeking out stories in the auto world before landing his dream job at Car and Driver. His new goal is to delay the inevitable demise of his 2010 Volkswagen Golf. More

  • in

    Toyota Recalls 33,000 Vehicles for Inaccurate Sticker

    Toyota has issued a recall of 33,848 cars, trucks, and SUVs due to a sticker showing an incorrect load-carrying capacity.The recall covers most of Toyota’s North American lineup and spans 22 models.Notification letters will be sent to owners on or before September 16, 2024, that will include corrected stickers for each model. Toyota issued a recall spanning 33,848 vehicles due to an issue regarding incorrect load-carrying-capacity stickers. The recall spans the majority of models Toyota sells in North America and covers 22 models ranging from the company’s sports cars to its pickup trucks and family vehicles. Unlike most recalls, which are generally tied to production issues or faulty hardware, this recall originated with Gulf States Toyota, a dealership group based in Texas. The company is an official distributor of Toyota accessories. Naturally, adding new bits and bobs to your car impacts the load capacity by adding more weight to the car. Add 150 pounds of gear, and the listed load capacity decreases by 150 pounds—requiring an updated load-carrying-capacity sticker. Greg Pajo|Car and DriverAccording to documents associated with the recall, Gulf States Toyota discovered a vehicle with an incorrectly modified sticker, which led to the recall. According to the documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the relevant safety standard FMVSS 110 S10.2 requires “that the amount of weight the load-carrying capacity is reduced by be accurate within 1 percent of the actual added weight.” Owners with an incorrect sticker may accidentally overload their vehicle, increasing the likelihood of a crash. Recent RecallsRecall documents state that notification letters will be sent to dealerships on or before August 9, while letters will be sent to owners on or before September 16. The notification letters to owners will include corrected stickers for each model along with detailed replacement instructions. The company will also offer free replacements at any Toyota dealership. Owners who want to know if their vehicle may be involved in the recall can check the NHTSA recalls website or Toyota’s recall tool. The recall population includes: 2023–2024 BZ4X2025 Camry Hybrid2024 Corolla2023–2024 Corolla Cross Hybrid2023–2025 Crown2024 4Runner2023–2024 Highlander, Highlander Hybrid 2024 Grand Highlander, Grand Highlander Hybrid 2023–2024 GR Corolla2024 GR862023 GR Supra2024 Land Cruiser Hybrid2023–2024 Prius, Prius Prime2023–2024 Sequoia Hybrid2024 Tacoma, Tacoma Hybrid2023–2024 Tundra, Tundra Hybrid2023–2024 Venza HybridJack Fitzgerald’s love for cars stems from his as yet unshakable addiction to Formula 1. After a brief stint as a detailer for a local dealership group in college, he knew he needed a more permanent way to drive all the new cars he couldn’t afford and decided to pursue a career in auto writing. By hounding his college professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he was able to travel Wisconsin seeking out stories in the auto world before landing his dream job at Car and Driver. His new goal is to delay the inevitable demise of his 2010 Volkswagen Golf. More

