Car Reviews

Porsche’s stick-shift, all-wheel-drive Carrera 4S is a strange and wonderful derivative of the awesome 911. More

From the August 2002 Issue of Car and Driver.
All you need to know about this new Nissan 350Z is that when it comes to its price-and-performance quotient, it is a re-creation of the segment-busting Datsun 240Z that set the sports-car world on its ear in 1970.
[editoriallinks id=’30242d5f-823f-4352-a13e-34c4571afe4d’ align=’left’][/editoriallinks]
When that original Z-car appeared, sports-car aficionados basically had two choices. On the one hand, they could spend less than $4000 and choose from an assortment of Fiats, MGs, Opels, Triumphs, and the Porsche 914/4, all of which had about 100 horsepower and not enough performance to keep up with a Chevy Impala that didn’t know it was racing. On the other hand, if they wanted serious speed, they had to spend well over $5000 for a Corvette, Jaguar E-type, or Porsche 911. The 240Z, which came with a 150-hp, 2.4-liter inline six and a price of $3601, neatly split the difference and established a new category all its own.
[image id=’c7ff47fa-12fc-46db-820e-7a20846883be’ mediaId=’0f8b6080-3f64-4777-b89c-89f5f44adfce’ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’original’][/image]
Fast forward to today. For $21,800 you can get a 142-hp Mazda Miata. For a couple more grand, there’s the similarly powerful Toyota MR2. But if you want serious grunt — over 250 horsepower these days—in a true sports car, you have to step up to the $42,420 Corvette.
The new Nissan 350Z completely fractures this horsepower hierarchy. With a base price of $26,809, the resurrected Z-car costs barely 10 percent more than a Mister Two, yet it has more than double that little Toyota’s power. In fact, the 350Z’s total of 287 horsepower is only a few ponies shy of what is offered in a Porsche 911 that costs two and half times as much as the Nissan.
[pullquote align=’center’]Highs: Excellent performance, terrific control feel, exciting styling inside and out.[/pullquote]
Even the top-of-the-line Track model tested here—with its front and rear spoilers (eliminating front and rear lift and cutting the drag coefficient from 0.30 to 0.29), Rays Engineering forged-aluminum 18-inch wheels (saving a total of almost 18 pounds of unsprung weight), Brembo brakes, viscous limited-slip differential, aluminum pedals, and raft of nonperformance upgrades—goes for only $34,619, $7810 more than a base Z.
[image id=’e65c7971-a500-4055-b769-0784c39c4fe6′ mediaId=’ae24bdba-c9bb-45cb-a494-af38cac5d3f2′ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’original’][/image]
This remarkable bargain is possible because the Z employs mass-produced components from Nissan’s parts bins. The Z’s V-6, for example, is the ubiquitous 3.5-liter, 24-valve, quad-cam unit that sees duty in everything from the Altima to the Infiniti QX4 sport-utility. For use in the Z-car, Nissan engineers have retuned this engine with slightly hotter camshafts and freer-flowing intake and exhaust systems. The resulting 287 horsepower at 6200 rpm is about 10 percent more than the Infiniti G35 engine musters.
This engine resides in the nose of a version of Nissan’s FM platform that was recently introduced in the G35. The designation “FM” stands for “front mid-engine” and means that the engine sits fully behind the center line of the front wheels, providing decent weight distribution. For use with the Z-car, this platform has had about eight inches chopped out of its wheelbase, which at 104.3 inches is still on the long side, about the same as a Corvette’s.
As you’d expect from a brand-new design, the FM chassis employs a sophisticated independent suspension with multilink geometry front and rear. Except for the rear diagonal links, all the suspension components, including the rubber-isolated rear subframe, are made of forged aluminum. The FM platform also includes rack-and-pinion steering, anti-lock brakes, and on this Track model, electronic stability control incorporating a welcome “off” switch. Compared with the G35 application of this chassis, the ride height is set lower for the Z, with more negative camber all around.
[image id=’bbfac7c8-ac03-49ff-8595-dcbd54b3edb0′ mediaId=’31b877bb-25d0-4f36-8f07-3db1b0de3400′ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’original’][/image]
We’re delighted to report that this hardware makes for more than an impressive spec sheet. How does this sound: 0 to 60 mph in 5.4 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 14.1 seconds at 101 mph? How about 0.88 g of cornering stick, a stopping distance from 70 mph to standstill in 164 feet, and a top speed of 156 mph? That’s essentially the same performance as a Porsche Boxster S, which has a base price of more than 50 grand.
Not only is the Z swift in a straight line and around corners, but it is effortlessly so. With a generous 3498cc under its hood and well-chosen ratios in the six-speed gearbox, healthy thrust is always just a twitch of your foot or a flick of your wrist away. There’s even plenty of poke in sixth gear, which drops engine revs comfortably on the highway. Both the 30-to-50-mph and 50-to-70-mph top-gear acceleration times are about nine seconds, indicating good flexibility.
Despite its performance, the 350Z does not feel as downy light as a Miata or MR2. Sure enough, at 3322 pounds it’s heavier than a Corvette. That said, the Z is a very satisfying drive with terrific control feel.
[image id=’ac120bdf-d2d2-488a-acac-d1c5ed2b62d5′ mediaId=’4360bb92-54e8-4055-b03b-fc5bb4fc758c’ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’original’][/image]
The shifter is precise and accurate, with a direct mechanical feel. The brakes are firm, proportional, and easy to feather on and off. And the pedals are perfectly arrayed for heel-and-toe shifting.
Most important, the steering is direct, linear, and beautifully weighted. The thick-rimmed, cast-magnesium three-spoke wheel provides a seductive combination of stability and immediate responsiveness. As you bend into a corner, the Z carves a smooth line with the exact radius that you command. Turn up the cornering speed, and the tires just bite harder into the pavement, with very little extra steering input required. As you approach the edge of the grip envelope, however, the Z will resolutely understeer. Only at low speeds, in the lower gears, can you use power to kick out the tail.
[pullquote align=’center’]Lows: Could stand to lose a couple hundred pounds and gain a more melodious engine note.[/pullquote]
On the give-and-take of bumpy Midwestern roads, this combination allows you to cover ground very rapidly. The Z’s structure is rock solid, never yielding so much as a creak or groan, even when the road surface is an endless series of cracks and pits. The firm suspension always takes the hard edge off the bumps, so you never endure any audible or physical pounding. For a firmly sprung high-performance car, the ride is impressively compliant.
Contributing to this comfort are the 350Z’s excellent seats. They’re supportive and well shaped, with plenty of lateral support, thanks to shoulder-level bolsters, grippy ersatz carbon-fiber upholstery, and an unusual hump — the “femoral support device” — on the driver’s-seat cushion between your thighs. This seat is even cut away slightly on the right to provide better access to the shifter, and the passenger seat has a generally less aggressive contour.
[image id=’b2240d99-53af-4cfc-96ca-5f8db8c55296′ mediaId=’d6bdac77-b592-4034-9ecf-008007d0b103′ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’original’][/image]
Although the 350Z’s interior is not fabricated from lavish materials, the overall mix of plastic panels, molded in various shades and textures of dark gray, is tasteful. And everywhere you look there are delightful details, such as the cast aluminum door handles, and the metallic trim on the steering wheel, instrument surrounds, shifter, various switches, and door-mounted ventilation registers.
We also like the instrument cluster that moves up and down with the steering wheel when you adjust its height. And when you look at the dash from outside the car, you appreciate that these dials are even finished on their backsides. The three instruments that are angled toward the driver atop the dash recall the original 240Z’s interior. And the damped motion of the lid on the central cubby as it flips up and retracts into the dashboard is positively seductive.
Interior space is plentiful for humans but less so for their trinkets and belongings. The adequately sized glove box is tucked into a panel behind the passenger seat. The cubby in the central console is small and well astern of the shifter. And the only power outlet is on the panel behind and between the seats, which means that your radar detector’s coil cord will be at shoulder level stretched as taut as a high-tension line.
[image id=’648654c1-bd25-4ce9-83b7-811927a181e1′ mediaId=’8f978c23-a792-4a36-a01a-689a2fe671cf’ align=’center’ size=’medium’ share=’false’ caption=” expand=” crop=’original’][/image]
In back, the luggage compartment is bisected by a stylized brace bolstering the upper suspension mounts . This device does not facilitate the accommodation of any large suitcases, although Nissan claims that two golf bags will fit on the inclined floor—if you stow the woods outside the bags. And should your cargo protrude too high, it will obscure the sightline of the rearview mirror, which is already restricted to a thin letter-box view, owing to the sheetmetal at the top and bottom of the rear hatch.
[pullquote align=’center’]The Verdict: A terrific sports-car value in a class all by itself.[/pullquote]
You will draw your own conclusions about the 350Z’s styling, but the editorial eye likes it very much. The lines are distinctive, muscular, and clean. But there’s just the right amount of visual jewelry in the form of the exotic headlights, the architectural door handles, and the taillights.
Overall, it’s a terrific combination of performance, practicality, style, and value.In other words, if you liked the original240Z, you’ll love the new 350.
Counterpoint
At less than 27 grand, the 350Z is a helluva car. At $35,000, I’m thinking I’d rather beg a Chevy dealer to cut me a sweetheart deal on a Vette. I should be gaga for this thing, but I’m not. Perhaps because the expectation of brilliance isn’t quite realized. The rear flanks are gorgeous, but the rectangular backup-light cluster and the front grille don’t fit, and an aggressive rev limiter steps in abruptly if one strays over the redline. The handling is crisp at turn-in, but then the Z resolutely plows the front end, forgoing any notion of an agile, tossable car. Some sedans are better balanced. I expect more from a sports car. —Larry Webster
Nissan has been trading on heritage in its publicity ramp-up for the Z-car revival, inventing words such as “Z-ness” and drawing parallels with the glory days of the 240Z. There are times when invoking images of past greatness is absurd; consider the current Chevy Malibu. But in this application, Nissan has a case. The as-tested price of this new car is almost 10 times that of the one we reviewed in June 1970, but it fits the same general parameters: eye-catching, thoroughly competent, reasonably brisk, and affordable compared with competitors. In 1970 we said, “For the money, the 240Z is an almost brilliant car.” My 2002 impression: ditto. —Tony Swan
I admit I was not initially taken by this new Z. Maybe it was the droopy, flabby-looking butt. Maybe it was the spectacularly space-inefficient interior and cargo areas. The plastic-encased structural support in the rear severely limits carrying capacity. There are 1002 covered cubbies scattered about the cabin, none of which is large enough to carry much. But three curves into our 10Best handling loop I actually uttered this phrase, “Dude, this car rules!” With its short shift throws, linear throttle response, excellent torque, excellent steering, and excellent ride and handling responses, this car totally books. —Daniel Pund
[vehicle type=’specpanel’ automotive-tagset-id=”][/vehicle]
This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

