More stories

  • in

    Ford Blue Advantage Used-Car Site to Add 14-Day Home Test Drives

    The number of online used-car shopping sites is growing, notably with GM announcing CarBravo earlier this month. Ford is now offering longer at-home test drives than competitors as a way to stand out.Any used vehicle purchased through Ford Blue Advantage, not just Ford models, can be tested out at home for two weeks and a maximum of 1000 miles once the program starts next month.Carvana and Vroom both offer seven-day test drives (with lower mileage allowances), and we don’t yet know what CarBravo will offer.You can’t kick the tires when you’re shopping for a car virtually, but you’ll soon be able to test it out for two weeks and put up to 1000 miles on it if you’re using Ford’s revamped used-vehicle shopping site called Ford Blue Advantage.

    Ford

    Ford Blue Advantage offers both Ford and non-Ford vehicles, and any one of them will qualify for the new 14-day/1000-mile money-back guarantee once that service officially starts in February. Ford partners with its dealers and Autotrader on the used-car site, and the automaker also offers two different warranty levels (Gold Certified or Blue Certified) for vehicles purchased under the Ford Blue Advantage program. Gold Certified used vehicles are for models up to six years old and come with a 12-month/12,000-mile limited warranty, while the Blue tier is used for vehicles up to 10 years old and comes with a 90-day/4000-mile limited warranty. Not every vehicle listed on Blue Advantage fits into one of these two categories, but Ford says 90 percent of the vehicles do. The Detroit Free Press notes that Blue Advantage features between 20,000 to 25,000 certified used vehicles, with around 80 percent of them being Ford models.Other online car shopping sites offer some form of at-home test drive, but Ford’s stands out for its duration and mileage. Carvana, for example, will let you test a vehicle out for seven days and with a 400-mile mileage cap (you can pay $1 per each additional mile). Carvana will let you test out and return a total of two vehicles, and then your third vehicle is the one you’re stuck with as it does not come with the seven-day guarantee. Vroom also has a seven-day test period (with a max of 250 miles). General Motors has not yet detailed any vehicle satisfaction guarantee for its new online shopping site, CarBravo, which is scheduled to start operating next month.

    Ford’s reasoning for starting the Blue Advantage partnership in early 2021 seems to have paid off. In its announcement for the new two-week guarantee period, Ford said that the company has seen internet traffic that is 500 percent higher to that shopping portal than the company’s previous Certified Pre-Owned site, and it said Ford certified used vehicle sales rose by 26 percent in 2021. We assume this increase had something to do with the strong demand for used vehicles over the past year and not just a new way to shop.
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    A Recent Op-Ed Suggests EVs are Ill Equipped to Handle a Winter Stranding. We Check the Facts

    The story landed Tuesday afternoon, January 4, just one day after an epic blizzard created a 48-mile jam of vehicles stopped along Interstate 95 in Virginia. The article stemmed from an anecdote tweeted by an unnamed Canadian truck driver who gave blankets to a Tesla driver worried about keeping his kids warm overnight.That tweet was brought to public attention by an opinion piece in the Washington Post, penned by columnist Charles Lane, with the alarmist headline, “Imagine Virginia’s icy traffic catastrophe—but with only electric vehicles.” It’s a collection of isolated facts and specific assertions designed to make the point that EVs aren’t safe in such conditions. Sadly, the author didn’t support that point with any of the data or analyses showing how EVs actually operate in cold weather. Lane calls the Tesla driver’s supposed plight “a reality check on the push by government and business to electrify cars and trucks.” He notes batteries lose capacity and charge more slowly in cold weather, and that gasoline cars that run out of gas can be refueled in a matter of minutes.

    That’s all true. In a different kind of climate event, however, it’s worth noting gasoline stations can’t pump during power outages—as the East Coast discovered in 2012 after Hurricane Sandy, when power was out for a week or more in some areas. Now, carmakers are starting to tout the ability of future EVs to recharge another EV. You can’t do that with a gasoline car unless you have a gasoline siphon, risking a mouthful of toxic liquid in the process. Lane’s article should have closed by describing how the Tesla-bound family would have suffered if the kindly trucker hadn’t kept them warm. Surely he showed how quickly their battery depleted, depriving those children of heat?No such luck. In fact, when you do the math, it turns out EVs may be able to heat their occupants just as long as a car with a combustion engine, depending on your assumptions about the cars, recharging, and refueling.

