More stories

  • in

    54,000 Teslas Recalled Because Full Self-Driving Beta Allows 'Rolling Stop'

    Tesla will issue an over-the-air software update to disable the “rolling stop” feature in the Full Self-Driving Beta as part of a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recall.The feature allows Teslas equipped with the FSD Beta to travel through a four-way-stop intersection at up to 5.6 mph without coming to a complete stop.Tesla says it is not aware of any incidents caused by the feature, and the update will be released in early February.Tesla will recall 53,822 vehicles by issuing an over-the-air software update disabling a feature called “rolling stop” found in the Full Self-Driving Beta software, documents on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recalls site said today. The recall affects nearly every Model S, X, 3, and Y with the Full Self-Driving Beta running firmware release 2020.40.4.10 or newer.The feature in question, “rolling stop,” permits the vehicle, when operating in the Full Self-Driving Beta, to drive through a four-way-stop intersection at up to 5.6 mph if a list of criteria are met. NHTSA points out that “entering an all-way-stop intersection without coming to a complete stop may increase the risk of collision.”

    Tesla

    The conditions that must be met for the “rolling stop” feature to activate include it being enabled in the FSD Beta Profile settings and that the vehicle is approaching a four-way stop at under 5.6 mph. Other criteria include that “no relevant moving cars are detected near the intersection” as well as “no relevant pedestrians or bicyclists” and that there is “sufficient visibility for the vehicle while approaching the intersection.” Lastly, all of the intersecting roads need to have a speed limit of 30 mph or less. If these conditions are met, the vehicle will drive through the intersection at a speed between 0.1 and 5.6 mph without coming to a complete stop first; if not, the vehicle will come to a full stop. The firmware including the “rolling stop” feature was released via an over-the-air update to vehicles with the FSD Beta on October 20, 2020. Tesla and the NHSTA met this year on January 10 and January 19, with a recall determination made on January 20 to shut down the feature starting with firmware release 2021.44.30.15, which is expected to be released over the air to affected vehicles in early February. Tesla said it “is not aware of any collisions, injuries or fatalities related to this condition.” The update will be free for owners, who can check NHTSA’s recalls website for updates.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2023 Aston Martin DBX 707 Aims to Dethrone Other Performance SUVs

    The DBX 707 is a performance version of Aston Martin’s SUV.The revised V-8 engine has 697 horsepower and works with a new nine-speed gearbox. It will go on sale this year, priced from $235,086.Aston Martin has been promising a faster version of the DBX since the regular one launched, and this is most definitely it. Based on manufacturer claims, the new 2023 DBX 707 is set to be the quickest performance SUV on the market, with Aston CEO Tobias Moers saying the company hopes to prove that by setting the corresponding record on the Nürburgring.

    Positioned above the standard DBX, which will continue to be sold alongside it, the DBX 707 has been given a substantial power upgrade thanks to an upgraded version of the 4.0-liter AMG V-8 that Aston says it has substantially engineered in-house. The engine uses new ball-bearing turbochargers and a revised calibration to boost output to 697 horsepower (the “707” name refers to metric horsepower). That’s 155 hp more than the regular DBX and means the DBX 707 outguns such luminaries as the 626-hp Bentley Bentayga W12 Speed, the 641-hp Lamborghini Urus and even the 670-hp Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid. Moers admitted that the Porsche was Aston’s benchmark target when he introduced journalists to the new car. The DBX 707’s torque output has risen too, with a new peak of 663 pound-feet. And the 707 swaps out the conventional nine-speed automatic transmission in the regular DBX to AMG’s snappier nine-speed gearbox with a wet-clutch pack instead of a torque converter. This will allow for quicker gear changes and launch-control starts, with a shorter final drive ratio meaning the 707 is claimed to be capable of a 3.1-second sprint to 60 mph. This would tie our result for the Lamborghini Urus, which is the quickest SUV we’ve ever tested.Given that improbable level of performance, and Moers’ desire for Nürburgring glory, it’s no surprise that the DBX 707 will have standard carbon-ceramic brakes with huge 16.5 inch rotors at the front and 15.4 inch discs at the rear. 22-inch wheels will be standard, and 23-inchers an option. These will wear Pirelli tires, but Moers says that any attempt to break the Cayenne Turbo S’s 7:38.9 Nürburgring time will be on more aggressive track-biased rubber: “at the end of the day it’s a tire test.”