It’s been more than 20 years since Audi introduced the S3, a high-performance version of the A3. Back then, its 20-valve 1.8-liter four-banger made 207 horsepower, a number that seems quaint today. While that original S3 never made it to the United States, we did get the 292-hp S3 in 2015, a punchy and attractive sports sedan capable of hitting 60 in 4.4 seconds. We were so smitten, we wondered why anyone would spend more for the slower S4 sedan.
A new S3 has arrived in Europe, and we took the first-to-market four-door Sportback hatchback for a drive. Audi won’t be bringing the Sportback stateside, like the last generation. We’ll only get the S3 sedan, and it’ll come sometime in 2021.

View Photos

Audi

2022 Audi S3 Has Over 300 Horsepower, Looks Sharp

2022 Audi A3 Prepares for Battle in the U.S.

The S3 has truly grown up. It weighs a bit more than before at about 3300 pounds, and power is up from the last-gen’s 292 horsepower to 306 from Audi and Volkswagen’s turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four. As smooth here as it was in the previous S3, the engine makes 295 pound-feet of torque from 2000 to 4750 rpm and maximum power from 5450 to 6500 rpm. Power is seemingly right there whenever you hit the accelerator, and there’s a lovely snarl that comes into the cabin. The S3 builds speed with ease and confidence.
Audi claims that the sprint from zero to 62 mph takes a mere 4.8 seconds. We’re guessing that estimate will prove to be a few tenths conservative than what we’ll extract from the sedan when we test it next year. Should you want more power, a new RS3 is in the works, and its turbocharged 2.5-liter five-cylinder will produce more than 400 horsepower.