  • in

    2025 GMC Terrain Is Boxy Again and Ditches the Push-Button Shifter

    The 2025 GMC Terrain enters its third generation with more trucklike styling, and the compact SUV no longer has a push-button shifter.Along with a 15.0-inch touchscreen, the new Terrain has a 175-hp turbo four and offers front- or all-wheel drive; the latter comes with a new eight-speed automatic transmission.The entry-level Elevation trim will go on sale later this year, and the AT4 and Denali variants will follow early next year as 2026 models.A lot is new about the 2025 GMC Terrain, most notably the death of its predecessor’s push-button shifter. Changing gears is once again easy to execute thanks to the new column-mounted lever. For its third generation, the redesigned Terrain also returns to the boxiness that defined the first-gen model. GMC says the compact SUV’s new look was inspired by the brand’s trucks, and it has tech that’s straight out of the mid-size three-row Acadia.Terrain Gains a Big ScreenInside, the new Terrain has more attractive materials and a dashboard that’s dominated by a massive vertically oriented touchscreen. Measuring 15.0 inches, it features Google built-in software that allows users to download apps and customize the layout. The Terrain’s infotainment system comes with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto capability and a 5G Wi-Fi hotspot. The driver also now faces an 11.0-inch digital gauge cluster that has configurable settings.For 2025, the previous SLE and SLT models are gone, and the Elevation now serves as the lineup’s entry point. It comes with more standard features than before, including a heated steering wheel, heated front seats, remote start, and adaptive cruise control. The latter is joined by a plethora of new driver-assistance tech such as bicycle and pedestrian detection, automated braking that works when turning at an intersection, and steering assist that helps avoid turning into that car lurking in your blind spot. The Terrain is also available with a rearview camera mirror for the first time, and the available surround-view camera system now has up to eight different views.While the rugged AT4 and ritzy Denali will join the Terrain lineup early next year as 2026 models, the Elevation will launch later this year as the sole offering. Like its higher-spec siblings, the Elevation is motivated by a 175-hp turbocharged 1.5-liter four-cylinder. The all-wheel-drive variant will go on sale first. Its 203 pound-feet of torque is routed through a new eight-speed automatic transmission that replaces the previous nine-speed unit. The front-wheel-drive Elevation has a continuously variable automatic transmission and less torque at 184 pound-feet. With AWD, the Terrain can tow 1500 pounds; FWD models are limited to 800 pounds.The Elevation rides on 17-inch wheels out of the box, but it offers a Black Edition package that includes black 19-inch wheels and an assortment of black exterior bits. Two-tone color is available on every model, with a choice of a black or gray roof. Compared with its predecessor, the new Terrain is just over an inch shorter from stem to stern, and it’s about two inches wider and taller too. Interior space grows as well, with the third generation bringing up to an inch of additional headroom and front-seat legroom increasing by three inches. Cargo space behind the rear seat is the same 30 cubic feet as before.The New AT4 and DenaliFor folks who want to escape the suburbs, the AT4 is the most capable Terrain model to do it. Not only does it have the requisite equipment such as all-terrain tires and red tow hooks, but it has a front skid plate for protecting its vital parts, a lifted ride height to help clear obstacles, and a suspension that’s specially tuned for driving off-road. The AT4 is also the only model with a Terrain drive mode. As with other GMC models, the Denali is the top-of-the-line Terrain. Every trim has a unique grille design, and that’s true for the Denali, which boasts a glitzy pattern. The shininess is matched by the standard 19-inch wheels, but an optional 20-inch set makes an even bigger visual statement. GMC says the Denali is fitted with upgraded dampers to help smooth out the ride. And like the AT4, the top trim has LED headlights and taillights that play animations.Pricing for the 2025 GMC Terrain hasn’t yet been released, but we expect the AWD Elevation to start around $35,000 when it reaches dealerships later this year. Meanwhile, the 2026 GMC Terrain AT4 and Denali will likely both cost somewhere close to $40,000 when they eventually join the lineup.More Terrain StoriesEric Stafford’s automobile addiction began before he could walk, and it has fueled his passion to write news, reviews, and more for Car and Driver since 2016. His aspiration growing up was to become a millionaire with a Jay Leno–like car collection. Apparently, getting rich is harder than social-media influencers make it seem, so he avoided financial success entirely to become an automotive journalist and drive new cars for a living. After earning a journalism degree at Central Michigan University and working at a daily newspaper, the years of basically burning money on failed project cars and lemon-flavored jalopies finally paid off when Car and Driver hired him. His garage currently includes a 2010 Acura RDX, a manual ’97 Chevy Camaro Z/28, and a ’90 Honda CRX Si. More