    Aston Martin

    Beyond the new wheels, visual distinctions for the DBX 707 include a bigger front bumper with an even larger front grille, dark window surrounds in place of chrome trim, and a massive diffuser element at the back with quad exhaust tips. The interior gets new sport seats, although the DBX’s regular comfort seats will remain a no-cost option, plus a revised center console with a rotary gear selector. There are also new shortcut buttons for various drive modes on the lower console, meaning drivers won’t have to use the infotainment system to tweak settings for the adaptive suspension, stability control, active exhaust system, and gearbox.Although the DBX 707 still uses Aston’s existing infotainment system, the one based on Mercedes’ last-generation STAR architecture, Moers also promises that development of a bespoke Aston User Interface is underway. “We cannot change the nav system, that takes a while, but we are creating a bespoke nav system and HMI for Aston without any more usage of Mercedes,” he promises.

    Aston Martin

    Moers is also bullish on the DBX 707’s sales prospects, surmising that the 707 could make up around 60 percent of all DBX sales. This is despite a $235,086 pricetag which makes it more than $50,000 more expensive than the standard car. Production will start before the end of the first quarter of 2022.
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2022 Toyota Tundra Hybrid Beats Old V-8 by 7 MPG

    The EPA estimates the 2022 Toyota Tundra Hybrid at up to 22 mpg combined, which is 7 mpg more than the outgoing V-8 model. The iForce MAX hybrid uses a twin-turbo 3.4-liter V-6 paired with an electric motor and nickel-metal hydride battery pack. Pricing for the hybrid starts at $53,995, and it will arrive in the spring. The 2022 Toyota Tundra replaces the previous model’s 5.7-liter V-8 in favor of a twin-turbocharged 3.4-liter V-6 engine for the sake of efficiency. A nonhybrid version of the V-6 is standard and a iForce MAX hybrid setup is optional, and we now have official EPA fuel-economy estimates for the gas-electric Tundra. Although the hybrid is not as efficient as the Ford F-150 PowerBoost hybrid, it’s a huge improvement over the old Tundra.

    2022 Toyota Tundra TRD Pro.
    Toyota

    At an EPA-estimated 22 mpg combined for rear-wheel-drive models and 21 mpg for four-wheel-drive trucks, the Tundra’s hybrid powertrain is 7 mpg more efficient than the outgoing model’s 5.7-liter V-8. It’s rated at up to 20 mpg in the city and 24 mpg on the highway in its two-wheel-drive configuration, though adding four-wheel drive knocks 1 mpg off in the city and 2 mpg on the highway.

    The F-150 PowerBoost hybrid is 3 mpg and 2 mpg more efficient than the Tundra iForce MAX, per the EPA’s standards. Both the F-150 PowerBoost and Tundra iForce MAX use a twin-turbocharged V-6 engine and roughly 1.5-kWh battery packs, but the Ford’s pack is a lithium-ion unit and the Toyota’s is a nickel-metal hydride pack. The Tundra’s electric motor is sandwiched between the engine and 10-speed automatic transmission and adds 48 horsepower for a total combined output of 437 horsepower and 583 pound-feet of torque. Even the nonhybrid twin-turbo V-6 is significantly more efficient that the outgoing model’s naturally aspirated V-8. But at 20 mpg combined, the standard iForce is 2 mpg less efficient than a Ram 1500 with the 3.6-liter V-6 with a 48-volt hybrid assist Ram calls “eTorque.” The Tundra’s combined rating is equal to a turbo four-cylinder Chevy Silverado, though the Chevy does better in city driving and on the highway.