View Photos

Audi

All-wheel drive and a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission are standard. The six-speed manual offered in the past is gone, even in Europe. The S3’s all-wheel-drive system uses a multi-plate clutch to manage the torque distribution between the front and rear axles.
On tight, curvy roads, the S3 shines. It is easy to go fast in this car. The electrically assisted power steering is crisp and on the slightly lighter side, turn-in is aggressive, and the limits of adhesion are extraordinarily high. An 18-inch wheel with 225/40R-18 tires is standard, and 235/35R-19 tires are optional. Our S3 wore the 19-inch wheel option, which offers a remarkably harmonious compromise between agility and comfort. The softness of the A3 is gone, although the Comfort setting turns even the S3 into a very comfortable long-distance cruiser.

View Photos

Audi

The interior of the new S3 is spacious, with ample room both up front and in the rear. We have praised the materials and workmanship in the A3, but the S3, which will start at about $45,000 when it hits the U.S., isn’t sufficiently differentiated from the less-expensive A3. While we like details such as the frameless mirrors and the stitching on the instrument panel, the hard plastic around the air vents looks out of place. And the shifter paddles on the steering wheel feel flimsy, with too little travel and a lack of feedback.
The exterior design is sporty and attractive, but the S3 is fitted with a number of faux air vents. The Audi S3’s segment is expanding. Mercedes-AMG offers two sedans, the A35 and the CLA35. BMW rolled out the M235i Gran Coupe this year. Cadillac’s excellent CT4-V’s longitudinal engine and rear-drive layout is a standout against this class of transversely mounted all-wheel-drive machines. If the lack of an S3 hatch is holding you back, a new VW Golf R should arrive stateside in late 2021 and is expected to share the new S3’s mechanicals. We’ll have to wait a bit longer to test out the S3 sedan, but our time with the Sportback leaves few doubts that another great S3 is on its way.

Specifications

Specifications
2021 Audi S3 Sportback
VEHICLE TYPE front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door hatchback
BASE PRICE (GERMANY) $47,500
ENGINE TYPE turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, iron block and head, direct fuel injectionDisplacement 121 in3, 1984 cm3Power 306 hp @ 6500 rpmTorque 295 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
TRANSMISSION 7-speed dual-clutch automatic
DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 103.5 inLength: 171.3 inWidth: 71.5 inHeight: 56.6 inCargo volume: 12 ft3Curb weight (C/D est): 355 lb
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST) 60 mph: 4.5 sec100 mph: 11.9 sec1/4 mile: 13.2 secTop speed: 155 mph
EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST) Combined/city/highway: 24/22/28 mpg

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

The biggest problem with the Aston Martin DB5 Goldfinger Continuation is always going to be one of discipline. The stoplight that stays red too long, the pedestrian who steps out without looking, the bully in the SUV that cuts you off—how long could you resist the temptation to deploy the twin .303-caliber machine-guns? Similarly, could you stave off the urge to deploy a smoke screen, or even an oil slick, in the face of a determined tailgater? What about the ability to instantly switch license plates before (or after) committing a moving traffic violation? “Me, officer? No, it must have been that other Silver Birch DB5.”
Unlikely as it seems, we are suffering from a confusing surfeit of James Bond-inspired DB5 replicas. Back in February, we told you about the carbon-fiber-bodied stunt version that was created for the latest outing in the long-running franchise, the delayed No Time To Die. Despite looking almost identical and also being produced by Aston Martin, the DB5 Goldfinger is very different. It’s also way cooler—because of gadgets.

View Photos

Aston Martin

Aston Martin Reopens, Building Goldfinger DB5 Cars

Aston DB5 Continuation Has Working Bond Gadgets

Car and Driver Tests James Bond’s Rides

Speaking of gadgets, it has pretty much a full set. The heritage Aston Martin Works division has followed up its official limited-run recreations of the DB4 GT and DB4 GT Zagato with a similarly perfect replica of the iconic DB5 that was created for the third official James Bond film, 1964’s Goldfinger. This was the first time that Britain’s least-secret secret agent, then played by Sean Connery, got to drive an Aston Martin. Thanks to the vivid imagination of production designer Ken Adam, it was also the first time 007 drove a car packed with a variety of lethal weaponry and defenses, something that immediately became a hallmark for the long-running franchise.
The DB5 in Bond’s arsenal for Goldfinger included twin Browning machine-guns that deployed from behind the front turn signals, rotating license plates, front and rear bumper rams, a bulletproof metal screen that rose up behind the rear window, dispensers for smokescreens and oil slicks, radar, and what seemed at the time like an impossible futuristic idea: an in-car telephone headset. The secret agent’s ride also had rotary tire slashers that seemed to somehow deploy from within its wire wheels and even, most famously, a passenger-side ejector seat that Connery uses to rid himself of a gun-wielding thug with exceptionally poor reactions.
Recreating most of these features for regular use proved a serious technical challenge, as the gadgets used on the cars used for filming were theatrical props. Chris Corbould, the Oscar-winning special-effects designer who has now worked on 15 Bond films, led a team to create replicas of the original alterations. Aston then worked out how to package them within what is, beneath the modifications and gizmos, an exact copy of an early DB5.