    U.S. Department of Energy

    Looking at Actual DataThe U.S. Department of Energy issued a chart showing the fuel consumption at idle of various gasoline and diesel vehicles. With no accessory loads, both the small gas and diesel engines (each 2.0 liters) consumed at a rate of nearly 0.2 gallon per hour, while a “large sedan” with a 4.6-liter V-8 drank twice as quickly at idle. In our recent test, a Hyundai Sonata with the turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder split the difference and consumed at 0.3 gallon per hour while running the climate control. If the gasoline car has a 14-gallon fuel tank that started at two-thirds full, or 10.5 gallons, that provides 35 hours of idle time if consuming 0.3 gallon per hour.As for electric cars, estimates for cabin-heating load vary widely depending on ambient temperature, presence or absence of sun, and other factors. In November, Reuters fact-checked a widely circulated claim that EVs are more likely to get stuck in traffic from batteries running low. In it, Oxford University researcher Katherine Collett suggested a 2-kW estimate for cabin heating. (Reuters’ verdict: The claim was false.) A (paywalled) Detroit Free Press article entitled “Vehicle of the Year Honors Prove the Tide Has Irrevocably Turned to Electric Vehicles” quotes Craig Van Batenberg, who trains EV technicians. He has written about heating EV passenger compartments for the global engineering association SAE International. He, too, says heat pumps use “about two kilowatts” to heat a car’s cabin. “With a 60.0-kWh battery,” he said, “I could heat the interior for about 30 hours.”A July 2020 blog post by TLK Energy, a German digital-modeling firm, calculates higher energy loads for heating an EV. Under two scenarios—a cloudy day at 0 deg C (32 deg F) and a sunny day at -10 deg C (14 deg F)—its estimates of energy use were 3.4 kW and 4.0 kW, respectively. Our 2019 Tesla Model 3 did better than any of these estimates, consuming energy at a rate of 1.6 kW to maintain 65 degrees inside with an average outside temperature of 15 degrees F. And it’s worth noting our car has the old resistive heating, not the more efficient heat pump that now conditions the cabins of new Model 3s.Let’s do the math. We’ll assume a 75.0-kWh battery that’s also two-thirds full, just like the gasoline car. Its 50.0 kWh will heat the cabin from 12.5 hours (at 4.0 kW) to 31.25 hours (at 1.6 kW), depending which assumption you use, which, at the high end nearly matches the gasoline car. This also suggests more data is needed to establish the energy used for heating by different EVs under different scenarios.No Way, Norway!Back in the Washington Post piece, the closest Lane gets to looking at actual EVs’ operation is to quote a Norwegian Automobile Federation study showing they lose 20 percent of battery range in cold weather. Lane spends a lot of time on Norway, noting the bulk of that nation’s cars are still powered by gasoline and that its government is dialing down subsidies for EV purchases. Each of those is factually correct. The missing context is that neither indicates a cooling of Norway’s push to end sales of cars with tailpipes by 2025. Au contraire: the first is simply a recognition that Norway’s fleet—like any country’s—will take time to turn over completely. The average vehicle on U.S. roads is 12 years old, so even if every new car sold today were electric, it would take a couple of decades to transform the fleet. As for lowering incentives, the government has judged its push toward EV adoption a success, to the degree that it can dial them down. Note that 90 percent of new vehicles sold in Norway in December 2021 were fully or partly electric. Hardly a sign of public recognition that EVs aren’t suited to the country’s winters, eh?That’s okay, since Lane ends by saying Norway isn’t relevant to the U.S. experience anyhow. Most of Oslo’s workers don’t even commute by car—imagine!Lane is correct in that assertion: Norway is indeed different from the U.S. Far more of that country’s citizens accept climate science than do Americans. Norway’s government implemented a robust plan to cut carbon emissions from virtually all sectors of the country—roughly 10 years ago. That contrasts to the U.S., which is notably unable to do anything of the sort.Lane ends by saying EVs can “work as well as ICE counterparts in many, or even most, ordinary situations.” But in the extraordinary ones, like 16-hour blizzard traffic jams? “We’re not there yet.” For single-vehicle families in the coldest of climates, there’s arguably some justification for that point of view. Note, though, the average U.S. household now has close to two vehicles (1.9, if you’re counting), and it’s likely to be a long time before both of them will be battery-electric. Yes, the Tesla Family Was Just FineAs for that shivering family in the Tesla, it turned out they didn’t run out of heat at all—though the kids may have been comfier in the blankets offered by the trucker. Two days after Lane’s opinion piece ran, the trucker responded to a question by noting the family stayed warm overnight and had 18 percent of battery capacity remaining the next morning. They were headed to a local Supercharger station to recharge.Then an actual Tesla driver who was caught in that very same massive 16-hour traffic jam on I-95 weighed in. “I’m grateful that I was driving my EV when I got stuck on I-95,” wrote Model 3 driver Dan Kanninen on the Zero Emission Transportation Association (ZETA) website. He spent 14 hours in his base Model 3, the shortest-range version of that car. He stayed warm (with no engine running, obviously) and was able to stream videos on the car’s 15-inch display. Kanninen had 50 miles of range left after 14 hours. EV drivers often charge at home, he wrote, so “we are less likely to have just a partial charge, unlike drivers who rarely drive on a full tank.” En route to a Supercharger station, he saw long lines of cars waiting to fuel up.Other sites have since weighed in to debunk the editorial. No data appears to be available on how many gasoline cars ran out of gas during the 16-hour stoppage.The moral of the story, one known by those who live in snowy regions: If a blizzard is forecast, bring winter clothes, hand warmers, food, water, a shovel for digging a snow cave, and bear spray—no matter what kind of vehicle you’re driving.Some research for this story derived from broader discussions of EV topics among the author and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Ford Is Taking the Mustang GT3 Racing

