More stories

  • in

    1992 Audi 90CS Quattro Sport: The Beefy Baby Audi

    From the September 1992 issue of Car and Driver.You’re looking at another stout German hitting our shores and making the case for full­-time four-wheel-drive machines. The latest Audi 90 marks the fourth generation of baby Audis. Baby, maybe, but not infan­tile. Over the years they’ve become ever more accomplished. Yet like many adults, even the lighter front-drive versions have put on a few pounds. In this all-wheel-drive 90CS Quattro Sport, it’s a few hundred pounds over last year’s 90 Quattro. So it is a ques­tion of stoutness: If a little goes a long way, how much does it take before the added load cuts down speed and fuel economy? And if you live in a fair-weather climate, is it worth lugging around a four-wheeled, full-time foul-weather kit to handle a few rainy, snowy, or icy days? HIGHS: Quality, stability, better looks, bigger trunk.On the other hand, if you live upstate in Alaska or high in the rainy Pacific North­west, boy, has Audi got a baby buggy for you! Don’t buy the hefty and pricey Quattro­ drive layout purely because you feel you must have more than two-wheel drive to put the power to the ground. The 90’s 172-hp 2.0-liter V-6 delivers less than an over­dose of performance, so traction on dry pavement poses little problem. Audi sends us three 90 models—a base S, a fancier CS, and the CS in Quattro trim—each with the V-6 developed for the bigger 100 sedan (C/D, December 1991). Although this engine is a fresh design, it lacks the technical tweaks that make you feel the difference between simply traveling well or truly thrilling to the journey. Audi’s chunky V-6 wears an electronic engine-­control system and port fuel injection but keeps a lid on the combustion process due to the single-overhead-cam layout that limits each cylinder bank to two valves per cylinder. That’s where it falls behind in today’s power parade. Audi itself pinpoints the 90’s prime competitors: Japan’s Acura Vigor, Infiniti J30, and Lexus ES300, plus Germany’s own BMW 325i and Mercedes-Benz 190E 2.6. The Quattro offers features these oth­ers don’t, but its power-to-weight ratio works against it. Compared with, say, BMW’s 325i—the very definition of a pocket-rocket sedan—the Audi lags. It produces 172 horsepower from 2.8 liters, whereas the BMW’s 24-valve six-cylinder whips up 189 horsepower from only 2.5 liters. And at 3404 pounds, the stolid Audi outweighs the BMW by 366 pounds. To be fair, the Audi, despite a wheel­base about four inches shorter, measures about six inches longer overall than the BMW. The 90’s wheelbase has actually been increased 2.3 inches in comparison with the previous 80’s. But wait—the Quattro’s wheelbase is six-tenths of an inch shorter than the regular 90’s because the four-wheel-drive model bears a differ­ent five-speed gearbox (no automatic available), plus a new independent rear suspension to cope with the power fed through the new rear half-shafts. The added hardware makes the Quattro weigh 200 pounds more than the front-drive version of the 90CS. The Audi’s slim cabin offers good comfort for four occupants and can carry five. But whoever gets wedged in the middle of the rear seat will feel as if he/she has been taken to the cleaners to have a few wrinkles pressed in. The Japanese competitors targeted by Audi offer slightly roomier accommoda­tions, yet, like the small BMW, they don’t provide four-wheel drive. And unlike the German entries, they generate less feed­back for the driver, especially under the duress of hard driving. In answer to the duress Audi faces in the market, Richard Mugg, vice president in charge of the company in America, says it will deliver “German engineering value at Japanese price points.” Mugg contends that the “90 offers the luxury of the Lexus ES300 and the sports flair of the BMW 325i, but is comparably priced with the Acura Vigor.” He adds: “Our prices will match those of our Japanese competitors and they will beat BMW and Mercedes.” The strategy is meeting with some success. Audi’s 1992 sales in the first five months are up more than 18 percent over the same period last year. LOWS: Heftiness, cost, and a lack of zip for this market segment.As long as we’re talking numbers, the revised 90 gains 23 percent in torsional rigidity (notable in a car structurally “opened up” for new folding rear seats with no bulkhead to back them up). A stretched deck helps provide 37 percent more trunk space in front-drive 90s, and 73 percent more room in the boot of the revised Quattro (though in comparison it still gives up some luggage space to its drive mechanism beneath).One thing you won’t find among the numbers is a two-door 90. Maybe the pre­vious version looked too much like a Ford Escort at three times the price. However, lots of people seem to like the new model’s taut look, beefcake stance, and striking wheels. The Quattro’s 205/60VR-15 performance tires replace the regular CS’s 195/65HR-15 all-weather tires (which are a “reverse” option on the Quattro for anybody who really needs them). Audi mounts the Quattro’s fatter tires on seven-inch aluminum rims instead of six-inchers. Fortunately, their simple spokes are easy to clean, because Audi’s four-wheel discs still puff out scads of clinging brake dust. Every car in this category showcases solid fit and finish. If there’s anything that’s too solid about the 90CS Quattro Sport, it’s the sport in its slightly lowered suspension. It jounces over sharp bumps. Yet the firm shocks, springs, and bushings don’t jell well enough with the big-boy tires to put the baby Audi quite on equal terms with the handling provided by more mature designs. The Quattro’s wheels pro­vide a wider track but also increase the 90’s tendency to follow truck ruts and the like. Although the overall stability of the Audi plays well, our track testing shows, for example, that it only matches the BMW 325i’s cornering grip at 0.80 g and leans harder on its front tires. And though both cars are equipped with ABS, Audi’s brakes take longer to stop and, as their load suggests, fade faster from higher speeds. This Audi has a smoothed nose copied from its big brothers, headlight washers, and aero headlights (among the better Audi lights in memory, others often falling, shall we say, short in the dark). The grille’s “quattro” badge reflects the only model message. There are also new front fender flares and a rear winglet. Inside, leather that should be grippier wraps a fine four-spoke wheel. Its hub houses an airbag, and beyond it are large tachometer and speedometer dials and smaller secondary gauges. The slim cabin leaves no place for more gauges except disconcertingly low on the console. A cli­mate-control system is sandwiched between those dials and an ill-marked but decent-sounding AM/FM/cassette stereo. A graphic row of controls above it switches fog lights, rear defroster, hazard flashers, and heated seats on or off. The 90’s headliner hangs low to clear the power sunroof, the pedals are spaced close, and the huge headrests—despite donut-hole centers—block the view to the rear. The narrow interior has a cozy immediacy, but the seats offer less imme­diacy than we’d like. They’re flatter, slicker, less grippy than needed in a car that grips the road more impressively. More Audi Reviews from the ArchiveWhen it comes to breaking that grip just for fun, the all-wheel-drive Audi falls behind the rear-drive BMW. The Quattro eats up 8.2 seconds going from a standstill to 60 mph; the 325i eats it alive in 6.9 seconds. In short, the Audi weighs hundreds of pounds more, sells for thousands of dollars more, and offers less power to boot (it around). The lower weight of Audi’s “lesser” front-drive 90CS promises more performance than the Quattro and higher fuel economy than the 20 mpg we aver­aged. So the regular CS won’t fall quite as far behind BMW’s wolverine in the days, weeks, and months between those pesky thunderstorms and snowfalls where the Quattro thrives. VERDICT: Welcome four-wheel-drive security, but with cost and weight penalties.All of which make us appreciate Audi’s bigger, sweeter 100CS all the more. It’s much roomier, weighs a few pounds less than the baby Quattro, feels much longer-legged despite having the same engine, covers an extra hundred miles or more on bigger tankfuls, and costs little more. That’s stout. SpecificationsSpecifications
    1992 Audi 90CS Quattro SportVehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
    PRICE
    Base/As Tested: $32,679/$33,250 (est.)Options: all-weather package (headlamp washers and heated seats, washer nozzles, and door locks); ski sack
    ENGINESOHC V-6, iron block and aluminum heads, port fuel injectionDisplacement: 169 in3, 2771 cm3Power: 172 hp @ 5500 rpmTorque: 184 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm 
    TRANSMISSION5-speed manual
    CHASSIS
    Suspension, F/R: struts/control armsBrakes, F/R: 10.9-in vented disc/9.6-in discTires: Dunlop SP Sport D8 m2205/60VR-15
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 102.2 inLength: 180.3 inWidth: 66.7 inHeight: 54.7 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 46/36 ft3Trunk Volume: 14 ft3Curb Weight: 3404 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS
    60 mph: 8.2 sec1/4-Mile: 16.4 sec @ 85 mph100 mph: 24.2 sec120 mph: 43.3 secRolling Start, 5–60 mph: 8.8 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 10.7 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 10.0 secTop Speed: 122 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 185 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.80 g 
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY
    Observed: 20 mpg
    EPA FUEL ECONOMYCity/Highway: 17/22 mpg 
    C/D TESTING EXPLAINED More