View Photos

Aston Martin

Some changes had to be made. The original replica machine-guns fired pyrotechnic blanks, which would have required reloading and which also sound exactly like real automatic gunfire—a characteristic that may have caused owners some legal difficulties. The Continuation’s barrels simulate fire with a mechanized recoil action and ultra-bright LEDs, but their loudspeaker soundtrack (taken straight from Goldfinger) is much more subdued than an actual Browning .303 would be. The oil slick is actually water, and the tire slashers come in a presentation case and can’t be fitted to the car, due to a corporate desire not to abet actual murder. And although the red button within the flip-open gear shifter is present, there isn’t an ejector seat on the passenger side, not even an under-seat cattle prod. (The asymmetric sunroof aperture is still present, though.) The gadgets can be operated by a control panel between the seats or, to better appreciate them when the car is stationary, through a remote control pack.
Another small issue is the one indicated by the proviso that has been scrupulously added to every official release about the Goldfinger Continuation: “Please note, this car is not road legal.” The fact that we drove the prototype on a route made up of some of England’s more picturesque public highways indicates there is some wriggle room in that restriction. Two companies in Britain are already offering to officially register Aston’s earlier Continuation models for street use in Europe. But unless you can find and exploit some serious motor-vehicle-department loopholes, it seems unlikely you will be able to enjoy this particular DB5 in the United States on anything other than your expansive private estate.

View Photos

Aston Martin

And that would seem to largely miss the point. Because while the gadgets are fun to play with, the core appeal of the Goldfinger is definitely the box-fresh DB5 that gets to haul them all around. This isn’t a restomod; beyond changes to accommodate the toys, nothing has been changed. So, the 4.0-liter straight-six engine breathes noisily through triple carburetors, the feeble ventilation system bringing the enticing smell of gasoline under gentle use. The steering is both unassisted and low geared, heavy around a parking lot but becoming almost too light at speed. And the chassis manages to be too hard and too soft, crashing over some apparently minor imperfections but delivering lurid body roll under even modest cornering loads. Which, you soon realize, are all the period-sized Avon Turbospeed tires are capable of handling. Small wonder Sean Connery had so much difficulty outrunning Goldfinger’s goons in their wimpy W120 Mercedes 180s.
None of this matters in the slightest. This is an entirely authentic DB5 driving experience. The flaws both add character and prove originality. They also serve to emphasize some of the DB5’s other strengths. The seating position is high and requires the driver to squeeze around the vast wooden-rimmed steering wheel, but there can be few better automotive views than the panorama through the wraparound windscreen and over the voluptuous curves of the hood, a full set of chrome-bezeled Smiths instruments in the foreground. Performance is plenty brisk thanks to 290 horsepower and 288 pound-feet of torque, the big six feeling impressively strong in its broad midrange and generating more than enough acceleration to easily outpace modern traffic. The five-speed manual gearbox is another highlight. Aston got ZF to dust off the original drawings to produce a new batch. But the gearchanges are now crisper and better-feeling than the vague shift actions common at the time.

View Photos

Aston Martin

Despite its devotion to speed, the DB5 is also a thoroughly nice way to travel not very quickly. Bond’s Aston comes from an era when cruising comfort and speed were prioritized over outright dynamic performance. At 60 mph with the electric windows lowered to dispel the heat being produced by the big engine, the cabin is remarkably calm, much more so than it would be in a modern alternative. This is one of those cars that delivers fun without breaking a single speed limit.
The accusation of having more money than sense is normally applied as an insult, yet the implied equation merely states that cash needs to outplay caution. You would have to be obscenely rich to even consider spending more than the $3.5 million Aston will charge for a DB5 Goldfinger Continuation. But for those who are sufficiently loaded and have scratched every other automotive whim, buying James Bond’s Aston Martin seems to us like an entirely justified thing to do.

Specifications

Specifications
2020 Aston Martin DB5 Goldfinger Continuation
VEHICLE TYPE front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2+2-passenger, 2-door coupe
BASE PRICE $3,523,677
ENGINE TYPE DOHC 12-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, 3×2 carburetorsDisplacement 244 in3, 3996 cm3Power 290 hp @ 5500 rpmTorque 288 lb-ft @ 3850 rpm
TRANSMISSION 5-speed manual
DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 98.0 inLength: 180.2 inWidth: 66.6 inHeight: 53.1 inTrunk volume: 11 ft3Curb weight (C/D est): 3850 lb
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST) 60 mph: 7.3 sec1/4 mile: 15.1 secTop speed: 145 mph
EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST) Combined/city/highway: 14/12/18 mpg

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

From the February 1989 issue of Car and Driver.
There’s a sequence in Out of Africa in which Robert Redford buzzes a clearing in a biplane, thumps down, and taxis up to his startled paramour, Meryl Streep. Delighted, she marvels at his unexpected arrival at the controls of an airplane:
“Where did you get it?”
“Mombasa.”
“When did you learn to fly?”
“Yesterday.”

DICK KELLEY

Well, hedgehoppers, that’s Nissan. It, too, just learned to fly. Or relearned. From the Maxima (C/D September 1988) to the 300ZX (check here next month) to this 240SX, all of Nissan’s new fliers tower with talent—as its legendary 240Z did under the Datsun banner two decades ago.
In 1969 the original Z-car, quick and light and looking right, captured the imaginations of the world’s sports-car fanatics. In a creative coup, Nissan perfectly conceived its two-seater coupe for its perfectly perceived market. The 240Z took flight with a near-ballistic rush that left its foes rocking in their wheel chocks.
Yet from the mid-seventies to the mid-eighties, Nissan squandered its well-deserved dynamic reputation. Its sporty models grew glitzy, and its lesser models became mundane. Meanwhile, Honda blitzed new trails in excellence, Mazda licked the edges of the performance envelope, and Toyota hung on as Japan’s biggest car company. By 1988, Nissan had fallen from second place among imports in U.S. car sales. Luckily, new Nissan management had already begun to trim its lineup of flabby underpinnings and blasé bodywork.

