More stories

  • in

    2021 Mercedes-AMG GLA45 Is Wild

    AMG wasted no time getting its hands on Mercedes’s smallest crossover, the new GLA. Compared to the 221-hp GLA250, the AMG GLA45 seems to be cut from entirely different cloth. There is an intermediate AMG GLA35 with at 302 horsepower, but the range-topping GLA45, with its 382-hp M139 engine, is the focus of this review.
    This same engine can be found in the GLA’s platform-mate, the CLA45. AMG extracts the 382 horsepower from a mere 2.0 liters of displacement. Force-fed by a single twin-scroll turbocharger, peak power comes at 6500 rpm, while maximum torque—354 pound-feet—is on tap from 4750 to 5000 rpm. Compared to the 302-hp GLA35, the 45’s cylinder head is completely different; its intake and exhaust ports are opposite to that of the GLA35. The turbo now occupies the real estate near the firewall, and the intake plenum sits out front. This setup optimizes airflow to feed this engine’s voracious appetite for oxygen and to better serve the powertrain’s cooling requirements.

    View Photos

    Mercedes-AMG

    Mercedes-AMG GLA45 Is a Small Superpower

    Mercedes-Benz’s GLA250 Grows Up

    2021 Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class Caps Entry-Level Line

    If you think that a single large turbo is a recipe for turbo lag, the GLA45 may dissuade you of that notion. Mated to an eight-speed dual-clutch automatic, the engine is so responsive that it largely resembles a naturally aspirated unit, except there’s great power at low rpm. Ripping through the gears, the GLA45 will charge to 60 mph in a conservative claim of 4.3 seconds—a 2018 GLA45 did the deed in 3.9—and the rush continues up to its terminal velocity, a claimed 155 mph. Even in quieter settings, the engine remains somewhat raspy and aggressive.
    Our GLA45 came with the AMG Dynamic Plus package that offers six driving modes that adapt the suspension, throttle-pedal feedback, sound, shift strategy, front-to-rear torque distribution, steering assist, and the permissiveness of the stability control. Switch to the Master setting, and the GLA45 will allow you to coax the crossover into an easily controllable drift. The Dynamic Plus package also includes adaptive dampers and larger front brake rotors clamped by six-piston calibers instead of four-pot binders.

    View Photos

    Mercedes-AMG

    The Dynamic Plus package highlights and helps optimize the GLA45’s chassis hardware. Stiffened and fitted with body reinforcements, the AMG version has a tauter suspension with struts up front and multilink in the rear. The steering is ultra sharp and direct while the body control is firm and tight. It feels at the ready, attentively waiting for any driver input to translate into rapid moves. The variable torque split between the front and rear axles is controlled by an electronically controlled clutch pack, and a torque-vectoring rear differential distributes power between the rear wheels.
    The same interior that looks so clean and simple in the GLA250 is transformed by AMG with a somewhat-sportier steering wheel, firm and supportive performance seats, grippy microfiber elements, standard red stitching, and red seatbelts. The 10.3-inch instrument cluster features an AMG-specific Supersport gauge cluster that looks great, although it is not more informative than the regular gauges, which can still be selected.

    View Photos

    Mercedes-AMG

    AMG seems to think that owners might take their GLA45 to a track. For those select few, there’s a Track Pace program that serves as a personal instructor, allowing the driver to record their favorite racetracks. Take it on the track, and the system feeds data into the instrument cluster or the head-up display to help improve lap times.
    What we don’t like about the GLA45 is common to all GLAs. We’re still fighting with the imprecise touchpad that operates the infotainment system, and even the GLA45 has a decidedly un-sporty column-mounted shifter. There’s also the matter of the GLA45 S, which isn’t available in the United States. At 415 horsepower, 369 pound-feet, and capable of 168 mph, it ladles out the power even more generously. But even without the S treatment, we can’t think of another crossover this size that’s more fun.

    Specifications

    Specifications
    2021 Mercedes-AMG GLA45
    VEHICLE TYPE front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door hatchback
    BASE PRICE (C/D EST) $55,000
    ENGINE TYPE turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, port and direct fuel injectionDisplacement 122 in3, 1991 cm3Power 382 hp @ 6500 rpmTorque 354 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm
    TRANSMISSION 8-speed dual-clutch automatic
    DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 107.4 inLength: 174.6 inWidth: 72.8 inHeight: 62.5 inCurb weight (C/D est): 3600 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST) 60 mph: 3.9 sec100 mph: 9.7 sec1/4 mile: 12.4 secTop speed: 155 mph
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST) Combined/city/highway: 25/23/29 mpg

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    1886 Benz Patent Motorwagen Sparked a Revolution

    From the December 1986 issue of Car and Driver.
    One century and a few zillion miles by automobile later, the thrill of self-propulsion hasn’t diminished an iota. We know this is an absolute fact now that we’ve had the rare pleasure of driving a replica of the original automobile, described by Carl Benz in his 1886 patent.

    The Best AMG Models of All Time

    History of AMG-Modified Mercedes E-class Wagons

    Every Full-Size Sedan Ranked from Worst to Best

    The startup ritual is a trip in itself. White gas and water are added to the appropriate brass reservoirs behind the seat. The engine oilers are topped off with 30-weight. The carburetor is adjusted with a knurled knob located just under the seat. The ignition is switched on, and the trembler coil sounds for all the world like a modern-day key buzzer. Exposed crankshaft journals are lubricated with a squirt or two of oil, and the cylinder is primed with a fuel-air mix by giving the massive horizontal flywheel a few swings back and forth. Finally, the big wheel is spun rapidly, until the Benz engine fumph-fumph-sneeze-fumphs to life.

    View Photos

    George LeppCar and Driver

    The commotion that follows is vintage hurdy-gurdy: ringing gears, occasional small-caliber pops, frantic shaking, and the steady throb of primeval power. A mist of oil spray and partly burned fuel forms over the machinery, and the 0.88-hp three­-wheeler is ready to ride.
    The climb aboard is awkward but not as big a chore as mounting a horse. The small leather bench is reasonably comfortable, and the weight of a human on top of it damps some of the wild vibration. Managing the controls is child’s play. There is no throttle to worry about, because the engine runs virtually flat out all the time. Where you expect to find a steering wheel, there is a delicate tiller with a pointer attached to it: aim the pointer left and you go left, right and you turn right. Benz was clearly onto something here. A hand lever to the left of the seat takes care of everything else: you pull it back to apply power to the rear wheels, push it forward for neutral, and shove it farther forward to brake.

    View Photos

    George LeppCar and Driver

    The fumph-fumphs are fewer and further between as the engine shoulders the load. Gradually it settles into a strained but steady cadence; with each piston stroke, you feel as if a soft battering ram were thumping your solar plexus. When your hair wafts up and off your forehead in the breeze, you know you’re flat out.
    The term “acceleration” doesn’t quite fit a Benz in the act of forward motion. It gathers speed like a fog bank cresting a hill. Any kid on foot could beat it in a race.
    The Benz’s chassis dynamics are identical to those you’d experience while riding a kitchen stool propped on top of a wheel­chair. From your precarious perch, the wide eyes of the assembled masses blur by at knee level. Your eyes show no terror, though, because the inner ear acts as a gyrostabilizer, quickly settling your qualms and automatically applying the requisite body English while slowing or turning. Hard braking, full-power cornering, and breathless blasts of oil-spitting speed soon become comfortable maneuvers.

    View Photos

    George LeppCar and Driver

    It isn’t long before the hardworking Benz needs a break. As the engine boils off its supply of cooling water and the friction drive begins to warm and stretch the leather transmission belt, there is noticeably less power to play with. On our gradually sloping test strip, the three-wheeler demonstrates a distinct preference for the down direction. With the grade in our favor, we can easily exceed 10 mph (clocked by the photo car’s speedometer), but outside assistance is necessary on the uphill leg. Two tireless Mercedes-Benz technicians, Ernst Thiel and Hermann Stehling, supply people power from behind and keep a close watch over the machinery.
    Apprentices at the Mercedes-Benz factory constructed this replica of the original Benz Patentwagen and 32 other historic recreations for this year’s anniversary-of­-the-automobile celebration. Eleven duplicates each of Gottlieb Daimler’s 1885 motor bicycle, his 1886 four-wheel motor carriage, and Benz’s three-wheeler were crafted in loving detail to give visitors to museums and expositions around the globe an opportunity to study these forebear of the modem automobile.

    View Photos

    George LeppCar and Driver

    Interestingly enough, the three-wheel replicas deviate significantly from the patent drawings registered by Carl Benz on January 29, 1886. The notable discrepancies are in the layout of the frame, the steering linkage, the seat design, the fuel ­tank location, and the type of radiator. There is no evidence of brakes in the original patent drawings, either, though they were mentioned in Benz’s written disclosure. What the replicas do mimic is the oldest Benz trike still in existence, an artifact owned by the Deutsches Museum in Munich. Some historians mark it as the one true original, but the number of discrepancies between it and Benz’s drawings support the theory that it’s a slightly later development of his Patentwagen. Given the disagreement on how to spell Benz’s first name (both “Carl” and “Karl” are widely used), it’s easy to see how the historical record can lapse now and then.
    No archivists were on hand to document the birth of the automobile, because no one—not even the inventors—had an inkling of its ramifications. Carl Benz was an engine developer and dreamer who enjoyed little commercial success either before or for quite some time after receiving his patent. The epic document was modestly titled Vehicle with Gas-driven Engine. His specific patent claims were only two: a driver-adjustable fuel-air mixing device and the use of a shift lever both to move a drive belt and to actuate brakes.
    Griffith Borgeson, a former C/D contributor and current European editor of Automobile Quarterly (AQ), brings the details of the patent to light in a recent AQ commemorative to Mercedes-Benz. He goes on to list a significant number of inventions that were ready and waiting on the shelf when Benz built the Patentwagen. Rubber tires, wire wheels, ball bearings, roller chain, rack-and-pinion steering, differential drive gearing, lightweight steel frames—and even fully engineered and commercially available two-seat velocipedes—all were in existence in the early 1880s, according to Borgeson’s research.

    View Photos

    George LeppCar and Driver

    It’s clear that Benz didn’t create the first automobile lock, stock, and cylinder barrel from scratch. What he did do was combine three crucial elements—an engine with adequate power, a lightweight chassis, and petroleum-based fuel—in such a way that a patent could be issued and systematic development carried out.