  • in

    2024 Porsche Cayenne Turbo E-Hybrid Is One Wild Animal

    The 2024 Porsche Cayenne Turbo E-Hybrid is the hippopotamus of high-performance mid-size luxury SUVs. It’s big and heavy, incredibly powerful, and shockingly quick.As its name implies, the Cayenne’s Turbo trim doesn’t rely solely on a twin-turbocharged 4.0-liter V-8 engine for motivation. Rather it takes a page from the outgoing Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid, stuffing an electric motor in between its bi-turbo bent-eight and eight-speed automatic transmission. For now, it’s the most potent Cayenne hybrid, although we’d wager that Porsche will revive the Turbo S nameplate and pin it to an even more extreme version sometime soon. Punchy PowertrainThe specific badging Porsche affixes to its top Cayenne E-Hybrid model matters less than the output its powertrain produces, and the peak 729 horsepower the Turbo E-Hybrid cranks out betters last year’s Turbo S E-Hybrid by 59 horses. Tweaks to the V-8 engine add 50 ponies to its stable for a total of 591 horsepower, and a more powerful electric motor pumps out 174 horses—40 more than the old Turbo S E-Hybrid’s. Blame the gas engine’s 6000-rpm power peak for the 36 horses that get lost totaling up the Turbo E-Hybrid’s combined power figure.The electric motor does a reasonable job pushing the hefty Turbo E-Hybrid off the line or through low-speed city traffic. With a peak of 339 pound-feet of torque, it even has enough oomph to get the plug-in Porsche up to 84 mph without the aid of the gas engine.Range and Drive ModesEstimated electric-only range from the lithium-ion battery pack (22.0 kilowatt-hours of usable capacity) should top 30 miles once the EPA gets around to rating it. But driving the Turbo E-Hybrid in its default E-Power (EV) mode is akin to putting a wild animal in captivity. To free the beast within, you need to turn the steering-wheel-mounted drive-mode switch to Hybrid, Sport, or Sport Plus (or, if you’re venturing off pavement, to Offroad).Hybrid is something like a safari park; the electric motor is still the primary motivator, but just a small prod of the accelerator brings the gas engine into the mix. Sport and Sport Plus, meanwhile, open the park gates and let the Turbo E-Hybrid embrace its savage nature. They keep the gas engine at the ready for instant access to the SUV’s prodigious power. Whereas E-Power and Hybrid modes leave the standard two-chamber air springs in their Normal mode, Sport and Sport Plus place the suspension in its firmer settings. Lapping Spain’s 2.6-mile Parcmotor Castellolí (Circuit Parcmotor) near Barcelona, Sport mode kept the air springs taut enough to limit excess body motions while retaining just enough compliance to maintain composure over the most undulating stretches of pavement. Turbo E-Hybrid PerformanceBoth the $148,550 Turbo E-Hybrid SUV and $153,050 fastback Coupe models should weigh about 5700 pounds once we get them on our scales. Unsurprisingly, these big Porsches were at their best when pointed straight ahead. Although the Spanish track’s two straightaways were too short to confirm the claimed top speed of 183 mph, they were plenty long enough to indulge the seemingly endless wave of power produced by the electric motor and eager-revving twin-turbo V-8.Porsche claims the Turbo E-Hybrid will pummel its way to 60 mph in 3.5 seconds. But we recorded a 3.2-second run to 60 in a similarly heavy but less powerful 2020 Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid, so we think the Turbo E-Hybrid has the potential to be even quicker. Despite its mass, the Turbo E-Hybrid tore through Parcmotor Castellolí’s 11 turns with fervor. Credit the optional 22-inch wheels wrapped in grippy summer rubber, which stood in for the standard 21-inch wheels and all-season tires. Porsche also offers 21-inch summers as a no-cost option.Plentiful grip, light and direct steering that weighed up predictably as we added input, and a clairvoyant ZF eight-speed automatic gearbox that held gears through corners all came together to push the Turbo E-Hybrid around each apex. Turning in with just a bit of extra speed revealed some understeer at the limit. Goading the accelerator just past the apex was enough to gently push the tail out before the torque-vectoring rear-end and all-wheel-drive system brought the rear axle back in line.Braking the Turbo E-HybridPorsche fits a set of 16.5-inch front and 14.4-inch rear rotors clamped down by 10-piston front and four-piston rear calipers to the Turbo E-Hybrid, and the combination was more than up to the task of slowing the big SUV during our spirited drive on the mountain roads near Parc Natural de la Muntanya de Montserrat (Montserrat Mountain Natural Park). The Turbo E-Hybrid we drove on the track wore optional carbon-ceramic brakes with even larger rotors measuring 17.3 inches up front and 16.1 inches out back. The $9080 brake option showed no signs of fade even after multiple sessions. On surface streets, however, the carbon-ceramic brakes’ grabby nature at lower speeds made it difficult to come to a stop smoothly, exacerbated by the uncouth handoff between regenerative and mechanical braking. The standard cast-iron stoppers suffered from no such clumsiness.Related StoriesWith either setup, the Cayenne E-Hybrid now includes an electric brake booster. Though the left pedal sacrifices some tactility as a result, it still remains appropriately firm and—when not equipped with the carbon-ceramic units—predictable in its application during day-to-day and at-the-limit braking.Like a hippo lazily wading in the water, the Cayenne Turbo E-Hybrid seems relatively docile when puttering about strictly on electricity. Provoke it with a boot of the accelerator or a turn of the drive-mode switch, however, and this beast transforms into a violent powerhouse capable of achieving tremendous speed. It’s incongruous that something as heavy as the Cayenne Turbo E-Hybrid is so speedy and powerful, but the dual nature of Porsche’s flagship plug-in-hybrid SUV may be the key to this high-performance model’s survival in the era of electrification.SpecificationsSpecifications
    2024 Porsche Cayenne Turbo E-HybridVehicle Type: front-engine, front-motor, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door hatchback or wagon
    PRICE
    Base: SUV, $148,550; Coupe, $153,050
    POWERTRAIN
    twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 32-valve 4.0-liter V-8, 591 hp, 590 lb-ft + AC motor, 174 hp, 339 lb-ft (combined output: 729 hp, 701 lb-ft; 22.0-kWh lithium-ion battery pack; 11.0-kW onboard charger)Transmission: 8-speed automatic
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 114.0 inLength: 194.1 inWidth: 78.1 inHeight: 65.5–66.3 inCargo Volume, Behind F/R: 48–55/15–22 ft3Curb Weight (C/D est): 5700 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
    60 mph: 3.0 sec100 mph: 7.5 sec1/4-Mile: 11.2 secTop Speed: 183 mph
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST)
    Combined/City/Highway: 19/18/20 mpgCombined Gasoline + Electricity: 50 MPGeEV Range: 35 miSenior EditorDespite their shared last name, Greg Fink is not related to Ed “Big Daddy” Roth’s infamous Rat Fink. Both Finks, however, are known for their love of cars, car culture, and—strangely—monogrammed one-piece bathing suits. Greg’s career in the media industry goes back more than a decade. His previous experience includes stints as an editor at publications such as U.S. News & World Report, The Huffington Post, Motor1.com, and MotorTrend. More

  • in

    2024 Porsche Cayenne S E-Hybrid Avoids a Certain Stigma

    It’s hard to imagine that any new Porsche could be a cause of badge shame, but for some buyers, evidently, there’s a stigma around being seen in an entry-level version. For customers shopping the plug-in-hybrid Cayenne, the new 2024 Porsche Cayenne S E-Hybrid gives eco- and image-conscious customers alike an option that tells the world they don’t settle for the mere E-Hybrid model. The S E-Hybrid turns up the wick by way of extra power and a lengthier list of standard features, and it requires a minimum spend of $100,750, a $7400 upcharge over the Cayenne E-Hybrid. That’s for the long-roof SUV body style. The fastback, or Coupe in Porsche parlance, stickers for $106,050. But is it worth it?No Special Engine for This SAs with the strictly gas-fed Cayenne S, the Cayenne S E-Hybrid packs a heartier punch than its lesser kin. The S E-Hybrid is not, however, a V-8 Cayenne S with an electric drive motor and battery in tow. Snagging that combination requires making the jump to the $148,550 Turbo E-Hybrid.Rather, the S E-Hybrid trades the standard E-Hybrid’s 300-hp turbocharged 3.0-liter V-6 for a 348-hp version. Like all gas-electric 2024 Cayennes, the S E-Hybrid complements its internal-combustion engine with a 174-hp electric motor. Thanks to the fatter powerband of its V-6, the S E-Hybrid’s combined output of 512 horsepower betters the Cayenne E-Hybrid’s by 49 ponies. Porsche says the additional power helps the S E-Hybrid run to 60 mph in 4.4 seconds—0.2 ticks ahead of the standard E-Hybrid and equal to that of a gas-only Cayenne S with the Sport Chrono package—though we wager it will beat that claim by a few tenths of second once we get it to the test track. Battery-Mode BoreThe slim acceleration advantage the S E-Hybrid has over the E-Hybrid is mostly nonexistent in the default E-Power drive mode, which effectively turns Porsche’s spicy capsicum into a flavorless bell pepper. In this mode, the Cayenne avoids firing up its gas engine and instead prioritizes battery-electric driving, feeding the motor electricity from its rear-mounted 22.0-kWh battery pack, which we estimate will provide more than 30 miles of electric-only range.The electric motor proved powerful enough to push the S E-Hybrid away from stoplights and putter along in stop-and-go traffic in the busy urban environs of Barcelona, Spain. Porsche claims the motor is capable of powering the vehicle up to 84 mph, but its limited output made it difficult to take advantage of open holes in traffic or complete passes at higher speeds without assistance from the gas engine. When the V-6 does make its appearance, however, the S E-Hybrid often overcompensates for the gas engine’s delayed arrival with a sudden surge of excess power. Solving this issue required twisting the steering-wheel-mounted drive mode dial—part of the standard Sport Chrono package—to Hybrid, Sport, or Sport Plus, all of which bring a more linear power delivery. (There’s also an Offroad mode for those looking to take their Cayenne off the beaten path.) The S E-Hybrid is arguably at its best in its efficiency-oriented Hybrid mode, which still favors the electric motor but quickly calls upon the gas engine when necessary. Switching to Sport or Sport Plus keeps the V-6 on boil, ensuring the powertrain’s full motivation is always at the ready. Standard Air SuspensionSp0rt and Sport Plus also firm up the two-chamber air springs, which use individual valves to independently control compression and rebound. They’re a standard feature on the S E-Hybrid (and a $2390 option on the E-Hybrid). Left in its Normal setting, the air suspension contributed to the Cayenne’s quiet and isolated cabin by deftly absorbing the speed bumps and other irregularities that occasionally dot Barcelona’s freshly paved roads. But it’s possible that U.S. roadways will reveal a less smooth ride over potholes and broken pavement.On the twisting tarmac that snakes around Parc Natural de la Muntanya de Montserrat (Montserrat Mountain Natural Park), the suspension even in its softest setting made the hefty S E-Hybrid feel reasonably wieldy. Body motions remain predictable and controlled, even if there is still noticeable pitch and some roll in turns. The Cayenne we drove was optioned with summer rubber (all-season tires come standard) and well-bolstered 18-way power front seats ($1710), which together ensured that both car and driver remained firmly planted through the route’s many high-g corners. The Cost to Go SHere’s the rub, though. As impressive as the Cayenne S E-Hybrid is, its overall mass—well in excess of 5000 pounds—means it can’t cosplay as a 911, even if it’s shockingly capable for a vehicle this big and heavy.There’s no hiding the fact that wrangling this Porsche around tight two-lanes feels more like work than play. Nor are its additional standard features enough to justify the delta between it and the only marginally slower Cayenne E-Hybrid. Even when optioned with the S’s upgraded wheels, headlights, and suspension, the regular E-Hybrid still undercuts the S E-Hybrid by $2710. More on the Cayenne S E-HybridFor some, that’s a small price to pay for the prestige of an S-badged Porsche. We think you’re better off sacrificing a few horses and saving a few bucks by sticking with the still-plenty-quick Cayenne E-Hybrid, but then again, we have no shame.SpecificationsSpecifications
    2024 Porsche Cayenne S E-HybridVehicle Type: front-engine, front-motor, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door hatchback or wagon
    PRICE
    Base: SUV, $100,750; Coupe, $106,050
    POWERTRAIN
    turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve 3.0-liter V-6, 348 hp, 369 lb-ft + AC motor, 174 hp, 339 lb-ft (combined output: 512 hp, 553 lb-ft; 22.0-kWh lithium-ion battery pack; 11.0-kW onboard charger)Transmission: 8-speed automatic
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 114.0 inLength: 194.1 inWidth: 78.1 inHeight: 65.2–66.1 inCargo Volume, Behind F/R: 48–55/15–22 ft3Curb Weight (C/D est): 5400–5500 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
    60 mph: 3.9–4.0 sec100 mph: 10.4–10.5 sec1/4-Mile: 12.3–12.4 secTop Speed: 163 mph
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST)
    Combined/City/Highway: 23/24/22 mpgCombined Gasoline + Electricity: 55 MPGeEV Range: 37 miSenior EditorDespite their shared last name, Greg Fink is not related to Ed “Big Daddy” Roth’s infamous Rat Fink. Both Finks, however, are known for their love of cars, car culture, and—strangely—monogrammed one-piece bathing suits. Greg’s career in the media industry goes back more than a decade. His previous experience includes stints as an editor at publications such as U.S. News & World Report, The Huffington Post, Motor1.com, and MotorTrend. More