DICK KELLEY

This is now, and the 240SX is Nissan. The new 240, though not directly related to the original, is also a car to lust after—unlike the 200SX it replaces. The 240’s trappings, from its voluptuous lines to its worthy innards, showcase Nissan’s reborn enthusiasm. A trip in the SX proves that, just as with the original 240Z, a flight in a well-trimmed craft brings its pilot great joy.
The 240SX steps up to the needs of the 1990s with all the right stuff. It contains a new, naturally aspirated, twelve-valve, 2.4-liter four-cylinder instead of the 200SX’s naturally aspirated V-6 or four-cylinder turbo. The SX handsomely houses the new engine amid lighter weight and better handling; Nissan’s engineers may have relearned flying overnight, but they weren’t born yesterday.
Nissan’s new managers cleverly insisted on retaining the 200SX’s basic rear-drive layout. The 240 makes the most of it with a new rear suspension. Its multilink design offers welcome self-stabilizing characteristics and precise handling—areas where the 200’s higher weight, narrower tracks, and less accomplished tires showed a weaker grip on theory and road alike. The new suspension design—similar to that finalized for the next 300ZX—easily provides almost any mix of agility and stability that Nissan cares to dial in. It delivers increasingly benign toe-in as cornering loads grow. It minimizes squat, lift, camber change, and jacking for flatter handling without stiffer springs and bushings. The 240’s front suspension retains the 200’s strut layout but includes more anti-dive.

View Photos

DICK KELLEY

Anybody seeking joy in an automobile’s handling, meaning all of us with hands caressing the wheel and feet hot to trot for thrills underfoot, will find exceptional dynamics in the SX—perfect for a lively model that Nissan flatly proclaims a sports car.
Like the old 240Z, the SX gives a terrain-hugging ride but masterful control. Like such recent fighter-tough, society-slick fliers as the BMW 750iL, the Peugeot 405Mi16, and the Plymouth Laser and Mitsubishi Eclipse turbos, the 240SX feels lighter than the scales say it should. It weighs 2798 pounds, but its deft controls and cheery bent for changing direction belie its mass, subtracting about 400 pounds from its feel.
Until you take the controls, the only clues that times have changed at Nissan lie in the 240SX’s bodywork. It comes as either a fastback, the SE, or a blocky notchback, the XE. Nissan styling clinics show public preference split 50-50.

DICK KELLEY

Both cars wear four-wheel disc brakes, but the fastback will soon offer an ABS system. Our SX was equipped with a sport package, optional only on the fastback. It includes fore-and-aft spoilers, a firmer suspension, alloy wheels, and tires fattened from 195/60R-15 all-weather skins to 205/60HR-15 performance rubber with better dry grip. From the same option box: cruise control and a leather-wrapped shifter and wheel.
Every 240 turns up with linear rack-and-pinion power steering. Nissan keeps communications between car and driver open and direct. No variable-assist or variable-ratio monkey-motion muddies the messages. Wound tight, the 240’s steering produces a snug 30.8-foot turning circle, good for superb tuckability in gridlock wars and parking snarls. Yet the guileless steering and almost unflappable chassis allow exhibitions of gripping behavioral magic. Blend this natural gift of grab with 0.83-g skidpad cornering, thanks to Bridgestone Potenza RE88s, and the 240SX helps you look like the most masterful conducteur de l’auto this side of Alain Prost.
Nissan fits in the SX almost every control that a master driver, an advanced amateur, or a really rank beginner could want. The dash layout, simple and thor0ugh, surpasses most others in both its appearance and its function. Barely a stretch of the driver’s mind or muscle distracts from the driving. A digital speedometer with head-up display lurks on the options list, but bypass it for thefine standard analog array-whose largetach and speedometer dials dominate the central bulge of the instrument pod.Small coolant-temp and fuel-level gauges nest in the pod’s outer corners.They fill perfectly the viewing space framed by the sport wheel-whose horizontal spokes join the rim a bit too low for best hand placement. Embedded in the wheel are membrane buttons for de-cently coordinated cruise controls,though the spoke-mounted buttons prove less handy than, say, Honda’s hub-mounted buttons or the stalk-activated designs from BMW and Mercedes-Benz.

DICK KELLEY

The 240’s console houses climate controls capable of all but rainmaking. Stereo components fill most of the leftover space above the snickety-snick five-speed stick or the lever for the optional four-speed automatic (whose gear ratios drew mixed reviews). Our SX’s radio fronted a clean layout and large soft-touch but-tons, but it didn’t pick up signals cleanly.As for onboard music, an optional Sony compact-disc player stood in for an also-optional cassette deck, but after hearing the four speakers’ poor AM/FM sound we didn’t bother trying any CDs. Still, based on Nissan’s studious attention to finer details in our prototype SX, we suspect the sound system in production-line 240s will not fall on its woofers.
The 240SX’s two-plus-two seating provides legroom for four if the two in back tape in at 24 inches head-to-toe and say “goo-goo” a lot. Up front, adults sit in a fashion more appropriate to front-cabin status. Despite supportive appearances, though, the deep buckets—even in their most upright position lean back quite far and offer so-so padding.Nissan, unlike most purveyors of automatic seatbelts, positions the inboard latches close beside the hips of front occupants, so you regain some support sacrificed by the lackluster seats. The backseat flops forward to add cargo length to the shallow hidden trunk, which stretches wider and longer than expected.
Braking performance also stretches long for a sporting car. The pedal feels fine during hard road driving, but all-out stops from 70 mph–even with consider-able pedal modulation-chew up 195feet. We anticipate shorter stops from SEs fitted with the promised ABS system.
The 2.4-liter SOHC four, with port fuel injection plus one exhaust and two intake valves per cylinder, growls out 140 hp. The 240SX equals the old V-6-powered 200SX’s 0-to-60-mph run of 8.6 seconds and zips a quarter-mile in
16.4 seconds at 83 mph. But soon there-after it quits abruptly: Nissan fits a top-speed governor to keep down buyers’ car-insurance costs. The power stops Iu!r-thunk! at a claimed 112 mph-though our 240SX took a nose dive at a true 107mph. Otherwise, the SX’s willing engine and slick body felt capable of knocking off 120 mph, its chassis even more.(Word is out-heh-heh-that snipping one engine-parameter wire disconnects the annoying cutout.)
Aiming to deliver 60,000 240SXs this year, Nissan pegs the base prices at$12,999 for the notchback and $13,199for the fastback-low bucks, but subject to added option costs. Moreover, several faster machines skulk on both sides of today’s exchange rates. Take the PlymouthLaser and Mitsubishi Eclipse turbo two-seaters: two seconds quicker from 0 to 50, about 35 mph faster up top, but barely costlier. Such machines may not keep a lid on running costs, and they will not bend into corners as rewardingly as the240SX, but you pays yer money and you takes yer turns as you please.
A note of guidance: Nissan insiders hint that an unrepentantly quick 240SX is well on the road to final development. The 240’s layout already seems so good that we humbly suggest a 50-percent power boost. Once and for all, Nissan, are you men or mice, ninjas or nice?