    View Photos

    George LeppCar and Driver

    Several years of tinkering with two-­stroke engines lay behind Benz’s invention. Convinced that automobility would be possible if a reasonable power-to-­weight ratio could be achieved, he dreamed of building a vehicle that “runs under its own power like a locomotive, but not on tracks, but like a wagon simply on any street.” Four-stroke engines patented by Nikolaus Otto in 1877 led the way. They achieved a phenomenal 100 horsepower (for stationary use) by 1880, and tens of thousands of the engines themselves and licenses to build them were sold around the world. Other manufacturers, envious of Otto’s technology, waged a legal battle to break his hold on it; meanwhile, Carl Benz spent his time experimenting in secret. In the fall of 1884 he began work on a four-stroke, benzine-burning engine. It was running well enough by the following year to propel a three-wheeler around his courtyard. Confident that he had something to boast about and that Otto’s claim to the four-stroke engine would soon be broken, Benz filed for a patent. Ironically, it was issued only one day before the German supreme court ruled against Otto.
    The Benz three-wheeler is a fascinating mix of short-lived features and ideas that have stood the test of time. It rides on only three wheels because Benz hadn’t yet devised a way to steer a four-wheeler. (He found one in 1893.) The flywheel is positioned horizontally because Benz believed that the inertia of a heavy mass spinning vertically would make steering difficult. Benz’s engine wasn’t as powerful or as fast-running as others of the time, but it incorporated several prophetic details: positive intake- and exhaust-valve actuation, a float-controlled and exhaust-heated carburetor, and an ignition system comprising a spark plug, a battery, a coil, and breaker points.

    View Photos

    George LeppCar and Driver

    One of the weakest aspects of the three­-wheeler was its cooling system. A water jacket around the cylinder barrel was fed by a gallon reservoir located above. Circulation was supposed to take place by the thermosiphon method (steam rising to the reservoir and recondensing), but the system was practically a total-loss design and had to be replenished every mile or so.
    Bertha Benz gave Carl two sons, three daughters, and a road test. In 1888, tired of her husband’s incessant tinkering and lack of commercial success, she decided that a convincing demonstration might help get the automobile business rolling. Without Carl’s knowledge, Bertha took her sons and a developmental three­-wheeler on the first-ever cross-country automobile trip, to her mother’s home some 60 miles away. There were problems en route—climbing hills—but the trip was completed by nightfall.

    View Photos

    George LeppCar and Driver

    What followed this first recorded unauthorized use of an automobile was the first user-inspired improvement of an automobile. Upon returning home, Benz’s sons, Eugen and Richard, complained loudly about all of the uphill pushing they had had to do on their journey. Carl responded by adding a lower gear to his design.
    Carl Benz’s family was there when he needed them, but it’s easy to understand why so many others found his three-­wheeler a poor substitute for the horse. It was, after all, slower, less aesthetically pleasing, and a good deal less reliable. In the intervening century, however, horses have gotten no faster. Their pollution problem is yet to be solved. They have utterly resisted development.
    Cars, on the other hand, started getting better when Bertha decided to teach Carl Benz a lesson in marketing. And they have never stopped.

    Specifications

    SPECIFICATIONS
    1886 Benz Patent Motorwagen
    VEHICLE TYPEmid-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger progenitor
    ENGINE TYPEsingle-cylinder, iron block and head, 1×1-bbl carburetor Displacement58 in3, 954 cm3Power0.88 hp @ 400 rpmTRANSMISSION1-speed direct drive
    DIMENSIONSWheelbase: 57.1 inLength: 99.5 inWidth: 57.0 in Height: 57.1 inCurb weight: 600 lb
    PERFORMANCETop speed: 10 mph

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Tested: 2020 BMW M8 Competition Rockets into Absurdity

    View Photos

    Marc UrbanoCar and Driver

    Q: How much “too much” is enough?A: More.
    The Hulk when Abomination finally succumbs. Patrick Bateman splatting his ax into Paul Allen. Marshawn Lynch powering into the end zone after punching his way through another defensive line. That cathartic moment after you’ve let the beast inside run wild, and you look back at what you’ve wrought, and you see that it is good. That’s how we imagine BMW’s engineers feel lately.

    The M8 Coupe and Convertible Make 600 HP Seem Sane

    The 2020 BMW M8 Offers Up to 617 HP

    Even the regular 8-series can be had with up to 523 horses, 23 more than the E60 M5 that first stopped the general public in its tracks back in 2005. Five hundred horsepower? From a V-10? Wait. Back up. BMW made a V-10? And it revved to what? Back up further. Five hundred twenty-three horsepower is more than double the output of the 1988 E28, the car that first forged the M5 legend. But now, 523 is available in a regular BMW—well, technically it’s an M Performance model, but that’s just marketing malarkey.

    HIGHS: Good God, the power. And its ease of use.

    It sounds crazy, we know. But if 523 horsepower is crazy, then 600 is believing that porcelain doll propped up in the spare bedroom is Mother, and 617 is the happiness you feel when she hands you a plate of fresh cookies. But you aren’t hallucinating, and those really are your choices with the new M8: 600 horsepower from a twin-turbocharged 4.4-liter V-8 or 617 in the M8 Competition.
    Hankering for a taste of the madness? (Hint: Yes, you are.) Set it to Sport mode, make sure the transmission is in its most aggressive setting, and Hulk-smash the brake first and then the gas. A notice flashes in the IP that launch control is engaged, and when you release the brake, the M8 smashes you back. It blasts through 60 mph in just 2.5 seconds and clears the quarter-mile in 10.7 at 129 mph. Just 15 seconds from stopped, it’s at nearly 150 mph. How’s this for an unexpected comparison? The M8 is quicker to 60 mph than a 710-hp Ferrari 488 Pista. With its tidier frontal area and significant power-to-weight advantage, the traction-on-launch-limited rear-drive Ferrari takes the lead by 100 mph, but that’s crazy performance from anything, especially something 16 feet long and weighing more than two tons. Goes to show how a car can leverage all-wheel drive to benefit acceleration.

    View Photos

    Marc UrbanoCar and Driver

    You’ll likely need the carbon-ceramic brake rotors because every time you crack the whip, you’re going to be adding 15, 20, even 40 mph. The left pedal will get a lot of use hauling this much mass back down to responsible cornering speeds. On a tight road, there’s no finding your rhythm if you so much as touch the gas. It’s all eye-widening acceleration followed by panic braking. Good thing the Pirelli P Zero PZ4s cling to the skidpad at 1.03 g’s. With those tires and 15.7-inch rotors up front and 15.0s in the rear, the M8 sheds brake heat like Rambo does water. At the test track, its 70-mph panic stop required just 146 feet.

    LOWS: Looks so much like a Mustang; weighs so much more than one.

    The M8’s electrically assisted steering offers both variable assist and a variable-ratio rack. It’s not the most communicative, but it is awesomely immediate off-center, helping the car feel smaller than it is. To really feel the M8 contract around you, turn all the aids off, switch all the various powertrain and chassis settings to their most extreme modes, and cut the power to the front axle. The car takes its set in a corner, and a little prod of the gas only makes the outside-front tire squeal louder. But a big prod wags the tail nice and easy, and a puppy-dog spirit emerges and begs you to steer with the rear.

    View Photos

    Marc UrbanoCar and Driver

    The big M8 isn’t quite as comfortable hanging it out as its predecessor, the M6, was, with less seamless transitions between a proper line and “woo-hoo!” The reluctance to indulge might be the fault of the extra weight over the nose, or maybe it’s the reduced tire stagger—the M6 wore 265s up front and 295s out back, while the M8 has 275s under the nose and 285s in the rear. Or maybe it’s the fact that the M8 is designed to be, and optimized for, all-wheel drive. But that playfulness is present, and regardless of why it’s diminished, it is a welcome (and unsurprising) discovery.

    BMW will paint your M8 Java Green Metallic for $5500, but we’d put that money toward keeping a ticket-fixing attorney on retainer.

    The 8-series designation returns for this generation—BMW having shelved it back in 1997—in an effort to reinvent prestige higher than the number 6 provides. But like the last generation of the 6-series, the 8 shares much of its architecture with the 5-series sedan. The M8 is actually 1.2 inches shorter than its M6 predecessor, a skosh wider, and a metric smidge lower.
    Mostly, though, it looks smaller because of the svelte new shaping. A sharp bone line runs along the door, vast concave scallops below it drawing visual tonnage from the profile. Similar suck-it-in-and-hold-it styling deflates the shapes along the hood and in the rear. Long, thin headlights with an aggressive squint flank an enlarged grille and gaping intakes in the lower fascia and only enhance the shrinking effect. But the car still carries visual heft. If the phrase “Big M8” doesn’t make you giggle, take a minute to Google it. You’re welcome.

    View Photos

    Marc UrbanoCar and Driver

    But inside, the M8 is not so huge. The back seat isn’t as laughable as, say, the Aston Martin DB11’s, but being second funniest isn’t a good thing here. Even up front, the M8 wears passengers out. On our 2000-mile campaign against the mayflies of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, we did a lot of fidgeting and would have stopped to stretch more than we did, but we prefer those bugs pulverized against the front fascia rather than tangled in our hair and buzzing down our backs. And the transmission tunnel forces an extreme pedal offset, which led to serious knee and ankle aches. Even so, the engine seems like it should maybe be pushed back farther still, considering the M8 carries 55.0 percent of its 4251 pounds over the nose.
    As the sportier version of an already obscenely powerful and heavy car, the M8 awkwardly straddles the line between the GT and sports-car worlds. It’s a little stiffer than the M850i but not quite as comfortable, and it isn’t as consistently excellent at balancing its two priorities. BMW’s new variable brake feel is a good example of this. In classic first-gen-innovation form, it’s not all that great in either of its two settings. It’s squishy in Comfort mode and less squishy but still unnatural in Sport. History has taught us that we will gripe about this for a couple years and then BMW will improve it and it’ll be fine. Right now, it’s not quite fine.

    The M Driver’s package raises top speed from 155 to 189 mph, but not to worry; it comes with a day of perform­ance-driving school.

    Even though the M8 is capable of lunatic shenanigans, we’re not sure it deserves such a wild color. It’s called Java Green Metallic, and there’s about a hectare of it here. That name makes no sense until you see it. It is caffeine for your eyeballs. Although maybe Drinking Ten 5-Hour Energys to Get Fifty Continuous Hours of Energy Green would have been more appropriate. A guy in an orange Mustang laughed at us. So did a kid with the sides and back of his head shaved and the mop on top bleached blond. We can’t say we blame them.