  • in

    2024 GMC Canyon AT4X AEV: The Grandest Canyon

    In the off-roading world, one could argue that having the right equipment the one time you need it makes it worth having all the time. That’s the philosophy behind the GMC Canyon AT4X and the AT4X AEV, trucks offering more proof that modern off-roading has become an extravagant affair. Think of the third-generation Canyon as essentially another trim level of the Chevy Colorado pickup with which it shares nearly every bolt and button—even its key-fob case. The major equipment that separates them are bumpers, badges, head- and taillights, wheels, and the Canyon’s amber marker lights at the center of its plastic fender flares that the Colorado doesn’t get. However, just like the Colorado, every Canyon is a four-door crew cab with a five-foot, two-inch bed. The GMC is intended to be grander than the Chevy, so it skips the Colorado’s two lowest trim levels and their less powerful versions of the turbocharged 2.7-liter four. Instead, all Canyons pack 310 horsepower and 430 pound-feet of torque in the high-output engine that Chevy saves exclusively for the Colorado’s ZR2 trim. In the Canyon Elevation, AT4, and Denali, that’s good for an impressive 7700 pounds of max towing. The trailering capacity for the AT4X drops to 6000 pounds.Kicking RocksThe Canyon AT4X debuts as the rock-ready trail basher that GMC regretfully didn’t offer until now. Its new features include Multimatic DSSV spool-valve dampers, 10.7 inches of ground clearance, and 33-inch Goodyear Wrangler Territory Mud Terrains at each corner. This beats the snot out of the 31-inch rubber and 8.4 inches of ground clearance on the last-gen Canyon’s most aggressive offering, the AT4. There are also electronically locking front and rear differentials, skid plates, rock sliders, 10 cameras (some of the paparazzi use spray nozzles to clean themselves), and a clever Terrain drive mode.We spent a few hours piloting the AT4X over slippery rock-covered off-road trails near Big Sky, Montana. The trails required a slow 5- to 10-mph roll but admittedly weren’t anything a Jeep Wrangler Sport or a Ford Bronco Big Bend couldn’t handle. The most technical sections required the use of 4Lo. Using the Canyon’s one-pedal Terrain mode in L1 or L2 brings aggressive automated stopping when you lift off the gas. L3 is more like a normal drive crawl and doesn’t immediately stop the truck, making it the smoothest. Still, Terrain strikes us as something you’d engage for the occasional slippery descent rather than an entire section of trail.The paved roadways between our hotel and the trailhead made a stronger argument for choosing a Canyon (or a Colorado) over its trail-ready rivals. Even while spinning the AT4X’s chunky tires at highway speeds, this GMC is supremely quiet—something that Broncos, Wranglers, and Gladiators, all the machines that come with removable tops and doors, can’t achieve. Add with the exceptional dampening, passengers may forget they’re under the roof of a pickup.AEV: More Letters, More EquipmentThe partnership with American Expedition Vehicles—which fills an impressive catalog of aftermarket overlanding parts for Jeeps, Broncos, and Rams (and famously fit a pickup bed and a 6.4-liter V-8 into a Wrangler before Jeep did)—adds tough stuff for the Canyon. The AT4X AEV is effectively GMC’s ZR2 Bison. It wears as much body protection as an NHL goaltender. There’s also a marginal improvement here for approach, departure, and break-over angles thanks to AEV hot-stamped steel front and rear bumpers, which the parts maker claims are tougher than getting out of a warm sleeping bag at 3 a.m. to use the bathroom. Bigger, 35-inch Goodyear Wrangler Territory Mud-Terrain tires wrap the AT4X AEV’s exclusive 17-inch Salta beadlock-capable cast-aluminum wheels. With 12.2 inches of ground clearance, the AT4X AEV sits 1.5 inches higher than the AT4X. Unfortunately, the hydraulic jounce bumpers we raved about during our drive of the ZR2 Bison don’t come standard here like they do on the Chevy. The full-size spare is mounted vertically in the bed, where it blocks about 50 percent of the rear window. This seems like an obvious opportunity to showcase GM’s rearview-mirror camera, found on models such as the Chevy Corvette, the Cadillac Escalade, and even the Sierra HD AT4X AEV, but it’s not available here. For AT4X AEV owners, then, hindsight is always 315/70R-17. Every Canyon AT4X AEV does come standard with three auxiliary connections in the kick panel for aftermarket upfitting. The switches are optional on AT4X models. The headrests in the AT4X AEV are stitched with the company’s logo. While red knobs and switches add style to the interior, the door panels and dashboard have that same plastic feel as the cheaper models. The 11.3-inch infotainment display with Google built-in looks nice but may hold too much responsibility (operating the headlights, for instance). The front seats are heated and ventilated, and the heated steering wheel gets hot enough to fry an egg. More on the Canyon PickupAt $55,895, the AT4X is some $7500 dearer than a Colorado ZR2. It’s also slightly more expensive than the full-size Ram 1500 Rebel and nose to nose with the 405-hp Ford Ranger Raptor that debuted early this year. Add another $10,100 for the Canyon AT4X AEV equipment. They say that having the right tools pays, but when you’re talking off-road pickups, clearly it also costs. SpecificationsSpecifications
    2024 GMC Canyon AT4XVehicle Type: front-engine, rear/4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door pickup
    PRICE
    Base: AT4X, $55,895; AT4X AEV, $65,995
    ENGINE
    turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injectionDisplacement: 166 in3, 2727 cm3Power: 310 hp @ 5600 rpmTorque: 430 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm
    TRANSMISSION
    8-speed automatic
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 131.4 inLength: 213.2–214.6 inWidth: 72.4 inHeight: 81.6–81.8 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 59–60/43 ft3Curb Weight (C/D est): 4950–5300 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
    60 mph: 7.1–7.4 sec100 mph: 23.3–23.7 secTop Speed: 100 mph
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST)
    Combined/City/Highway: 16–18/16–17/16–20 mpgAssociate EditorYes, he’s still working on the 1986 Nissan 300ZX Turbo project car he started in high school, and no, it’s not for sale yet. Austin Irwin was born and raised in Michigan, and, despite getting shelled by hockey pucks during a not-so-successful goaltending career through high school and college, still has all of his teeth. He loves cars from the 1980s and Bleu, his Great Pyrenees, and is an active member of the Buffalo Wild Wings community. When Austin isn’t working on his own cars, he’s likely on the side of the highway helping someone else fix theirs. More

  • in

    The 2024 GMC Sierra HD AT4X AEV Climbs, and Moves, Mountains

    The GMC Sierra HD AT4X AEV is as long as a line of 20 people. It’s strong enough to relocate up to 18,500 pounds of earth or pull the enormity of a single EarthRoamer. It’s the heaviest Sierra HD sold, with a crushing 8605-pound claimed curb weight. With its mirrors extended, it’s wider than a full-size school bus, and if you thought the regular Sierra HD was tall, the AEV version reaches roughly two inches further into the sky. While its dimensions illustrate how cartoonishly huge the biggest pickups have become, the AT4X AEV also gives GMC’s mightiest pickup truck serious capability.Taking the already off-road-equipped Sierra HD AT4X to the next level, the AT4X AEV gets the American Expedition Vehicle treatment. That includes AEV stitched headrests and as many badges as the local police precinct, but there’s also useful stuff, such as the hot-stamped steel front and rear bumpers.The Sierra HD AT4X AEV comes exclusively as a 2500HD crew cab with the standard 6-foot 9-inch bed and four-wheel drive. Both the 401-hp 6.6-liter V-8 gasser with 464 pound-feet of torque and the preferred 470-hp turbocharged 6.6-liter V-8 Duramax diesel powerplant with 975 pound-feet of torque are offered. A 10-speed automatic transmission bolts to either, but the final drive ratio for the gas engines is 3.73:1 while diesels get 3.42 gearing. Both powertrains slurp from a 36.0-gallon fuel tank.The 35-inch Goodyear Wrangler Territory MTs wrapping AEV’s exclusive 18-inch aluminum wheels add to this package’s rugged premise. Don’t let the big-truck guys in on a little secret: The mid-size Canyon AT4X AEV is on the same overall diameter tires, just mounted on smaller 17-inch wheels instead. Our time with the AT4X AEV was completely off-road, so we can’t report on their highway-speed noise level.The AEV has the same 1.5-inch suspension lift as the HD AT4X and includes its Multimatic DSSV spool-valve dampers, which are unlike anything from other off-road-themed heavy-duty pickups from Ram and Ford. The dampers create a shockingly smooth ride as they soak up the ohs and ouches of uneven off-road terrain. On a trail near Big Sky, Montana, the HD AT4X AEV met a 28.0-degree descent down a slippery rock section of Yellowstone country. It dug its claws in like a grizzly bear, calmly lowering itself to the base of the hill as if it had grown up eating berries. Like the Chevy Silverado HD ZR2 Bison the GMC is based on, the AT4X AEV also uses an independent front suspension. The same steel used to make the AEV bumpers is also employed on the belly of this whale to protect its transfer case, while the skid plate under its nose is aluminum. There are also massive tow hooks, should things go massively wrong. According to GMC, the chromed-up Denali is the sales leader among Sierra HD pickups. GMC says its expects 40 percent of AT4X trucks to get the AEV treatment. We’d argue that as ridiculously Herculean as these trucks are, the useful equipment added for AT4X and AT4X AEV is more practical than the Denali’s shiny grille.The HD AT4X AEV still has all the stuff less aggressive trims offer. The ergonomically comfy radio tune and volume controls behind the steering wheel work via fingertip. GM’s rearview mirror camera turns the dust you’ve kicked up behind you into a high-definition motion picture film. Instead of the steel rock sliders found in AT4X AEV versions of the Sierra 1500 and the Canyon, the HD model still has a powered step rail. And it’s a good thing, because with 11.8 inches of ground clearance, you might otherwise need cowboy stilettos to climb aboard. More on the Sierra 2500HDLike purchasing a spread in Montana, obtaining this outsized truck requires herding Benjamins by the barnful. The 2024 Sierra 2500HD AT4X AEV is $94,290. That’s $9495 extra on top of the AT4X, and it dwarfs the $76,195 needed to lasso a Denali or the $72,560 Ram asks for an HD Power Wagon. Compared to the Chevy version, which starts at $82,085 for the ZR2 Bison with similar AEV-equipped body armor, the GMC does seem like a bragging chip rather than a bargain. Oh, and tack on another $9490 for the Duramax diesel. However, if there’s one thing more ridiculous than a $94K heavy-duty pickup clambering through the woods, it’s gotta be a $76K truck that’s too afraid to.SpecificationsSpecifications
    2024 GMC Sierra 2500HD AT4X AEVVehicle Type: front-engine, rear/4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door pickup
    PRICE
    Base: AT4X AEV, $94,290; AT4X AEV diesel, $103,680
    ENGINES
    pushrod 16-valve 6.6-liter V-8, 401 hp, 464 lb-ft; turbocharged and intercooled pushrod 32-valve 6.6-liter diesel V-8, 470 hp, 975 lb-ft
    TRANSMISSION
    10-speed automatic
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 159.1 inLength: 250.7–252.0 inWidth: 81.9 inHeight: 82.7 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 73/66 ft3Curb Weight (C/D est): 7900–8650 lb
    PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
    60 mph: 6.6–7.3 sec1/4-Mile: 15.1–15.8 secTop Speed: 98 mphAssociate EditorYes, he’s still working on the 1986 Nissan 300ZX Turbo project car he started in high school, and no, it’s not for sale yet. Austin Irwin was born and raised in Michigan, and, despite getting shelled by hockey pucks during a not-so-successful goaltending career through high school and college, still has all of his teeth. He loves cars from the 1980s and Bleu, his Great Pyrenees, and is an active member of the Buffalo Wild Wings community. When Austin isn’t working on his own cars, he’s likely on the side of the highway helping someone else fix theirs. More