Specifications

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2 + 2 passenger, 3-door coupe
PRICE AS TESTED: $16,108
ENGINE TYPE: SOHC inline-4, iron block and aluminum head, port fuel injection
Displacement: 146 cu in, 2389 ccPower: 140 hp @ 5600 rpmTorque: 152 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 5-speed manual
DIMENSIONS:Wheelbase: 97.4 inLength: 178.0 inWidth: 66.5 in Height: 50.8 inCurb weight: 2798 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS:Zero to 30 mph: 2.6 secZero to 60 mph: 8.6 secZero to 90 mph: 20.0 secTop gear, 30-50 mph: 11.1 secTop gear, 50-70 mph: 11.4 secStanding ¼-mile: 16.4 @ 83 mphTop speed: 107 mphBraking, 70-0 mph: 195 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.83 g
FUEL ECONOMY:EPA city/highway: 20/26 mpgC/D observed: 23 mpg

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

From the October 2006 issue of Car and Driver.
There’s been a lot of talk on internet chatrooms lately about whether the new AMG 6.2-liter naturally aspirated V-8 engine is an improvement over the supercharged 5.4-liter V-8 that was an AMG staple—particularly, if the new car is quicker or slower off the mark. Well, the answer is yes and no, at least on the evidence of the CLS63 AMG that we have been stylin’ in of late. The 6.2-liter V-8 makes 507 horsepower in the CLS, up from 469 hp in the old CLS55 AMG. Torque is down, though, from 516 pound-feet to 465 lb-ft. More power usually results in better top-end performance, whereas more torque normally means quicker mid-range and off-the-line acceleration.

The Best Sedans of 2020

Best Luxury SUVs in 2020 Ranked

Luxury Cars for $25,000: Window Shop With C/D

To a certain extent, that’s what our numbers show. The CLS63 gets to 60 mph from rest in a blistering 4.1 seconds, a tenth quicker than the CLS55, but is identical otherwise up to 120 mph and shares a 12.6-second quarter-mile time. The 30-to-50 and 50-to-70-mph figures show the benefits of the supercharged motor’s fatter torque curve (2.2 and 2.5 seconds, respectively, compared with 2.5 and 3.1 for the CLS63), while the extra top-end grunt of the 63 comes into play above 120 mph. By 150 mph, the CLS63 is ahead by almost a second and a half.
So, apart from marginally better performance away from a stop light and in go-to-jail-fast territory, what are the benefits of the new engine? Well, it sounds absolutely fantastic, especially as it nears the 7200-rpm redline. (Yeah, that’s right: a 6.2 liter V-8 that spins past seven grand.) The loud, guttural growl is a bit too intoxicating, because the desire to hear a blaring soundtrack makes it all too easy to stray into triple-digit temptation. It really does pickup and go past 100 mph.
The seven-speed automatic transmission is as smooth as a luxury-car salesperson, not to say that the old five-speeder was bad. More important, manual shifting is now effected by a pair of paddles on the back of the steering wheel—right for upshifts, left for down—in place of the buttons in the CLS55.
Other important mechanical changes are fitment of AMG’s new sport suspension and revised brakes. The vented and cross-drilled front rotors are now 14.2 inches in diameter (up from 14.0 inches) and the front calipers have six instead of eight pistons. At the back, there are 13.0-inch-diameter discs and four-piston calipers. The AMG suspension is a recalibrated version of Mercedes’ Airmatic air-spring setup, which works in conjunction with the so-called Adaptive Damping System. Just like the system in the E-class, it has driver selectable settings, none of which are perfect. The sportiest setting beats you up over bad pavement and the comfiest one doesn’t offer enough body control.
Still, the CLS63 has lots of grip, decent steering, and is very entertaining once the traction control is turned off and the throttle is mashed. It isn’t quite as sweet a chassis as a BMW M5’s, but the CLS has the advantage of a fine automatic transmission in place of the M5’s clunky Sequential Manual Gearbox and a torquier, more compelling engine. Only serious AMG-heads are going to be able to spot the difference between this one and the CLS55. Discreet 6.3 AMG badges on the flanks and tail are the only real external clues, while there is a new instrument cluster and a fabulous, race-car-like steering wheel. Otherwise, the gorgeous CLS shape and lush interior remain. Why mess with success?
The only real drawback of this car is the sticker: $95,575 base, with an as-tested price of $100,805. It’s a lot of dough, sure, but the combination of the CLS shape and the rocking new AMG powertrain make this is a sweet ride for the whiz-kids of this world.

Specifications

SPECIFICATIONS
2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS63 AMG
VEHICLE TYPE Front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 4-door sedan
PRICE AS TESTED $100,805 (base price: $95,575)
ENGINE TYPE DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injectionDisplacement: 379 in3, 6208 cm3Power (SAE net): 507 bhp @ 6800 rpmTorque (SAE net): 465 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm
TRANSMISSION 7-speed automatic with manumatic shifting
DIMENSIONSWheelbase: 112.4 inLength: 194.0 inWidth: 73.7 inHeight: 54.7 inCurb weight: 4366 lb
C/D TEST RESULTSZero to 60 mph: 4.1 secZero to 100 mph: 9.8 secZero to 150 mph: 23.5 secStreet start, 5-60 mph: 4.4 secStanding ¼-mile: 12.6 sec @ 114 mphTop speed (governor limited): 158 mphBraking, 70-0 mph: 163 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.87 g
FUEL ECONOMYEPA fuel economy, city/highway: 13/20 mpgC/D-observed fuel economy: 13 mpg

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

From the October 2005 issue of Car and Driver.
The obvious part of the formula is obviously far from new: Cram a big ol’ V-8 in there, make the car go faster. Detroit has been doing this since the ’60s. But what may not be so obvious is that there’s a big asterisk to the formula when you start applying it to a front-wheel-drive car. The footnote reads something like this: “Put enough power through a front-drive system, and the driver will find himself turning right or left when he was planning on straight ahead.”