    View Photos

    Marc UrbanoCar and Driver

    The M8 coupe starts at $134,995. The base price for an M8 Competition is $147,995. The car we tested is about as expensive as you can make an M8—or any BMW other than a fully loaded M760i. The custom paint cost $5500; the ceramic brakes, $8150. Carbon-fiber exterior trim adds $5400 to the bottom line, the 16-speaker Bowers & Wilkins stereo accounts for $3400, and the active safety stuff that we switched off immediately every single time we turned on the car, $2800. It might not seem worth $2500 to raise your top-speed limiter from 155 to 189 mph, but trust us when we say the time will probably come when, on an empty freeway, you mat the throttle and are surprised to see a number greater than 155 in the head-up display. To help prepare you for this moment, that option also scores you a day at a BMW high-performance driving school.
    Yes, our car’s $175,745 price seems crazy, but what’s crazier is that this is one of the cheapest ways to get into the 10s in the quarter-mile. That the M5 Competition will do it for some $60,000 less and includes an extra set of doors makes this M8 seem almost sane.

    View Photos

    Marc UrbanoCar and Driver

    Counterpoint
    Typically when launching a vehicle, you’ll notice some engine wailing, torque-converter stalling, and adrenaline-building drama leading up to the event. The M8 Competition is different. With the driveline preloaded and the reactor out front snarling at a launch-control-determined 2800 rpm, the M8 blasts off without a chirp of the tire, shifting twice before 60 mph. Need 170 mph in 22.0 seconds? Easy. Please spare me the Java Green hue. Acceleration this unassuming deserves something more subtle. —David Beard

    Specifications

    Specifications
    2020 BMW M8 Competition
    VEHICLE TYPE front-engine, rear/all-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door coupe
    PRICE AS TESTED $175,745 (base price: $147,995)
    ENGINE TYPE twin-turbocharged and intercooled V-8, aluminum block and headsDisplacement 268 in3, 4395 cm3Power 617 hp @ 6000 rpmTorque 553 lb-ft @ 1800 rpm
    TRANSMISSION 8-speed automatic
    CHASSIS Suspension (F/R): multilink/multilinkBrakes (F/R): 15.7-in vented, cross-drilled, carbon-ceramic disc/15.0-in vented, cross-drilled carbon-ceramic discTires: Pirelli P Zero PZ4; F: 275/35ZR-20 102Y ★ R: 285/35ZR-20 104Y ★
    DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 111.3 inLength: 191.8 inWidth: 75.1 inHeight: 53.6 inPassenger volume: 81 ft3Trunk volume: 15 ft3Curb weight: 4251 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 2.5 sec100 mph: 6.3 sec150 mph: 15.5 sec170 mph: 22.0 secRolling start, 5–60 mph: 3.5 secTop gear, 30–50 mph: 2.3 secTop gear, 50–70 mph: 2.4 sec1/4 mile: 10.7 sec @ 129 mphTop speed (mfr’s claim): 189 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 146 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 288 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.03 gStanding-start accel times omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY Observed: 15 mpg
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY Combined/city/highway: 22/19/26 mpg More

  • in

    Tested: 1978 Porsche 928 Changes the Sports Car Game

    From the June 1977 issue of Car and Driver.
    Davis: We drove the cars on Saturday morning. Stepping out into the courtyard at the Mas d’Artigny, high above Nice, we could peer out through the gate to the parking lot and see a whole bouquet of gleaming Porsche 928s awaiting our pleasure. Sun shining, temperature about 45 degrees Fahrenheit, a perfect day to drive the most spectacular production car to come along in ten years.

    Tested: 2020 Porsche 911 Carrera S Lets Us Shift

    The Base Porsche 911 Still Has the Goods

    Most of the cars arrayed before us were white, but there were just enough reds and dark metallic blues (like our cover car) to provide contrast and dramatize the stunning effect of the white ones. I’d already climbed all over the car they’d had on display the night before in the hotel conference room, but sitting in that navy-and-olive-checkered seat, knowing that I was about to fire it up and drive it away, put my old adrenal glands on full red alert. There doesn’t seem to be anything ordinary or commonplace on the whole car.
    The instrument panel is adjustable in concert with the steering column. Release the flat latch on the column’s underside and the whole steering wheel/instrument cluster can be raised or lowered to suit your demands. Since the height adjustment precludes an adjustment for reach, the pedals can be moved. All this, plus the range of seat adjustment, makes it almost impossible to be uncomfortable in the 928.
    As I sat there fiddling with the controls and waiting for Yates to join me, 928 project engineer Helmut Flegl squatted at my elbow and said, “Put it in first.” I swung the lever over to the left and pushed it straight ahead. “Put it in first,” he said again. So I came back to neutral, reflected for a moment, then put it back where I’d had it in the first place. “That’s second, put it in first!” Oh god, I haven’t even started the engine and I’ve already made a fool of myself. First in the all-­new Porsche five-speed manual is down and to the left, in the same plane as reverse. This makes it possible for the gears most often used to lie in the conventional H-pattern we all know and love. It makes perfect sense, once you’re told where first is. A Mercedes-Benz three­-speed automatic built to Porsche specifications will be offered as an alternative, though none was available for us to try out at the introduction.

    View Photos

    Ken Osburn/Brock YatesCar and Driver

    We were to drive a 108-mile loop that took us from our hotel at Vence, west through the hills overlooking the French Riviera to Grasse, thence to Draguignan and back to home base via the Auto­route. The first leg was mine, and Yates immediately began to get carsick. We tried to deal with the problem via the vents, but the ventilating system just wasn’t up to the job, so we were forced to make the whole run with the windows cracked open. Yates’s malady was traced to the unpleasant smell of under­coating that seemed to permeate our car. The inability of the ventilation system to deal with it was unforgivable. Any American car, any BMW 320i would have kept the air inside fresh and odor­-free.
    We began our drive by getting lost. After screaming past the same bemused villagers from several different directions, we spotted a sign for Grasse and we were on our way. The flexibility of the car’s all-aluminum V-8 is remarkable, and we found that three gears would be quite ample to transmit all that power under any circumstance. The five-speed box is really a cosmetic device in this car, so willing is the engine. The 928 is the most stable and reassuring Porsche I have ever driven. Coming off a rough corner in any intermediate gear, at any point in the mid-rev range, you just open the throttle and the sensation is like that of dialing up a rheostat. More and more and faster and faster, change up, the process repeats itself, and so on until the trees are all blurred and the kilometer stones seem to be coming by every ten seconds. The car never hints that this awesome display of advanced vehicle dynamics is anything out of the ordinary. A driver’s car, unquestionably, but a very civilized touring car at the same time. Yates says that the 928 is the fulfillment of an old enthusiast’s dream—the sports-racing car tamed tor use on the street—and he’s right.

    View Photos

    Ken Osburn/Brock YatesCar and Driver

    Setright: The Dynamics of the Idea. The late Dr. Ferdinand Porsche pursued, as a car designer, a retrogressive career. He began as the first protagonist of front-wheel drive, when working for Lohner. He proceeded, or perhaps receded, by designing for Mercedes-Benz some front-engine, rear-wheel-drive cars of some historical and considerable aesthetic importance. Finally he made his name inseparably linked with cars whose rear wheels were driven by engines immediately in front of, or behind, them. In the Grand Prix racing cars he proposed for Auto Union, the otiose weight of a propeller shaft and its infringement upon the ideal location of the driver (and hence upon either the frontal area or the transmission efficiency of the car) combined with the superior traction given by the greater load on the rear tires of the inherently tail-heavy car to give it a theoretical advantage in performance over the then-more conventional rivals, although the solecisms of his independent suspension made that advantage always difficult and often impossible to realize in practice. In the people’s car that he created for the KdF (Kraft durch Freude: Strength through Joy) movement, superior traction again constituted an attraction of driving in mountainous or agricultural country, and this combined with the advantages of mechanical simplicity and unrivaled manufacturing economy to make the tail-engine Volkswagen a similarly persuasive design. After the fall of Hitler (a customer whom he accorded surprisingly scant respect), the remembered glamour of the Auto Union and the revived availability of useful components from Volkswagen offered another persuasive combination, which led to a series of rear-engine sporting cars that have borne the name of Porsche with increasing distinction through all the years that have followed. No such arguments, neither the exigencies of racing nor the constraints of humble circumstances, could prevail upon his successors in title when they conceived the 928 as a materially new answer to a notionally old question.
    In a car weighing 3200 pounds, a modest length of Cardan shaft is not an insupportable burden. In a car putting 1.2 square feet of tractive rubber firmly in contact with the road, there is no need to pile a quarter of a ton of engine on top of them to amplify a grip that is already sufficient. In a car whose occupants, sit­ting side by side, may be presumed to require more elbow and shoulder room than they need at pelvic level, the separation of their seat cushions by a drive­shaft tunnel has no effect upon the frontal area of the car, nor much effect on the sociability of its passengers.
    On the contrary, the 928 has been made as a dynamic dumbbell, with its major masses disposed at its extremities to give it a high polar moment of inertia. The effect of this has been exaggerated by an admittedly deliberate attempt to keep the wheelbase short, an attempt so successful that the overall length of the car is 78-percent greater than the length of the wheelbase. Porsche may come in time to regret this piling of Tedium upon Ossian, for it has an unnecessarily cramping effect upon the room in the posterior seats: It would have done little behavioral harm and much spatial good had the whole apparatus been stretched by a few inches inserted between the axles. The car is only fourteen feet, eight inches long, the same as a Lotus Elite; if it grew another four inches it would still be a foot shorter than a Jaguar XJ-S. However that may be, it seems that Porsche recognized that it was going to build a car with uncommonly good responses and that, if an ordinary driver’s capabilities were not to be unreasonably strained, it would be advisable to exploit a fairly high polar moment to mollify the twitchiness that they would otherwise have expected.