    For the past few months, the rumor in the sports-car racing world was that the next iteration of Corvette C8.R would be getting a high-profile crosstown rival in 2024. Today, Ford has confirmed it: The Mustang is joining both GT3 racing and IMSA’s GTD Pro class in two years.Ford will partner with Multimatic to both build and race the cars. If that name sounds familiar, you may recognize it from its part in building both the current Ford GT road car and the GTE-class race car that ran from 2016 to 2019. Multimatic is most famous as a constructor of racing cars, like the upcoming Porsche and Audi LMDh racers that will fight for overall wins at Le Mans, but it has also run full racing programs like the European Ford GT and American Mazda DPi operations. Its latest venture will be a two-car factory GT program for Ford, something like the Mustang’s answer to the famous yellow-and-black factory cars of Corvette Racing.

    Starting with tomorrow’s Rolex 24, IMSA has replaced its longtime GTLM category with a GT3-based class called GTD Pro. Any team hoping to compete in it has to conform to a global GT3 rule set, one that traditionally requires companies to build at least 30 total cars and offer many of those for sale to private customers. Ford will be no exception, with customer Mustang GT3s available when the car debuts with its factory operation in 2024.Joey Hand, a Le Mans class winner as a Ford factory driver during its 2016–2019 GT program, has been signed to the program as a test driver. In addition to that role, he will continue on as an internal development driver for Ford’s entire racing program. That side of the job will see him run the road course races in the NASCAR Cup Series this year.The new Mustang racers will be powered by a variant of the 5.0-liter Coyote V-8 built by M-Sport, the company that builds and races the Ford Puma in the World Rally Championship. In addition to the GT3 version, Ford also plans to build and sell a successor to its current Mustang GT4 racer, also built with Multimatic and available to customers since 2016.While no mention was made of what Mustang this new racing car would actually represent, the two-year window before the program rolls out leaves plenty of time for Ford to debut the newest generation of a car that has been in production since 2015.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Future Electric Lotus Sports Car Might Look Like the Esprit

    Lotus has revealed a sketch of a future electric sports car with a wedge-like design reminiscent of the iconic Esprit.The sports car will utilize batteries developed in a new partnership with Britishvolt, a U.K.-based battery cell specialist.Before this EV sports car arrives, Lotus will begin deliveries of the electric Evija hypercar and will unveil an electric SUV, called Type 132.British automaker Lotus, purveyor of lightweight sports cars, has already begun its transition to electric vehicles with the 1972-horsepower Evija, a hypercar with a claimed top speed of over 200 mph. Now Lotus has announced plans for another battery-powered sports car, which will be the result of a collaboration with Britishvolt, a company specializing in battery-cell development.