    EPA

    Toyota says that Tundras equipped with the iForce MAX hybrid will start arriving at dealerships in the spring, and pricing starts at $53,995. The hybrid is available starting on the Limited trim level and up and it costs $3400 extra over the nonhybrid.
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2022 Toyota Tundra's Hybrid Powertrain Is a $3400 Upgrade

    The 2022 Toyota Tundra’s hybrid powertrain is a $3400 option on the Limited, Platinum, and 1794 Edition models.The TRD Pro model (starting at $68,500) and the new top-of-the-line Capstone, which starts at $75,225, are both hybrid only. Called iForce Max, the pickup truck’s hybrid setup generates 437 horsepower and is EPA rated up to 22 mpg combined.Want a hybrid version of the 2022 Toyota Tundra full-size pickup truck? The newly introduced powertrain (called iForce Max) is a $3400 option on select models, and it comes standard on the off-road-ready TRD Pro and top-of-the-line Capstone models.

    With Toyota finally revealing prices as well as full fuel-economy ratings, we now know that it’s less expensive to buy a hybrid Tundra than a hybrid Ford F-150. An F-150 King Ranch hybrid pickup starts at $61,305, which is nearly $11,000 more than the Tundra’s $50,595 entry point. That’s for a rear-wheel-drive Limited model with the standard 5.5-foot cargo bed. While it’s possible to upgrade to the longer, 6.5-foot box, the hybrid is only available on models with the CrewMax cab. The Platinum and 1794 Edition hybrids start at $62,085 and $62,785, respectively.
    Unlike those trim levels, the TRD Pro and the Capstone are only offered as hybrids with all-wheel drive. The former costs $68,500 and the latter stickers for $75,225. In addition to their individual styling and features, they benefit from the hybrid powertrain’s extra power and fuel efficiency. We tested a TRD Pro that hit 60 mph in 5.7 seconds and finished the quarter-mile in 14.5 seconds at 92 mph.
    The iForce Max features a twin-turbo 3.4-liter V-6 with an electric motor integrated into the 10-speed automatic transmission. The setup generates a combined 437 horsepower and 583 pound-feet of torque. The EPA rates rear-drive hybrid models at 22 mpg combined; that estimate drops to 20 mpg on all-wheel-drive examples.
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2023 Acura Integra's Interior Spotted Looking Similar to the Civic's

    @Derphound01 via Instagram

    Photos of the 2023 Acura Integra’s interior have appeared on social media.The Integra was on display at the 24 Hours of Daytona race in Florida.The production Integra will go on sale later this year.Whether it was intentional or not, Acura quietly revealed the interior of the 2023 Integra at the 24 Hours of Daytona race in Florida this weekend. While the Integra prototype reveal late last year didn’t include any photos or information about the new hatchback’s cabin, this car on display at the race appeared to have a production-ready cabin. User @Derphound01 sent these images to C/D via social media, and we can see that the Integra’s dashboard shares much with the Honda Civic’s.

    Though there are some differences in materials and design, the honeycomb texture of the air vents and the three knobs for the climate control appear similar between the two cars. So does the tablet-style touchscreen infotainment system sticking out of the dash. The shift knob for the six-speed manual has the same metal finish as the Civic Si’s but is shaped differently.

    @Derphound01 via Instagram

    The Integra also appears to have different seats than the Civic; in this example, the interior features a beige and black color scheme with leather upholstery. The steering wheel looks to have an “A-Spec” badge on the lower part of the rim, suggesting that the prototype shows the standard version of the Integra rather than the eventual Type S performance model.

    @Derphound01 via Instagram

    We expect the standard Integra to share its powertrain with the Civic Si, meaning it will have a turbocharged 1.5-liter inline-four with around 200 horsepower. A six-speed manual will be available, but we don’t know if the Acura will offer the same continuously variable automatic transmission as the Civic or a different geared automatic. The Integra Type S is likely to use the more powerful turbo 2.0-liter inline-four from the upcoming 2023 Civic Type R.We’ll hear more details about the production 2023 Integra later this year, as it’s set to go on sale soon, with the Integra Type S likely to follow later on.
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2023 Chevy Corvette Z06 VIN 001 Sells at $3.6 Million for Veterans' Charity