  • in

    2001 Honda Prelude Type SH Is Today’s Bring a Trailer Pick

    Honda is bringing back the Prelude, a model that has a great history.With a rev-happy 2.2-liter VTEC four and a crisp-handling chassis, this Type SH is bound to put a grin on your face.This final-gen example is nicely equipped and looks sharp in silver over black.Confirmed to be returning for a sixth generation, the Prelude has always been Honda letting its hair down a little. Not a full performance-oriented car packed with screaming revs like the S2000 or the Integra Type R, the Prelude was pitched as a fun and sporty coupe, relatively affordable and well-made, more special than an Accord or Civic but still sensible. Such is a recipe for a great modern classic.Take for example this 2001 Prelude Type SH, for sale on Bring a Trailer (which, like Car and Driver, is part of Hearst Autos). Everything you want is here: gutsy VTEC-equipped four-cylinder power, a five-speed manual so you can row your own gears, an all-business cabin uncluttered by screens, and luxuries like air conditioning and a CD player. Best of all, this one’s a top-of-the-line Type SH model, its handling as highly polished as Preludes ever got for the U.S. market.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerIn a six-car shootout from 1997, when this model was new, we crowned a Prelude Type SH the best-handling car priced under $30K, beating out usual suspects like the E36 BMW 3-Series and the Mazda Miata. It wasn’t a case of votes cast by the stopwatch, but rather overall polish and sophistication. When Honda gets it right, it really gets it right, and such was the case for the fifth-gen Prelude.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerIt was pure golden-age Honda. The suspension was a control-arm setup, the steering was rack-and-pinion (a slightly quicker rack in the Type SH), and the chassis was notably stiffened over the previous-generation Prelude. Under the hood, a 2.2-liter four-cylinder offered decent torque for everyday driving duties, and made peak power of 200 horsepower at 7000 rpm. A modern Civic Si calls time at 6600 rpm, but the Prelude’s four will rev all the way past its 7400 rpm redline to an 8000 rpm fuel cut.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerIt feels quicker than it is, thanks to the noticeable switchover at 5250 rpm, when Honda’s well-known variable Valve Timing and Electronic Control (VTEC) kicks in. That little rush to redline is part of what makes driving a Prelude feel special, but overall it’s more the way the car works as a whole, each element fussed with to create a cohesive approach. It would not be a stretch to call it a “poor man’s NSX,” but it’s also a far more practical classic than the mid-engined Acura.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerThe only problem seems to be that not many Preludes have weathered the past 20 years, when they were just old, affordable Honda coupes. Not aged enough to become a classic, and offering VTEC performance during the height of compact performance enthusiasm brought on by the Fast and Furious movies was not a great recipe for survival. Finding a Prelude that someone hasn’t messed with is tough.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerThe good news here is that this one has just 47K miles on its odometer. It’s had some paintwork here and there, but no crash damage is reported on the Carfax, and the color combination of silver over black is both classic for the marque and hard-wearing. Keeping it looking like it just rolled off a lot in 2001 will be easy.Honda has kept silent about what kind of powertrain will be available in the new Prelude, but don’t hold your breath for a two-door Civic Type-R. There’s even a good chance the new car could be hybridized, or just get the Civic Si’s turbocharged 1.5-liter engine. The reborn Prelude may well be a fine car, but it has big shoes to fill.Instead, you can pick up a Prelude from the era when pretty much every Honda was something special. It’s past time the Prelude got its due as a collectible classic.The auction ends on August 13.Brendan McAleer is a freelance writer and photographer based in North Vancouver, B.C., Canada. He grew up splitting his knuckles on British automobiles, came of age in the golden era of Japanese sport-compact performance, and began writing about cars and people in 2008. His particular interest is the intersection between humanity and machinery, whether it is the racing career of Walter Cronkite or Japanese animator Hayao Miyazaki’s half-century obsession with the Citroën 2CV. He has taught both of his young daughters how to shift a manual transmission and is grateful for the excuse they provide to be perpetually buying Hot Wheels. More