    View Photos

    Ken Osburn/Brock YatesCar and Driver

    A high polar moment of inertia is not altogether a good thing. Its advantages have been sought in the yawing plane where it makes no small contribution to directional stability. All too frequently overlooked (remember the MGC?) is its effect in the pitching plane, where the high-pitch frequency and small-pitch amplitude of a rear-engine or mid-engine car (or indeed any other with a low polar moment of inertia) is altogether preferable. Yet if these two pitch factors can be separated, the picture may be changed: A low-pitch frequency can be more restful, provided that the pitch amplitude is not suffered to grow correspondingly larger as it would if uncorrected. The means of correction are a commonplace of modern suspension design: By geometrical artifices that resist tail-squat in acceleration and nose­dive in braking, the detrimental habits of a short-wheelbase car with a high polar moment of inertia can be eradicated, leaving the advantages unobscured.
    Even more important than the polar moments of such a car is the position of its center of gravity, which in the 928 is located ideally at mid-wheelbase. The weight distribution of a rear-engine car is inimical to that first-class adhesion for the front wheels that is particularly important in a fast car. This would be most apparent when the car was in the acceleration mode, when the opposition of its great tractive effort at the rear wheels and the inertia of the car’s mass acting through its center of gravity would produce a transfer of load onto the rear wheels and off those at the front. This transfer is sufficient in a front-engine but well-balanced car such as the 928 to insure an adequate coefficient of friction between the rear tires and the road so as to permit full-power acceleration without wheelspin. It would be a mistake to suppose that its needs are extravagant: Capable of accelerating from standstill to 62 mph at an average rate of 0.42 g, the 928 will not exceed a peak instanta­neous rate of 0.77 g in bottom gear.
    The value of weight transfer on the front tires is greater in braking, where again the adhesion between the tires and the road increases in proportion to the vertical load on the tires. Even when the car is merely in the overrun condition, this forward load transfer is significant, though its magnitude is naturally less; but the concatenation of Pirelli P7 tires, anti-dive suspension, and beautifully judged balance makes it feasible that on a suitable surface a rate of retardation of 1.2 g might be reached, and this may informatively be compared with the rate of acceleration already quoted.
    There is a further disadvantage common to tail-heavy cars that the balance and morphology of the 928 naturally combat. In a well-streamlined car (and it is inconceivable that Porsche should produce any other), the aerodynamic center of pressure moves forward as the speed increases: Should it move ahead of the center of gravity, the car becomes directionally unstable. There are sundry body-shaping tricks that can serve in mitigation, but most of them look ugly or increase drag if not both.

    View Photos

    Ken Osburn/Brock YatesCar and Driver

    Davis: As Yates began to feel better with the windows open and I became accustomed to the 928, we began to hurry. The power steering is a Porsche design, using a special Bosch pump, and its boost eases off as the speed increases. It is about as good as any power-assisted steering we have ever driven. The car behaves itself even when driven by an over-enthusiastic editor/publisher fresh from America’s polite traffic and boring speed limits. Only once did it stumble, and then I couldn’t get it to repeat its mistake. Yates got out to take some pictures, and I was manfully tossing around the selected corner, lifting abruptly as I got past his position on the roadside. Once, not quite off the corner, I lifted my foot and the tail jumped to the outside quite abruptly; exactly the sort of behavior the Weissach axle (see Mr. Setright below) is supposed to prevent.
    Setright: The Suspension and Steering. The more I examine the 928 specifications, the more I see the car as a commercial version of the jewelescent Pagaso Z103 that preceded it by twenty years. Alas, commercial is almost always a pejorative term, and in this case its use may be unfair. Yet we must remember the firm’s reason, after years of building low-polar-moment cars in the tradition of the Grand Prix Auto Union P-­Wagen, for suddenly turning out a high­ polar-moment job in the idiom of that racer’s rival, the GP Mercedes-Benz: “We have done so because we cannot find 15,000 customers named Bernd Rosemeyer!” In other words, it is better for Porsche to perform a volte face in the showroom than for a customer to do one on the road.
    Nor would it find so many ready to pay dearly for something as severe as the Pegaso. If anything distinguishes the modern sporting car from the old-fashioned sort (and on the evidence of these two cars, there cannot be much), it must be the compliance that is built into the modern one to insulate it and its occupants from the lively tattoo of the tires beating on the road surface. Today’s radial is a snare drum, from which every flam and paradiddle is transmitted to the car’s structure through the most direct route, which is the suspension linkage. Some resilience is necessary in its joints if the vibrations are to be mollified; in particular, the Pirelli P7 needs longitudinal compliance to soften the exceptional longitudinal stiffness of its belts. This degree of freedom is built into the lower wishbone pivots at front and rear.
    Porsche sought American advice on the translation of the 928 specifications into English and got into a terrible mess when it came to the suspension. Somehow the company was tricked into talk of trailing arms, but the reality is double wishbones—and if you dislike the term, would you be any happier with the kinematic engineers’ “four-bar linkage”? It might mean more than Porsche’s new term for its rear suspension, called the Weissach axle.

    View Photos

    Ken Osburn/Brock YatesCar and Driver

    Weissach is the place where they have a test track, and there is no axle. There is just a four-bar linkage, but the lower bar is wishbone-shaped and pivots about a diagonal axis on elastic bushes. These suffer axial compression when the wheels are driving the car; on the overrun, they extend themselves again and thus give the rear wheels a measure of toe-out. It happens in lots of cars, especially in the 911: Lift-off oversteer has become the handling hazard supreme. A study of cornering accidents revealed that most of the cars involved ended their gyrations inside the corner: Each driver thought he was going too fast and naturally lifted his foot from the accelerator pedal, producing a sharp nosing into the corner that only made his predicament seem more acute. In the 928, the cure is another degree of freedom in the front pivot of the rear bottom wishbone: As movement in one (induced by variations in tractive or braking thrust) tends to toe the wheel outwards, similarly induced movement in the other toes it commensurately inwards. The result is as near to neutrality or insensitivity to throttle as is possible in a short-wheelbase car with a great potential for longitudinal load transfer. The transfer might be more remarked were it not for the anti-dive geometry of the front suspension and the anti-squat at the rear. In both cases it is of the inertial type, which does not interfere so much with steering geometry—and in the 928 it would be bad otherwise. The negative scrub radius of the steering demands that castor be reduced to a minimum, because its jacking effect as the wheel is turned is aggravated by the king-pin inclination, instead of being reduced by it as in conventional steering geometry. Porsche has been unable to cram the entire length of the kingpost inside the wheel, so it has to be tilted rather steeply to give the negative offset it sought. Even so, the jacking effect is likely to be considerable: Unwinding lock when going slowly in the 928 would be hard work without the ZF power steering.
    Davis: At the halfway point, coffee was laid on by the Porsche people in a little bistro near St. Cezaire. I was rushing along at a great rate, charging through one downhill second-gear corner after another, when suddenly there was old Karl E. Ludvigsen, sitting, drinking his coffee right where I seemed to be headed, about a hundred meters straight ahead. It was the coffee stop. Yates shouted, I went for first gear and braked quite sharpishly into the parking lot past Ludvigsen, who watched coolly over the edge of his expresso cup. As we disembarked, he ambled down and allowed as how ours was the most spectacular arrival so far.
    Looking at the test cars in the parking lot, perched on the edge of a deep gorge complete with a mountain stream rushing below at full chat, we couldn’t help being impressed with the “rightness” of the design. The absence of wheel flares and spoilers is especially welcome. The night before, designer Tony Lapine had said, “One of the nicest things about a completely new design is the fact that we can do it right. Spoilers and wheel flares simply show that the engine and suspension have become faster than the shape. The 911 Turbo has to look the way it does, but the 928 can be clean—at least until it starts going faster.” To prove his point, the 928 is only fractionally less efficient in aerodynamic terms than the winged and spoilered Turbo.
    To prove the flexibility of the engine, Yates managed to exit the parking lot in third gear, mentioning that he thought it was an extraordinarily long first. I waited until I was sure the fancy double-plate clutch would hold before commenting. The undercoating smell got to me a bit too, but like an enthusiastic traveling dog, I breathed deeply at the open window and kept myself well. Yates thought the clutch was spongy and slow in response. I hadn’t noticed it, but the suggestion has been made that this could be related either to its two-plate construction or the great mass of drive shaft with which it must deal.

    View Photos

    Ken Osburn/Brock YatesCar and Driver

    When we struck the Autoroute below Draguignan, Yates went mad and laid it on 230 kph for about twenty miles. Now, one must bear in mind that the Auto­route, though wide, is not straight, and on that particular day they were allowing other people to drive upon it—God knows why. We smoked past car after car, a sort of parade of European tourists going by in reverse, a film run backwards. I maintained some semblance of courage by doing a running parody of French CB, if there was any: “‘Ay Beavair, een zat Deux Cheveau four-wheeler, what’s you ‘andle, come back? You got eet copy of me zair, Beavair? Zees eez zee Ugly American, headed for zat Nice-town. ‘Ow she look ovair you shoulder, keed?” Yates didn’t even notice my forced jollity. He just blew off everybody in southern France.
    Setright: The Engine. Six years have passed since Mr. Jackson of Petrol Injection Ltd., realizing the shortcomings of all fuel-injection systems including his own Tecalemit-Jackson apparatus, created a new one in which a pair of butterflies in series created a constant-depression metering chamber so that at long last the mass air flow could be directly measured instead of being indirectly (and inaccurately) inferred. Thereafter, an impressively short interval was allowed to pass by Bosch before it produced its own clumsier but equally efficacious version. Since that time, the Bosch K-Jetronic injection system has been an enormous success, and it comes as no surprise to find Bosch dominating the scene in the engine compartment of the new P-Wagen. Very modern and European it makes it look; but let us look back a few more years.
    Sixteen years, at least, have passed since Chrysler devised a formula where­with to calculate the length of intake ducts that would insure the greatest amplification of the engine’s volumetric efficiency at the desired speed for maximum torque. The length of each of the eight ram pipes feeding the Porsche 928’s inlet ports accords with that formula, to set the peak of the torque curve at 3600 rpm, when it renders 267.6 foot­-pounds, corresponding to a brake mean­ effective pressure of 149 pounds per square inch.
    European and American engineering are blended well in the 928 motor, surely the nearest thing yet seen to a mid-Atlantic engine. It is a 90-degree V-8 with a two-plane crankshaft, zero-lash hydraulic tappets and parallel valves arranged in line to open into cuneiform combustion chambers allowing a modest inlet ­valve area approaching nineteen percent of the piston area. Mostly Michigan, so far, but each row of valves is surmounted by an overhead camshaft, driven by a toothed nylon belt (the longest yet), and the heads are clamped down by long shear-relieved resilient studs seated at the bottoms of the cylinders. Aping a current European fad, the entire engine from heads to sump is a stacked­-up sandwich of light-alloy die castings, the cylinder block being of the open-­deck style that always makes for good coolant flow but sometimes creates sealing problems. The Western influence shows in the material of the block: It is the high-silicon Reynolds 930 alloy that permits the relief-etched bores to be unlined, given suitably coated pistons.
    Another fashion enjoying some currency among European engine-men is for the crankcase to be split along the plane of the main bearings’ axis, the nether half taking the form of a ladder or crate embodying all the main bearing caps. The idea is to improve the rigidity of the crankshaft’s support, but it is a poor way of holding the base of the block in shape. Chrysler’s system of deep skirts embracing caps that are bolted up and across but not through (a vital distinction seldom appreciated in Europe) has more to commend it, but Porsche (probably for production convenience) has chosen the latter and suffered for it: An oil-pressure relief gallery had to be introduced before the thing would remain weep-free, despite the miracle-of-modern-science plastic gasket that alone was thought capable of perfectly sealing the joint. Es irrt der Mensch so lang er streht (Man errs so long as he strives): Goethe must have known a thing or two about engineering.