  • in

    1994 SuperTuner Showdown: Aftermarket Monsters

    From the February 1994 issue of Car and Driver.Put any car guy under the micro­scope, zoom down through his polite and civilizing layers to where the corpuscles flow red hot, and there burns The Uni­versal Fantasy: You get a surpassingly neat car, then you make it even neater. This is a field trip into that fantasyland. But first, let’s agree on what consti­tutes “neater.” Can we drop all pretense at high-mindedness? Truth be told here, the satisfactions we’re chasing aren’t much above scheming to get the biggest slice of the pizza. And then getting it!Give us more of the good stuff!More power. Speed thrills. More grip. G’s thrill. What else is there? Ah, now here is the leading question.David Dewhurst|Car and DriverThe fantasy cars we’re seeking don’t exist on any menu. They’re cooked to order. So, what’s the chef’s latest inspi­ration? Give him some room, we say. Let’s see what he can do. That’s what happened here. We called a meeting of the best car chefs—tuners, in the parlance. “Cook something up for us,” we said. “Show us maximum neat. Bend our mind, blow our fuses.”For a meeting room, we reserved the state of Texas. Lots of space down there, too much, heh, heh, for really good police protection on all the blacktops. For the exacting demands of testing, we bought a day on the Firestone test track at Fort Stockton. Clearly, this would be a go-fast meet­ing. But we wanted real cars, not racing cars. So we threw down two require­ments to assure that these Chef’s Specials would be good citizens of the automotive world. First, they had to be emissions legal. That means the tuners had to demonstrate that their engine-modification packages passed the standard EPA emissions test, which would make them 49-states legal, or that they certified them with the tougher California Air Resources Board, which is accepted by the feds.David Dewhurst|Car and DriverSaleen MustangSometimes the thing just blows up.Even the best-made plans often go awry when it comes to driving and testing a group of supertuned cars. No matter how much preparation goes into the endeavor, there’s always some­thing that goes wrong. Unfortunately, this time it was the Saleen entry that blew up. It suffered a fatal clutch failure early into our second day of cross-country roadwork and thus never made it to the instrumented testing.Having sold all of his ’93 Mus­tangs and with the ’94 models still a few months away from production, Steve sent a ’91 model borrowed from a customer. It came equipped with a 302-cubic­-inch (4.9-liter) V-8 sporting a Vortec supercharger, TFS high-perfor­mance cast-iron heads, and Saleen Racecraft low-restriction intake mani­fold, dual exhaust system, and performance chip. Added up, the engine modifications are claimed to produce 425 hp, which is 190 hp more than the last Mustang Cobra we tested. Exterior modifications included a composite hood, deeper front air dam, lower body-side cladding, and a large rear wing.Suspension and brake modifications consisted of stiffer springs, shocks, and bushings, plus larger rotors and calipers both front and rear. Rounding out the mechanical modifications were shock­-tower braces and a set of seventeen-­inch wheels shod with low-profile BFGoodrich Comp T/A tires. Interior changes were limited to a roll cage, rac­ing harnesses, and some additional gauges. In all, the modifications made for a seemingly strong contender with an aggressive stance, good looks, and a sweet sound coming from the pipes.Due to the clutch failure, our only impressions of the Saleen were gathered during our first day of over-the-road driving on the cross-country leg of the program into New Mexico. Although the engine felt strong and pulled impres­sively at the start of our drive, its output and performance seemed to wane as the day wore on. Soon after our lunch stop, on the first really twisty section of road, the engine began to blow oil out the rocker cover vent, and the V-8’s output faded. At day’s end, it was fully winded and in need of rejuvenation.On open stretches, interstates, and two-lane blacktop, the Saleen tracked straight, exhibiting none of the usual dartiness common to cars equipped with wider tires. The stiffer suspension under­pinnings and low-profile rubber increased ride harshness, but not intol­erably, over that of a stock Mustang GT. Handling, however, was less than per­fect on the twisty mountain road sections of our drive. Under hard cornering, the rear end tended to wiggle and squirm like Bob Packwood at a NOW conven­tion. A loud grinding sound emanating from the aft end only added to our sense of unease.Coming on the heels of the after­market industry’s annual SEMA show, our gathering proved to be troublesome for Saleen, because his only cherry car had to be in Las Vegas on display. The poor showing of this entry was probably due more to the car’s high mileage and heavy usage than to his modifica­tions and workmanship. But as we’ve said before, when it comes to after­market tuners, caveat emptor. —André IdzikowskiSPECIFICATIONSVehicle type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 3-door coupePrice, stock (1993)/modified (1991): $19,900/$31,278Engine type: 16-valve V-8, iron block and heads, port fuel injectionModifications (1994 prices): engine: Vortec super­charger, low-restriction intake manifold, high-perfor­mance heads (oversized valves), 1.72 roller rockers, low-restriction dual exhaust system, performance chip, ($5267); short-throw racing transmission with 3.00:1 final-drive ($1684); suspension: stiffer springs and shocks, bushings, shock-tower braces, underbody sub­frame connectors ($1110); brakes: four-piston front calipers with 13-inch grooved rotors, 2-piston calipers with 10.5-inch vented rotors, stainless lines ($2495); wheels and tires: 17-inch Saleen 3-piece alloy wheels, BFGoodrich Comp T/A tires ($2695); body and interior composite hood, air dam, spoiler, side skirts, extra gauges, roll cage, racing harness ($2495)Power, stock/modified: 235 hp/425 hpTransmission: 5-speed manualCurb weight: 3250 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph, stock/modified: 5.6 sec/DNF1/4-mile, stock/modified: 14.3 sec @ 98 mph/DNF100 mph, stock/modified: 14.7 sec/DNF130 mph, stock/modified: 35.3 sec/DNFRolling Start, 5–60 mph, stock/modified: 5.9 sec/DNFTop Gear, 30–50 mph, stock/modified: 11.3 sec/DNFTop Gear, 50–70 mph, stock/modified: 12.0 sec/DNFTop Speed (drag limited): 137 mphBraking, 70­–0 mph: 181 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad, stock/modified: 0.85/DNFSuch certification has another bene­fit—it pulls this fantasyland within check­book reach of your armchair. These aren’t one-off powerplants available only to magazine testers. They’re on the market, and any of the chefs would be delighted to cook one up for you. As for our second requirement, well, you won’t feel too sorry for us. To qual­ify for the track test, the cars had to live through the roadwork. There’s nothing like hundred-mile stretches of open road, punc­tuated by stop-and-go metro slogging, to screen out the prima donnas and nickel rockets. Neat cars are supposed to do all the things that ordinary cars do, and more. Not less. So we planned two days of switching seats and blurring the Texas terrain, just to make sure these weren’t one-trick ponies. When the meeting was called to order in El Paso, six tuners presented their credentials. Many more were invited—­including Callaway, Dinan, Hennessey, HKS, and Ruf—but the emissions-legal requirement or logistical problems held them back. Another, the Stillen 300ZX, was felled by an untimely crash. That left us with a Mustang-to-Mercedes array, $31,278 to $200,000 in full-dress prices. Cheap thrills these aren’t. Steve Saleen’s supercharged 5.0 Mus­tang weighed in at the affordable end. Saleen is just now celebrating his tenth anniversary as a “small-volume manu­facturer,” a level of truce with the regu­lators that few special builders ever attain. It permits him to modify zero-mile cars and sell them through new-car dealers. Unfortunately, his makeover of the 1994 Mustang was still a few months off at the time of the meeting. Instead, he sent a high-mileage customer car of the old design. Peter Farrell Supercars RX-7The prescription for activist-enthusiasts.Rally champ turned road racer Peter Farrell launched his aftermarket tun­ing operation right in the middle of a busy and successful IMSA GT Super­car series, in which he was campaigning Mazda­-sponsored RX-7s. It seems that more than a few civilian RX-7 owners were following the race series and developing an acute speed-lust in the process. Naturally, they called Farrell’s race shop in search of a cure. Peter Farrell Supercars Inc. was born to minister to these poor sick souls.And who better to do so? Of the handful of shops souping up RX-7s, Farrell’s is the oldest and it’s the only one with a direct factory racing connec­tion. PFS owns what may be the only dynamometer outside Japan set up to run ’93 twin-turbo rotary engines, so when Farrell rates his engine at 360 horse­power, you know that it actually makes 105 more ponies than a stocker.Farrell is a hands-on racer. He’s totally Type A, he wrenches what he runs, and he doesn’t just send his chief mechanic along on trips like this—he comes himself. It naturally follows that his car, which is clearly the most adjustable one of the bunch, encourages the active involvement of its driver.Progressive-rate springs and adjust­able shock absorbers with eight settings provide ride comfort that ranges from RX-7 Touring-soft to firmer than a stock R2. Quite a bit more understeer has also been baked in to make the car more user-­friendly for the non-racer.High-volume intake and exhaust systems and a larger, more efficient intercooler provide the poten­tial for big speed. It’s Far­rell’s magic software that allows the engine to fulfill that potential. Most tuners provide an engine com­puter chip with a high-per­formance calibration pro­grammed in. The PFS computer comes with three performance calibra­tions, each optimized for a different set of operating conditions (plus a no­-boost “valet” mode). But if you can demonstrate to Farrell that you’re smart enough to han­dle it, he will sell you the almost infi­nitely programmable model we tested.This baby allows fine tuning of the fuel, boost, and ignition maps for oper­ating conditions outside those encoun­tered on the government’s emission cycle. Air too thin at high altitude? Dial in a bit more boost and less fuel. Can’t find 92-octane fuel? Dial back the spark and boost. The car is always adjusted to get max power for the conditions.So tuned, this RX-7 runs like a rocket. Big power lives in the secondary turbo that chimes in at over 4500 revs to lift boost levels as high as 15 psi, so quick sprints require a vicious clutch drop. The top speed of 170 mph was measured after two attempts were aborted, due to a failed hose clamp on the boost-pressure relief valve and an oil breather line that burst after g-forces filled it with oil in the banking on our 7.5-mile track. But Farrell doesn’t com­pete on drag strips or the Bonneville Salt Flats—he’s a road racer. So it’s no sur­prise that his car cleaned up on the road­ course: here, despite strong understeer, the RX-7 turned in the best lap time by 0.8 second. A tuned car that’s both faster and more forgiving than stock with no comfort penalty—sounds like good medicine to us. —Frank Markus SPECIFICATIONSVehicle type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 3-door coupePrice, stock (1994)/modified (1993): $36,758/$47,203Engine type: twin-turbocharged and intercooled 2-rotor Wankel, aluminum rotor housings iron end plates, port fuel injectionModifications (1994 prices): engine: larger intercooler with larger and more rigid ducting, low-restriction intake system, driver-programmable powertrain-management computer, low-restriction exhaust system aft of stock catalytic converter ($3500); short-throw shifter kit and 4.30:1 rear-axle gearset ($1000); suspension: progressive-rate springs, 8-position adjustable shocks, stiffer anti-roll bars ($1500); brakes: Kevlar pads, stainless lines ($450); wheels and tires: 17-inch O.Z. Mito 3-piece modular wheels, Bridgestone Comp T/A tires ($3800); body: front fascia, rear spoiler ($1290)Power, stock/modified: 255 hp/360 hpTransmission: 5-speed manualCurb weight: 2848 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph, stock/modified: 5.3 sec/4.3 sec1/4-mile, stock/modified: 14.0 sec @ 100 mph/12.9 sec @ 112 mph100 mph, stock/modified: 14.0 sec/10.7 sec130 mph, stock/modified: 27.4 sec/18.3 secRolling Start, 5–60 mph, stock/modified: 5.9 sec/5.3 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph, stock/modified: 13.4 sec/10.9 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph, stock/modified: 7.9 sec/5.8 secTop Speed (drag limited), stock/modified: 157 mph/ 170 mphBraking, 70­–0 mph, stock/modified: 156 ft/164 