  • in

    Ultra-Rare 1991 Isuzu Impulse RS Turbo Is Today’s Bring a Trailer Pick

    Overshadowed by its Geo Storm sibling and undermined by Isuzu’s focus on SUVs, the second-generation Impulse is a forgotten gem, and the all-wheel-drive RS Turbo is the fastest, rarest version.A high-tech pocket rocket, this Impulse also features a Lotus-tuned suspension, passive rear-wheel steering, anti-lock brakes, and a functional hood scoop.With just 27,000 miles on the clock, this is one of the nicest remaining examples of a fun, obscure, and very collectible car.For a car that struggled to get noticed when it was new, the second-generation Isuzu Impulse RS Turbo isn’t shy. It’s loud, raw, and quick, and if you’re behind one at a stoplight, it advertises its “all wheel drive/intercooled turbo” status right on the back in all-caps decals. There are also “Handling by Lotus” and “DOHC” badges on the sides. If Isuzu had added decals or plaques for all of this punchy pocket rocket’s laundry list of tech, it might have ended up looking like a Winston Cup car. Despite all those features, sporty looks, and an available shooting-brake body style, Isuzu sold fewer than 10,000 second-gen Impulses in the U.S. before it axed its car line in 1993. Despite that ignominious end, the Impulse went out with a bang. This 27,000-mile 1991 Impulse RS Turbo AWD for sale on Bring a Trailer (which, like Car and Driver, is part of Hearst Autos) is the ne plus ultra of Impulses. With 160 horsepower and moves to rival Integra GS-Rs and 240SXs, this unsung hero is one of just 600 U.S.-market turbos.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerThe Impulse’s problem was that its main adversary wasn’t the Integra or 240SX but the Geo Storm, its GM sibling from the start of development in 1985. GM owned 35 percent of Isuzu then, and the Storm would theoretically boost production and profits for Isuzu’s tiny car division, make replacing the aging first-generation Impulse easier, and provide Chevy with a fun, high-quality small coupe.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerIn reality, while the Geo didn’t get the Impulse’s best performance bits, it was cheaper, obviously related, and enjoyed a bigger dealer network and much more marketing budget. Geo sold 280,000 Storms while Impulses gathered dust. By 1991, Americans also thought of Isuzu as an SUV brand. They flocked to showrooms for the Amigo, Rodeo, and Trooper, not its cars. Meanwhile, Japan’s souring economy also meant poor sales at home, which led to the company’s 1992 decision to cancel its U.S. car line and ultimately stop building cars altogether.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerStill, Isuzu swung for the fences with the Impulse and Storm designs. The spaceship-like coupes were created under the eye of Isuzu’s Takao Honda, and the wagonback was sketched by one of Isuzu’s first female designers, Masayo Nagata. They had advice from high up, too, with GM design VP Chuck Jordan consulting on the designs at the firm’s Fujisawa studios. The Impulse looks more menacing, and those “eyebrow” lights resemble the Lamborghini Jarama’s.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerMechanically, they were just as bold, incorporating a Lotus-tuned suspension, Isuzu’s own Nishiboric passive rear-wheel steering, all-wheel drive with a 43:57 front-to-rear torque split, optional anti-lock brakes, and punchy twin-cam, 16-valve engines, including the optional 1.6-liter, 160-horse turbo. Lotus, also owned by GM back then, borrowed Isuzu’s turbo four and five-speed gearbox for the Elan M100 roadster.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerDelayed by labor shortages in Japan, the Impulse was introduced in 1989 but it didn’t arrive until the spring of 1990. That year, it came only as the XS coupe, with a 130-hp 1.6-liter twin-cam four, the Storm’s more powerful optional engine, and a four-speed automatic or a five-speed manual. In 1991, Isuzu added the wagonback XS and the all-wheel-drive RS Turbo coupe, which would be the two rarest versions, but the RS, while included in the 1992 brochure, lasted just that one year and only 600 were shipped over, all manuals.Courtesy: Bring a TrailerSprightly and grippy, the all-wheel-drive turbo was a genuinely entertaining car, as we discovered in an April 1992 comparo. It was noisy and unrefined, probably thanks to attempts to keep the price down, but it could certainly keep up with other rad-era rivals like the Mitsubishi Eclipse, Integra GS-R, and Honda Prelude. It’s still a fun ride with a devoted cult following today.The tribe of classic Isuzu owners is tight-knit, active, and inclusive, with a lively Facebook group (Isuzone) and regular drives. This car has been offered for sale in that group before and is considered to be one of the nicest, lowest-mileage RSs in existence. It rides on non-original wheels (the originals are included) and has lost its rear windshield wiper, but it’s otherwise a minter and ready to roll. Best of all, Impulses (and Storms) are hardy cars; they’re easy to live with, though their rarity makes some parts hard to get. If you’re ready to be Radwood royalty and enter the Isuzone, the auction ends on August 14. More