    View Photos

    Ken Osburn/Brock YatesCar and Driver

    So did Ts’ai-ken t’an, the Taoist who wrote: “The stillness in stillness is not the real stillness. Only when there is stillness in movement can the spiritual rhythm appear.” We may scarcely doubt that he was referring to the balancing of the inertia forces in an engine: When the pistons assume a momentary stillness at top or bottom of the stroke, primary inertia forces reach their maxima but are easily counterweighted by a two-plane V-8 crankshaft, whereas the secondary forces due to connecting-rod angularity reach their greatest values at about mid ­stroke, when piston acceleration is fiercest. The problem can be eased by making the rods as long as possible (if they were infinitely long, the problem would disappear), but long rods make a V-8 both tall and wide. Porsche makes the con rods of the 928 a little shorter than the conventional length between centers, which is twice the stroke: At 1.92 times, they result in the piston acceleration at maximum safe engine speed (6300 rpm) reaching 70,980 feet per second. Thus the wrist pin is burdened twice each revolution by a piston that bears on it with 2204 times its own static weight. The pin looks as though it can stand it, as it should—such loadings are about average for a modern engine. The rods themselves, though, are rather special, being made by sintering die-compacted steel powder, followed by a coining to improve the mechanical properties. It is a good process, resulting in rods that are lighter than forgings and stronger than castings.
    A sensitive driver will never put them to the 2204-g test. With maximum power (240 horses) rendered at 5250 rpm and 133 pounds per square inch bmep, and with the gearbox ratios so closely and evenly spaced, there is little point in revving the 928 beyond 5700 or even 5500 rpm, and even less to be gained if the option of an automatic transmission is exercised. Even without the benefits of hydrokinetic conversion, the engine’s full-throttle torque exceeds 81 percent of maximum all the way from 5600 down to 1500 rpm. Would it be mischievous to point out that the shape of its torque curve is very much like that of the old Chrysler Ramcharger?
    Davis: After our drive, we had lunch with Tony Lapine and probably bored him with our boyish enthusiasm. Lapine is one of the good guys. I knew him in Detroit in 1953, when he was laboring at GM Styling and sports cars were slow. Funny that somebody who was just one of the guys around Detroit over twenty years ago would be sitting here with us in Nice, about to become no-fooling-honest-to-gosh famous when the 928 hits the streets.
    After lunch I took a nap. When I awoke it was getting dark, and all the other guys had taken a bus to Monaco and then to dinner at some Mexican restaurant. I wandered into the bar and found one of the Porsche people who graciously suggested that I have dinner with his party instead. As it turned out, his party included Dr. Ernst Fuhrmann, the head man at Porsche, and my trip was made.
    Dr. Fuhrmann is a feisty little gent, deceptively dove gray in color. His suit, his hair, his eyes all suggest a monochrome until he begins to speak. As he warms up, he begins to shift into the translucent grays and blues of an industrial diamond-flashing, sparkling, by turns ironic and comic. A very stimulating and entertaining dinner companion.
    After the formalities were over and the first bottle of wine was two-thirds gone, he asked, “Why do Americans buy Porsches? They can’t drive them as they are meant to be driven.” I answered that even under America’s Victorian speed laws, a Porsche was still a rewarding car to drive, that Americans treasured its mechanical sophistication and respected its potential, even though they might never experience its performance at the absolute limit.

    View Photos

    Ken Osburn/Brock YatesCar and Driver

    He then said, “It’s not surprising that a car that is designed to be good at 230 kph would be good at 100. It would be very surprising if cars designed to be good at 100 kph could be good at 230. Our cars are not as they are because we are better engineers than General Motors. Our cars are as they are because Germany has no speed limits. If I was running General Motors or Ford, my cars would probably seem just as dumb as Estes’s or Ford’s. I run a small company with very few customers, and it is easy for me to look smart—only my risks are proportionately greater.”
    He warmed to his subject as we wrecked a perfect sea bass and ordered red wine for the cheese. “I design cars for a thousand people or so. I don’t have to design cars for everybody. At Daimler­-Benz or General Motors, I would have to listen to this one or that one: ‘The car is too small; it is too big; old people won’t like it; it must have four doors.’ I am in an enviable position. If I don’t like it, it won’t get built.”
    “One man can design a car. A small group of men can design a car. But a large group of men will always design gray mice. I promise you that anyone who has owned a Turbo or a 928 for one year will never forget it. On the other hand, a man who has owned a gray mouse—no matter how good it is—will look back twenty years later and say to his wife, ‘What was that car we had? It was a very good one, but I can’t remember the name.’ ”
    I asked Dr. Fuhrmann about Tony Lapine. He thought about my question for a moment, then grinned wickedly and said, “He is, of course, crazy. But that is my problem. One does not expect to ride a fine, spirited horse without some trouble. He is not your average citizen; he is one of the best and that will make anyone unusual.”
    This was the transition point. After reflecting on Tony Lapine for a moment, he was led to comment on the kind of company Porsche is. “We can bring a new design to market two years faster than Daimler-Benz. We can act out of simple conviction in a way that the giants cannot. For instance, we committed 200 million Deutschmarks to the 928 project in 1974—against annual sales of only 600 million. In 1974, mind you, when nobody would give you a penny for the future of the sports car. There was an energy crisis, a recession, and most of the people running car companies had—I don’t know how to say this nicely in English—uh, brown in their underwear. But we went ahead. We couldn’t look back.”
    “The 928 is not ‘the car of the year.’ It’s a car for the Eighties, a car for the decade. We think it’s the car of the future. The 911 is the end-product of twenty years’ development. The 928 is only the beginning of a new era.”

    View Photos

    Ken Osburn/Brock YatesCar and Driver

    “In the old days, we developed our cars the hard way. We had no test track, no fancy instruments. We used the public roads and our own asses. Now we are much more sophisticated, with the most comprehensive facilities for research and development. But when it’s time to make the decisions, we still have to drive the cars and trust our asses. There is no other way. How it feels is more important than what the instruments tell you.”
    “You know Zora Arkus-Duntov? He was very helpful to us in our early development. He drove for us at Le Mans, in the 1100cc class, and in those days our cars suffered from instability. He told us what was wrong. Not how to fix it, but at least what he knew the problem was. Years later, General Motors sent a Corvette Sting Ray, one of the first ones, over here for Auto Motor und Sport to test, and they said it was undrivable. Arkus-Duntov flew over to see what was wrong, and they all went to Hockenheim and ran on the short circuit there. Duntov drove the Corvette, and one of their editors drove an NSU Sport Prinz, about 1000cc, and they lapped him in fifteen laps. They couldn’t tell him what was wrong, you see, but they did point out that his car had a problem. Maybe he learned something from that.”
    Now we left the dinner table and went to the bar, where I had a Williams pear brandy and he had a scotch. Swirling the scotch and its ice cubes, he said, “Speed is what automobiles are all about. If it wasn’t so, we would walk. The government cannot legislate a value on speed, or any limitation of it. They cannot set our priorities for us…they don’t know how fast I want to go or how soon I must be where I’m going. Speed has little to do with energy conservation. The United States has speed limits, and it wastes more gasoline than Germany uses. Is that fair? No. Speed is what it’s all about.”
    Setright: The Transmission and Driveline. Given the generous torque and the characteristic K-Jetronic flexibility of the 928, it makes sense for top gear to be direct-drive, that being the quietest and least consumptive. If it had no other virtue, the arrangement would at least preserve us from lots of ill-defined talk about whether a geared-up ratio actually constituted an overdrive; instead we can content ourselves with the knowledge that the highest gear of the 928 is a fairly long-striding one, such that at the 143 mph declared by Porsche to be conservative maximum speed, the crankshaft is turning 5400 revolutions to the minute. The four lower ratios are all indirect and are beautifully close, getting closer with every succeeding upward change. Without exceeding 5500 rpm, that gives 40, 59, 80 and 108 mph for the indirect gears, all of them naturally Porsche-synchronized and selected by a double-rod linkage contrived to isolate the shift lever from vibrations.
    The whole cog cluster is in a liberally finned casing integrated with the final drive, on the end of a tubular beam rigidly fixed to the barrel-housing at the back of the engine. Through this tube passes a multi-piece drive shaft supported in a couple of bearings to prevent whirling of its slender and torsionally flexible wheel. Its dimensions (the shaft is less than an inch in diameter) are governed not only by the torque it has to transmit, though that in itself is significant: The maximum torque multiplication is in bottom gear, by a factor of 3.601, and were the gearbox bolted to the back of the engine, the shaft would have to be sturdy enough to cope with 964 pound-feet of torque. Instead, the shaft never has to transmit more than the engine supplies, so it can be as surprisingly slender as it is. All that needs to be determined is the clutch location, and this is something that has provoked argument ever since these polarized transmissions first came into use.
    When the clutch is disengaged to permit a gear change, the driven plate rotates with the gearbox input shaft, adding its rotational inertia to the other rotating masses that have to be accelerated or braked by the synchromesh. The more power the clutch has to transmit, the greater its diameter tends to be, and its rotational inertia increases as the square of that diameter; so Porsche has done the sensible and expensive thing that follows as a matter of course in motorcycles and racing cars, increasing the number of clutch plates and thus their frictional area while allowing their diameter and rotational inertia to be minimized. So far, the thinking is sound, and, if the clutch were at the tail of the drive shaft, that shaft could be made larger in diameter, perhaps as a thin-walled tube, reducing its whirling tendencies, increasing its strength and stiffness (notably in torsion), and fitting it admirably to share with the clutch driving-plates some of the duties of the engine flywheel, enabling that customarily burdensome component to be made just a little less substantial.
    Instead, Porsche has put its nice new clutch on the back of the flywheel, right behind the engine, just where you would expect to find it in a more humdrum car. The result is that, when the clutch is disengaged, not only its driven plates but also the entire length of the drive-shaft assembly is added to the rotating masses whose inertia must be overcome by the long-suffering synchromesh mechanism. To minimize this rotational inertia, the shaft has to be made as slender as possible, and in the process acquires a flexibility in torsion that may be thought undesirable. Not only does it make the driveline feel rather elastic, it also strengthens the possibility of resonant torsional vibrations passing through that slender shaft. Perhaps we need not worry unduly: Porsche’s designers may have nodded when drafting the layout, but they must have done their subsequent sums well enough to insure that torsional oscillations never become intrusive or dangerous. Why else do you suppose that the driveline is an assembly of short shafts, rather than one long one?
    Davis: Soon you’ll be able to buy a Porsche with a 4.5-liter aluminum V-8 engine in the front. It will be nearly as fast as the Turbo, ten times easier to drive and a lot less trouble to own. It will cost you almost $25,000, but if you can afford it, it will be the car of which you’ve always dreamed. Furthermore, it will make you the envy of every red-blooded adult male in the civilized world.
    About once every ten years, some car comes along that forces the automotive community to re-examine all of its preconceptions and conventional wisdom. The Porsche 928 is exactly that kind of automotive phenomenon. It will blow your mind, knock your socks off, toss your hat in the creek. If some Philistine should suggest that you could buy a pretty nice mobile home for the same money, stick your fingers into his nose and rip it off his face. For ten years or more Motor Trend and Road & Track have been bilking gullible citizens into purchasing magazines with “The All­ New Mid-Engine Corvette for 1968-70-75-80-85” (choose one). When this Porsche hits the street, an all-new mid­-engine Corvette will look at least a day late and a dollar short.
    Porsche purists are already muttering that the 928 is not a “real” Porsche. They are, of course, entitled to their opinions, but they are also, of course, wrong. The 928 is an almost poetic reaffirmation of Porsche’s bedrock understanding and appreciation of the fundamental automotive verities. It is a sensational car. Its technology is such that it could have been a BMW or a Mercedes-Benz—and either firm would be delighted to have it, thank you—but only Porsche conceived it and had the courage to bring it to market. In 1974 with annual sales of $240 million, with the energy crisis and its speed limits and predictions of gloom and doom all around, Porsche committed $80 million to the realization of a totally new high-performance sports car, a super-car that would put everybody back to Square One over­night. Brave guys.
    Cars like the Mercedes-Benz 450SLC and the Chevrolet Corvette suddenly look very obsolete indeed. The BMW 630CSi instantly becomes a bit more ordinary than its specifications and performance originally led us to believe. This is a new car. Not a rehash, not a copy of somebody else’s successful theme, not a refined agglomeration of sedan components, this new Porsche is as fresh and exciting as the first Porsche 1300 Super I drove in 1953, and it will have the same dramatic effect on the enthusiast world’s notions and perceptions. It will be controversial, but it will become the standard by which other sports cars are judged for at least the next decade.