Fastest Sedans in Lightning Lap History

Which Ultimate Pony Car Is the 1/4-Mile King?

Quickest American Muscle Cars, Ever

It’s called torque steer, and it’s the major limiting factor in front-drive performance cars. Despite various engineering advances, the problem persists in cars such as Acura’s otherwise superb TL, which sends 270 horsepower through a six-speed manual transmission to the front wheels via a helical limited-slip differential. But in the Grand Prix GXP, with more horsepower (303 at 5600 rpm) and a lot more torque (323 pound-feet at 4400 rpm), torque steer is not a serious issue. There are hints-a little tugging when the driver cracks the throttle at low speed-but no real wrestling.
How’d they do that? By adopting a measure no one else has ever put into production. More in a minute. But first, another front-engine, front-drive problem, one that’s even more chronic than torque steer. With a design that puts all the heavy powertrain hardware up front, front-drive cars invariably have a pronounced forward weight bias, 64/36 percent in this case. As a consequence, the front wheels carry more than their fair share of the car’s mass, diluting the ability of the tires to transmit steering inputs. Worse, the front tires are also required to transmit power to the pavement, and all things being equal, the poor things just can’t handle their multiple assignments as well as the front tires of rear-drive cars. The result is understeer. The faster the driver herds the car into a turn, the more it wants to go straight.

Highs: Mellow V-8 rumble, plentiful V-8 torque, excellent road manners.

Pontiac’s solution to these two inherent front-drive directional control problems-understeer and torque steer-is unique. Instead of four tires of equal size, the GXP has a lot more rubber up front than at the rear: Bridgestone Potenza RE050As, 255/45-18 front, 225/50-18 rear.
“We wanted a car to run with BMWs,” says program engineering manager Phil Minch. “But we were limited by the W-car architecture, in other words, by front-wheel drive.
“The rear end never lets go when you have the same size tires all around. So we put our computer guys on it, and they came back with a recommendation for a smaller rear tire, to give the car better balance.”
This is a radical departure from conventional wisdom, and the idea proved out in initial testing. But there was a nasty side effect: Increasing the contact patch at the front amplified torque steer. However, after experimenting with a number of different tires from a variety of manufacturers, Minch and company decided the problem lay in the tire’s construction-the way the plies were wrapped-and not the footprint. With sufficient application of power, the tire sidewalls distort, thus affecting directional stability.

AARON KILEY

Bridgestone, the supplier of choice, was initially reluctant to accept this theory, but when the GXP team achieved improved results using an off-the-shelf tire from another maker, the Bridgestone people got to work and developed a tire that delivered the desired performance.
Other elements of the GXP package include Bilstein monotube front struts–a first for a front-drive GM car, according to Minch–and forged aluminum 18-inch wheels (8.0-inch-wide front, 7.0 rear), a stouter rear anti-roll bar, and a 0.4-inch reduction in static ride height versus the old GTP Competition Group.
Still another challenge was fitting the 5.3-liter V-8 into an engine bay originally conceived for a transverse V-6. Although GM has flirted with this idea in the past–our man Csere drove a Chevy Lumina mule with V-8 power more than 10 years ago–it wasn’t as easy as simply greasing the thing up and cramming it in there. The powertrain troops had to develop a tidier version of the 5.3, achieved by creating a unique edition of the block with a shorter crank, a single-belt accessory drive, and a starter mounted on the transmission rather than on the engine block.
The net of the redesign was a reduction in overall length of “about an inch,” according to Minch, which was enough.
The transplant also required mods to the 4T65-E four-speed automatic to handle the extra torque and a three-point engine-mount system designed to damp the V-8’s torque rotation at full throttle.
Pared down, the 5.3 V-8 met the assembly parameters–it installs from beneath–and provided an extra payoff at the scales. The all-aluminum V-8 is actually lighter than the supercharged iron-block 3.8-liter from the old GTP.

Lows: Hints of torque steer, hefty curb weight, high steering effort at low speed.

But how does it stack up in terms of Pontiac’s BMW objective? Let’s be clear. This ain’t a BMW. It’s not as agile as the sports-sedan pacesetters from Bavaria, and even though the unique tire stagger puts the GXP’s responses much closer to neutral, the Pontiac’s defining trait is still mild understeer. The four-speed TAPshift manumatic is better than some we’ve experienced, leaving upshift decisions totally in the hands of the driver, but the transmission offers only four speeds to play with. The engine’s torque band is so broad, and the transmission’s up- and downshifting so prompt in full automatic mode, that the driver can achieve pretty much the same levels of haste by simply putting the lever in D and leaving it there.
That said, the GXP is not without some appealing traits. If it’s not quite BMW eager in transient response, it’s not too far off the curve, and if the GM Magnasteer II system is artificially heavy at low speeds, it’s quick (2.4 turns lock to lock) and accurate, with effort that lightens as velocities climb. The GXP turned in a ho-hum 0.82 g on the skidpad, but real-world grip feels better than that, and as Minch and his cohorts hoped, a driver can induce a little oversteer. And braking performance–174 feet from 70 mph, and zero fade–is on par for this class. The net is a forgiving and capable four-door, arguably the most entertaining sedan Pontiac has ever offered.
There are some interior elements that enhance the entertainment. The front buckets, for example, are close to BMW territory in comfort and support, and the grippy steering wheel and nicely sized shift buttons enhance the sense of driver involvement. The head-up display is effective for keeping track of speed without glancing down, and the center-dash info display even includes a g-meter. Unfortunately, the latter will only deliver its readings–accel, decel, and lateral–when the car is stopped. Thus, the driver can only see the peak numbers achieved during his most recent stretch of road, rather than what’s going on in real time. Minch admits the GXP team made the mistake of checking with the liability lawyers before programming the g-meter display.