  • in

    Plug-In Hybrids Are a Lot Slower in EV Mode, Our Tests Show

    The Toyota Prius Prime and other plug-in hybrids are sluggish in EV mode in our acceleration testing.PHEVs are heavier than regular hybrids and have electric motors that aren’t as powerful as pure EVs, leading to slow 60-mph runs on electricity alone.In electric-only mode, the Prius Prime and other PHEVs took about twice as long to accelerate to 60 mph.Welcome to Car and Driver’s Testing Hub, where we zoom in on the test numbers. We’ve been pushing vehicles to their limits since 1956 to provide objective data to bolster our subjective impressions (you can see how we test here).Plug-in hybrids such as the Toyota Prius Prime, for example, occupy the space between hybrid and electric vehicles. PHEVs have an internal-combustion engine that works with one or more electric motors (just like regular hybrids that don’t have a plug), but they also have a larger battery pack than a traditional hybrid to provide more electric-only range and the ability to plug in to recharge like an EV. While PHEVs might sound like the best of both worlds, it’s more complicated than that, especially since they’re usually heavier than hybrid equivalents yet their electric motors aren’t as mighty as EV alternatives. And for anyone who loves an electric car’s speedy acceleration, that sensation is lost in translation on plug-in hybrids when motivated by electricity alone. As our 60-mph acceleration testing reveals, PHEVs are downright slow in EV mode. The sprint to 60 mph is a staple of Car and Driver’s comprehensive testing regime, but when it comes to testing plug-in hybrids in electric-only mode, we’ve only done a few. That’s largely because automakers use different operating strategies. Some such as Toyota allow drivers to “lock” the powertrain into EV mode, whereas others such as Volvo lack a dedicated EV mode, meaning the gas engine fires up after a certain amount of throttle input. The latter makes achieving a credible electric-only 60-mph time very tedious.Still, to show how much more slowly PHEVs accelerate in EV mode, we collected test results from a Toyota Prius Prime, a BMW X5 xDrive50e, a Lexus RX450h+, and a Mercedes-Benz GLE450e. We tested all four in both hybrid and electric-only modes and found that when their gas engines were left offline, their 60-mph times roughly doubled.Toyota Prius PrimeThanks to its plug-in-hybrid powertrain, the Toyota Prius Prime is more powerful than the regular Toyota Prius, which is a traditional hybrid. Naturally, the Prime is quicker in hybrid mode, and its larger 10.3-kWh battery gives it an EPA-estimated electric driving range of up to 44 miles. However, the Prime’s plug-in system also makes it about 300 pounds porkier than its hybrid sibling. That added mass is motivated by an Atkinson-cycle 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 150 horsepower and 139 pound-feet of torque. Paired with two electric motors, the Prime’s total system output is 220 horsepower. In hybrid mode, the front-wheel-drive Prime used all that to hit 60 mph in 6.5 seconds. However, that time stretched to a sluggish 11.7 seconds in EV mode, as our 3536-pound test car was propelled solely by a 161-hp electric motor driving the front wheels.Acceleration Times (Hybrid mode/EV mode)60 mph: 6.5 seconds/11.7 seconds 1/4-mile: 15.1 seconds at 94 mph/18.7 seconds at 75 mphLexus RX450h+Lexus subscribes to the same PHEV philosophy as its parent company, meaning its plug-in models have a dedicated EV mode just like Toyotas. The Lexus RX450h+ is, of course, a ritzier experience than the Prius—it’s quicker too. The