    Specifications

    Specifications
    1978 Porsche 928
    VEHICLE TYPE front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2+2-passenger, 2-door coupe
    PRICE AS TESTED (C/D EST) $23,000
    ENGINE TYPE SOHC 16-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injectionDisplacement 273 in3, 4474 cm3Power 240 hp @ 5250 rpmTorque 268 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
    TRANSMISSION 5-speed manual
    CHASSIS Suspension (F/R): control arms/control armsBrakes (F/R): vented disc/vented discTires: Pirelli P7, 225/50VR-16
    DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 98.4 inLength: 175.0 inWidth: 72.3 inHeight: 51.7 inCurb weight: 3197 lb
    PERFORMANCE (FACTORY DATA) 62 mph: 6.8 sec100 mph: 13.5 secTop speed (mfr’s est): 140 mph

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Tested: 1983 Volkswagen Rabbit GTI Was Worth the Wait

    From the November 1982 issue of Car and Driver.
    The automotive business may be topsy­-turvy these days, but there’s still no question about where the world’s best drivers’ cars come from. For sheer quantity, you can’t beat the Fatherland: Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, and VW turn out more great rides than the rest of the world’s carmakers combined. Even the Japanese still think German cars are magic—and they’re working furiously to close the gap.

    Best Hatchbacks of 2020

    New VW GTIs Always Make Us Happy, Here’s the Mk 8

    So without further ado, allow us to introduce the latest autobahn panzer to grace our roads, the Volkswagen Rabbit GTI, from—wait a minute—Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania? That’s right. Volkswagen of America is now producing a home-grown version of the little hatchback we’ve been waiting for, the GTI—the perennial benchmark of high­-performance European econoboxes. Better still, it works so well, you’d swear it came from Wolfsburg.
    If you find this leap of faith a little hard to accomplish, we understand. For one thing, the German-made GTI is one killer shoe box. The intense VW engineers take the three letters on the grille very seriously, and the result of all their tuning is a poor man’s hot rod capable of running with BMWs on the autobahn and on twisty Bavarian back roads.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    Nor was there any reason to anticipate such a car from VW of America. The cars rolling out of Pennsylvania farm country have been the farthest things from Teutonic boy racers. Since opening its U.S. plant in 1978, VW has soft-pedaled its German heritage in favor of an Americanized image. Suspensions turned flaccid, seats became bench-flat, and the flash and filigree levels rose alarmingly. If you wanted a German-style driver’s car, you had to choose from one of the imported models on the dealer’s floor, like the Jetta and the Scirocco.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    That era, we’re happy to report, seems over. With sales off 45 percent from a year ago, VW of America is trying a whole new approach. Jim Fuller, then vice-president of Porsche and Audi, was shipped in last spring to get the lights turned back on, and a new corporate campaign—internally called “Roots”—has been established to foster a more vital image for the company.
    This game plan, as you might guess from the name, is for VW to “Germanize” its Americanized, U.S.-built cars. Aside from the image-making GTI—which is intended to cast a glow on the whole line—the program calls for firmer suspensions, better seats, and more understated trim across the board.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    Judging by the GTI, VW seems serious enough to do it. Everything about this car is calculated to make an enthusiast salivate in anticipation. From suspension to seats, all the important parts have been uprated to full autobahn-­class standards—quite an accomplishment, considering the long arm of the cost accountants.
    From ten paces, the transformation is quite subtle, though still visible enough that no keen enthusiast will miss it. A small air dam pokes out beneath the front bumper. Molding and bumpers are blacked out. A thin red molding encircles the grille, and simple red badges are stuck on the grille and the rear deck—just like on the German model. The only other giveaway to this car’s identity lurk in the wheel wells: meaty, P185/60HR-14 Pirelli P6 tires on 14.0-by-6.0-inch alloy wheels.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    Clue number two that this is no ordinary economy car comes the second you pull open the door and slide behind the soft, molded, four-spoke Scirocco wheel. The driving environment is aggressively businesslike, but also pleasantly luxurious—more like what you’d expect in an Audi. The highlight of the interior is a pair of deeply sculptured sport seats like those found in the Scirocco, upholstered in heavy-weight corduroy—deep blue with red stripes in the case of our jet-black test car. A somewhat misshapen center console contains a clock, an oil-temperature gauge, and a voltmeter, which supplement the tach, the speedo, the fuel gauge, and the coolant-temp gauge in the instrument cluster. The final touches are a golf-ball shift knob and the substitution of pseudo brushed aluminum for pseudo wood on the dash and console faces.
    What you key to life on the other side of the firewall is also something you won’t find in any normal Rabbit: a 1.8-liter four-cylinder that packs more power than any other U.S.- spec Rabbit ever has—90 horsepower at 5500 rpm, to be exact. This 16-hp improvement over the stock powerplant is the result of a variety of revisions. The engine has been bored out from 1715cc to 1781, and compression has been bumped from 8.2:1 to 8.5. The breathing has been improved by opening up valve sizes and adding a low-restriction exhaust system with a 3mm-larger-diameter pipe.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    The 1.8-liter’s 22-percent power improvement is still 16 horses shy of the 1.6-liter German GTI’s power peak—something the engine engineers claim is intentional. The cam from the stock 1.7-liter four was retained, they say, to fatten up the midrange for better around-town response, which is sadly lacking in the high-winding German edition.
    Before you roll your eyes at what sounds like an excuse, you should know that this powerplant is a delight to live with. It’s spunky down low and pulls hard for the redline. The new motor muscles the 2100-pound GTI to 60 mph in a brisk 9.7 seconds, nearly two seconds faster than the standard Rabbit five-speed—and nearly a second faster than a 5.0-liter Trans Am four-speed. There’s even enough power to push the VW’s boxy body through the atmosphere at 104 mph.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    The new engine is more than just stronger, it’s more refined as well. VW’s engine team used this opportunity to reduce piston weight by twenty percent and to lengthen the connecting rods by ten percent—two key changes that combine to make this engine one of the world’s most velvety fours. A portion of the GTl’s improved noise-and-vibration control can be traced to a most unlikely source—a new slip-joint connection between the exhaust header and the tailpipe. The upgraded system eliminates the tinny exhaust note of Rabbits past, replacing it with a mellow, expensive-sounding hum.
    Another measure of driving pleasure comes through from the gearbox: a GTI unit imported from Germany. The ratios are the closest you’ll find this side of a race car, and they make it easy to keep the free-revving engine in the choice section of the power band.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    Of course, an equal portion of the European GTI’s prowess is derived from the poise its chassis shows under pressure. Here, too, VW of America has come through. Since the U.S. car is about 140 pounds heavier than its German counterpart, U.S. spring rates and shock valving had to be revised. They were chosen specifically to match the European car’s handling characteristics, however. To maintain the best possible quality control, the front struts come from VW’s European supplier, and the rear shocks are Sachs units. The U.S. car does benefit from the same front and rear anti-roll bars used on the German GTI, as well as the foreign car’s ventilated front disc brake rotors.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    The first thing you notice when you put all these gourmet pieces into motion is what they don’t do to our old friend the Rabbit. The new GTI is not a hard-edged street racer. The engine isn’t shrill or peaky; the suspension doesn’t jiggle or crash over the bumps. The GTI is far more sophisticated and refined than that. It will stick like glue—0.78 g is available for cornering work—but excellent roadholding is only half the story. It’s almost as composed and supple as the high-dollar brands are over bad pavement, always on its toes through mountain switchbacks, and quick to answer your right foot at any speed. It never seems to breathe hard.
    Despite short gearing—4300 rpm shows on the tach at 80 mph—the GTI is a quiet and comfortable long-distance cruiser. For long hauls or short, the front seats work wonders—this despite being handicapped by having only fore­-and-aft and backrest-angle adjustments. Even the new, optional four-speaker AM/FM-stereo/cassette radio sounds plenty good.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    Next to all-around performance like this, a Scirocco pales. This once-humble Rabbit, in fact, now qualifies as a full-fledged GTI hatchback. What ultimately makes the GTI truly significant, however, is that it’s the first car sold in the U.S. to marry this level of driving satisfaction with the utility, compact dimensions, and fuel efficiency of an economy car. Our test GTI returned an impressive 26 mpg during five days of leadfooted road testing—including a morning of instrumented track tests. That happens to be exactly the same real-world mileage we netted with a stock five-speed Rabbit three-door we tested recently. What’s more, if driving enjoyment in a small car is your paramount concern, you’d be hard pressed to beat the cost-benefit ratio inherent in the GTI’s eight-grand admission price.
    For that sum you will not be overwhelmed by clever features, a component sound system, or infinitely adjustable seats. In true German fashion, VW equips the GTI only with what’s needed to get the job done, thank you. When it comes to sheer driving enjoyment, though, the new GTI currently stands in a class of one. True to its pedigree, it can make you feel great—and that’s the best thing any car can do for its driver.
    Counterpoint
    Listen, we ought to give this car a medal or something. Partly because it’ll put the hurt on so many so-called sports cars in the stand-on-it-and-steer-it mode. But mostly because the GTI isn’t another one of those dumb boy racers that ride like produce wagons and make power like blenders stuck on purée.
    I mean, even a fast car should live up to certain minimum standards. So I don’t mind that the GTI rides like a Jaguar. I can live with first-class furnishings in the passenger cabin. I can stand a smooth, powerful engine that squeezes a bunch of miles out of every gallon of gas. If this is the sacrifice I have to make for a car that does business as good as the C/D performance specs say the GTI does, I’m ready to bite the bullet.
    Like everybody else, I expected a kind of Porsche Speedster—an uncivilized, fast little car. Imagine how lucky we are that this Eighties-style Speedster is civilized as well as fast. It’s a fast little car without the nonsense. —Michael Jordan
    As a self-proclaimed forward thinker, I’m sent into a quasi funk every time I think of what the GTI could have been. With Euro horsepower (110 DIN) and fewer black-speed decorations, this box could have left for dead every other performance car in the country.