    Lotus Esprit S1
    Lotus

    Lotus revealed a sketch of the future sports car, which features sharp, angular lines reminiscent of early versions of the Lotus Esprit from the late 1970s and early 1980s. The iconic wedge shape of the Esprit—which famously featured in the James Bond flick The Spy Who Loved Me as a submarine—is elongated in the sketch, and features a Union Jack motif over the rear haunch. It’s unclear whether the production sports car will mimic the Esprit as closely, but Lotus says it provides the “first clues.”

    The partnership between Lotus and Britishvolt will center around the co-development of a new battery cell which will provide the juice for the next generation of sporty Lotus EVs. The primary focus will be boosting energy density, reducing battery weight, and decreasing charging times. Before this new sports car arrives, Lotus will unveil the Type 132, a new all-electric SUV, at some point this year. Deliveries of the Lotus Evija should also begin in 2022, after delays caused by the global pandemic and resulting supply shortages.
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    2022 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe Hybrid Commands a Hefty Price Premium

    Jeep has announced pricing for the 2022 Grand Cherokee’s 4xe plug-in-hybrid model.It starts at $59,495 and ranges up to $76,095 for the loaded Summit Reserve trim.Jeep says that 4xe models will start arriving at dealerships this spring.Jeep’s second 4xe hybrid SUV is based on the new two-row Grand Cherokee, and this plug-in hybrid will be the most expensive model in the lineup. It starts at $59,495 and offers five trim levels ranging up to $76,095 for the top Summit Reserve, making for a premium of between $8250 and $9980 compared with the nonhybrid Grand Cherokee.

    All Grand Cherokee 4xe models have the same powertrain that consists of a turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four gasoline engine and two electric motors. It produces a total of 375 horsepower and 470 pound-feet of torque and is said to provide an electric driving range of 25 miles on a full charge. That’s notably more power than even the Grand Cherokee’s optional 357-hp 5.7-liter V-8, and considerably more than the base 3.6-liter V-6’s 293 horsepower. But the hybrid will also likely weigh more than the nonhybrid model owing to its battery pack and other extra hardware.The 4xe’s trim lineup largely mirrors the standard Grand Cherokee’s. All hybrids come standard with four-wheel drive, and the base 4xe appears to be roughly equivalent to the Limited 4×4. It’s also available in the off-road-oriented Trailhawk trim ($64,280) and the more luxurious Overland ($67,555), Summit ($71,515), and Summit Reserve ($76,095) configurations.While the standard 2022 Grand Cherokee is on sale now, there will be a bit more of a wait for the 4xe, as Jeep says it won’t start arriving at dealerships until sometime this spring.
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Nearly 700,000 Nissan Rogue SUVs Recalled for Dashboard Fire Risk

    Nissan will recall 688,946 of its 2014–2016 Rogue SUVs to fix a problem with the electrical connector for the under-dashboard harness.Corrosion from water and salt coming in through the driver’s footwell could cause the harness to corrode, causing issues up to and including a risk of fire.Owners will be notified starting March 2, and Nissan said its fix for the issue is “under development.”Nissan announced it will recall nearly 700,000 of its 2014–2016 Rogue SUVs to fix a problem with the dashboard harness connector. Over time, salt and water getting in through the driver’s-side footwell could “wick up the dash-side harness tape and enter the connector,” Nissan said. This could lead to a number of problems, according to a report filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Among them could be failure of the driver’s-side power window or power seat controls, illumination of the all-wheel-drive system warning light, battery discharge, “a burning odor,” smoke under the dash on the driver’s side, and, potentially, fire.

