Aurelia Butler

The first 2024 Tesla Cybertruck has reportedly been sold at auction at the Petersen Auto Museum, according to posts on X.The angular truck sold for $400,000, with attendees paying at least $1750 for access to the event.Tesla has yet to confirm production specifications for the Cybertruck, and it’s unclear how many motors this early-VIN example packs.At long last, production of the Tesla Cybertruck finally appears to be underway. Over the weekend, social media posts claimed that a 2024 Cybertruck was auctioned at an event at the Petersen Auto Museum. The truck allegedly sold for a whopping $400,000, as reported by InsideEVs.com. The auction occurred during the Petersen’s 29th gala event, hosted by Jay Leno. Tickets to the festivities cost $1750, with a table reservation coming in at $17,500 and a “premier” table ringing in at $30,000. Clearly, the attendees have cash to spare, and posts on X, the site formerly known as Twitter, state that the truck sold at auction for $400,000. We reached out to the museum for confirmation of this figure, but a representative told us that they couldn’t confirm winning bid amounts “due to internal fundraising policies.”If the sale goes through, this would become the first Cybertruck to be officially sold. The unorthodox pickup, first revealed back in 2019, was originally slated for production in 2021 before consistent delays pushed it back. The museum had advertised that attendees of the gala could bid on a “low-VIN” 2024 Cybertruck, and the museum representative told us that the winning bidder will receive a low-VIN Cybertruck “when Tesla completes production,” effectively making this an auction for a build slot and not a car.More Tesla NewsIn recent months, there have been increased sightings of Cybertrucks testing and being hauled on flatbeds. Tesla had previously said that full-scale production wouldn’t begin until 2024, but that early units would start rolling off the line this year. On July 15, Tesla posted on X claiming that the first Cybertruck had been built at the automaker’s Giga Texas factory. This isn’t the first time a high-interest EV truck has been auctioned off. The first 2024 GMC Hummer EV SUV sold for $500,000 at the Barrett-Jackson Scottsdale auction in January, while the first Hummer EV SUT truck was auctioned for $2.5 million at a Barrett Jackson auction in 2021. Delivery When?Tesla, however, still hasn’t announced an official delivery start date for the Cybertruck. The automaker also hasn’t confirmed specifications for the production-spec pickup, which was originally claimed to start around $40,000. Several variants were planned, from a single-motor rear-wheel-drive base model to a high-performance Tri-Motor version, but it’s unclear which of these will be produced for 2024, or at all. The Cybertruck definitely exists now—Tesla recently posted video of the Cybertruck driving over dirt trails in Baja, Mexico—and it is only a matter of time until, we presume, it officially launches. This content is imported from poll. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.Associate News EditorCaleb Miller began blogging about cars at 13 years old, and he realized his dream of writing for a car magazine after graduating from Carnegie Mellon University and joining the Car and Driver team. He loves quirky and obscure autos, aiming to one day own something bizarre like a Nissan S-Cargo, and is an avid motorsports fan. More

Millions of airbag inflators could be deemed defective as early as next year as NHTSA calls for a massive recall of as many as 52 million of the safety items. At least nine ruptures and two deaths have occurred, and the safety agency has been investigating the issue since 2015.The maker, ARC, denies manufacturing defects, while three automakers have issued recalls.The U.S. government safety agency NHTSA has said it is preparing for a recall next year of 52 million airbag inflators that can rupture during deployment. This opens the door to the prospect of what could become another complicated, decade-long repair of defective airbags in tens of millions of vehicles.In a public meeting held Thursday in Washington, D.C., the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) discussed its decision that two airbag inflator manufacturers, ARC Automotive and Delphi Automotive Systems, should recall inflators that explode with excess pressure and shoot shrapnel into the frontal occupants. NHTSA has investigated ARC inflators since July 2015 after receiving reports of ruptures on two vehicles shortly after the Takata airbag recall began unfolding in 2014. The Takata recall repairs, which are still not fully complete, began with isolated, small recalls on early-2000s Hondas and grew to 100 million inflators across the world, two-thirds of which resided in U.S.-market cars. At least 27 people in the U.S. were killed and 400 injured, according to NHTSA.The Earlier Recall, in DetailAccording to the agency’s initial decision in September, which is the first step in starting a recall, there have been seven inflator ruptures in U.S. crashes since 2014. One driver was killed after a crash in a 2015 Chevrolet Traverse in which metal shards flew out. All other drivers, including one passenger, were injured primarily in the face. A second driver was killed in a 2009 Hyundai Elantra during a 2016 crash in Canada, while a passenger-side airbag inflator ruptured in Turkey a year later on a 2015 Volkswagen Golf that used an ARC inflator built in Tennessee.Four of the incidents involved a Traverse, the latest of which occurred on March 22, 2023. General Motors in May recalled nearly one million vehicles, some of which were the Traverse, for this defect. A 2002 Chrysler Town & Country, 2004 Kia Optima, and 2016 Audi A3 e-tron were also cited for ruptures in crashes. BMW began a recall for this defect in 2017, while Volkswagen initiated a recall in 2022.1-in-370,000 Chance of Rupture”Ruptures will continue to happen,” said Bruce York, a division chief at the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation, at the public hearing. The agency estimates, based on 2.6 million reported deployments of ARC inflators, that the risk of ruptures during future crashes would be 1 in 370,000.Steve Gold, vice-president of product integrity for ARC, said the seven U.S. ruptures were “isolated incidents and not indicative of a systemic defect.” He called the agency’s comparison of ARC inflators to Takata inflators as “inaccurate and misleading” because those inflators were largely affected by humidity and age and that seven known defects in 23 years of production “does not represent increased risk over time.”The alleged defects, according to NHTSA, involve a manufacturing defect where “excess weld slag” on the metal seam caused by joining parts of the inflator together can block the gas flow to the bag, building excess pressure and causing the entire inflator to rupture. This can result in “metal fragments being forcefully propelled into the passenger compartment,” according to NHTSA. The agency issued a standing order to ARC in 2016 so the company would report ruptures during manufacturing and in 2018, ARC began using borescopes to “detect the occurrence of excess weld slag or other debris in its inflators.” While ARC ran tests in 2018 of more than 900 inflators taken from 2001-2005 model year cars in salvage yards and found no ruptures, automakers reported ruptures in 2021 and 2023, according to NHTSA. The 52 million number, according to NHTSA, was calculated for all airbag inflators ARC and Delphi made before using the borescopes.Gold said ARC is a Tier 2 supplier and not legally responsible for initiating recalls like an automaker. But NHTSA said in its September initial decision letter that ARC is not exempt from complying with federal safety regulations. Class-Action Lawsuits in ProgressSix class-action lawsuits alleging economic harm were filed in 2022 against ARC, various automakers, and two airbag manufacturers that used ARC inflators (Joyson Safety Systems, formerly known as Key Safety Systems which bought out Takata, and Toyoda Gosei). They have been combined under federal judicial review. One lawsuit filed in Northern California alleged that because the inflators used ammonium nitrate, a low-cost propellent found to be highly unstable and a root cause of the Takata failures, that ARC was inherently at fault. But NHTSA has not cited ammonium nitrate as a failure point or a root cause in its investigations.NHTSA is accepting written responses to its hearing by December 4, after which it will likely release a final decision to issue a recall. Contributing EditorClifford Atiyeh is a reporter and photographer for Car and Driver, specializing in business, government, and litigation news. He is president of the New England Motor Press Association and committed to saving both manuals and old Volvos. More