    View Photos

    Robin RiggsCar and Driver

    But I am sheered back up again by thinking of what it is. This car just down-the-road drives better than any other box I’ve tried in the past year. The suspension has the right resilience, and the steering has the right feel. There’s a wonderful sense of balance. Balance is the hardest quality to engineer in—harder by far than horsepower—and VW has done it right. You can really make some moves in this car.
    Seats are nearly as difficult. For my anatomy, the GTI’s buckets fit better than the best that can be done with all the knobs and squeeze bulbs in Camaros and Supras. For around $8000, I don’t know of a friendlier place to sit and drive. —Patrick Bedard
    Universal esteem for anything—automobiles, moving pictures, jelly doughnuts—is unheard-of in this office. Yet everybody loves the Rabbit GTI, including me. But let me enter a short list of this car’s deficiencies into the record for the sake of objectivity. The clutch pedal vibrates underfoot at times. It’s difficult to heel-and-toe. The steering is too slow for my tastes. Lastly, the Rabbit is by now an old car, a condition I’ll mention in passing without actually holding it against the GTI in any way. Let us instead say the car is mature.
    The most interesting thing to me about the GTI is that it’s a true original even though the idea of a sport box has been bandied about for years. The Japanese have nothing of the sort. Chevrolet can only dream of such a car. The Ford Motor Company is working hard on the Escort GT, but the fruit of its labor is not yet ripe. Now that VW has done the definitive econoracer, copying it should be easy. This is one case where cribbing is encouraged, at least by me. —Don Sherman
    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2021 Kia K5 Rolls Out a New Name for the Optima

    View Photos
    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    Don’t get hung up by the new nameplate on the redesigned 2021 Kia K5. This is very much the shapely mid-size sedan formally known as the Kia Optima. We’re a little sad to see a perfectly good vehicle name fall to alphanumeric nonsense, but the Optima has always been known as the K5 in the Korean market. The badge on the trunklid takes nothing away from its family sedan goodness. Like its predecessor, it upholds Kia’s increasingly impressive ability to balance upscale execution, design, and value.

    2021 Kia K5 Drops Optima Name, Adds Sporty Options

    Good-Looking 2021 Kia K5 Starts under $25,000

    At the center of the Optima-to-K5 metamorphosis is the latter’s adoption of the Hyundai-Kia conglomerate’s latest N3 platform, which also underpins the similarly fresh 2020 Hyundai Sonata. We had a brief drive of the new K5 last year around Kia’s home market of South Korea. Compared to the outgoing Optima, the new sedan is 2.0 inches longer, 1.0 inch wider, and 0.8 inch lower. Its 112.2-inch wheelbase also is up 1.8 inches, with that growth primarily going to expanding rear-seat space. Even with the K5’s sloping roofline, six-footers can easily sit behind six-footers.

    View Photos

    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    The Optima was always a looker, and the K5 arguably is even more so with its strong character lines, balanced proportions, and intricate detailing. We’ll leave it to you to decide if the K5’s sharper lines, zigzag LED running lights, and “sharkskin-inspired” grille treatment work better than the Sonata’s demurer look, but there’s no denying this Kia pushes style and design further than what’s expected of the segment.
    Driving the Change
    Things are comparably tame under the K5’s hood, although the GT model will address that when it arrives later this year with a 290-hp turbocharged 2.5-liter inline-four and an eight-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission. The front-wheel-drive GT-Line and EX models that we drove in Michigan featured the standard 1.6-liter turbo-four—180 horsepower and 195 pound-feet of torque—mated to a conventional, smooth-shifting eight-speed automatic. In our testing of a similar 2020 Sonata, this setup was good for a zero-to-60-mph run in 7.3 seconds. That car also returned 36 mpg on our 75-mph highway fuel-economy test, although some competitors such as the Toyota Camry can top 40 mpg in that measure. For the K5, its EPA estimates top out at 29 mpg city, 38 mpg highway, and 32 mpg combined.

    View Photos

    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    The K5 breaks from the front-drive-only Sonata by offering all-wheel drive. That system will be available later this year as an option only on the volume LXS and GT-Line trim levels. The upgrade won’t come cheap, though. Bundled with a host of otherwise optional equipment, all-wheel drive will add $2100 to the price of the LXS and $3700 to the GT-Line.
    Kia says the K5 was tuned separately from the Sonata, yet both share a similar characteristics on the road. The K5’s steering is precise but numb in feel, there’s an initial softness to its brake pedal that firms up when you stand on it, and it goes around corners with reassuring competence and stability. The relatively soft suspension returns good overall ride comfort and moderate body roll in corners, but we would like more insulation from the road. Both of the cars we drove rolled on 18-inch Pirelli P Zero All-Season tires (16s are standard on lesser trims) that provided reasonable levels of grip. Yet, despite a standard acoustically laminated windshield and increased sound-deadening material, road noise is prominent on most surfaces and the big wheels thwack loudly over bumps and pavement seams.

    View Photos

    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    The K5’s 1.6-liter is content with being worked lightly, doling out its peak torque at just 1500 rpm with a subdued thrum. Sport mode energizes things a touch by prompting the eight-speed to hold on to lower gears longer and pumping slightly more engine noise into the interior through the stereo speakers. It also firms up the steering effort a little, albeit with no change to its tactility. But only the K5’s GT model gets paddle shifters, and the standard transmission will upshift on its own well before the engine’s 6500-rpm redline, even with the shift lever slotted into its manual mode.
    Interior Evolution
    Kia has significantly upped the Optima’s interior game with excellent fit and finish and a thoughtful sprinkling of not-too-shiny bits. The K5 succeeds in incorporating various styling elements from both Kia’s sportier Stinger hatchback and the Telluride SUV, along with exemplary functionality and ease of use. GT-Line models can be optioned with jazzy red leatherette upholstery with GT-Line logos emblazoned on the front headrests, but we preferred the cooler ambiance of the more luxurious EX model with its greater feature count and its convincing fake-wood detailing. While we would’ve liked to lower the front seats even more in their tracks, the K5’s thrones don’t feel perched as excessively high as the latest Sonata’s.

    View Photos

    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    There are some budget-minded elements to be found, including hard plastics on the door panels, center console, and lower dash. EX models add more soft-touch points and a few niceties that we wish were standard across the range, such as rear climate-control vents. But all K5s come with dual-zone automatic climate control, a crisp (albeit small) 4.2-inch instrument cluster display, and an 8.0-inch center touchscreen. A 10.3-inch touchscreen is optional. Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity are standard, but strangely, you’ll have to use a power cord to sync with the larger 10.3-inch touchscreen. Kia says it may address that discrepancy with wireless connectivity in a future technical update. Other tech highlights include an optional 12-speaker Bose stereo and wireless device charging.
    Even the K5’s competitively priced $24,455 LX base model comes with loads of standard safety gear and driver aids, including forward-collision avoidance with pedestrian detection, automatic high beams, a driver-attention monitor, and lane-keeping assist. Moving up through the lineup unlocks additional assistants, such as navigation-supported adaptive cruise control with stop-and-go capability, rear cross-traffic detection, and blind-spot monitoring. Fully loaded, the front-drive Kia K5 GT-Line costs about $28K, while the more indulgent EX tops out around $32K. That’s slightly less than a new Sonata Limited yet a bit more than you’ll pay for a similarly equipped Honda Accord or Toyota Camry.

    View Photos

    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    The new Kia K5 may not be as engaging to drive as the Accord, which remains our top pick in the segment. And had it been around for our most recent comparison test of family sedans, it probably wouldn’t have improved upon the Sonata’s second-place finish. To be sure, we will let the Kia and the Honda duke it out soon enough. But what the K5 does offer is an impressively styled and smartly executed package that’s studded with features and technology. Optima still has a better ring to it than K5, but Kia’s redesigned mid-sizer is good enough that we don’t really care what it’s called.

    Specifications

    Specifications
    2021 Kia K5
    VEHICLE TYPE front-engine, front- or all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
    BASE PRICE LX, $24,455; LXS, $25,455; GT-Line, $26,355; EX, $28,955; GT, $31,455
    ENGINES turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve 1.6-liter inline-4, 180 hp, 195 lb-ft; turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve 2.5-liter inline-4, 290 hp, 311 lb-ft
    TRANSMISSION 7-speed dual-clutch automatic, 8-speed automatic
    DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 112.2 inLength: 193.1 inWidth: 73.2 inHeight: 56.9 inPassenger volume: 102–105 ft3Trunk volume: 16 ft3Curb weight (C/D est): 3100–3400 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST) 60 mph: 5.2–7.4 sec100 mph: 17.8–20.1 sec1/4 mile: 13.5–15.7 secTop speed: 135 mph
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST) Combined/city/highway: 29–32/26–29/35–38 mpg

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Tested: 2020 Ioniq Electric Runs 150 Miles on Its New and Larger Battery

    View Photos
    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    Hyundai’s 2020 Ioniq Electric isn’t all about the range. If you want an EV that will go more than 200 miles on a charge, a Hyundai salesman will walk you over to the $38,330 Kona Electric SUV with a 258-mile EPA range. And the Kona isn’t the only alternative. There are plenty of other choices for just a few thousand more than the Ioniq EV’s $34,020 base price. A Chevrolet Bolt and its 259-mile range starts at $37,495, the Nissan Leaf Plus offers 215 miles of range for $39,125, and the 250-mile range Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus opens for $39,190.