mid-size luxury SUV has a 2.5-liter Atkinson-cycle four-cylinder with 180 horsepower and 168 pound-feet of torque. Helping juice those numbers to a combined 304 horses are three electric motors that draw from an 18.1-kWh battery. A pair of e-motors on the front axle generate 179 hp and 199 pound-feet, while a third motor with 53 hp and 89 pound-feet is attached to the rear axle and helps provide all-wheel drive. Flatten the RX450h’s throttle in hybrid mode and it hits 60 mph in 6.0 seconds. Switch to EV mode, and the electric motors need 10.6 seconds to move the 4866-pound plug-in-hybrid Lexus SUV to the same mark. Acceleration Times (Hybrid mode/EV mode) 60 mph: 6.0 seconds/10.6 seconds 1/4-mile: 14.6 seconds at 95 mph/17.7 seconds at 74 mphBMX X5 xDrive50eThe BMW X5 is a mid-size SUV with a plethora of powertrain options. These range from the standard 375-hp turbocharged inline-six to the 617-hp twin-turbo V-8 that motivates the hi-po X5 M. Somewhere in the middle is the plug-in-hybrid xDrive50e, which has a turbocharged 3.0-liter straight-six that makes 308 horsepower and 331 pound-feet of torque. The gas engine partners with an electric motor that’s integrated into the housing of the eight-speed automatic transmission. Fed by a 19.2-kWh battery, the e-motor packs 194 horses and 280 pound-feet. Altogether, the X5’s plug-in-hybrid powertrain produces 483 horsepower and 516 pound-feet of torque, which helps the all-wheel-drive SUV hit 60 mph in a hasty 3.9 seconds. Accelerating with electricity alone, the 5473-pound Bimmer reached 6o in 9.3 seconds, which is the quickest of the PHEV bunch we tested but slow, nonetheless. When in EV mode, the plug-in X5 can travel at speeds of up to 87 mph without the gas engine getting involved.Acceleration Times (Hybrid mode/EV mode) 60 mph: 3.9 seconds/9.3 seconds 1/4-mile: 12.5 seconds at 110 mph/16.9 seconds at 80 mphMercedes-Benz GLE450eThe Mercedes-Benz GLE450e is the plug-in-hybrid member of Mercedes’s mid-size luxury SUV lineup, and it has a 2.0-liter turbo four producing 248 horsepower and 295 pound-feet of torque. The gas engine pairs with a 23.3-kWh battery that feeds an electric motor making 134 horses and 325 pound-feet of torque. The PHEV GLE’s total output is 381 horsepower and 479 pound-feet. The hybrid all-wheel-drive setup shoved the 5940-pound Merc to 60 mph in a tidy 5.3 seconds. However, taking the gas engine out of the equation meant the trip to 60 took almost three times as long, with the mark arriving in 14.4 seconds, by far the slowest EV-only time of all four PHEVs we tested. For comparison, the similarly sized Mercedes-Benz EQE500 SUV, with its 402-hp dual-motor electric powertrain, sped to 60 mph in 4.2 seconds.Acceleration Times (Hybrid mode/EV mode) 60 mph: 5.3 seconds/14.4 seconds 1/4-mile: 13.9 seconds at 99 mph/19.7 seconds at 69 mphMore PHEV ReadingEric Stafford’s automobile addiction began before he could walk, and it has fueled his passion to write news, reviews, and more for Car and Driver since 2016. His aspiration growing up was to become a millionaire with a Jay Leno–like car collection. Apparently, getting rich is harder than social-media influencers make it seem, so he avoided financial success entirely to become an automotive journalist and drive new cars for a living. After earning a journalism degree at Central Michigan University and working at a daily newspaper, the years of basically burning money on failed project cars and lemon-flavored jalopies finally paid off when Car and Driver hired him. His garage currently includes a 2010 Acura RDX, a manual ’97 Chevy Camaro Z/28, and a ’90 Honda CRX Si. More