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad, stock/modified: 0.99/0.95 gJohn Lingenfelter, naturally, was ready. He’s a racer—by instinct a predator, no more able to hide his intentions than an eagle circling in the sky. He’s 48 now, an eminence with steel-gray hair: for a quar­ter of a century he’s been building engines to put in fast cars, many of them his own, for the sole purpose of beating all comers, at the drags mostly. His shop in Decatur, Indiana, specializes in powertrains, usually Chevy V-8 because that’s what the market wants, but his talent finds horsepower in whatever the customers bring to his door. He doesn’t hide from the bureaucratic procedures, either. His standard tweak of the Corvette LT1—displacement stretched to 383 cubic inches (6.3 liters) output upped to 440 horsepower—has passed all the emissions tests necessary for CARB acceptance. The black Corvette he unloaded in El Paso was specially built for the occasion—rented, actually, from Bud’s Chevrolet in St. Marys, Ohio, and reloaded with a Lingenfelter 383. What we thought of as a meeting, he viewed as a shootout. And he came, as usual, cocked and locked. Minneapolis Corvette specialist Doug Rippie brought a black Corvette too, a ZR-1, seemingly stock at first glance. Then you notice the big-bore exhausts and the roll bar. Rippie is 43, barb-wire lean, reserved at first, like a midwestern farmer. His shop does “anything for Corvettes,” but road racing is the passion. He parked his own helmet after the 1986 season to concentrate on preparing cars for others. He’d comprehensively massaged this ZR-1 for its owner, 22-year-old Steve Wait, to run in the Silver State 100 last May. Wait drove it to a seventh-in-class finish, averaging 159.4 mph on his first try at this public-road display of bravery that occurs twice each year. Lingenfelter CovetteWalk softly and carry a big broom.Among the brightly colored, bespoil­ered entries in this test, John Lin­genfelter’s Corvette sticks out like a healthy, normal thumb. There’s little clue to this car’s speed other than its shiny ZR-1 wheel—sort of like Clark Kent with little dumb­bell cufflinks. Lin­genfelter likes the subtle approach. Ask him what his Corvette will do, and he’ll defer until he sees the numbers. He prefers to let the machinery speak for itself. Experienced drag racers (or, the ones who know bet­ter) are aware of the peril of prediction. You could call 48-year-old Lingenfelter experienced, with twelve NHRA class championships under his belt. He even worked as an engineer for International Harvester for seven years. But Lingen­felter is best known for the reworked Chevy Corvettes, from small block to ZR-1, which have left his Indiana shop since 1987. For this exercise, he worked up a standard LT1 coupe, because he thought more readers would be inter­ested in it. Lingenfelter works hardest on what he knows the best: the engine. This car includes his bored, stroked, and blue­printed 383-cubic-inch (6.3-liter) engine, with its hotter cam, and re­worked intake and exhaust system . It makes 440 horsepower (140 more than stock) at 6000 rpm. Lingenfelter included ZR-1 tires, wheels (polished at a local shop), anti-­roll bars, and springs, because he likes their ride and handling. He also wanted the ZR-l tires’ 200-mph speed certification. To fit the wide wheels in the stock fenders and to maintain proper wheel offset, the rear spindles are machined. This Corvette drives as if it were on some illicit drug. The torque, all 450 pound-feet of it at 4500 rpm, might as well be anywhere on the tach—down low, in the midrange, or near the 6500-rpm redline. The exhaust howls, and the body squirms with each shift, giving this car an uncanny liveliness. In accelera­tion tests, the tires want to go up in smoke in second gear. Lingenfelter sug­gests we shift at 6300 rpm. Spin the tach past 6000 rpm, where its markings end, and the needle starts bouncing, as if to say, “Hey! What the hell’s going on down there?” Top speed, with the engine in full baritone wail, is 189 mph.The tire and wheel swap made for better roadholding and braking but did not translate to faster track laps. With the prodigious underhood juice, Lin­genfelter’s car required restraint in cor­ners. When the tail did swing wide, it would recover with a hard snap. “This car requires a careful and deft touch,” said tester Csere. Still, Lingenfelter’s car matched the lap times of Rippie’s smooth-handling ZR-1. As drag racers will remind you, power counts for a lot. Lingenfelter seemed relaxed throughout the test, probably because his car, which needed little fiddling, seemed so well prepared. He even came pre­pared with a broom to sweep the track for the acceleration tests. Something his car did handily, as well. —Don SchroederSPECIFICATIONSVehicle type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 3-door coupePrice, stock (1994)/modified (1993): $40,074/$59,260Engine type: 16-valve V-8, iron block and aluminum heads, port fuel injectionModifications (1994 prices): engine: bore +1 mm, stroke +7 mm, heads and intake manifold ported and pol­ished, high-performance cam, performance chip, low­-restriction exhaust system aft of catalytic converters ($16,800); suspension: ZR-1 front and rear springs, cus­tom-valved shocks, stiffer anti-roll bars ($1255); brakes: 4-piston front calipers, 12.9-inch grooved and cross­-drilled front rotors, stainless-steel lines ($3182); wheels: polished 1994 ZR-1 ($2363)Power, stock/modified: 300 hp/383 hpTransmission: 6-speed manualCurb weight: 3368 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph, stock/modified: 5.4 sec/4.2 sec1/4-mile, stock/modified: 14.0 sec @ 103 mph/12.4 sec @ 119 mph100 mph, stock/modified: 13.2 sec/9.0 sec130 mph, stock/modified: 26.3 sec/14.7 secRolling Start, 5–60 mph, stock/modified: 5.8 sec/4.3 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph, stock/modified: 12.0 sec/8.7 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph, stock/modified: 12.2 sec/9.1 secTop Speed (drag limited), stock/modified: 158 mph/189 mphBraking, 70­–0 mph, stock/modified: 176 ft/167 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad, stock/modified: 0.89/0.95 gIn addition to the gasoline in his veins, Rippie has computers in his mind, the result of computer school in his younger days. Now he’s fearless when it comes to engine-management black boxes. His ZR-1 package, rated at 475 horsepower from the stock 5.7-liter displacement, is emissions legal in all 50 states. Twinkly-eyed Peter Farrell, 35, is a racer, too, so much so that he left his native New Zealand ten years ago to pursue the bigger possibilities of the U.S. Along the way, he hooked up with Mazda to cam­paign the new RX-7 in road racing. Now he’s applying what he’s learned on the track, and his own intuition about what street drivers really want, into a go-fast, handle-sharp package for the RX-7 that he calls the Peter Farrell Limited Edition.Farrell’s good-humored approach makes him seem less of a gunslinger than the Corvette racers. But steer the conver­sation toward the politics of IMSA racing and watch him ruffle up like a banty rooster. Racers—good ones, anyway—are all alike under the skin. They thrive on advantage: finding it, seizing it, using it to make others small in the rear-view mirror. His engine mods, which boost the RX-7’s output by 105 horsepower to 360 horse­power, are legal in 49 states, and the paperwork has been filed for California. As the players lined up for the first sortie out of El Paso, the pea-shooter rotary—as it turned out, the only runner with less than 400 horsepower—was the consensus underdog. Rotary engines have always been inscrutable to piston guys. Over the years, though, we’ve learned that inscrutable is not the same as impotent. DR Motorsports Corvette ZR-1Fine-tuning without fanfare.The three-inch exhausts poking out the back of this ZR-1 sing a glori­ously throaty basso profundo, and they jump the needle on the dyno by 17 horsepower, yet we have the idea Doug Rippie allows them in the car with a certain reluctance. Before leaving his Minneapolis shop, he’d tried to conceal them with a spray of flat black. Showing off­—hell, showing any­thing—is not his style. “Not interested,” is all he has to say about the deep chin spoilers, wings, spats, slats, slits, and strakes that dress up—and less often enhance the perfor­mance of—some cars. That stuff all runs against his grain. He messes with the looks only when he gets performance. The Dymag cast­-alloy wheels are made to his specifica­tion—0f magnesium to reduce weight, of non-standard offsets to make the track width one inch wider in front, one inch narrower in back. This brings these dimensions closer to one of his chassis­-tuning axioms—to avoid greatly dissi­milar front and rear track dimensions.Rippie, at heart, is a chassis tuner, even though his engine business is now as big as his chassis business. Twenty years of road racing does that, just because road courses are a lot more fun in cars that turn and brake as athletically as they accelerate. He began tuning the current-model Corvette eight years ago. He learned well. This Corvette, in the twisties, pretends it’s not a Corvette. In fact, among the staffers, this may prove to be a watershed Corvette. The stock version has tremen­dous grip, but it’s full of transitional wiggles that accompany changes of brake, power, and steering inputs. Though these wig­gles don’t fling you off the road, they’re unsatisfying to perfection seekers and, at very least, they encour­age leaving big margins next to mountain dropoffs. Those among us who were impressed by Corvette grip tended not to admit the wiggles—until they finally drove a Corvette that doesn’t wiggle. This one.In the mountains, this is a precision tool, with very good path accuracy. On the road course—after the top-speed run, when the engine was whipped—it matched the lap times of the more pow­erful Lingenfelter car without the yaw­ing histrionics. Doug Rippie has this chassis figured out. His list of modifications (in con­densed form here) is extensive: coil springs in place of the plastic leaves; drastically-reduced bump steer both front and rear; less static caster; less brake anti-dive; more camber gain in front, and less in back; and harder bush­ings in certain pivots. The whole pack­age costs over $23,000—but it makes a terrific Corvette. On the road, particularly when Rip­pie experimentally dialed an altitude correction, the engine felt like its full, rated, 475 hp. But during sustained full-­throttle testing, the engine suffered from a mysterious fuel restriction that stran­gled its output the faster it went. The problem was so severe that we couldn’t complete a top-speed run. Still, we’re impressed. The drastic improvement in handling shows just how much a good chef can contribute. —Patrick BedardSPECIFICATIONSVehicle type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 3-door coupePrice, stock (1994)/modified (1991): $71,538/$90,932Engine type: DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injectionModifications (1994 prices): engine: ported and pol­ished intake plenum, manifold, and cylinder heads, low­-restriction exhaust system, performance chip, heavy-­duty clutch ($12,495); 3.73:1 rear-axle gearset ($895); suspension: revised front and rear suspension geome­try, coil springs (replace transverse leaf springs and lower ride height one inch), revised valving for 3-posi­tion cockpit-adjustable shocks, bushings ($3745); brakes: stock calipers reinforced, rear brake bias spring, stainless lines ($695); wheels: 18-inch Dymag magne­sium wheels ($4000); body: roll-cage and racing harness ($1325)Power, stock/modified: 405 hp/475 hpTransmission: 6-speed manualCurb weight: 3546 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph, stock/modified: 4.7 sec/4.3 sec1/4-mile, stock/modified: 13.1 sec @ 111 mph/12.7 sec @ 115 mph100 mph, stock/modified: 10.6 sec/9.5 sec130 mph, stock/modified: 18.3 sec/16.6 sec150 mph, stock/modified: 28.3 sec/27.1 secRolling Start, 5–60 mph, stock/modified: 5.3 sec/4.9 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph, stock/modified: 12.9 sec/11.4 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph, stock/modified: 12.9 sec/11.5 secTop Speed (drag limited), stock/modified: 179 mph / N/ABraking, 70­–0 mph, stock/modified: 161 ft/165 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad, stock/modified: 0.92/0.94 gIf engine output were proportional to moving parts, the SOHC V-12 BMW would be a fearsome competitor. Auto­Thority Performance Engineering of Fair­fax, Virginia, had been rubbing on a BMW 850i for some time—on the engine and on the cosmetics. The goal was a “smooth, quiet, tractable, and emissions-legal car,” according to company spokesman Paul Misencik, and, of course, one that was “considerably more powerful.” Although AutoThority has had its name on a few racing cars over the years, it’s not a race place. From its beginning in the mid-Seventies as a service and tuning shop for Porsches, it progressed into