    HIGHS: Exceedingly energy efficient, surprisingly classy cabin, strong value versus rivals.

    But, let’s say you don’t want to spend the extra dough and that the refreshed Ioniq’s 170-mile EPA range works for you. That range is an improvement over the first Ioniq Electric, which traveled 124 miles on a charge, and it beats the smaller-battery $32,525 Nissan Leaf’s 149-mile range. Credit the new and larger battery (28.0 kWh to 38.3 kWh) for the added range. Charging can also happen faster thanks to a slightly upgraded onboard charger that goes from 6.6 kW to 7.2 kW to help speed charging times for the Ioniq’s larger battery.

    Hyundai Ioniq Offers an Alternative to the Prius

    Best Lease Deals for July 2020

    Fully Electrified Hyundai Ioniq Driven

    Enough with the EPA talk; we have our own range test, one where we drive at a steady 75 mph on the highway. We didn’t subject the previous Ioniq to the same methodology, so there is no direct comparison for the 150 miles of highway range we observed in the updated Ioniq. That makes its freeway legs longer only than the 2017 BMW i3 and both the Bolt and Leaf can cover 180 miles, so don’t expect to road trip. But it is worth noting that the 12 percent drop from it’s EPA range is among the least we have seen, meaning Hyundai is very honest in its own test practices and reporting.

    View Photos

    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    Trucklike Braking and Flappy Paddle Fun
    The 2020 Ioniq Electric also comes with a more powerful permanent-magnet synchronous AC motor than last year. While it zaps the same 218 pound-feet of torque to the front wheels, the motor now generates 134 horsepower (up from 118). The additional electrified ponies don’t change the acceleration times much compared with the last Ioniq we tested back in 2017. A run to 60 mph takes a tepid 8.3 seconds, while a Bolt EV does it in 6.7 ticks, and the smaller-battery Leaf does it in 7.4 seconds. The Hyundai still feels punchy around town, especially for anyone who isn’t familiar with the sensation of an electric motor’s instant torque. However, the Ioniq feels particularly languid at highway speeds. It needed 4.9 seconds to make it from 50 and 70 mph, again trailing both the Chevy and Nissan’s EVs.

    LOWS: Meh acceleration, 170-mile range puts it a class below the Bolt and Model 3, tires aid efficiency but hurt braking distances.

    View Photos

    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    As reluctant as the Ioniq was to speed up, it was even less willing to slow down in a hurry. We measured a long stopping distance of 191 feet from 70 mph. That’s longer than a 5602-pound GMC Sierra 1500. The Hyundai’s braking performance isn’t an outlier, though. The Bolt EV and Leaf recorded equally long 70-mph-to-zero stops. Blame the low-rolling resistance tires, selected for their ability to stretch every electron, not for grip. Despite the slipperiness of our Ioniq’s narrow 205-section-width rubber, which registered an SUV-like 0.79 g of grip on our 300-foot skidpad, we like how Hyundai gives the driver control over regenerative braking. Controlled via paddles on the steering wheel, it’s possible to select between three different levels of deceleration, or you can hold the left paddle to activate the full potential of regenerative braking. It’s strong enough to bring the car to a complete stop. Never having to touch the brake pedal and maximizing regenerative braking is a fun distraction from the electrified Ioniq’s otherwise commuter-car driving behavior.

    View Photos

    Michael SimariCar and Driver

    Classier Inside and Cheaper Than Rivals
    A larger battery and longer range aren’t all that’s new. The 2020 Ioniq Electric also receives a lovelier interior. The redesigned instrument panel benefits from richer materials and a more stylish aesthetic that’s set off at night by the blue glow of ambient lighting. The cabin is also modernized with a new high-res digital gauge cluster and touch-sensitive climate controls, and on our high-spec Limited model, you also get a larger 10.3-inch touchscreen that’s standard on Limited models. Too bad many of the updates are prettier than practical. Hyundai replaced most of the physical buttons with touch controls that don’t offer the same feedback or reliable responses as a button.
    Our gray Ioniq Electric Limited arrived with an as-tested price of $39,590, but if you forgo some features like blind-spot monitoring and power front seats, you can get into the SE-trim Ioniq for just $34,020. We’d recommend the SE, since the Limited doesn’t add any range, and if you’re willing to spend nearly $40,000 on an EV, you should get one of the aforementioned ones with longer legs.

    Specifications

    Specifications
    2020 Hyundai Ioniq Electric
    VEHICLE TYPE front-motor, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door hatchback
    PRICE AS TESTED $39,590 (base price: $34,020)
    MOTOR TYPE permanent-magnet synchronous motor, 134 hp, 218 lb-ft; 38.3-kWh lithium-ion battery pack
    TRANSMISSION 1-speed direct drive
    CHASSIS Suspension (F/R): struts/torsion beamBrakes (F/R): 11.0-in vented disc/11.2-in discTires: Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 205/60R-16 92H M+S
    DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 106.3 inLength: 176.0 inWidth: 71.7 inHeight: 58.1 inPassenger volume: 94 ft3Cargo volume: 23 ft3Curb weight: 3433 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 8.3 sec100 mph: 26.1 secRolling start, 5–60 mph: 8.1 secTop gear, 30–50 mph: 3.1 secTop gear, 50–70 mph: 4.9 sec1/4 mile: 16.5 sec @ 84 mphTop speed (governor limited): 108 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 191 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.79 gStanding-start accel times omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY Observed: 121 MPGe75-mph highway driving: 127 MPGeHighway range: 150 miles
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY Combined/city/highway: 133/145/121 MPGeRange: 170 miles

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    From the Archive: 1985 Honda Civic CRX 1.5Si

    View Photos
    DAVID DEWHURSTCar and Driver

    From the April 1985 Issue of Car and Driver.

    The Honda Civic CRX is one of our favorite cars, but we’re never sure how to categorize it. With comfortable accommodations for two, low cost, and superior fuel economy, it’s an outstanding commuter car. But with its sporty two-seat design, excellent performance, and nimble handling, it can also be viewed as the reincarnation of the low-priced sports car.

    For the 1985 model year, American Honda has tipped the balance decisively in the sporty direction by importing a new version of its two-seater, the CRX 1.5Si. The Si is equipped with several features that CRXs for the Japanese and European markets have enjoyed for more than a year.

    Best Hatchbacks of 2020

    Honda Civic Coupe Dead, New Sedan and Hatch Coming

    The Greatest Cars of All Time: The Eighties

    The most important upgrade is fuel injection. Honda engineers have fitted their own electronic fuel-injection system and a new tuned-runner intake manifold to the existing all-aluminum 1.5-liter engine. An associated change is the deletion of the CVCC prechambers with their tiny intake valves; the fuel injection offers no easy means of providing the richer mixture burned in the prechambers. Modern three-way catalysts and feedback fuel-air-ratio controls, however, have made the CVCC system largely unnecessary for emissions-control purposes.
    Sources at Honda tell us that this engine was delayed for America to ensure its durability and reliability. Whereas those aspects of the engine will only be proved in time, the new motor’s energetic output is immediately apparent. Power has increased from 76 bhp at 6000 rpm to 91 bhp at 5500 rpm, and torque is up from 84 pounds-feet at 3500 rpm to 93 pounds-feet at 4500 rpm. To bolster performance further, the Si’s final-drive ratio is four percent lower.

    DAVID DEWHURST

    These measures improve the CRX’s already healthy performance by a good margin. The 0-to-60-mph sprint is covered in just 9.1 seconds, compared with 10.4 seconds for a standard 1984 1.5-liter CRX. In the standing quarter-mile, the Si stops the clock in 16.4 seconds at 81 mph, compared with 17.4 seconds at 77 mph. The margin widens further at higher speeds as the injected car attains 100 mph in 36.3 seconds, about eighteen seconds quicker than a standard CRX, and its top speed jumps from 103 to 112 mph. At the same time, the injected motor is every bit as smooth and torquey as the standard one and is much easier to start and operate in cold weather.
    The added thrust makes the CRX even more of a blast on winding roads than it was before. Although the injected car comes with the same sport suspension and wheel and tire sizes as the other 1.5-liter CRXs, the twenty-percent power boost makes it easier to exploit its capable handling. Entry and exit speeds in corners can be closer to the car’s limits, and the extra power allows the handling balance to be adjusted with the throttle over a broader speed range than before.

    DAVID DEWHURST

    On a jaunt through the Angeles Crest Forest on our way to a desert test site, we found the injected CRX remarkably capable. Even on the steep uphill stretches, it had plenty of power. The sure-footed chassis was unflustered by the varied switchbacks and occasional slippery sections. The chassis is so well balanced, in fact, that it could benefit from larger or stickier tires, which would improve its middling 0.75-g lateral grip. Such a change should be accompanied by more supportive seats, because the existing buckets are already marginal for hard driving.
    Although the tires and the seats are unchanged, the CRX 1.5Si is equipped with several features that, like the injected engine, were previously withheld from the American market. One is a unique power sunroof. Unlike a conventional sunroof, which slides backward between a roof s inner and outer panels, the Si’s moves upward and then backward over the roof, taking a smaller bite out of headroom and allowing a much larger panel than would be possible with a conventional design.
    Also included are a rear wiper/washer, 5.0-inch-wide aluminum wheels, and a new rear spoiler that’s molded of soft urethane. (The rear wing on regular CRXs is molded of hard plastic.) In addition, the CRX Si has an exclusive metallic-black paint option, supplementing the standard choice of red, white, or blue.
    Otherwise, the Si has the same excellent layout and features as other CRXs. The additional goodies boost the base price of an Si to $7999, more than a grand higher than the standard CRX, but we think sporting drivers will find their money well spent. Honda should have no trouble selling the 18,000 units it intends to import in 1985.
    Perhaps such success will encourage Honda to continue in this vein and import the CRX DOHC Si, which has recently been introduced in Japan. Its 1.6-liter engine, four valves per cylinder, and 135 JIS horsepower would leave no doubt in anyone’s mind that the CRX is a sports car, not a mere commutermobile.

    Specifications

    Specifications
    1985 Honda Civic CRX 1.5Si91-hp 4-inline, 5-speed automatic. 1840 lbBase/as-tested price: $7999/$8799C/D TEST RESULTS60 mph: 9.1 sec1/4 mile: 16.4 @ 81 mphBraking, 70­–0 mph: 209 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.76 g C/D observed fuel economy: 32 mpg

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More