  • in

    These 12 Cars Are Expected to Bring Big Money at the Monterey Auctions

    Estimate: UnknownRM Sotheby’sAny narrow-body Cobra is a special and extremely valuable thing, but this particular example may well be verging on priceless. Bought new by Henry “Hank” Williams (not that Hank Williams, but he was a jazz drummer who played with B.B. King and Ray Charles), this car was a regular at many a Shelby gathering, owned for nearly six decades by a man who would become a close personal friend of Carroll Shelby. Williams drove his Cobra 140,000 miles over his lifetime, covering the last of those miles one year before his death at the ripe old age of 99. He raced it in nearly 400 races, entered it in countless shows, and was the first Black person to drive a sports car for a lap of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway in it. The car is being sold by his family trust, and few cars come with a better story. More

  • in

    Tested: Hyundai Ioniq 5 N Is Slower When It’s Fake Shifting

    The electric Hyundai Ioniq 5 N has a drive mode that simulates gearchanges but reduces its acceleration times.With N e-Shift activated, the 641-hp EV acts like it has an eight-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and needed 3.5 seconds to hit 60 mph.The Ioniq 5 N’s fake shifting made it four-tenths slower to 60 mph and 1.1 seconds slower to 100 mph, but the fakery might be more fun for some.Welcome to Car and Driver’s Testing Hub, where we zoom in on the test numbers. We’ve been pushing vehicles to their limits since 1956 to provide objective data to bolster our subjective impressions (you can see how we test here).Do you remember blue ketchup? An experiment by the condiment kings at Heinz in the early 2000s turned what for nearly two centuries had been red to green, purple, orange, and, in some bottles, pink. Electric cars—not quite as old as ketchup—are having a blue-ketchup moment. Take the 641-hp Hyundai Ioniq 5 N, for example. Its ability to imitate the sounds and gearchanges of a gas-powered car make it one especially unusual tomato. To simulate the sensations of a car with a dual-clutch automatic transmission, the all-wheel-drive Ioniq 5 N moves and makes noises that an electric car typically wouldn’t. With N e-Shift drive mode enabled, its software will drop torque between “gearshifts” and allow you to slam into a pseudo redline if you forget to upshift. It’s as convincing as it is cool. Pair that with the Ignition drive sound that mimics engine noise, and you could easily fool a passenger into believing they’ve climbed into the seat of some custom SEMA-show Elantra N with an eight-speed dual-clutch transmission. As senior editor Ezra Dyer said in his review, “Auditory cues are a practical advantage in a car that gathers speed like a Supermarket Sweep contestant gathers groceries.” That, and the imitation pops and crackles sound far more exciting than the vacuum-cleaner-has-come-unplugged sound that EVs typically make on deceleration. Configured for FunThe Ioniq 5 N is the quickest Korean car we’ve tested, launching to 60 mph in 3.0 seconds, taking 6.9 seconds to get to 100 mph, and reaching the quarter-mile in 11.1 seconds at 123 mph. To achieve those times, we used the Ioniq 5 N’s Drag mode, which needs roughly 20 minutes to pre-warm the battery. We also used launch control to ensure the car was configured for maximum quickness.This time around, we threw some of that serious business out the window as we entered the depths of Hyundai’s infotainment menus to toggle on all of the fun. Due to drive-mode restrictions, we had to run our standing start twice to accurately measure the comparison with and without fake shifting.With N e-Shift mode enabled, the Ioniq 5 N won’t allow the use of N Grin Boost (good for 40 horsepower of extra oomph) or launch control. We kept the Ioniq 5 N in N mode and its softest suspension setting to allow for additional squat to help with grip, but we still used Drag mode to condition the battery. Letting the software automatically handle shifts was quicker, so we kept our greedy paws away from the paddle shifters too.The Cost to FlossWe began this test using those settings as our baseline, instead of relying on the results when using launch control. The Ioniq 5 N was only a tenth slower to 60 mph (3.1 seconds), 0.3 second slower to 100 mph (7.2 seconds), and 0.2 second behind in the quarter-mile (11.3 seconds) than when using launch mode.Then we enabled N e-Shift mode, making the Ioniq 5 N burble and pop, snapping through its make-believe gears like a WRC car starting a rally stage. But the simulated drama came at a cost. With N e-Shift activated, it took the Ioniq 5 N 3.5 seconds to reach 60 mph (a four-tenth penalty), 8.3 seconds to hit 100 mph (1.1 seconds slower than without fake shifting), and 11.8 seconds to clear the quarter-mile at 117 mph (five-tenths behind our baseline). There was also a big difference in passing times. In the fake-shifting mode, the Ioniq 5 N was two-tenths slower from 30 to 50 mph and six-tenths slower from 50 to 70 mph. At least the fake-shifting N model is still a full second quicker to 60 mph than the less intense 320-hp Ioniq 5. Despite what our hearts tell us, test data proves over and over that in every modern application, the automatic transmission moves cars quicker to 60 mph than even the most impressive sleight of hand can manage in the dwindling number of cars sold today with a manual transmission. In the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N, it is the virtual automatic transmission that doesn’t cut the mustard like the immediacy of an EV’s direct-drive unit. Still, since N e-Shift mode can be turned on or off, the decision to sacrifice quickness is a choice, and while the Ioniq 5 N is slower when it’s faking gearchanges, it might fool you into falling in love with an electric powertrain.More on the Ioniq 5 NAustin Irwin has worked for Car and Driver for over 10 years in various roles. He’s steadily worked his way from an entry-level data entry position into driving vehicles for photography and video, and is now reviewing and testing cars. What will he do next? Who knows, but he better be fast. More