    Interior of 2015 Nissan Rogue.
    Nissan

    According to the chronology of the issue that Nissan has filed with NHTSA, there have been three “unconfirmed incidents” in U.S. vehicles and no injuries, as well as two “thermal incidents” and two “incidents with localized thermal damage” in Rogue vehicles in Canada.Nissan said the problem is likely to occur in only about 1 percent of the recalled vehicles. They include 305,220 Rogues built at the Renault Samsung Motors plant in South Korea and 383,726 built at Smyrna, Tennessee, for a total of 688,946 2014 through 2016 models. Nissan said it changed the manufacturing process at the end of the 2016 model year, so newer Rogues will not experience the issue, and the NHTSA report said no other Nissan or Infiniti vehicles used the same harness layout and tape as on these earlier Rogues.Owners will be notified beginning March 2. Nissan is still figuring out a remedy for the issue but said it expects a repair to be available in the spring. The automaker also said it will contact owners about reimbursement for fixes that happened before the recall notification, since the vehicles in the recall are no longer under warranty.In the meantime, Rogue owners who want to find out if their vehicle is affected can check the NHTSA recalls site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Tesla Won't Bring Cybertruck, Roadster, Semi to Market in 2022

    During an earnings call tonight, Elon Musk said Tesla will not introduce any new models in 2022, meaning the Cybertruck, Semi, and Roadster are yet again delayed.CEO Musk also revealed that the company is not currently working on the $25,000 EV he announced in 2020.Musk emphasized that the company’s focus is on its Full Self-Driving package and said he expects to “achieve Full Self-Driving safer than a human this year.”Tesla churned out nearly a million electric vehicles worldwide last year, but don’t hold your breath waiting for new models from the pioneering EV company. In an investor relations webcast today, Tesla CEO Elon Musk revealed that reservation holders for the Cybertruck, Roadster, and Semi—all of which have missed their scheduled production dates—will have to wait even longer before they can get their hands on the long-awaited vehicles.

    “We’re not introducing any new models this year,” said Musk in the earnings call. “We will, however, do a lot of engineering and tooling to create those vehicles: Cybertruck, Semi, Roadster, Optimus [which is actually a robot], and be ready to bring those to production hopefully next year.”

    Tesla Semi won’t come out in 2022, but this image was part of the investor presentation on Jan. 26 anyway.
    Tesla

    It appears there is still a lot of work to be done on the Cybertruck, despite Musk tweeting yesterday that he has been driving a prototype around the Gigafactory site in Texas. “There’s a lot of new technology in the Cybertruck that will take some time to work through,” Musk explained. “There’s a question of what’s the average cost of a Cybertruck and to what degree is that affordable.”Speaking of affordability, Musk also shed light on the $25,000 car, rumored to be called Model 2, that was announced on Tesla’s Battery Day in 2020. “We are not currently working on the $25,000 car,” Musk revealed. “We have too much on our plate now, frankly, but at some point there will be [time].”It’s sort of the wrong question,” he continued. “The thing that overwhelmingly matters is, when is the car autonomous.” Throughout the call, Musk reinforced the idea that Tesla’s priorities lie in introducing self-driving technology rather than expanding the model lineup, and that Full Self-Driving will be the major profit driver for the company.”Everything pales in comparison to the value of robotaxi or full self-driving,” he summed up. “I would be shocked if we do not achieve full self-driving safer than a human this year.”
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More

  • in

    Subaru Revives the WRX Wagon, but Not the One We Want

    Subaru will launch a WRX wagon in Australia soon with the same 271-hp engine as the sedan.Unfortunately it’s available only with a CVT automatic and not with a manual transmission.We don’t expect to see a WRX wagon like this in the U.S. anytime soon.Subaru hasn’t sold the WRX in wagon form on our shores for quite some time, but the bodystyle is making its return—at least in Australia. The new 2022 WRX will offer a Sportswagon model and is set to go on sale down under within the next few months. It’s based on the Levorg wagon sold elsewhere but swaps out that model’s less powerful turbo 1.8-liter flat-four for the same 271-hp 2.4-liter engine found in the WRX sedan, meaning it’s a true WRX. Interestingly, the wagon version also does without much the sedan’s black plastic cladding, making for a cleaner look.But there’s a catch.While the sedan offers a six-speed manual transmission as standard equipment, the Sportswagon will only be offered with a continuously variable automatic transmission. Subaru does say it has improved the CVT’s responsiveness with this new generation, but it definitely wouldn’t be our first transmission choice for this all-wheel-drive performance machine.

    Subaru

    We won’t pine after the Australia-market WRX too much for now, but we can still look back fondly on previous versions of the WRX wagon that did offer manual transmissions. There was even a wagon version of the higher-performance WRX STI at one point. But sadly we don’t expect Subaru to change its ways and offer a WRX wagon in the States anytime soon. Maybe if we ask nicely enough?
    This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io More