The Verdict: A cool idea that would have been even cooler a decade earlier.

An intriguing footnote to this front-drive breakthrough is that it won’t be immediately applied to other GM offerings. The 2006 Chevy Impala SS, for example, gets the 5.3-liter V-8, but the package will use equal-size tires all around and won’t have the Bilsteins.
With an as-tested price of $31,135 (base, $29,995), the GXP is on a more or less equal price footing with some compelling competitors-the Acura TL, the BMW 325i, the Infiniti G35. And that adds up to a tough sell. But this is GM, remember, the discount leader. We checked the company’s latest sales ploy-everybody gets the GM employee discount-and came up with a GXP base of $24,696. At that price, this good-looking all-American is tough to resist.
Counterpoint
Here is a car that depicts the difference between soccer and football, between Peter Pan and Terry Bradshaw. The GXP has brute force that can be summoned instantly, a pugnacious snarl, and a chassis that didn’t go to Harvard. Very American, and very likable in a roughhouse, bawdy sort of way. If you wear your baseball cap backward, this Bud’s for you. Look for owners to drive by in the hip-hop position, heads behind the B-pillar. And yet the GXP corners and handles well, isn’t overly teched up like the Euros, looks bad-ass in black, and the price is right. It’s one of the most memorable sporting American sedans I’ve driven in a gawdawful long time. —Steve Spence
Skeptical is not a strong enough word to describe the brain waves circulating after taking in the GXP’s spec sheet: 303 horsepower driving which wheels, you say? And a four-speed automatic? A taller final drive actually makes the GXP civilized and not the supreme burnout machine I expected. This V-8 makes nothing but good noises and lots of torque, but how does gearing a car to go over 100 mph in second gear make sense? Come on, a closely spaced six-speed could have smoked the porky Hemi Charger. Five years ago, I think Pontiac would have been on to something. Nowadays, the similarly priced Charger R/T seems like a no-brainer. —Dave VanderWerp
In the early ’90s, I drove an experimental Chevy Lumina whose front wheels were powered by a Chevy V-8. I found it to be splendid. At long last GM has put that concept on sale with this GXP, and it still works. As it has for decades, the V-8 delivers effortless performance to this front-driver, and the GXP copes gracefully with the power. One reason is front tires that are larger than the rears. This makes sense, given that the front tires must steer and propel the car while carrying 76-percent more weight than the rears do. There’s still a whiff of clumsiness in this large, old platform, but if you crave V-8 power at a reasonable price, the GXP is worth a look. —Csaba Csere

Specifications

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

From the May 2005 issue of Car and Driver.
Japanese love a good obento, which is a select assortment of traditional delicacies served in a bento box, a compartmentalized tray with high walls to prevent intermingling of foodstuffs. Perhaps that’s why you can’t buy the same feisty Mitsubishi Colt Turbo hatchback in both Europe and Japan, or the nifty six-passenger Mitsubishi Grandis wagon in the U.S. Intermingling has risky consequences. It’s bad obento.

Best Sports Cars of 2020

Quickest Cars You Can Buy for Less Than $30,000

Fastest Sedans in Lightning Lap History

At least there’s the Lancer Evolution, which Mitsubishi spreads like sinus-clearing wasabi across the world to spice up its lackluster image. For 2006, the Lancer Evolution’s generational odometer rolls over from the current Evo VIII, on sale since 2003, to the Evo IX. Accordingly, this rigid, noisy, spartan, all-wheel-drive son-of-a-rally-car gets new front and rear bumpers, aero tweaks, nattier seats, and lighter alloy wheels. And along with that it gets a 10-hp boost to 286, mostly from a new-to-Evo variable-valve-timing system.
Timing is everything, as we discovered with our own test gear strapped onto a six-speed Evo IX MR at Mitsubishi’s Okazaki track. It’s a postage stamp of grass and asphalt ribbons enveloped by the dense suburbs near Nagoya, Japan, and home to Evo development since the Evo II in 1992. With the Evo IX MR, we saw 60 mph in 4.6 seconds and the quarter-mile in 13.4 seconds at 104 mph, the fleetest sprinting we’ve garnered from any stock Evo.

View Photos

Oh, but you were expecting more than new bumpers and 10 added horses for the Evo IX? The name is “Evolution,” after all, and it is indeed evolving toward an all-new Evo X set to arrive late in 2007. That would be shortly after the debut of a redesigned Lancer sedan on a new platform dubbed GS.
Meanwhile, be content with the same three Evo flavors as before-the trim-stripped RS and the base Evo, both with five-speed manuals, plus the six-speed Evo MR with Bilstein shocks and forged BBS wheels. We’re told to expect a $500 bump of the current base prices (starting at $29,074 for the RS) when pricing is announced for the September on-sale date.
Inside are aluminum pedals (except in the RS) and redesigned seats. A faux-carbon-fiber panel adorns the dash. Cloth is gone; pseudo-suede center panels are now bordered by leather bolsters. All-leather seats are an option.

View Photos

Outside, a new front bumper fights aerodynamic lift with an available chin spoiler that increases the low-pressure zone under the nose. Two oval nostrils in the bumper help the intercooler by ramming fresh air around its input and output pipes. In back, the carbon-fiber airfoil can be had with a Gurney flap, a thin wing extension that increases downforce to the rear.

Specifications

SPECIFICATIONS
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX
VEHICLE TYPEFront-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
PRICE AS TESTED $35,700 (estimated base price: $35,700)
ENGINE TYPE Turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, iron block and aluminum head, port fuel injectionDisplacement: 122 in3, 1997 cm3Power: 286 hp @ 6500 rpmTorque: 289 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm
TRANSMISSION 6-speed manual
DIMENSIONSWheelbase: 103.3 inLength: 178.5 inWidth: 69.7 inHeight: 57.1 inCurb weight: 3300 lb
C/D TEST RESULTSZero to 60 mph: 4.6 secZero to 100 mph: 11.9 secStanding ¼-mile: 13.4 sec @ 104 mphBraking 70-0 mph: 155 ft
FUEL ECONOMYEPA fuel economy, city driving: 19 mpg

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More