recalibrated engine-management chips for many European and Japanese brands. Now it has complete engine­-building and car-modifying facilities, though they are minor enterprises compared with the chip business. Nonetheless, it has produced an 850i that makes a strong impression even before its V-12, stroked to 5.5 liters from 5.0, comes to life. The aero mods to the nose, sills, and rear, all painted tuxedo black to match the body, give it a sleek, muscular presence they’d barely recognize down at the BMW store. The ultra-low-profile Pirelli P-Zero tires on 18-inch wheels fill the openings just right. The overall look manages what may be a first in the realm of custom cars, to tell the world “one of a kind” in tones that whisper. The flamboyant-yellow RENNtech­-modified Mercedes 500SL says one-of-a-kind too, albeit with the question “Who else would dare?” German-born Hartmut Feyhl started young, at age seventeen, as an apprentice at Mercedes-tuner AMG in Affalterbach, Germany. He stayed with AMG for eleven years, gaining experience, developing information sources at Mercedes engineering and elsewhere. AMG transferred him to the U.S. as tech­nical director, a position he held for two years before starting RENNtech in Del­ray Beach, Florida, in 1989. Now he’s 32 and determined to succeed on his own. AutoThority 850iPay attention to the man behind the curtain.Paul Misencik says he’s not the brain trust behind AutoThority—that would be founder Al Collins—but he agrees with the principle behind the company in Fairfax, Virginia, and its 475-horsepower BMW 850i. “Our philosophy is not speed at all cost,” Paul explains. “We want horsepower and refinement.” That particular axiom might also explain how a 25-year-old who stud­ied philosophy at the University of Maryland came to an outfit that exists to make infinitesi­mal changes to engine-managing microchips in the search for more horsepower. Before he studied Schopenhauer, Misencik studied cars. He put himself through the Jim Russell race school at Mont Tremblant in his teens, then raced a Formula Ford for two seasons. He approached Collins for a job after col­lege, when he watched a Collins-modi­fied Porsche 934 in action at Summit Point. Now Misencik is in charge of marketing AutoThority’s doctored chips, but he also gets behind the wheel with engineers in the last stages of chip programming as a guinea pig for the drivability of new projects. Ninety percent of AutoThority’s business is chip work. With computer software that can plot fuel delivery curves, AutoThority modifies the pro­file of an engine’s fuel delivery with additional data points. If you’ve got a Mazda, Nissan, or a BMW, AutoThor­ity has probably seen its chips with their pants down.The other ten percent of its business is special projects like this 1991 850i, owned by a New Yorker who asked for at least 450 emissions-legal horse­power. AutoThority went shopping for the power at Racing Dynamics and picked out a new crankshaft, new pistons and camshaft, a new exhaust system, and eighteen-­inch wheels. The stock intake manifold went to California’s Extrude­ Hone, where gritty gunk was squeezed through its passages to widen and smooth them for better airflow. Finally, all the combustion surfaces—the piston heads, the valves, and the combustion chamber itself—went to New York’s Swain Tech for a ceramic coating. The result? The AutoThority 850i was 1.2 second quicker to 60 mph, tripped the quarter-mile 1.1 seconds sooner, and topped out 14 mph faster than the governer-limited stocker. The engine work transforms this pudgy bat­tlecruiser into a lithe-lier ride. Because it favors understeer in the twisties, balanc­ing the 850i’s cornering attitude is much easier with 475 horsepower underfoot. A couple of glitches sullied Auto­Thority’s upgrades. It occasionally hic­cuped under light throttle, and twice it overheated in high-rpm, low-speed cor­ner work. And its tuners expected it to go nearly 190 mph, not the 170 mph we observed. Misencik says this is because the car has two electronic speed limiters and they only disabled one. Those foibles aside, the AutoThority 850i is bothersome for just one reason. A stock new $94,095 850Ci is already too expensive. The conversions added another $52,000 to the 1991 car. But if you’ve already bought into BMW’s mega-cruiser philosophy, the AutoThor­ity is the next logical step. —Martin Padgett Jr.SPECIFICATIONSVehicle type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2+2-passenger, 2-door coupePrice, stock (1994)/modified (1991): $94,095/$141,983Engine type: SOHC 24-valve V-12, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injectionModifications (1994 prices): engine: stroke +8 mm, compression increased to 10:1, low-friction piston skirts, ceramic-coated piston crowns, valves, and cylinder head surface, performance cams, honed intake manifold, per­formance chip, low-restriction header and tailpipes ($38,000), 2.93:1 rear-axle gearset ($2000); suspension­: lower, stiffer, progressive-rate springs ($800); wheels and tires: 18-inch Racing Dynamics alloy wheels and Pirelli P-Zero tires ($6000); body: air dam, spoiler, side skins ($9000)Power, stock/modified: 296 hp/475 hpTransmission: 6-speed manualCurb weight: 4168 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph, stock/modified: 6.3 sec/5.1 sec1/4-mile, stock/modified: 14.9 sec @ 96 mph/13.8 sec @ 103 mph100 mph, stock/modified: 16.6 sec/12.7 sec130 mph, stock/modified: 31.7 sec/23.7 secRolling Start, 5–60 mph, stock/modified: 6.7 sec/5.5 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph, stock/modified: 12.1 sec/9.5 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph, stock/modified: 12.2 sec/9.8 secTop Speed (governer limited), stock/modified: 156 mph/170 mphBraking, 70­–0 mph, stock/modified: 181 ft/174 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad, stock/modified: 0.82/0.87 gAfter a close inspection of this car, there’s little more that needs to be said about the young Mr. Feyhl, except that he’s quite prickly when things don’t go his way. His car shows supreme confidence; he started for El Paso on a completely untested suspension package (probably his factory contacts eliminated the usual need for trial and error). He’s a perfectionist; modifications throughout the car are highly detailed and beautifully done. He’s aggressive; the name RENNtech appears on the decklid, on the license-plate sur­round, on the exhaust tips, on the front fenders, on the engine cover, and three times on each hub cover. As we plugged in our radar-and-laser detectors and made ready for the first day’s 335-mile qualifying thrust into New Mex­ico’s Mogollon Mountains, what were we to make of this screaming yellow, Hey-­look-at-me! Mercedes? High-profile visu­als and high-speed muscles, all crammed into the same car, are a worrisome recipe. Might just as well file our route plan with the highway patrol.The canny Lingenfelter, it should be noted, eyed this car like a loaded gun. He’d encountered Feyhl before, at some past showdown when the German was mothering over another unlikely machine, a big Mercedes transformed into an AMG Ham­mer—four doors, $160,000 price, top speed over 180 mph. Racers remember feats like that. And they don’t charge them off to luck. RENNtech 500SLThis Mercedes hot rod shows as well a it goes. Even a brief glance at the RENNtech 500SL will persuade you that its cre­ator, Hartmut Feyhl, is as much arti­san as tuner. His car’s meticulously applied, glorious yellow paint—extend­ing even to the wheel spokes and the arms of the windshield wipers—and his carbon-fiber composite hub caps cannot be overlooked.A peek in­side confirms the notion that this 500SL is as much show car as hot rod. The bright yel­low and gray leather interior, with contrast­ing stitching, covers every interior surface—even the mirror housing. The workmanship is exquisite and the effect is riveting without being garish. This particular car also uses high-­tech composites as interior trim. The panels flanking the transmission tunnel as well as part of the shift knob are car­bon-fiber and Kevlar moldings, which are rich, warm, and smooth. The yel­lowish Kevlar fibers in the gray resin even complement the leather trim. Feyhl, the head of RENNtech, has devoted considerable attention to the “optical qualities” of his cars—as he puts it in his German-accented speech. But his background includes eleven years at AMG, the premier Mercedes tuning firm in Germany, and his cars reflect AMG’s—and his own—auto­bahn bloodlines. Under the hood lies a V-8, punched out from 5.0 to 6.0 liters and fitted with headers, hotter cams, an extrude-honed intake manifold, a low-restriction air ­cleaner, and catalysts that flow more freely. The result is 440 hp, which flows through a beefed-up four-speed automatic to a 2.47:1 limited-slip differen­tial (stock is 2.65). Feyhl beefed up the SL’s underpin­nings with stiffer and lower springs, thicker anti-roll bars, firmer Bilstein shocks, harder bushings, and beefier brakes and Pirelli P-Zero tires, 245/40-18 in front and 275/35-18s in the rear on 8.5 and 10.0-inch-wide O.Z. wheels. Feyhl also put the SL on a 400-pound diet by substituting Recaro shell-type seats for the electric-motor infested orig­inals, using lighter sound-proofing, and removing the convertible top and much of its complex mechanism. These changes transform the 500SL into an explosive hot rod. It hits 60 mph in 4.6 seconds, covers the quarter-mile in 13.0 seconds at 111 mph, and runs solidly into its 6200-rpm cutoff at 182 mph. The RENNtech SL can corner at 0.93 g and stop from 70 mph in 161 feet. It all adds up to an SL that’s remark­ably agile. You can hurl it into corners with confidence and rocket away from the apex while holding the car in perfect balance with the responsive throttle and precise steering. Despite its performance, the souped­-up SL is not a nervous thoroughbred. It idles smoothly, its exhaust note is sub­dued, and its muscular suspension remains nicely supple. Best of all, the RENNtech SL feels solid enough to run sub-five-second 0-to-60s forever.The downside to the RENNtech mods is money—they virtually double the SL’s price to about 200 grand. But Feyhl’s workmanship, performance, and refinement simply amplify the original product. You shouldn’t be surprised that his price does the same. —Csaba Csere SPECIFICATIONSVehicle type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 2-door convertiblePrice, stock (1994)/modified (1991): $108,148/$200,000 (est.)Engine type: DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injectionModifications (1994 prices): engine: bore +4 mm; stroke +6 mm, honed intake manifold and high-volume air cleaner, low-restriction exhaust system ($40,000); 2.47:1 rear-axle gearset ($4000); suspension: lower and stiffer springs, stiffer shocks, larger anti-roll bars, urethane bushings ($10,000); brakes: 4-piston aluminum front calipers with 13.0-inch rotors, 2-piston rear calipers with 12.0-inch vented rotors, stainless lines (incl. w/ suspension mods.); wheels and tires: O.Z. Futura 3-piece composite wheels with Pirelli P-Zero tires ($5500); body: air dams, spoiler, side skirts, custom paint ($10,000, est.); interior: Recaro seats, custom yellow leather trim with carbon-fiber and Kevlar accents ($30,000)Power, stock/modified: 315 hp/440 hpTransmission: 4-speed automaticCurb weight: 3782 lbC/D TEST RESULTS60 mph, stock/modified: 6.3 sec/4.6 sec1/4-mile, stock/modified: 14.6 sec @ 99 mph/13.0 sec @ 111 mph100 mph, stock/modified: 15.1 sec/10.8 sec130 mph, stock/modified: 28.3 sec/18.5 sec150 mph, stock/modified: N/A / 29.0 secRolling Start, 5–60 mph, stock/modified: N/A / 4.7 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph, stock/modified: 3.7 sec/2.8 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph, stock/modified: 3.9 sec/2.9 secTop Speed (governer/redline limited), stock/modified: 155 mph/182 mphBraking, 70–0 mph, stock/modified: 175 ft/161 ftRoadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad, stock/modified: 0.82/0.93 gFor the record, the road miles were more fun than even the enforcers would imagine, and discretion demands that we leave it at that. But we can declassify a few observations. Consider: 1. Tire makers and chassis tuners are making progress with ultra-low-profile tires. Although such tires still tend to be vague on center, the darty behavior over worn roads that was common a few years ago was not bothersome in any of these cars.2. Modern fuel injections have altitude­-compensating systems to improve performance and economy at high elevations. But there’s still plenty of room for improvement. 3. If your engine demands premium fuel, you still have to plan your trips care­fully. We faced empty tanks and towns with only 86 octane in southern New Mexico.4. It’s amazing how calm and perfectly appropriate three-digit speeds seem when you’re driving the right car on open roads. 5. It’s amazing, too, how much perfor­mance is left untapped in today’s produc­tion cars. More