    Chevrolet donated the first production version of the new Z06 that will roll off the line this summer, and bidders quickly decided this one would be worth owning. Before this weekend’s Barrett-Jackson auction, pundits thought it might fetch over a million dollars. Instead, it went for $3.6 million.That’s in part because the proceeds will go to Operation Homefront, which assists military veterans with their needs in transitioning back to civilian life in the U.S. The Z06, which has a 670-hp 5.5-liter V-8, will be priced starting at the more affordable price point of $90,000 when it starts reaching buyers later this year.It was expected to sell for over a million dollars, but the first retail production 2023 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 70th Anniversary Edition ended up going for $3.6 million at the Barrett-Jackson auction in Scottsdale, Arizona, this weekend. That’s the auction company’s record for a car auctioned for charity, beating the first mid-engine Chevrolet Corvette Stingray, which sold for $3 million in 2020 to benefit the Detroit Children’s Fund. Interestingly, the winning bidder was the same person for both Vettes: NASCAR team owner Rick Hendrick.Cars like attract their fair share of attention, but there was another reason VIN #1 off the production line sold for over three times its expected value, and that’s because 100 percent of the proceeds from the sale will go to Operation Homefront, a national nonprofit organization that works “to build strong, stable, secure military families so they can thrive in the communities they have worked hard to protect.”

    Barrett-Jackson

    The parts used for the 670-hp 5.5-liter LT6 V-8 engine in this Corvette could be used in a race car, Corvette chief engineer Josh Holder told local ABC15 Arizona news station. That’s unsurprising since this is the highest-horsepower naturally aspirated production V-8 found in any production car, ever. Production on the new Z06 will start this summer and will start at around $90,000. By fetching $2.7 million more than that, it’s clear this auction was as much about the charity as the car.
    This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    Operation Homefront’s president & CEO, retired U.S. Army Brigadier General John Pray, told ABC15 that Operation Homefront has met more than 50,000 requests for assistance by spending a total of $35 million. Operation Homefront Tweeted out its thanks to Chevy for donating the vehicle, saying that “seeing the crowd so energized in support of our nation’s military and veteran families was inspiring.”

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Ford Blue Advantage Used-Car Site to Add 14-Day Home Test Drives

    The number of online used-car shopping sites is growing, notably with GM announcing CarBravo earlier this month. Ford is now offering longer at-home test drives than competitors as a way to stand out.Any used vehicle purchased through Ford Blue Advantage, not just Ford models, can be tested out at home for two weeks and a maximum of 1000 miles once the program starts next month.Carvana and Vroom both offer seven-day test drives (with lower mileage allowances), and we don’t yet know what CarBravo will offer.You can’t kick the tires when you’re shopping for a car virtually, but you’ll soon be able to test it out for two weeks and put up to 1000 miles on it if you’re using Ford’s revamped used-vehicle shopping site called Ford Blue Advantage.

    Ford

    Ford Blue Advantage offers both Ford and non-Ford vehicles, and any one of them will qualify for the new 14-day/1000-mile money-back guarantee once that service officially starts in February. Ford partners with its dealers and Autotrader on the used-car site, and the automaker also offers two different warranty levels (Gold Certified or Blue Certified) for vehicles purchased under the Ford Blue Advantage program. Gold Certified used vehicles are for models up to six years old and come with a 12-month/12,000-mile limited warranty, while the Blue tier is used for vehicles up to 10 years old and comes with a 90-day/4000-mile limited warranty. Not every vehicle listed on Blue Advantage fits into one of these two categories, but Ford says 90 percent of the vehicles do. The Detroit Free Press notes that Blue Advantage features between 20,000 to 25,000 certified used vehicles, with around 80 percent of them being Ford models.Other online car shopping sites offer some form of at-home test drive, but Ford’s stands out for its duration and mileage. Carvana, for example, will let you test a vehicle out for seven days and with a 400-mile mileage cap (you can pay $1 per each additional mile). Carvana will let you test out and return a total of two vehicles, and then your third vehicle is the one you’re stuck with as it does not come with the seven-day guarantee. Vroom also has a seven-day test period (with a max of 250 miles). General Motors has not yet detailed any vehicle satisfaction guarantee for its new online shopping site, CarBravo, which is scheduled to start operating next month.