  • in

    1996 Ford Taurus SHO Grows Up

    From the October 1995 issue of Car and Driver.If there was anything wrong with the first SHO Taurus, it was that it lacked refinement. It certainly did not lack performance. Even with the automatic transmission that was introduced for 1993 to bolster sales, the SHO ran to 60 mph in 7.6 seconds and tripped the quarter-mile lights in 15.7 seconds. That put it in the company of the BMW 325i and the Acura Legend. Along with such sprightly accel­eration came marvelous midrange flexi­bility and rip-snorting throttle response. Somehow, this failed to impress the sports-sedan clique, who refrained from purchasing SHO Tauruses in even the modest numbers Ford had hoped for. It’s a risky wager, but we bet the new Ford Taurus SHO does not suffer the same fate. Why? Because the car has moved into a new niche, its focus has altered, and its image has shifted upmarket. And the car will cost a lot more—about $33,000, Ford tells us. The new SHO is more a four-door Lincoln Mark VIII than it is a souped-up family sedan. The choice of a V-8 under­lines that fact as much as it fulfills the prophecy we heard from Ford officials a few years ago that all Fords would soon be powered by engines from their own drawing boards. The new SHO’s engine shares the basic architecture of the Duratec 2.5-liter V-6 found in the smaller Contour, with exactly the same bore, stroke, and cylinder spac­ing. Development time decreases when all of an engine’s dimensions and parameters have already been explored. This com­monality endows the 3.4-liter V-8 with a 60-degree angle between cylinder banks, relinquishing the usual 90-degree V-8’s inherent equilibrium and making the installation of a balance shaft necessary.Although this is a Ford engine, devel­opment was shared by Yamaha, which machines and assembles the engines in Japan after receiving castings produced, using a patented Cosworth process, by Ford’s plant in Windsor, Ontario. The fin­ished engines are shipped back to Ford’s Atlanta assembly plant for installation in the SHO Taurus. It is the only Ford engine with direct ignition, reverse-flow cooling, and aluminum bucket tappets in the valve­train. And what a civilized engine it is. Producing just a satisfying purr at cruising speeds—and a mellow snarl when spurred to greater effort—the four-cam V-8 sounds and feels more expensive than the V-6 it replaces. But it doesn’t have the immediacy that the old V-6 flaunted, nor the enthu­siastic midrange pickup. Although the V-8 produces more torque (225 pound-feet versus 215 at the same 4800 rpm), it seems to lack the V-6’s instant midrange throttle response. The early prototype SHO we tested was also less capable in every performance cat­egory except braking, where it equaled the old car’s 197-foot stopping distance from 70 mph. Its 8.0-second 0-to-60 time makes it 0.4 second slower than the previous SHO automatic we tested. It was also a half-­second slower in the quarter-mile. The impression of having less midrange response is heightened by the fact that the new SHO comes only with an automatic transmission; it downshifts obediently at any generous measure of throttle increase, choosing to rev rather than to lug. And this impression is also reinforced by the some­what distant nature of the well-isolated powerplant. In the old SHO, a dig at the throttle pro­duced an exuberant snarl from the engine, a distinct tug of torque steer at the wheel, and a surge of power. In the new car, such things are handled much more circum­spectly, the sensations diluted by the improved body structure, the well-behaved steering, the seamless transmission, and the thick layer of refinement that coats all of the car’s mechanical exploits.The only part of the new SHO’s reper­toire that is uncharacteristically rude is the ride quality across abrupt breaks in the pavement. Over tar patches and bad expan­sion strips, the suspension thumps like a buckboard—this despite automatic dual-­level damping, which is informed by ride­-height sensors and initiated by electronics. Over less sudden undulations, the ride is nice and flat, with little roll or pitch to dis­turb its attitude. The SHO is also very quiet on pave­ment that lacks the sharp breaks needed to set up that disturbing percussion, and it covers ground with a tempo understated by the car’s good composure and quiet ride. Helping keep the act together is a remarkably smooth and precise variably assisted steering gear, along with handling that keeps the car faithfully on your chosen line without any of the deviations you usually expect from changes in surface camber or texture. Here again, the quality of the new SHO’s steering and handling is subtle, engineered to keep the occupants isolated from the action rather than involved in it. You have to detect the tiny bit of road feel through the damped steering mechanism and to acknowledge the good off-center response visually rather than as a tactile change of wheel effort. Consequently, the new SHO is less of an overt driver’s car, even though it exhibits much better poise than its prede­cessor. Most of the torque steer is gone, but the new car still swivels slightly off­-course under full throttle, at the same time revealing a mild locked-up steering effect. Squeeze in a degree of correction and the car locks onto a heading slightly off-course in the other direction, if you’re still accel­erating hard. Mainly, though, the new SHO just goes obediently about its business. The elec­tronically controlled AX4N transmission is among the least intrusive mechanisms of its kind, producing upshifts (just above 6000 rpm, despite the 7000-rpm redline) that are a perfect blend of speed and smoothness, and downshifts that are more apparent on the tach than they are through the seat of the pants. Squeeze the overdrive button off while cruising and you can watch the tach needle swing to a new posi­tion without any discernible driveline surge. It’s that smooth. Along with the creamy driveline, the new SHO has a roomy interior filled with sculpted forms, organic moldings, and swoopy panels. When you slide inside it, any expectations of a sporty persona dis­solve. The accommodations are generous and comfortable. The switches are clear and easy to use, with decent tactile quali­ties, but the surfaces are as impersonal as the control interfaces. The oval center con­sole, in particular, is an art-deco affecta­tion that feels as if it will not grow friendlier with time. More on the Taurus SHOStill, the only part of the SHO’s pol­ished new upscale personality that does not work is the jittery, clumpy ride on high-frequency pavement breaks. The rest of it—questionable styling aside—is gen­teel enough to lure luxury-car aspirants who wouldn’t have considered the pre­vious Taurus SHO. As for the fans of the previous car . . . Ford must be hoping that they have matured, too. SpecificationsSpecifications
    1996 Ford Taurus SHOVehicle Type: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
    PRICE
    Base: $33,000 (est.)
    ENGINEDOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injectionDisplacement: 207 in3, 3392 cm3Power: 225 hp @ 6000 rpmTorque: 225 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm 
    TRANSMISSION4-speed automatic
    CHASSIS
    Suspension, F/R: control arms/multilinkBrakes, F/R: 11.5-in vented disc/10.0-in discTires: Goodyear Eagle RS-AF: 225/55VR-16
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 108.5 inLength: 198.3 inWidth: 73.1 inHeight: 55.7 inPassenger Volume, F/R: 56/47 ft3Trunk Volume: 18 ft3Curb Weight: 3574 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS
    60 mph: 8.0 sec100 mph: 22.4 sec1/4-Mile: 16.2 sec @ 86 mph120 mph: 39.2 secRolling Start, 5–60 mph: 8.0 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 4.1 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 5.1 secTop Speed (drag ltd): 136 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 197 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.79 g  
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY (ESTIMATED)City/Highway: 18/26 mpg 
    C/D TESTING EXPLAINED More