    Ford’s reasoning for starting the Blue Advantage partnership in early 2021 seems to have paid off. In its announcement for the new two-week guarantee period, Ford said that the company has seen internet traffic that is 500 percent higher to that shopping portal than the company’s previous Certified Pre-Owned site, and it said Ford certified used vehicle sales rose by 26 percent in 2021. We assume this increase had something to do with the strong demand for used vehicles over the past year and not just a new way to shop.
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    A Recent Op-Ed Suggests EVs are Ill Equipped to Handle a Winter Stranding. We Check the Facts

    The story landed Tuesday afternoon, January 4, just one day after an epic blizzard created a 48-mile jam of vehicles stopped along Interstate 95 in Virginia. The article stemmed from an anecdote tweeted by an unnamed Canadian truck driver who gave blankets to a Tesla driver worried about keeping his kids warm overnight.That tweet was brought to public attention by an opinion piece in the Washington Post, penned by columnist Charles Lane, with the alarmist headline, “Imagine Virginia’s icy traffic catastrophe—but with only electric vehicles.” It’s a collection of isolated facts and specific assertions designed to make the point that EVs aren’t safe in such conditions. Sadly, the author didn’t support that point with any of the data or analyses showing how EVs actually operate in cold weather. Lane calls the Tesla driver’s supposed plight “a reality check on the push by government and business to electrify cars and trucks.” He notes batteries lose capacity and charge more slowly in cold weather, and that gasoline cars that run out of gas can be refueled in a matter of minutes.

    That’s all true. In a different kind of climate event, however, it’s worth noting gasoline stations can’t pump during power outages—as the East Coast discovered in 2012 after Hurricane Sandy, when power was out for a week or more in some areas. Now, carmakers are starting to tout the ability of future EVs to recharge another EV. You can’t do that with a gasoline car unless you have a gasoline siphon, risking a mouthful of toxic liquid in the process. Lane’s article should have closed by describing how the Tesla-bound family would have suffered if the kindly trucker hadn’t kept them warm. Surely he showed how quickly their battery depleted, depriving those children of heat?No such luck. In fact, when you do the math, it turns out EVs may be able to heat their occupants just as long as a car with a combustion engine, depending on your assumptions about the cars, recharging, and refueling.