  • in

    Tested: 2024 Dodge Hornet R/T Is the Face of a New Dodge

    From the November 2023 issue of Car and Driver.The Dodge Hornet R/T is freighted with expectations. In the post-Challenger world, we’re all looking for a sign that Dodge can find its way without supercharged V-8s and red key fobs. The Hornet is a vision of that future, infusing a dreary yet marketable form—the small crossover—with trademark lovable Dodge dumbness. The car has functional hood scoops, an ornery exhaust burble, and the hybrid version of temporary overboost, which Dodge modestly calls PowerShot. The Hornet hits 60 mph in 5.5 seconds, not too far in arrears of the 5.1 seconds required by a manual Hemi Challenger R/T. On paper, this vehicle fits neatly into the Dodge pocket-rocket succession, joining rowdy former luminaries such as the Omni GLH and the Neon SRT-4. In reality, the story is a little more complicated. Don’t break out your yellow splitter guards just yet.HIGHS: Punchy acceleration, useful EV range, flashes of Dodge whimsy. For one thing, the Hornet achieves that Nissan Rogue–demolishing 60-mph time only after you pull both paddle shifters to engage PowerShot mode. According to Dodge, PowerShot unlocks an additional 30 horsepower from the rear electric motor for 15 seconds and knocks 1.5 seconds off the 60-mph time. We found that it trimmed a mere 0.2 second from the 60-mph and quarter-mile runs and a slightly more noticeable 0.3 second from the 5-to-60-mph time. PowerShot’s 15-second duration neatly covers a quarter-mile, which is dispatched in 14.2 seconds at 96 mph. The Hornet makes 288 horsepower and 383 pound-feet of torque, figures that require engaging PowerShot, but it seems the unboosted output can’t be too far off. And all of that torque makes the R/T feel strong even when you’re not lined up at a drag-strip Christmas tree.As for Dodge’s other performance claims, we had a hard time matching a few of them. The company says the R/T is good for 0.90 g on the skidpad, but we managed only 0.87 g, even though our test car included the Track Pack, which brings Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 tires and electronically controlled dampers. The Track Pack’s Brembo four-piston fixed front brake calipers contributed to a tidy 164-foot stop from 70 mph, with no fade even after multiple stops from 100 mph (which required 334 feet). That performance is even more impressive considering the R/T’s weight, which checked in at 4205 pounds. A quote often attributed to Albert Einstein seems fitting: “The wing structure of the hornet, in relation to its weight, is not suitable for flight, but he does not know this and flies anyway.”LOWS: Middling fuel economy, max power limited to 15-second bursts, $10K-plus upsell over the GT.Part of the R/T’s chunkiness is due to its 12.0-kWh battery, which the EPA figures is good for 32 miles of electric range. We nearly matched that number at 75 mph too, logging 31 miles and 74 MPGe. With the battery depleted, we averaged 27 mpg overall, which is definitely better than you’d see from a wide-body Hellcat Charger. In electric mode, the Hornet—now rear-wheel drive—musters a mere 121 horses, but that’s enough to push it as high as 84 mph before the gas engine awakens. The electric side of the powertrain can go AWOL at higher speeds, depending on the battery’s state of charge and the temperature of the battery and motor, as evidenced by the Hornet’s 118-mph peak speed on our 1.5-mile straightaway. Dodge claims a 128-mph top speed, but attaining that might require the Bonneville Salt Flats and a nice tailwind. The base GT model, Dodge says, is good for 140 mph.But we’ve got strong acceleration, respectable EV range, and an artfully crafted interior, so what’s not to like? Well, there’s the oddly jacked-up ride height, which makes the Hornet look like a wagon that’s in the process of being raised skyward on a four-post lift, but that could be easily rectified with the upcoming Direct Connection factory lowering springs. The bigger issue is right there on the window sticker. The $48,465 as-tested price poignantly reminds you that the Italian-built Hornet is a twin to the Alfa Romeo Tonale. We don’t envy the Dodge salespeople tasked with selling a $48,000 Hornet when there are cheaper all-wheel-drive three-row Durangos sitting on the same lot. VERDICT: Dodge studies abroad and returns with an unconvincing accent.If you think the Hornet might make a lot more sense at a price closer to $30,000, you’re right, and it does. The base GT model brings a 268-hp turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder hooked to a nine-speed automatic and all-wheel drive for $32,330. With that transmission and significantly less weight, the Hornet GT should post numbers awfully close to the R/T’s. If there’s a true heir to affordable Dodge performance, it probably shouldn’t surprise us that it’s the one without a plug.More on the HornetSpecificationsSpecifications
    2024 Dodge Hornet R/TVehicle Type: front-engine, rear-motor, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door wagon
    PRICE
    Base/As Tested: $42,530/$48,465Options: Customer Preferred Package 28B (Tech Pack: Intelligent Speed Assist [ISA], Active Driving Assist, park-assist system, drowsy-driver detection, $2345; R/T Blacktop and Track Pack Bundle: black Alcantara non-vented seats with red accents, Inox steel door sills, gloss-black painted mirror caps, dark badges, gloss-black painted side mirror moldings, leather steering wheel, dual mode suspension, 235/40-R20 all-season tires, Abyss finish aluminum wheels, bright pedals, red painted Dodge calipers, 4-way power lumbar driver and front passenger seat, 8-way power adjustable driver and front passenger seat, driver seat memory, $3590)
    POWERTRAINTurbocharged and intercooled SOHC 16-valve 1.3-liter inline-4, 177 hp, 199 lb-ft + 2 AC motors, 44 and 121 hp, 39 and 184 lb-ft (combined output: 288 hp, 383 lb-ft; 12.0-kWh lithium-ion battery pack; 7.4-kW onboard charger)Transmissions: 6-speed automatic/direct-drive
    CHASSIS
    Suspension, F/R: struts/strutsBrakes, F/R: 13.5-in vented disc/12.0-in vented discTires: Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4F: 235/40ZR-20 (96Y) Extra Load
    DIMENSIONS
    Wheelbase: 103.8 inLength: 178.3 inWidth: 72.5 inHeight: 63.0 inCargo Volume, Behind F/R: 51/23 ft3Curb Weight: 4205 lb
    C/D TEST RESULTS
    60 mph: 5.5 sec1/4-Mile: 14.2 sec @ 96 mph100 mph: 15.4 sec110 mph: 20.7 secResults above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 6.2 secTop Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.4 secTop Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.6 secTop Speed (mfr’s claim): 128 mphBraking, 70–0 mph: 164 ftBraking, 100–0 mph: 334 ftRoadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.87 g 
    C/D FUEL ECONOMY
    Observed: 24 MPGe75-mph Highway Driving, EV/Hybrid Mode: 74 MPGe/27 mpg75-mph Highway Range, EV/Hybrid mode: 31/300 mi
    EPA FUEL ECONOMY
    Combined: 29 mpgCombined Gasoline + Electricity: 77 MPGeEV Range: 32 mi
    C/D TESTING EXPLAINEDSenior EditorEzra Dyer is a Car and Driver senior editor and columnist. He’s now based in North Carolina but still remembers how to turn right. He owns a 2009 GEM e4 and once drove 206 mph. Those facts are mutually exclusive. More