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Looking at Actual DataThe U.S. Department of Energy issued a chart showing the fuel consumption at idle of various gasoline and diesel vehicles. With no accessory loads, both the small gas and diesel engines (each 2.0 liters) consumed at a rate of nearly 0.2 gallon per hour, while a “large sedan” with a 4.6-liter V-8 drank twice as quickly at idle. In our recent test, a Hyundai Sonata with the turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder split the difference and consumed at 0.3 gallon per hour while running the climate control. If the gasoline car has a 14-gallon fuel tank that started at two-thirds full, or 10.5 gallons, that provides 35 hours of idle time if consuming 0.3 gallon per hour.As for electric cars, estimates for cabin-heating load vary widely depending on ambient temperature, presence or absence of sun, and other factors. In November, Reuters fact-checked a widely circulated claim that EVs are more likely to get stuck in traffic from batteries running low. In it, Oxford University researcher Katherine Collett suggested a 2-kW estimate for cabin heating. (Reuters’ verdict: The claim was false.) A (paywalled) Detroit Free Press article entitled “Vehicle of the Year Honors Prove the Tide Has Irrevocably Turned to Electric Vehicles” quotes Craig Van Batenberg, who trains EV technicians. He has written about heating EV passenger compartments for the global engineering association SAE International. He, too, says heat pumps use “about two kilowatts” to heat a car’s cabin. “With a 60.0-kWh battery,” he said, “I could heat the interior for about 30 hours.”A July 2020 blog post by TLK Energy, a German digital-modeling firm, calculates higher energy loads for heating an EV. Under two scenarios—a cloudy day at 0 deg C (32 deg F) and a sunny day at -10 deg C (14 deg F)—its estimates of energy use were 3.4 kW and 4.0 kW, respectively. Our 2019 Tesla Model 3 did better than any of these estimates, consuming energy at a rate of 1.6 kW to maintain 65 degrees inside with an average outside temperature of 15 degrees F. And it’s worth noting our car has the old resistive heating, not the more efficient heat pump that now conditions the cabins of new Model 3s.Let’s do the math. We’ll assume a 75.0-kWh battery that’s also two-thirds full, just like the gasoline car. Its 50.0 kWh will heat the cabin from 12.5 hours (at 4.0 kW) to 31.25 hours (at 1.6 kW), depending which assumption you use, which, at the high end nearly matches the gasoline car. This also suggests more data is needed to establish the energy used for heating by different EVs under different scenarios.No Way, Norway!Back in the Washington Post piece, the closest Lane gets to looking at actual EVs’ operation is to quote a Norwegian Automobile Federation study showing they lose 20 percent of battery range in cold weather. Lane spends a lot of time on Norway, noting the bulk of that nation’s cars are still powered by gasoline and that its government is dialing down subsidies for EV purchases. Each of those is factually correct. The missing context is that neither indicates a cooling of Norway’s push to end sales of cars with tailpipes by 2025. Au contraire: the first is simply a recognition that Norway’s fleet—like any country’s—will take time to turn over completely. The average vehicle on U.S. roads is 12 years old, so even if every new car sold today were electric, it would take a couple of decades to transform the fleet. As for lowering incentives, the government has judged its push toward EV adoption a success, to the degree that it can dial them down. Note that 90 percent of new vehicles sold in Norway in December 2021 were fully or partly electric. Hardly a sign of public recognition that EVs aren’t suited to the country’s winters, eh?That’s okay, since Lane ends by saying Norway isn’t relevant to the U.S. experience anyhow. Most of Oslo’s workers don’t even commute by car—imagine!Lane is correct in that assertion: Norway is indeed different from the U.S. Far more of that country’s citizens accept climate science than do Americans. Norway’s government implemented a robust plan to cut carbon emissions from virtually all sectors of the country—roughly 10 years ago. That contrasts to the U.S., which is notably unable to do anything of the sort.Lane ends by saying EVs can “work as well as ICE counterparts in many, or even most, ordinary situations.” But in the extraordinary ones, like 16-hour blizzard traffic jams? “We’re not there yet.” For single-vehicle families in the coldest of climates, there’s arguably some justification for that point of view. Note, though, the average U.S. household now has close to two vehicles (1.9, if you’re counting), and it’s likely to be a long time before both of them will be battery-electric. Yes, the Tesla Family Was Just FineAs for that shivering family in the Tesla, it turned out they didn’t run out of heat at all—though the kids may have been comfier in the blankets offered by the trucker. Two days after Lane’s opinion piece ran, the trucker responded to a question by noting the family stayed warm overnight and had 18 percent of battery capacity remaining the next morning. They were headed to a local Supercharger station to recharge.Then an actual Tesla driver who was caught in that very same massive 16-hour traffic jam on I-95 weighed in. “I’m grateful that I was driving my EV when I got stuck on I-95,” wrote Model 3 driver Dan Kanninen on the Zero Emission Transportation Association (ZETA) website. He spent 14 hours in his base Model 3, the shortest-range version of that car. He stayed warm (with no engine running, obviously) and was able to stream videos on the car’s 15-inch display. Kanninen had 50 miles of range left after 14 hours. EV drivers often charge at home, he wrote, so “we are less likely to have just a partial charge, unlike drivers who rarely drive on a full tank.” En route to a Supercharger station, he saw long lines of cars waiting to fuel up.Other sites have since weighed in to debunk the editorial. No data appears to be available on how many gasoline cars ran out of gas during the 16-hour stoppage.The moral of the story, one known by those who live in snowy regions: If a blizzard is forecast, bring winter clothes, hand warmers, food, water, a shovel for digging a snow cave, and bear spray—no matter what kind of vehicle you’re driving.Some research for this story derived from broader discussions of EV topics among the author and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More